Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Ask The Gunwriters WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?

Print Thread

Hop To

Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win? Steelhead #4796090 01/08/11
Joined: Apr 2007 Posts: 32,312 Wetter'n Oregon Jeff_O Campfire 'Bwana
Jeff_O Campfire 'Bwana Joined: Apr 2007 Posts: 32,312 Wetter'n Oregon	I did! I scored a beat-up Marlin 336 for $129 at a gunshop no less. That was smart. Gave it to my brother. Not so smart. Wish I still had it. The CENTER will hold. Reality, Patriotism,Trump: you can only pick two FÜCK PUTIN!

GB1

Entire Thread
Title	Posted By	Posted
WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	jwall	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	MontanaMarine	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	VAnimrod	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	ready_on_the_right	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	pabucktail	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	bigsqueeze	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Rangr44	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	roninflag	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	levergunfan	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	GuyM	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	CLB	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	savage62	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	achildofthesky	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	RockyRaab	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	WestOfPecos	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	efw	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	whelennut	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	efw	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	TNrifleman	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	bigsqueeze	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Huntz	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	gnoahhh	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	jwall	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	jwall	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	cra1948	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Vic_in_Va	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Vic_in_Va	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	jimmyp	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	WheelchairBandit	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	VAnimrod	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	bigsqueeze	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	djs	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	djs	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	ChipM	01/10/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Big_Redhead	01/11/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	efw	01/12/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Gunplummer	01/12/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	inland44	01/12/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	jwall	01/12/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	jimmyp	01/13/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	jwall	01/13/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Kodiakisland	01/13/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Mar336	01/13/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	jwall	01/13/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Kodiakisland	01/13/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	denton	01/13/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	levrluvr	01/13/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/13/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Fraser	01/13/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Vic_in_Va	01/13/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Mar336	01/13/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	jwall	01/13/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Blackheart	01/13/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Mar336	01/14/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	bigsqueeze	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	bigsqueeze	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	WPAH	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	RockyRaab	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	jwall	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Grasshopper	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Jeff_O	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	smokepole	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	jwall	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	efw	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	denton	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	TexasPhotog	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	DigitalDan	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	gnoahhh	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	gmsemel	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	PepeLp	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	1minute	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Big_Redhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	efw	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	tzone	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	gnoahhh	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	tex_n_cal	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	1OntarioJim	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Teal	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Big_Redhead	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	efw	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	luv2safari	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Bristoe	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Bristoe	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Bristoe	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Mar336	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	WheelchairBandit	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Bristoe	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	tex_n_cal	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	cra1948	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Birdwatcher	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Bristoe	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	DigitalDan	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Bristoe	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Mar336	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Mar336	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	DigitalDan	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Dancing Bear	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	gnoahhh	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	contender	01/09/11

Moderated by RickBin

Link Copied to Clipboard

AX24

509 members (1beaver_shooter, 222Sako, 257 roberts, 219 Wasp, 160user, 2500HD, 56 invisible), 2,185 guests, and 1,145 robots.

Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod

May
S	M	T	W	T	F	S
			1	2	3	4
5	6	7	8	9	10	11
12	13	14	15	16	17	18
19	20	21	22	23	24	25
26	27	28	29	30	31

Forum Statistics

Forums81

Topics1,193,396

Posts18,506,897

Members74,000

Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023

Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.120s Queries: 17 (0.006s) Memory: 1.1410 MB (Peak: 1.2016 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-12 20:20:32 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS