It occurs to me from my participation in a number of different forums that Americans love to express their rage for bicyclists on the road. I am a bicyclist. It's one of my many passions. So give me your best shot. In the end we may all learn something.
Other than the hilarous "aero" helmets and silky shorties, I don't mind 'em a bit. Interesting how fast they move out of the way when being overtaken by a 35 ton CLAAS 940 chopper with an 8-row corn head mounted in front..
I think they're more of a pita in the city than on any country road; if for no other reason than they rarely obey any street signs (stop, yield, etc) in larger cities..
Being mostly urbanite, they invade our rural areas on the weekends. Pretty humble and easy to work when they are just a few. The bigger groups get more arrogant and indignant. With the hills and curves in our roads they are quite often a hazard.
It occurs to me from my participation in a number of different forums that Americans love to express their rage for bicyclists on the road. I am a bicyclist. It's one of my many passions. So give me your best shot. In the end we may all learn something.
Saturday, about 200 of those two wheeled azzholes in garish and colorful spandex, blocked most of Biscayne Blvd up around 163rd Street. Far from the first time either. That is the main reason I dislike bike jockeys.
Being mostly urbanite, they invade our rural areas on the weekends. Pretty humble and easy to work when they are just a few. The bigger groups get more arrogant and indignant. With the hills and curves in our roads they are quite often a hazard.
X2. In our area we get a lot of them on weekends up from the city. Lots of blind curves where there is no visibility till you have made the turn. If you drive any where close to the speed limit your going to end up with a bunch of bicyclist on your hood as there isn't til to stop when you finally see 15 of them right in the middle of the lane. Have to dive 20mph everywhere when the speed limits 60
Bicyclists have moved down my list of people that that should be deported. We have bigger fish to fry than heterosexual men that dress and act like homos.
Stay safe and make sure you wear neon spandex to stay safe and reduce chafing.
Why a 300 pound middle age lard ass in spandex thinks he is entitled and safe to ride on busy rural roads that logging trucks frequent is beyond me. Hwy 49 here in NC is a grease slick waiting to happen.
I don't get why they wear the spandex when "training". I understand it's more aerodynamic but wouldn't a person want to make practice harder so it's feels easier when it's for real?
Other than the hilarous "aero" helmets and silky shorties, I don't mind 'em a bit. Interesting how fast they move out of the way when being overtaken by a 35 ton CLAAS 940 chopper with an 8-row corn head mounted in front..
I think they're more of a pita in the city than on any country road; if for no other reason than they rarely obey any street signs (stop, yield, etc) in larger cities..
YMMV..
Ride safe, Paul..
Those corn farming implements are impressive, and the corn growers are good folks.
Being mostly urbanite, they invade our rural areas on the weekends. Pretty humble and easy to work when they are just a few. The bigger groups get more arrogant and indignant. With the hills and curves in our roads they are quite often a hazard.
Riding in a pack is a hell of a lot of fun. I won't ride with groups that don't work with traffic though.
So give me your best shot. In the end we may all learn something.
ok
when you are riding in a group, and a woman is in front of you, are you watching her butt?
Always!...wouldn't you?
I'm not a roadie, fat tires for me. Dirt, single track, double track, asphalt....doesn't matter, mountain bike is the way to go... I pack a pistol too, always.
Well for starters, they should have to be inspected, carry insurance, have a license plate visible just like a car or motorcycle being they want the equal rights and privileges to hog the road.
They should be ticketed for impeding traffic on roads with no shoulder and a double yellow line.
Most are gay like, they seldom obey traffic laws, in general they are a scourge to the safety of the motoring public.
It occurs to me from my participation in a number of different forums that Americans love to express their rage for bicyclists on the road. I am a bicyclist. It's one of my many passions. So give me your best shot. In the end we may all learn something.
Saturday, about 200 of those two wheeled azzholes in garish and colorful spandex, blocked most of Biscayne Blvd up around 163rd Street. Far from the first time either. That is the main reason I dislike bike jockeys.
There are several groups that ride that area on weekend mornings. One of them is called the Don Pan group. There are often professional riders who join that group as it is in the top 5 fastest in the country. I met one of their regular riders this summer, and that guy was an animal. He can easily hold 25MPH over a 50 mile ride. On the Don Pan ride, his group averages 27-28. And they flat out do not care about motor vehicle traffic.
Groups are often a source of consternation in urban areas and more and more on the lightly traveled winding hilly back roads.
I don't have much problem with bikers on the roads. It's more of a problem when they invade the trails during hunting season then bitch about us hunters. We were here 100 years before them.
Being mostly urbanite, they invade our rural areas on the weekends. Pretty humble and easy to work when they are just a few. The bigger groups get more arrogant and indignant. With the hills and curves in our roads they are quite often a hazard.
X2. In our area we get a lot of them on weekends up from the city. Lots of blind curves where there is no visibility till you have made the turn. If you drive any where close to the speed limit your going to end up with a bunch of bicyclist on your hood as there isn't til to stop when you finally see 15 of them right in the middle of the lane. Have to dive 20mph everywhere when the speed limits 60
I am a motorcyclist as well as a bicyclist. One of the fundamental tenets of safe motorcycle riding is to never outdrive your line of sight. By that I mean don't go faster than you can react to what's around the corner or over the hill. What if there is a broken down vehicle around the bend? An accident scene? A slow moving piece of farm equipment? A vehicle exiting a driveway? A mail truck?
No road user should outdrive their line of sight no matter their manner of conveyance. It's irresponsible. It's often fatal to motorcyclists. I keep a sharp ear out any time I am on the other side of a blind hill or blind bend in the road. I shouldn't have to be prepared to dive out of the way of an irresponsible motorist, but I am.
Why a 300 pound middle age lard ass in spandex thinks he is entitled and safe to ride on busy rural roads that logging trucks frequent is beyond me. Hwy 49 here in NC is a grease slick waiting to happen.
