Originally Posted by Igloo
Originally Posted by jwall
B W said,

"There was a member here that had the results of the test. Sorry I can't recall his handle. Those results suggested the Tikka was more reliable in adverse conditions".

Yes sir, I remember reading that as well. Living & hunting in the South, that Canadian test didn't influence me tho.
However IF it performed that well in that cold and snow etc.... it would work here in the heat/humidity,

Guys, I'm not poo pooing Rugers !! I have had many rifles & handguns with no complaints other than bulk & weight.

In 2003 when I chose Tikka T 3 Lite..... I have never looked back. No Regerts! lol

Jerry


Jerry,

I've taken a spin around the interweb (admittedly very short) but couldn't find anything official on the results of the test. Hopefully I can find something! This fellow seems to say that Ruger won the actual testing protocol. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWad_jOVfls

Course he could be wrong! Theres sure nothing that looks weak about a Tikka!

But I really hope I find more


I know I couldn't find it. I don't have that much time. But I do remember the article and they chose Tikka.

Jerry


jwall- *** 3100 guy***

A Flat Trajectory is Never a Handicap

Speed is Trajectory's Friend !!