You can say Kelly was a fool, but history belongs to the victor, and while the police won the battle they lost the war.
There were changes implemented after the Kelly outbreak to ensure it didn't happen again, people got a fairer go, crooked and corrupt police
were cleaned out, and the Stringybark shooting stung the police.
Kelly was NOT a victor..he LOST convincingly...both the war and the battle.
his ultimate intention as you claim, was to secede from the Crown colony and form a new 'independent state'
and do so through armed violent rebellion/insurrection. .He did not achieve such lunatic pipe dream ambition,
not even miserably or remotely close.!! ..He was a dismally deluded loser career criminal(by choice) with bat-crazy
visions of grandeur.
You have for the course of this debate, haphazardly put forward feeble house of cards arguments that remain (for the
overwhelming most part) speculative and unsubstantiated in point and context of criminal LAW...In some cases your
own points counter and self-defeat your other points...You have basically come full circle with yourself to contradict
yourself and now dispute yourself.
