You are entitled to your own opinion, but you are not entitled to your own facts.
"I have learned two things in 32 years of being a wildlife conservation officer. Violators lie when they get caught and they lie after they are convicted to minimize their role in the violation, and even when the truth comes out of them, it is rarely the whole truth."
John S.
Apologists would have people believe that the helicopter usage was limited to airlifting an aging hunter into camp. Go up a few posts and see for yourself if that is not what is being implied. There is absolutely nothing in the public record that supports such a conclusion.
The evidence strongly supported the case that while the helicopter may have used to transport the hunter to camp, the helicopter was retained as much for the purpose of locating elk as it was for transport and the inconvenient truth is that the helicopter was in fact used for real-time elk spotting.
Last edited by JDHasty; 05/10/16.