By law that person is entitled to use that road. As a motorist I have encountered bicyclists on those kind of roads and have found them easy to go around. Do you have a hard time getting around them?
I don't get why they wear the spandex when "training". I understand it's more aerodynamic but wouldn't a person want to make practice harder so it's feels easier when it's for real?
The padding is a must. Even with that, my butt is often my limiting factor in endurance. The form fitting slick material makes finite shifts of position in the saddle much easier. You kinda have to experience to appreciate it.
Trail bikers going like hell with their head down, oblivious to anything r anybody else on the trail. Road bikers riding two or four abreast on a two lane country road. If they want to ride on the roads,they should be licensed on the bicycle
No road user should outdrive their line of sight no matter their manner of conveyance.
Ya, mean, like crotchies?
Quote
It's irresponsible.
Ala crotchies..
Quote
It's often fatal to motorcyclists.
Especially crotchies..
Quote
I keep a sharp ear out any time I am on the other side of a blind hill or blind bend in the road. I shouldn't have to be prepared to dive out of the way of an irresponsible motorist, but I am.
I know of several trails that have been taken over by bikers. Sliding their tires on downhills have left the trails so rutted that hikers can't walk on them. You have to get to the side.
The only problem I have with bikers is they can't maintain the posted speed and thus are a hazard.
That would be my only gripe as well.
Lots of bikes in Boise and lots of "Share the Road" bumper stickers and fortunately lots of bike lanes so bikes and cars don't have to share the same lane. Even where there are no designated bike lanes most stay well to the side of the road so you can pass okay, but every once in while someone is riding out in the lane on a busy two lane road so you can't pass, and going maybe 25 in a 30-35 mph zone. I don't mind sharing the road as long as someone isn't being a hazard.
Then there are a few foolish people who like riding against traffic in bike lanes or on sidewalks. I've pulled out of an intersection to make a right turn and almost hit or been hit by someone coming the wrong way - your attention is to the left on traffic coming in the lane you will be pulling into. But I've never seen the Spandex road bikers do that, it's almost always some teenager that doesn't GAF anyway.
That said it comes down to courtesy and safety. Whether a car is driving slowly and impeding the flow of traffic or a bike is doing the same, it isn't safe. Yesterday when I was driving to work there was a guy on a bike that was blocking a lane of traffic. The road didn't have a bike lane and he couldn't ride far enough over to allow cars to pass. He could have ridden on the sidewalk. I thought the guy was an idiot, he was endangering himself and others by his actions.
To me it's just common sense. When riding a bike I don't want to tangle with a car because I will loose. I'll do everything reasonable to keep myself tangling with traffic even if my "rights" allow me to be an idiot.
I've only tangled with a car once, and while technically it wasn't my fault I realize I could have avoided it. I was at an intersection and when the light turned green I pedaled away. A car the pulled away slowly and I was right beside him. He made a right turn into me just after the intersection. I was in his blind spot and didn't see his turn signal. Fortunately he made a very slow turn so I just scraped my leg against the side of his car and didn't go down. A very loud F bomb got his attention.
Expect people to do stupid stuff and do everything you can to be safe.
Well for starters, they should have to be inspected, carry insurance, have a license plate visible just like a car or motorcycle being they want the equal rights and privileges to hog the road.
They should be ticketed for impeding traffic on roads with no shoulder and a double yellow line.
Most are gay like, they seldom obey traffic laws, in general they are a scourge to the safety of the motoring public.
If it would guarantee that people would treat me courteously and equitably, I'd happily get inspected and put a license plate on my bike. I already carry insurance. The reality is, people offer that as a complaint, but it wouldn't really change their attitude. It's weird, but the people who most often set forth that argument are otherwise small government types. Yet on this issue, they want more government. Would 8 year old kids be able to get their license, inspection and insurance at Wal-Mart? Will they have to pedal down to the DMV and wait in line with everyone else to get their license.
I very often disregard traffic laws. When I do it may just benefit you, it will never negatively impact you.
Your state law very likely allows you to legally pass on a double yellow to go around an "impediment." Go around a bicyclist like you would the mail truck or a tractor.
I wish they'd get over to the side of the road. Most of them seem to be riding out in the middle of the lane.
Sometimes there's a reason to be in the center of the lane. If you look at this link, you'll see the most common causes of car/bicycle crashes. The most common explanation given when a bicyclist is hit is "I didn't see him." At times I gravitate to the center of the lane to increase my visibility. I do as I approach and move through intersections. I may as I approach a blind hill or blind bend. This helps mitigate some of vulnerabilities the accompanying link mentions. Most states require bicyclists t stay as far right as practicable. That word is purposefully used rather than possible. Most state's laws go on to discuss times when bicyclists may take center lane. On a narrow road where there's not room for a car to safely overtake a bike completely within lane cyclists may take the full lane. This will often discourage a squeeze pass.
I don't have much problem with bikers on the roads. It's more of a problem when they invade the trails during hunting season then bitch about us hunters. We were here 100 years before them.
We have a nice trail in Desoto National Forest in MS. They close it during hunting season Even if they didn't I wouldn't ride there. That said, is it really hard to find a place away from the trail to hunt where you are?
The only problem I have with bikers is they can't maintain the posted speed and thus are a hazard.
Hi there neighbor! What do you do when you encounter a slow moving delivery truck or construction vehicle in your lane. How about granny who goes well below the speed limit. What do you do when there is a dead deer in your lane? Those things aren't hazards to alert motorists.
Trail bikers going like hell with their head down, oblivious to anything r anybody else on the trail. Road bikers riding two or four abreast on a two lane country road. If they want to ride on the roads,they should be licensed on the bicycle
If we assume a road is too narrow to safely overtake a bicyclist completely within that lane. In other words, you have to move into the oncoming lane to safely go around them, then you'll spend less time in the oncoming lane if they are side by side rather than end to end. There's a cool video that demonstrates this. If the lane is wide enough to safely share, then they need to get their asses in single file to help a brother out.
