Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
Originally Posted by Fischer
comerade - I don't think there's much point in a 22" barreled Weatherby magnum,

I agree.

Quote
...which is why they currently come in 26", and the older ones were available in 24" & 26". The cartridges were designed to run in longer barreled rifles - they need the inches to hit their stride. I hunt frequently in thick woods and swamps in the southeast, usually with a 22" 30-06, and have never wished for a shorter barrel or felt like the longer barrel was a hindrance.


There we disagree. Although I' have a 26" barreled rifle, I choose not to carry it afield. Personal prefernce is 22" or shorter.

Ziggy, you completely misinterpreted this. Look again and you'll see I was referring to my 22" barreled 30-06 in the woods. Open spaces, however, do not restrict barrel length - in my opinion. Carry what makes you happy, it's what I do.

Quote
Ziggy - I agree. How long ago was it that men (and some women) carried 8 & 9 lb rifles all over the place and never whined about it? I do have one lightweight rifle and enjoy carrying it, but I sure as Hell don't feel sorry for myself when I'm humping around a full sized rifle.


I'm not Ziggy, but how long ago was it since I gave a flying F what others choose? And why should anyone care if others choose differently? The older I get the more I appreciate light rifles with light recoil. But once I was young and stupid and didn't know better. Now I know I don't need to put up with heavy recoil or weight to get the job done. Many others have apparently come to the same conclusion. Apparently light rifles and low recoil age work for a lot of people.

I don't give a rat's ass what you or anybody else wants to carry. That remark was spawned by whatshisname being a smartass. He couldn't make a case for his dislike of the round, so he took a personal swipe at me and more than one. I thought that was the liberal's move. He was the one who brought up the "9 lb rifle", nobody else. You know, when the wheels come off your argument, time to start making $hit up.

My Weatherby is a light rifle. Not as light as some, but starts out at 6.75 lbs. I don't consider it to be a hard recoiling rifle in 270 Wby, especially with that stock, designed to mitigate recoil. I can shoot it off the bench comfortably. The same rifle in 300 mag - no thanks.

This "cost" argument never fails to crack me up. Even if I was forced to buy Weatherby factory ammo at full cost, it would still be the cheapest part of the whole hunting experience. If money's a problem, you'll find it's probably a lot cheaper to just go to the grocery store than gear up to go hunting.


Cost is a relative thing. A few $ to one person is a lot, to another it is nothing. While I've reached the point in my life where I can do what I want, I'm still a cheapskate that prefers to spend his money on bullets rather than brass and powder. Especially when the end result (game down) is the same but with less recoil.

[/quote]

I reload too, have been since the early 1970s. More for precision than cost, but the cost is certainly a benefit and 95% or more of my shooting is with reloads. I have some rifles that I've never put a factory round through. But in the big picture, factory ammo is a negligible cost. I'll buy it if it's the best solution and I've got to say, Weatherby factory ammo is awful hard to equal.