Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by jwp475

She ignored the obvious risk of not knowing the difference between a taser and a pistol



Again, if your assertion is that, at the moment she pulled the trigger, she knew the difference between her Glock and her Taser, then what you're arguing is not criminal negligence, but plain old first degree murder.


I have consistently argued her negligence, so how do you make this giant leap?



I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first