The only problem I have with bikers is they can't maintain the posted speed and thus are a hazard.
Hi there neighbor! What do you do when you encounter a slow moving delivery truck or construction vehicle in your lane. How about granny who goes well below the speed limit. What do you do when there is a dead deer in your lane? Those things aren't hazards to alert motorists.
True. However at times of heavy traffic you may not be able to pass. If the cyclist is an aforementioned inconsiderate azzwhole and doesnt get out of tbe road, he will likely engender much angst.
It's not hard not to be an inconsiderate azzwhole.
No road user should outdrive their line of sight no matter their manner of conveyance.
Ya, mean, like crotchies?
Quote
It's irresponsible.
Ala crotchies..
Quote
It's often fatal to motorcyclists.
Especially crotchies..
Quote
I keep a sharp ear out any time I am on the other side of a blind hill or blind bend in the road. I shouldn't have to be prepared to dive out of the way of an irresponsible motorist, but I am.
You obviously don't run a crotchie..
(all in good fun)..
It's obvious that it is in good fun. I fully expect to take some shots that aren't in good fun before this thread runs its course. I can take it.
I know of several trails that have been taken over by bikers. Sliding their tires on downhills have left the trails so rutted that hikers can't walk on them. You have to get to the side.
I ride mountain bikes too. I don't outdrive my line of sight!
As a somewhat related aside. Oak Mountain State Park has great mountain bike trails. Built and maintained by mountain bikers. The trails are in phenominal shape. In the same park, there is a hiking trail that goes to Peavine Falls. It is deeply rutted and washed out.
Your point stands though that we should all strive to be good stewards of our trails.
Paul, First,let me say that I've done some biking! But,many of them show an arrogant,self righteous attitude, which can be a danger to both themselves and others. Example: Many years ago I was taking a friend of mine to the SLC Airport,from western Wyoming. We were running late(which is par for the course for me),and I was "pushing" the speed limits a bit. On I-80,just east of SLC is a couple of miles of fairly steep,downhill,curvey roadway. I was in a right hand curve( doing about 70),in the right lane. When, there he was,a cyclist in the center of my lane. I had two options,stick the blue oval of my F-250 up his a@$, or make an evasive manuver to the left. Thank God, the adjacent lane was unoccupied! I really wanted to stop and introduce him to the shovel,which always resides in the truck bed! But, as earlier stated, I was running late. memtb
It occurs to me from my participation in a number of different forums that Americans love to express their rage for bicyclists on the road. I am a bicyclist. It's one of my many passions. So give me your best shot. In the end we may all learn something.
When I lived in Brisbane Australia, where cycling is huge, large groups would meet early each morning for a pre-work ride. They would buzz by my house along our street on the river shouting at one another waking up folks left and right. Do understand, it is common to have all windows, sliding glass WALLS open during the night there. Numerous complaints, formal and polite meetings with cyclists, homeowners and LEO have been going on for years and no change. They could clearly GAF. A loose bunch of pitt bulls could have been handy.
I once made it for several months riding a bike everywhere except dates and vacations before I got too lazy. I was much healthier.
Now I am worse. When I roll a jeep I do 45mph and wave at the tailgaters. Interestingly, when I am driving something else and get stuck behind someone doing 45mph out here in the country, I have to remind myself that I do the same obnoxious thing. Gotta share the road!
That said it comes down to courtesy and safety. Whether a car is driving slowly and impeding the flow of traffic or a bike is doing the same, it isn't safe. Yesterday when I was driving to work there was a guy on a bike that was blocking a lane of traffic. The road didn't have a bike lane and he couldn't ride far enough over to allow cars to pass. He could have ridden on the sidewalk. I thought the guy was an idiot, he was endangering himself and others by his actions.
To me it's just common sense. When riding a bike I don't want to tangle with a car because I will loose. I'll do everything reasonable to keep myself tangling with traffic even if my "rights" allow me to be an idiot.
I've only tangled with a car once, and while technically it wasn't my fault I realize I could have avoided it. I was at an intersection and when the light turned green I pedaled away. A car the pulled away slowly and I was right beside him. He made a right turn into me just after the intersection. I was in his blind spot and didn't see his turn signal. Fortunately he made a very slow turn so I just scraped my leg against the side of his car and didn't go down. A very loud F bomb got his attention.
Expect people to do stupid stuff and do everything you can to be safe.
Bikes do not generally belong on sidewalks. It's dangerous. Motorists are not expecting traffic moving at bicycle speeds on sidewalks. I'll opine that the bicyclist you mentioned was safer in the center of the lane (cars had obviously seen him and reacted.) How many times have you hit a slower moving vehicle? I am going to guess none. It's easy to avoid running over someone if you are paying attention. If a driver isn't payin attention and hits a slow moving vehicle, it is THAT DRIVER that was unsafe, not the slow moving vehicle. I will never stack traffic up behind me. I'll ease over and let it vent.
The accident you described is a right hook, and they are generally avoidable. In fact most of the accidents mentioned in this link are fairly easy to avoid. http://bicyclesafe.com/
The most difficult to mitigate is the rear end. Cyclist lane position is often the source of much frustration for motorists, but is also often used by bicyclists to mitigate risks.
Thank you!! If you want to claim your right to the road pay up like everyone else license and yearly inspection. They skate way too much on violations of the vehicle code. I see some who are trying to be courteous and give them the same respect, But too many are just arrogant a-holes. The bigger the group the worse the behavior.
Originally Posted by viking
Well for starters, they should have to be inspected, carry insurance, have a license plate visible just like a car or motorcycle being they want the equal rights and privileges to hog the road.
They should be ticketed for impeding traffic on roads with no shoulder and a double yellow line.
