Originally Posted by battue


I much prefer the Nula stock for fit than the Kimber. Some don't like the more curved grip of the Nula but I prefer it and for some reason the Nula stock seems to jump less off the bench and recoils less. The more curved grip allows the palm to absorb more of the recoil?


Battue do you think that's because the NULA has a slightly heavier barrel contour than the Kimber?

Have not fired a NULA in years but noticed this comparing the Forbes to a Montana in the store recently.The tube seems heavier in contour.

I like the Forbes but would grab the Montana,myself.




The 280 Remington is overbore.

The 7 Rem Mag is over bore.