The comment concerning a "swamped" barrel was inaccurate in that it simply stated that such a barrel was ...larger at the muzzle...and that is true of a number of barrel configurations while NOT being always true of swamped barrels. I do wonder why the poster did not simply quote his source in his initial post directed at me, perhaps he was not so sure of his "facts" as he wants to appear?
Simple brevity.
On the other hand your replies are verbose. It makes you appear to be full of yourself.