Most are gay like, they seldom obey traffic laws, in general they are a scourge to the safety of the motoring public.
It's weird, but the people who most often set forth that argument are otherwise small government types. Yet on this issue, they want more government.
No. They (we) want equitable treatment.
Then a true small government type should lobby to have the laws applied to motor vehicles stricken down rather than stand in favor of additional laws for bicyclists right?
Pretty simple - obey the rules of the road if you ride on the road. Corollary - obey the rules of pedestrians if you ride on the sidewalk (stop at intersections to walk bike across or ride across slowly after stopping).
I don't begrudge SxS riders on roads with no shoulders and narrow lanes. I do think that riding SxS way out in the driving lane on roads with wide lanes and wide shoulders is ridiculous.
The only problem I have with bikers is they can't maintain the posted speed and thus are a hazard.
Hi there neighbor! What do you do when you encounter a slow moving delivery truck or construction vehicle in your lane. How about granny who goes well below the speed limit. What do you do when there is a dead deer in your lane? Those things aren't hazards to alert motorists.
True. However at times of heavy traffic you may not be able to pass. If the cyclist is an aforementioned inconsiderate azzwhole and doesnt get out of tbe road, he will likely engender much angst.
It's not hard not to be an inconsiderate azzwhole.
That's a good point and is part of the reason I don't stack traffic up behind me. I take a very cooperative attitude toward other road users.
Paul, First,let me say that I've done some biking! But,many of them show an arrogant,self righteous attitude, which can be a danger to both themselves and others. Example: Many years ago I was taking a friend of mine to the SLC Airport,from western Wyoming. We were running late(which is par for the course for me),and I was "pushing" the speed limits a bit. On I-80,just east of SLC is a couple of miles of fairly steep,downhill,curvey roadway. I was in a right hand curve( doing about 70),in the right lane. When, there he was,a cyclist in the center of my lane. I had two options,stick the blue oval of my F-250 up his a@$, or make an evasive manuver to the left. Thank God, the adjacent lane was unoccupied! I really wanted to stop and introduce him to the shovel,which always resides in the truck bed! But, as earlier stated, I was running late. memtb
There are certainly jackwipes in all walks of life. I'd just ask folks to be fair minded and not let those few unpleasant encounters negatively shape your interaction with me on the road.
Usually a 2x4 to the back of the head (or just below the helmet line if you're looking for maximum effect), clears up any misunderstandings we may have with bicyclists around here.
Everybody gets along great, I just don't see the problem.
That said it comes down to courtesy and safety. Whether a car is driving slowly and impeding the flow of traffic or a bike is doing the same, it isn't safe. Yesterday when I was driving to work there was a guy on a bike that was blocking a lane of traffic. The road didn't have a bike lane and he couldn't ride far enough over to allow cars to pass. He could have ridden on the sidewalk. I thought the guy was an idiot, he was endangering himself and others by his actions.
To me it's just common sense. When riding a bike I don't want to tangle with a car because I will loose. I'll do everything reasonable to keep myself tangling with traffic even if my "rights" allow me to be an idiot.
I've only tangled with a car once, and while technically it wasn't my fault I realize I could have avoided it. I was at an intersection and when the light turned green I pedaled away. A car the pulled away slowly and I was right beside him. He made a right turn into me just after the intersection. I was in his blind spot and didn't see his turn signal. Fortunately he made a very slow turn so I just scraped my leg against the side of his car and didn't go down. A very loud F bomb got his attention.
Expect people to do stupid stuff and do everything you can to be safe.
Bikes do not generally belong on sidewalks. It's dangerous. Motorists are not expecting traffic moving at bicycle speeds on sidewalks. I'll opine that the bicyclist you mentioned was safer in the center of the lane (cars had obviously seen him and reacted.) How many times have you hit a slower moving vehicle? I am going to guess none. It's easy to avoid running over someone if you are paying attention. If a driver isn't payin attention and hits a slow moving vehicle, it is THAT DRIVER that was unsafe, not the slow moving vehicle. I will never stack traffic up behind me. I'll ease over and let it vent.
The accident you described is a right hook, and they are generally avoidable. In fact most of the accidents mentioned in this link are fairly easy to avoid. http://bicyclesafe.com/
The most difficult to mitigate is the rear end. Cyclist lane position is often the source of much frustration for motorists, but is also often used by bicyclists to mitigate risks.
Cycling on a sidewalk can be dangerous, but often much less so than in the road.
If a road is narrow with no shoulder and a side walk is available, a cyclist is far better off on the sidewalk if he cannot keep up with the pace of traffic. The thing is, he will now have to contend with pedestrians who are moving at a much slower pace and moving erratically.....just like the cars in the road have to deal with cyclists.
Usually a 2x4 to the back of the head (or just below the helmet line if you're looking for maximum effect), clears up any misunderstandings we may have with bicyclists around here.
Everybody gets along great, I just don't see the problem.
That person is a grade A cockhole. I have been known to invite people back to have a chat with me. Those cyclists were almost all hugging the white line or to the right of it and weren't in any way an impediment to the driver. That was uncalled for. More and more cyclists have video cameras on their bikes.
That said it comes down to courtesy and safety. Whether a car is driving slowly and impeding the flow of traffic or a bike is doing the same, it isn't safe. Yesterday when I was driving to work there was a guy on a bike that was blocking a lane of traffic. The road didn't have a bike lane and he couldn't ride far enough over to allow cars to pass. He could have ridden on the sidewalk. I thought the guy was an idiot, he was endangering himself and others by his actions.
To me it's just common sense. When riding a bike I don't want to tangle with a car because I will loose. I'll do everything reasonable to keep myself tangling with traffic even if my "rights" allow me to be an idiot.
