Quote
Maybe "guess again" was too complicated a concept for you. When you're completely clueless, Wikipedia ain't necessarily your friend.


I'm not sure what you're rambling about, but what I posted refutes the statement that was made, and has nothing to do with anything you've said.

Here is the (false) statement I was referring to:

Quote
Guess again.

Grand juries receive and evaluate the evidence presented to them by the prosecutor. They have no right to demand additional evidence


Instead of whining about WIKI, why not prove it's incorrect if you believe that's the case, by showing your own source

One shot, one kill........ It saves a lot of ammo!