Gee........doesn't bullet weight, mass,diameter, expansion characteristics,penetration,impact velocity,rpm's, bone breaking (immobilizing effect),deep and wide wound channels, count for anything?
By the time we finish with this ballistic relativism and reach its highly illogical conclusion, the 243 will be as good a Cape Buffalo or brown bear cartridge as a 375 H&H....and we know that ain't gonna happen.
65 -
I ain't alone in seeing the FALLACY of your reasoning (?).
There is game that DESERVE more tissue destruction for a 'quicker' , humane kill.
Also with less tissue destruction (internal) it takes bigger animals longer to run out of oxygenated blood to result in death. In that 'longer' time those larger animals WILL be able to go 'farther' and could wind up in terrain WE wouldn't want to have to get them out of , deep ravines or downfall timber etc.
I am also talking PROPERLY constructed bullets for the game.
You use what you want, just don't try to con me into what I know better.
I'm probably OUT of this discussion.