I've only tangled with a car once, and while technically it wasn't my fault I realize I could have avoided it. I was at an intersection and when the light turned green I pedaled away. A car the pulled away slowly and I was right beside him. He made a right turn into me just after the intersection. I was in his blind spot and didn't see his turn signal. Fortunately he made a very slow turn so I just scraped my leg against the side of his car and didn't go down. A very loud F bomb got his attention.
Expect people to do stupid stuff and do everything you can to be safe.
Bikes do not generally belong on sidewalks. It's dangerous. Motorists are not expecting traffic moving at bicycle speeds on sidewalks. I'll opine that the bicyclist you mentioned was safer in the center of the lane (cars had obviously seen him and reacted.) How many times have you hit a slower moving vehicle? I am going to guess none. It's easy to avoid running over someone if you are paying attention. If a driver isn't payin attention and hits a slow moving vehicle, it is THAT DRIVER that was unsafe, not the slow moving vehicle. I will never stack traffic up behind me. I'll ease over and let it vent.
The accident you described is a right hook, and they are generally avoidable. In fact most of the accidents mentioned in this link are fairly easy to avoid. http://bicyclesafe.com/
The most difficult to mitigate is the rear end. Cyclist lane position is often the source of much frustration for motorists, but is also often used by bicyclists to mitigate risks.
We have a law that if a slower moving vehicle is impeding five or more vehicles, the vehicle needs to move over to let them pass. As it was the morning commute, there were more than five vehicles behind him. He was oblivious to this and could care not. There wasn't a single person on the sidewalk and he could have easily and safely ridden on the sidewalk to allow traffic to pass him.
Slow moving vehicles do cause risks. There is a big difference between sharing the road and trying to own the road.
If they cannot go a min speed they should stay off of the road,, Here in the Mnts you come around a curve and bam there is one at a crawl right in the middle of your lane.
Thank you!! If you want to claim your right to the road pay up like everyone else license and yearly inspection. They skate way too much on violations of the vehicle code. I see some who are trying to be courteous and give them the same respect, But too many are just arrogant a-holes. The bigger the group the worse the behavior.
Originally Posted by viking
Well for starters, they should have to be inspected, carry insurance, have a license plate visible just like a car or motorcycle being they want the equal rights and privileges to hog the road.
They should be ticketed for impeding traffic on roads with no shoulder and a double yellow line.
Most are gay like, they seldom obey traffic laws, in general they are a scourge to the safety of the motoring public.
If I am ever given a ticket on a bicycle, I will frame it. I have NEVER met a motorist who obeys every law. If I come to a stop sign and there is no traffic coming, I slow roll it. On my bike and in my car. I almost always slow roll right on reds. I travel over the speed limit every time I drive. I don't give turn signals when there's nobody there to see it. Don't we all break the law. How often is it that a cyclist breaks the law and injures someone. It's exceedingly rare. It happens thousands of times across this country with people in motor vehicles. Yet bicyclists seem to be the subject of so much scorn.
There are times I break the law on my bike and it actually benefits the motorists I share the road with. They probably don't even realize it.
If you want an 'entertaining' drive, get behind a bike on Hwy 66 between Klamath Falls and Ashland, OR. Only a fool would ride a bike on it but Ashland is yuppieland and there are plenty of fools there.
That said it comes down to courtesy and safety. Whether a car is driving slowly and impeding the flow of traffic or a bike is doing the same, it isn't safe. Yesterday when I was driving to work there was a guy on a bike that was blocking a lane of traffic. The road didn't have a bike lane and he couldn't ride far enough over to allow cars to pass. He could have ridden on the sidewalk. I thought the guy was an idiot, he was endangering himself and others by his actions.
To me it's just common sense. When riding a bike I don't want to tangle with a car because I will loose. I'll do everything reasonable to keep myself tangling with traffic even if my "rights" allow me to be an idiot.
I've only tangled with a car once, and while technically it wasn't my fault I realize I could have avoided it. I was at an intersection and when the light turned green I pedaled away. A car the pulled away slowly and I was right beside him. He made a right turn into me just after the intersection. I was in his blind spot and didn't see his turn signal. Fortunately he made a very slow turn so I just scraped my leg against the side of his car and didn't go down. A very loud F bomb got his attention.
Expect people to do stupid stuff and do everything you can to be safe.
Bikes do not generally belong on sidewalks. It's dangerous. Motorists are not expecting traffic moving at bicycle speeds on sidewalks. I'll opine that the bicyclist you mentioned was safer in the center of the lane (cars had obviously seen him and reacted.) How many times have you hit a slower moving vehicle? I am going to guess none. It's easy to avoid running over someone if you are paying attention. If a driver isn't payin attention and hits a slow moving vehicle, it is THAT DRIVER that was unsafe, not the slow moving vehicle. I will never stack traffic up behind me. I'll ease over and let it vent.
The accident you described is a right hook, and they are generally avoidable. In fact most of the accidents mentioned in this link are fairly easy to avoid. http://bicyclesafe.com/
The most difficult to mitigate is the rear end. Cyclist lane position is often the source of much frustration for motorists, but is also often used by bicyclists to mitigate risks.
Cycling on a sidewalk can be dangerous, but often much less so than in the road.
If a road is narrow with no shoulder and a side walk is available, a cyclist is far better off on the sidewalk if he cannot keep up with the pace of traffic. The thing is, he will now have to contend with pedestrians who are moving at a much slower pace and moving erratically.....just like the cars in the road have to deal with cyclists.
I won't say I won't take the sidewalk to help motorists out, but I will avoid it as much as I can as it is less safe than traveling with traffic in the lane. There have been quite a few studies done on this. You are right that a cyclist dealing with pedestrians on a sidewalk is similar to a car dealing with bicyclists on the road. Can you think of one critical difference?
