What I'm saying is the bar is too low for use of lethal force.
A grand jury not deciding to indite is just more evidence that the bar is too low.
Well, this is just about the oddest thing anyone has had to say on the subject, so far.
Despite the fact that the members of the grand jury had access to evidence that you and I - and everyone else here - have not seen, you apparently believe that civilians are not to be trusted with governing themselves.
You're not likely capable of understanding the point he was making.
Hawkeye, the main difference between you and David Walter is that he is an intelligent, thoughtful man who sincerely believes that the members of the grand jury in this case were too lenient in their oversight of the officers. I respectfully disagree with him.
You, on the other hand, are a deranged lunatic whom I pity, but otherwise have no respect for at all.
