I don't mind giving some ground if the science is solid, and valid provenance is at hand to back it.
Far more often is the cases of bad science being twisted to fit an extreme environmental agenda.
If someone is gun shy about these things now, who can blame them? Especially given the history of these cases.
It's gotten to the point that when someone cries wolf, we all run false flags up the poles.
Divisiveness. It's not just related to democrat and republican.
Interesting comment I highlighted considering your previous posts on this thread...
My experience/knowledge base agrees strongly with what mudhen posted regarding sage grouse.