I want them to obey the rules (laws) of the road just like automobiles must do. In Oklahoma we have a traffic statute that mandates bikes must ride single file as close to the edge of the road as possible and one that require motorists to pass bike by at least 3 feet if safe to do so. The bike riders in my area insist on riding 3 or 4 across and can't be bothered to move to single file even when I honk to let them know I am coming up behind them. They also do not stop for stop signs or signal turns. That behavior pisses me off to know end.
That said it comes down to courtesy and safety. Whether a car is driving slowly and impeding the flow of traffic or a bike is doing the same, it isn't safe. Yesterday when I was driving to work there was a guy on a bike that was blocking a lane of traffic. The road didn't have a bike lane and he couldn't ride far enough over to allow cars to pass. He could have ridden on the sidewalk. I thought the guy was an idiot, he was endangering himself and others by his actions.
To me it's just common sense. When riding a bike I don't want to tangle with a car because I will loose. I'll do everything reasonable to keep myself tangling with traffic even if my "rights" allow me to be an idiot.
I've only tangled with a car once, and while technically it wasn't my fault I realize I could have avoided it. I was at an intersection and when the light turned green I pedaled away. A car the pulled away slowly and I was right beside him. He made a right turn into me just after the intersection. I was in his blind spot and didn't see his turn signal. Fortunately he made a very slow turn so I just scraped my leg against the side of his car and didn't go down. A very loud F bomb got his attention.
Expect people to do stupid stuff and do everything you can to be safe.
Bikes do not generally belong on sidewalks. It's dangerous. Motorists are not expecting traffic moving at bicycle speeds on sidewalks. I'll opine that the bicyclist you mentioned was safer in the center of the lane (cars had obviously seen him and reacted.) How many times have you hit a slower moving vehicle? I am going to guess none. It's easy to avoid running over someone if you are paying attention. If a driver isn't payin attention and hits a slow moving vehicle, it is THAT DRIVER that was unsafe, not the slow moving vehicle. I will never stack traffic up behind me. I'll ease over and let it vent.
The accident you described is a right hook, and they are generally avoidable. In fact most of the accidents mentioned in this link are fairly easy to avoid. http://bicyclesafe.com/
The most difficult to mitigate is the rear end. Cyclist lane position is often the source of much frustration for motorists, but is also often used by bicyclists to mitigate risks.
Cycling on a sidewalk can be dangerous, but often much less so than in the road.
If a road is narrow with no shoulder and a side walk is available, a cyclist is far better off on the sidewalk if he cannot keep up with the pace of traffic. The thing is, he will now have to contend with pedestrians who are moving at a much slower pace and moving erratically.....just like the cars in the road have to deal with cyclists.
I won't say I won't take the sidewalk to help motorists out, but I will avoid it as much as I can as it is less safe than traveling with traffic in the lane. There have been quite a few studies done on this. You are right that a cyclist dealing with pedestrians on a sidewalk is similar to a car dealing with bicyclists on the road. Can you think of one critical difference?
I can think of several. Though I will stipulate that I'm not much for laws. I prefer common sense.
Many road cyclists are not actually commuting, they are training. That is a big reason they do not utilize sidewalks or get out of the way when the situation would warrant them to do so. It would "interrupt" their training/ride.
That is the type of selfishness that gets one the label of inconsiderate azzwhole.
Wife road for years. I did for a few, and realized it was too dangerous out there where we ride rurally.
She rode benefits, races, tri's, bi's etc....
I finally convinced her to quit, and ride only in parks and such because most bike riders in rides have no respect. They think they own the road. And someone will swerve to miss a group and end up hitting my wife that refused to ride in groups(funny she was once flagged for drafting though--- I'd have told that ignorant official a few things and left the stupid race... my wife drafting... yeah right but I digress)
Bikes around here, generally speaking are ok in the country. the riders that ride on our 2 lane roads without shoulders watch the rear, and move over or stop depending on traffic.
OTOH 2 years ago when we were called to an involved structure fire, there was a big ride in town. THe bike riders at the intersection would NOT yield ROW to our fire engine. While still putting on my gear I did manage to speak to the group out the window while putting my SCBA on....
The arrogant ones ruin it for the rest. Like Carolyn said, it was as bad as being in a run with Rick Perry, he'd stop anywhere and block the run for a photo op.... WTF, run or GTF out of the way, we could care less you are governor of TX....
If you take pleasure in riding a bicycle on Route 2 through the state of Montana, you are an idiot.
Dave
Why is that Clark? It runs parallel to an interstate. I would think all the traffic in a hurry would be on the interstate. I examined a long stretch on google satellite and it was generally straight with wide lanes and a small stretch of shoulder. I would imagine that there are places it goes through mountain passes where the sightlines are limited and the road narrows.
Edit. Yep, I'd avoid those passes. Beautiful road, beautiful scenery, but too tight in some of those blend bends.
Craziest cycling accident I ever heard of was when a local kid was killed when a car that was passing him struck a deer. The deer went over the top of the car and struck the kid in the head, killing him.
That said it comes down to courtesy and safety. Whether a car is driving slowly and impeding the flow of traffic or a bike is doing the same, it isn't safe. Yesterday when I was driving to work there was a guy on a bike that was blocking a lane of traffic. The road didn't have a bike lane and he couldn't ride far enough over to allow cars to pass. He could have ridden on the sidewalk. I thought the guy was an idiot, he was endangering himself and others by his actions.
To me it's just common sense. When riding a bike I don't want to tangle with a car because I will loose. I'll do everything reasonable to keep myself tangling with traffic even if my "rights" allow me to be an idiot.
I've only tangled with a car once, and while technically it wasn't my fault I realize I could have avoided it. I was at an intersection and when the light turned green I pedaled away. A car the pulled away slowly and I was right beside him. He made a right turn into me just after the intersection. I was in his blind spot and didn't see his turn signal. Fortunately he made a very slow turn so I just scraped my leg against the side of his car and didn't go down. A very loud F bomb got his attention.
Expect people to do stupid stuff and do everything you can to be safe.
