Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Ask The Gunwriters WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?

Print Thread

Hop To

Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win? bigsqueeze #4797760 01/08/11
Joined: Apr 2004 Posts: 61,130 gone V VAnimrod Campfire Kahuna
VAnimrod Campfire Kahuna V Joined: Apr 2004 Posts: 61,130 gone	Originally Posted by bigsqueeze It is, what it is. A short to moderate ranged brush and timber cartridge, which is chambered in a handy lever carbine. Hint: Those still flat f'kin' work.

GB1

Entire Thread
Title	Posted By	Posted
WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	jwall	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	MontanaMarine	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	VAnimrod	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	ready_on_the_right	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	pabucktail	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	bigsqueeze	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Rangr44	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	roninflag	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	levergunfan	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	GuyM	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	CLB	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	savage62	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	achildofthesky	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	RockyRaab	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	WestOfPecos	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	efw	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	whelennut	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	efw	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	TNrifleman	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	bigsqueeze	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Huntz	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	gnoahhh	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	jwall	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	jwall	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	cra1948	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Vic_in_Va	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Vic_in_Va	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	jimmyp	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	WheelchairBandit	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	VAnimrod	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	bigsqueeze	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	djs	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	djs	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	ChipM	01/10/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Big_Redhead	01/11/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	efw	01/12/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Gunplummer	01/12/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	inland44	01/12/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	jwall	01/12/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	jimmyp	01/13/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	jwall	01/13/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Kodiakisland	01/13/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Mar336	01/13/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	jwall	01/13/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Kodiakisland	01/13/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	denton	01/13/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	levrluvr	01/13/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/13/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Fraser	01/13/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Vic_in_Va	01/13/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Mar336	01/13/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	jwall	01/13/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Blackheart	01/13/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Mar336	01/14/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	bigsqueeze	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	bigsqueeze	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	WPAH	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	RockyRaab	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	jwall	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Grasshopper	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Jeff_O	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	smokepole	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	jwall	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	efw	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	denton	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	TexasPhotog	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	DigitalDan	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	gnoahhh	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	gmsemel	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	PepeLp	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	1minute	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Big_Redhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	efw	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	tzone	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	gnoahhh	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	tex_n_cal	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	1OntarioJim	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Teal	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Big_Redhead	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	efw	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	luv2safari	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	logcutter	01/08/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Bristoe	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Bristoe	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Bristoe	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Mar336	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	WheelchairBandit	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Bristoe	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	tex_n_cal	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Steelhead	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	cra1948	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Birdwatcher	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Bristoe	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	DigitalDan	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Bristoe	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Mar336	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Mar336	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	DigitalDan	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	Dancing Bear	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	gnoahhh	01/09/11
Re: WHY 30-30 NOT 308 Win?	contender	01/09/11

Moderated by RickBin

Link Copied to Clipboard

AX24

569 members (17CalFan, 219DW, 1234, 219 Wasp, 19rabbit52, 10Glocks, 50 invisible), 2,003 guests, and 1,147 robots.

Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod

May
S	M	T	W	T	F	S
			1	2	3	4
5	6	7	8	9	10	11
12	13	14	15	16	17	18
19	20	21	22	23	24	25
26	27	28	29	30	31

Forum Statistics

Forums81

Topics1,193,464

Posts18,508,252

Members74,002

Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023

Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.121s Queries: 17 (0.008s) Memory: 1.1422 MB (Peak: 1.2029 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-13 13:10:54 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS