You see a bunch of men working with chainsaws breaking up fallen trees, and you enter the scene and start a ruckus requiring them to try and subdue you. One of them meant to use his chainsaw to hold you down, and it accidentally got turned on during the struggle and kills you. Who's at fault?
Unfortunately that scenario isn't what occurred.
I didn't assert that this is what occurred. I'm clearly drawing an analogy. Your task now is to argue that my analogy is defective. You've yet to do this.
