Everyone on this thread espousing the greatness of ballistic second focal plane reticles made by many rifle scope manufacturers would be very depressed if they had the equipment necessary to actually check to see if the reticle subtensions given by the manufacturer are correct.

Then there's the problem with BDC trees matching the actual drop of your load.

For them to work, the scope must be set to its highest power, and even then many are incorrect.

I'd like to know if there is even one dude on this forum other than me that has actually tested a scope properly with equipment dedicated to the task?

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]


It's hilarious to read posts on the 'fire stating "this scope doesn't track, the click values of brand X are wrong, brand X doesn't adjust correctly" etc... posted by dudes who just guess.





Originally Posted by Bristoe
The people wringing their hands over Trump's rhetoric don't know what time it is in America.