Bikes do not generally belong on sidewalks. It's dangerous. Motorists are not expecting traffic moving at bicycle speeds on sidewalks. I'll opine that the bicyclist you mentioned was safer in the center of the lane (cars had obviously seen him and reacted.) How many times have you hit a slower moving vehicle? I am going to guess none. It's easy to avoid running over someone if you are paying attention. If a driver isn't payin attention and hits a slow moving vehicle, it is THAT DRIVER that was unsafe, not the slow moving vehicle. I will never stack traffic up behind me. I'll ease over and let it vent.
The accident you described is a right hook, and they are generally avoidable. In fact most of the accidents mentioned in this link are fairly easy to avoid. http://bicyclesafe.com/
The most difficult to mitigate is the rear end. Cyclist lane position is often the source of much frustration for motorists, but is also often used by bicyclists to mitigate risks.
We have a law that if a slower moving vehicle is impeding five or more vehicles, the vehicle needs to move over to let them pass. As it was the morning commute, there were more than five vehicles behind him. He was oblivious to this and could care not. There wasn't a single person on the sidewalk and he could have easily and safely ridden on the sidewalk to allow traffic to pass him.
Slow moving vehicles do cause risks. There is a big difference between sharing the road and trying to own the road.
I lived in AK for a while and loved that law. I will always find a way to keep from stacking traffic up behind me. The RVers up there in AK didn't seem to care too much about that 5 vehicle rule. They are a heck of a lot harder to go around than a bike too.
Wife road for years. I did for a few, and realized it was too dangerous out there where we ride rurally.
She rode benefits, races, tri's, bi's etc....
I finally convinced her to quit, and ride only in parks and such because most bike riders in rides have no respect. They think they own the road. And someone will swerve to miss a group and end up hitting my wife that refused to ride in groups(funny she was once flagged for drafting though--- I'd have told that ignorant official a few things and left the stupid race... my wife drafting... yeah right but I digress)
Bikes around here, generally speaking are ok in the country. the riders that ride on our 2 lane roads without shoulders watch the rear, and move over or stop depending on traffic.
OTOH 2 years ago when we were called to an involved structure fire, there was a big ride in town. THe bike riders at the intersection would NOT yield ROW to our fire engine. While still putting on my gear I did manage to speak to the group out the window while putting my SCBA on....
The arrogant ones ruin it for the rest. Like Carolyn said, it was as bad as being in a run with Rick Perry, he'd stop anywhere and block the run for a photo op.... WTF, run or GTF out of the way, we could care less you are governor of TX....
One of the few things I can't stand are elitists. It seems certain groups seem to have them, not naming all but cyclists, fly fishermen, traditional bow hunters, greenie hikers, etc.
If they cannot go a min speed they should stay off of the road,, Here in the Mnts you come around a curve and bam there is one at a crawl right in the middle of your lane.
I ride a bike alot, but I stay off of the roads.
Never outdrive your line of sight. You should never go so fast that you can't react to a hazard around the bend or over the hill. It's dangerous and dumb.
There's a reason bicyclists are scorned across the country. Some people just refuse to see why and instead get on the internet and cry about it.
Spell it out for the "slower" folks that like to dress up and play with bikes on the highway.
They're a PITA on roads designed for automobiles, too slow, and often hog the lane creating passing hazards.
They're arrogant, feel entitled, inconsiderate, self-absorbed, passive aggressive (as opposed to outright aggressive like the motorists they piss off), elitists, and let's admit it, they look ridiculous in spandex outfits with a little foam helmet.
They're what's wrong with American values. Them and Walmart people.
There's a reason bicyclists are scorned across the country. Some people just refuse to see why and instead get on the internet and cry about it.
Spell it out for the "slower" folks that like to dress up and play with bikes on the highway.
They're a PITA on roads designed for automobiles, too slow, and often hog the lane creating passing hazards.
They're arrogant, feel entitled, inconsiderate, self-absorbed, passive aggressive (as opposed to outright aggressive like the motorists they piss off), elitists, and let's admit it, they look ridiculous in spandex outfits with a little foam helmet.
They're what's wrong with American values. Them and Walmart people.
And if I ever witness a bicyclist get hit by a vehicle on 13 or 200 I will only slow down to make sure the motorist's car isn't too badly damaged.
Dave
Jeeze, even if all 400 Montana residents were on that road at one time, seeing a bicyclist on that road shouldn't be an issue. Interestingly enough, the very part of that highway I zoomed in to street view, there were cattle on the road. Yet another reason to never outdrive your line of sight. Are the drivers up there that bad?
Highways are built, and funded, by modern transportation. They are not a [bleep] entertainment device or exercise equipment. If you are taking up space on the road, do the speedlimit. If you can't, go somewhere else.
Exceptions granted for farm equipment, heavy equipment, and trucks driven by courteous operators.
I want them to obey the rules (laws) of the road just like automobiles must do. In Oklahoma we have a traffic statute that mandates bikes must ride single file as close to the edge of the road as possible and one that require motorists to pass bike by at least 3 feet if safe to do so. The bike riders in my area insist on riding 3 or 4 across and can't be bothered to move to single file even when I honk to let them know I am coming up behind them. They also do not stop for stop signs or signal turns. That behavior pisses me off to know end.
Perry
I have driven in OK before. Based on my observations, few of your motorists obey the law.
The state of OK does NOT have a law that requires bicycles to stay as far to the right as possible. Bicyclists MAY ride two abreast according to OK law.
Do you really want bicyclists to obey every law all the time?
There's a reason bicyclists are scorned across the country. Some people just refuse to see why and instead get on the internet and cry about it.
Spell it out for the "slower" folks that like to dress up and play with bikes on the highway.
They're a PITA on roads designed for automobiles, too slow, and often hog the lane creating passing hazards.
