Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Originally Posted by ltppowell
Originally Posted by 4ager
Originally Posted by JP_Lucas
What if they guy he shot was a known murderer?


What if a bullfrog had wings? What if the sun rose in the West?

WTF difference would that make? The cop shot an unarmed man, who was fleeing, in the back multiple times and then planted a Taser or other object next to the victim to make it look legitimate. If the guy had been a known murderer or anything else doesn't change the fact that the shooting was unjustified murder.


Actually, if the there was good (articulate) reason to believe that the guy was going to murder somebody if allowed to escape, his shooting would be justified. For instance, a serial killer, terrorist or somebody engaged in a murder shooting spree. This obviously was a not one of those situations. Just a guy that didn't have the temper to be a cop finding out the hard way (for everybody).


If that was the case he wouldn't have needed to tamper with the evidence.


You're right, and even if was the case, tampering with evidence would sink him. "It ain't what you do that get's you in trouble, it's lying about it.".


The only thing worse than a liberal is a liberal that thinks they're a conservative.