The discussion of Kelly involves understanding & application of criminal LAW principles -
and such critical applications of 'reasonable doubt' and 'Beyond reasonable doubt'
and an indisputable basis of supporting evidence.
Yet your speculative allegations put forward against police can easily be counter-argued to establish reasonable doubt as to veracity.
POLICE
Primary intent to murder - speculative and reasonably refutable
Leather body straps as evidence of such intent - speculative and reasonably refutable
Many guns as evidence of such intent - speculative & reasonably refutable
8 police as evidence of such intent - speculative and reasonably refutable.
Warrants left behind as evidence of such intent - speculative and reasonably refutable
Plain-clothes illegal - speculative and unverified as unlawful
Posing as miners illegal - speculative and unverified as unlawful
KELLY
Murdering three police - FACT not speculative,
Criminal collaboration with known outlaws - FACT not speculative
Malicious destruction of infrastructure - FACT not speculative
Robbing banks - FACT not speculative
Impersonating police - FACT not speculative
Stealing personal property - FACT not speculative
Armed hostage taking of civilians- FACT not speculative
Conspiring Insurrection through violence - true if judging by what you said about a new 'state'
