Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Ask The Gunwriters WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?

Print Thread

Hop To

Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win? roninflag #4795805 01/08/11
Joined: May 2010 Posts: 806 Eastern Oregon L levergunfan Campfire Regular
levergunfan Campfire Regular L Joined: May 2010 Posts: 806 Eastern Oregon	My eyes are only good enough for 300 yards...LOL, so the Marlin works great. Took a 6x6 bull at 110 yards with one 30-30 LeverEvolution round. He did not move...just quivered and dropped. "Living is hazardous to your health..."

GB1

Entire Thread
Title	Posted By	Posted
WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	jwall	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	MontanaMarine	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	VAnimrod	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	ready_on_the_right	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	pabucktail	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	bigsqueeze	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Rangr44	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	roninflag	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	levergunfan	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	GuyM	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	CLB	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	savage62	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	achildofthesky	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	RockyRaab	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	WestOfPecos	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	efw	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	whelennut	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	efw	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	TNrifleman	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	bigsqueeze	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Huntz	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	gnoahhh	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	jwall	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	jwall	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	cra1948	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Vic_in_Va	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Vic_in_Va	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	jimmyp	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	WheelchairBandit	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	VAnimrod	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	bigsqueeze	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	djs	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	djs	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	ChipM	01/10/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Big_Redhead	01/11/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	efw	01/12/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Gunplummer	01/12/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	inland44	01/12/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	jwall	01/12/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	jimmyp	01/13/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	jwall	01/13/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Kodiakisland	01/13/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Mar336	01/13/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	jwall	01/13/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Kodiakisland	01/13/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	denton	01/13/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	levrluvr	01/13/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/13/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Fraser	01/13/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Vic_in_Va	01/13/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Mar336	01/13/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	jwall	01/13/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Blackheart	01/13/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Mar336	01/14/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	bigsqueeze	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	bigsqueeze	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	WPAH	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	RockyRaab	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	jwall	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Grasshopper	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Jeff_O	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	smokepole	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	jwall	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	efw	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	denton	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	TexasPhotog	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	DigitalDan	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	gnoahhh	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	gmsemel	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	PepeLp	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	1minute	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Big_Redhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	efw	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	tzone	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	gnoahhh	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	tex_n_cal	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	1OntarioJim	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Teal	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Big_Redhead	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	efw	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	luv2safari	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Bristoe	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Bristoe	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Bristoe	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Mar336	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	WheelchairBandit	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Bristoe	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	tex_n_cal	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	cra1948	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Birdwatcher	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Bristoe	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	DigitalDan	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Bristoe	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Mar336	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Mar336	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	DigitalDan	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Dancing Bear	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	gnoahhh	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	contender	01/09/11

Moderated by RickBin

Link Copied to Clipboard

AX24

558 members (160user, 1936M71, 10gaugemag, 1minute, 1_deuce, 007FJ, 62 invisible), 2,349 guests, and 1,305 robots.

Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod

May
S	M	T	W	T	F	S
			1	2	3	4
5	6	7	8	9	10	11
12	13	14	15	16	17	18
19	20	21	22	23	24	25
26	27	28	29	30	31

Forum Statistics

Forums81

Topics1,193,492

Posts18,509,064

Members74,002

Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023

Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.093s Queries: 17 (0.008s) Memory: 1.1407 MB (Peak: 1.2013 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-13 18:58:57 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS