If you will read the post I commented to maybe you will learn something.
Here's the post you commented on, with your comment:
Originally Posted by JP_Lucas
Originally Posted by ringworm
Let me wake some people up to a little reality... You can only use deadly force at the moment force is required and nessasary. You can not use it in retaliation post incident. If a guy mugs me and sticks a knife in my face then turns and runs I can't shoot him in the back. Because the black man committed a crime by resisting arrest with force, the instant his quit physically resisting and began to run away (passive resistance) the use of deadly force was no longer justified. Its called revenge.
What if he slices your belly open and then drops the knife and runs?
Now, that is not what you claimed you said:
Originally Posted by JP_Lucas
He didn't say in this instance. He said if a guy stuck a knife in his face.
Thus, this reply of mine remains accurate:
Originally Posted by 4ager
Originally Posted by JP_Lucas
He didn't say in this instance. He said if a guy stuck a knife in his face.
Completely different circumstance, and that's not what you said.
If you can stay consistent and on subject, you might learn something.
If you haven't a clue about when deadly force is justified, it's probably best to STFU or at least ask a reasonable question such as "when is deadly force justified", and not "what if" you way around in circles you can't even keep straight.
Originally Posted by Mannlicher
America needs to understand that our troops are not 'disposable'. Each represents a family; Fathers, Mothers, Sons, Daughters, Cousins, Uncles, Aunts... Our Citizens are our most valuable treasure; we waste far too many.
