Originally Posted by Nontypical
They certainly aren't equals, but if you want to kill an elk, a .280 (or .270 for that matter) can still carry over 1500 ftlbs past 400 yds, and a 7mag can carry it past 500yds. That's an energy number many consider around an acceptable minimum for elk. Most elk are shot at well less than 400 yds, which I think is a good thing. Thus, some of my version of the argument that they are effectively equivalent for killing elk at reasonable ranges. Understanding point blank ranges is also part of it.


Just a note � using Nosler 6�s fastest data and AccuBond bullets, a .270 Win/130g/6158fps drops below 1500fpe at about 435 yards. For the .270 Win/140g/3018fps the range is about 480 yards . For the 7mm RM/160g/3077fps it is past 640 yards. As you say, they certainly aren�t equals.
Quote


Should every hunter be shooting at elk past 400yds?
I'll leave that to the individual reader to answer, but I've got my opinion from what I've seen. No.
...


Not just �No�, but �Hell, no!�




Coyote Hunter - NRA Patriot Life, NRA Whittington Center Life, GOA, DAD - and I VOTE!

No, I'm not a Ruger bigot - just an unabashed fan of their revolvers, M77's and #1's.

A good .30-06 is a 99% solution.