Originally Posted by Starman

thats interesting, that cop fired 30 rounds...now what if a person with their family had police rounds whiz past and hit some of their family,

would you consider that a threat you are entitled to give an armed respond to?...first utmost priority is to look after yer family...
hence neutralise ANY imminent threat as best and as rapidly as one can.....or does that liberty only apply to cops?

I doubt cops would be too happy or understanding if you hit and killed one of theirs when just trying to look after your family.
do you think LE would refrain from attempting to prosecute you?

now keep in mind... cops will approach the wrong home with a no-knock warrant and shoot dead the totally innocent resident
for simply trying to protect himself from an invasive threat...and police will argue to the judge that their actions were totally justified.


When you've got nothing to offer, change the topic.


"Don't believe everything you see on the Internet" - Abraham Lincoln