Originally Posted by Riflehunter
Originally Posted by jwp475
Originally Posted by Riflehunter
Originally Posted by jwp475
Originally Posted by Riflehunter
Originally Posted by jwp475
And Elmer was flat out wrong just like you are
Better to use logical argument, as Mule Deer does, rather than respond like you have.


So facts are meaningless to you? Elmer was flat out wrong.

Go into the Terminal Bullet Performance thread here and learn


https://forums.accuratereloading.com/eve/forums/a/frm/f/4711043
You are the one who quoted Elmer Keith, I responded that he clearly stated that .333-06 and .338-06 was better than .35 Whelen because of sectional density. Then you mean to say anyone with experience doesn't quote sectional density. I responded that Elmer Keith had considerable experience. Don't blame me if you are unable to discuss something logically without getting upset when someone points out flaws in your logic.


You can't follow a trail of logic, I said Elmer was wrong and that is a fact. If you read through the thread that I linked the proof is there with penetration testing proving it
Those who argue that Elmer Keith was wrong about most things are not stating fact, they are giving their opinion. High sectional density of heavier bullets can result in deeper penetration. I don't know why you would disagree with this. The more you say such things as "Elmer Keith was wrong and so are you" and "go xxx and learn" the dumber you sound, especially when you have demonstrated that you have an inability to logically argue something.


When you refuse to look at the thread that I linked which has penetration test that prove exactly what I am saying show your ignorance and dumbfucuktitude.



I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first