I cannot say that I do. Generally the video we say was missing relevant context. I always assumed that when the officer's action was examined against the law that their actions were deemed just.
There were two main reasons:
1.) The jury saw video that the rest of the United States wasn't allowed to 2.) The defense demonstrated that the officers used the PR-24 as they were trained
Now with that in mind, please watch this short video from last Tuesday.
Let me know when the light bulb comes on:
So the Rodney King case was as I suspected. The jury saw what we couldn't, and the officer's actions were examined against the law, policy and training.
I think my bulb has a faulty ballast.
I guess you still haven’t watched let it fall?? Put your biker shorts on, put the crash helmet on, put a smedium moisture wicking shirt on, bottle of protein and watch let it fall. Once you do it will all come together for you..
Last edited by 79S; 06/12/20.
Originally Posted by Bricktop
Then STFU. The rest of your statement is superflous bullshit with no real bearing on this discussion other than to massage your own ego.
