You guys do your God proud. I'm sure that such a Being would love nothing better than having a bunch of intolerant, vindictive, childish arseholes as company for all eternity.
Tolerance can only be a virtue if there is a non-relative standard for distinguishing the tolerable between the intolerable. To illustrate the point: we don't say someone is "tolerant" (virtuous) because they accord others the right to prefer chocolate over vanilla ice cream since there is no rational basis for saying the preference for chocolate ice cream is superior to the preference for vanilla. Since you claim your dialectal opponents are "intolerant, vindictive, childish, arseholes" please educate us on the non-relative moral standard that justifies your claimed moral absolutes (your name-calling)?
