Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by deflave
Originally Posted by jwp475
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by jwp475

She ignored the obvious risk of not knowing the difference between a taser and a pistol



Again, if your assertion is that, at the moment she pulled the trigger, she knew the difference between her Glock and her Taser, then what you're arguing is not criminal negligence, but plain old first degree murder.


I have consistently argued her negligence, so how do you make this giant leap?




Because TRH and PaulBarnard are contrarians.

They don’t actually know anything and they don’t have any real experience with the subjects they argue. They just do it to do it.

That’s why it’s all circular and stupid.


Thanks again for the enlightening commentary.

Let me clue you in Sparky. I am not arguing anything here. I am asking for a value judgement from the members by asking if jail is the right response to human fallibility. Is jail the right thing for a motorist rear ends and kills a bicyclist in broad daylight.




Apparently the legislator thinks so



I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first