Originally Posted by rost495
Originally Posted by Whiptail
Originally Posted by Jim_Conrad
Good grief.

Spend 20,000 to save 5000 in gas...


Those are the direct costs. The indirect costs are wars in the middle east, enriching people who hate us, and environmental damage(more controversial). I bet most of Europe is regretting being dependent on Russia for gas and oil right now.

At the very least it will be an interesting and entertaining project. New technologies don't always payoff instantly.


yet if the admin and govt didn't hate fossil fuel one could produce here, as we were under Trump, and be better off all along. Prices down. 3rd world begging to sell to us, win win all around. Disregard there is almost 500 years of fossil fuels left here in the USA and in that 500 years no telling how much more the earth will regenerate as time passes.


I don't see that Trump had a dramatic impact on oil prices excluding lockdowns.
[Linked Image from lh3.googleusercontent.com]

There's nothing wrong with having choices and different solutions. I'd agree that the government shouldn't be picking winners and losers as that is job of the free market.


Quando omni flunkus moritati