They're arrogant, feel entitled, inconsiderate, self-absorbed, passive aggressive (as opposed to outright aggressive like the motorists they piss off), elitists, and let's admit it, they look ridiculous in spandex outfits with a little foam helmet.
They're what's wrong with American values. Them and Walmart people.
They must be a much bigger PITA where you are than where I live. I drive about 50K miles per year and can't think of a single instance where I was held up for even a full minute by a bicyclist. What's the longest you have ever been held up by a bicycle or a group of bicyclists? Tell me about that if you don't mind.
And if I ever witness a bicyclist get hit by a vehicle on 13 or 200 I will only slow down to make sure the motorist's car isn't too badly damaged.
Dave
Jeeze, even if all 400 Montana residents were on that road at one time, seeing a bicyclist on that road shouldn't be an issue. Interestingly enough, the very part of that highway I zoomed in to street view, there were cattle on the road. Yet another reason to never outdrive your line of sight. Are the drivers up there that bad?
Highways are built, and funded, by modern transportation. They are not a [bleep] entertainment device or exercise equipment. If you are taking up space on the road, do the speedlimit. If you can't, go somewhere else.
Exceptions granted for farm equipment, heavy equipment, and trucks driven by courteous operators.
By law, bicyclists are allowed on most non-interstate highways. Their tax dollars are used to pay for the roads. Is it really that hard to move your steering wheel 2 degrees to the left or to press gently on your brake then on your gas?
And if I ever witness a bicyclist get hit by a vehicle on 13 or 200 I will only slow down to make sure the motorist's car isn't too badly damaged.
Dave
Jeeze, even if all 400 Montana residents were on that road at one time, seeing a bicyclist on that road shouldn't be an issue. Interestingly enough, the very part of that highway I zoomed in to street view, there were cattle on the road. Yet another reason to never outdrive your line of sight. Are the drivers up there that bad?
I was looking at the highway 13 that runs south to north connecting Circle, Macon and Scobey. It's a narrow road, but straight with good sight lines. At first glance, it looks like the kind of road I enjoy. Wide open prairie with mountains in the distance. I can't imagine there would be much traffic.
Because you routinely wave me to pass when approaching a curve, on a hill or in a no-passing zone.
If I pass you on a curve, double yellow and a car shows up, it's you that is getting pushed to the ditch.
You just follow the rules and I will too.
If you don't like me following you, then go faster.
Because you often do NOT follow the rules of the road.
An entire pack, 25+, ran a stop-sign in front of me, forcing me to choose between the opposite side ditch or having three of them as a hood ornament.
Oh yeah, and when you come to the coffee shop after your run, please dress, having a bunch of sweaty riders, with bulging quadriceps and mini peckers makes me pass coffee out my nose...............
You want to ride a 45# vehicle in traffic go ahead, have fun, I'm sure not all are jerks...........
That said it comes down to courtesy and safety. Whether a car is driving slowly and impeding the flow of traffic or a bike is doing the same, it isn't safe. Yesterday when I was driving to work there was a guy on a bike that was blocking a lane of traffic. The road didn't have a bike lane and he couldn't ride far enough over to allow cars to pass. He could have ridden on the sidewalk. I thought the guy was an idiot, he was endangering himself and others by his actions.
To me it's just common sense. When riding a bike I don't want to tangle with a car because I will loose. I'll do everything reasonable to keep myself tangling with traffic even if my "rights" allow me to be an idiot.
I've only tangled with a car once, and while technically it wasn't my fault I realize I could have avoided it. I was at an intersection and when the light turned green I pedaled away. A car the pulled away slowly and I was right beside him. He made a right turn into me just after the intersection. I was in his blind spot and didn't see his turn signal. Fortunately he made a very slow turn so I just scraped my leg against the side of his car and didn't go down. A very loud F bomb got his attention.
Expect people to do stupid stuff and do everything you can to be safe.
Bikes do not generally belong on sidewalks. It's dangerous. Motorists are not expecting traffic moving at bicycle speeds on sidewalks. I'll opine that the bicyclist you mentioned was safer in the center of the lane (cars had obviously seen him and reacted.) How many times have you hit a slower moving vehicle? I am going to guess none. It's easy to avoid running over someone if you are paying attention. If a driver isn't payin attention and hits a slow moving vehicle, it is THAT DRIVER that was unsafe, not the slow moving vehicle. I will never stack traffic up behind me. I'll ease over and let it vent.
The accident you described is a right hook, and they are generally avoidable. In fact most of the accidents mentioned in this link are fairly easy to avoid. http://bicyclesafe.com/
The most difficult to mitigate is the rear end. Cyclist lane position is often the source of much frustration for motorists, but is also often used by bicyclists to mitigate risks.
We have a law that if a slower moving vehicle is impeding five or more vehicles, the vehicle needs to move over to let them pass. As it was the morning commute, there were more than five vehicles behind him. He was oblivious to this and could care not. There wasn't a single person on the sidewalk and he could have easily and safely ridden on the sidewalk to allow traffic to pass him.
Slow moving vehicles do cause risks. There is a big difference between sharing the road and trying to own the road.
You do have a good law in that one... I've seen it ignored quite often though, but it helps.
Because you routinely wave me to pass when approaching a curve, on a hill or in a no-passing zone.
If I pass you on a curve, double yellow and a car shows up, it's you that is getting pushed to the ditch.
You just follow the rules and I will too.
If you don't like me following you, then go faster.
Because you often do NOT follow the rules of the road.
An entire pack, 25+, ran a stop-sign in front of me, forcing me to choose between the opposite side ditch or having three of them as a hood ornament.
Oh yeah, and when you come to the coffee shop after your run, please dress, having a bunch of sweaty riders, with bulging quadriceps and mini peckers makes me pass coffee out my nose...............
You want to ride a 45# vehicle in traffic go ahead, have fun, I'm sure not all are jerks...........
I will often communicate with drivers that come up behind me. I have waved plenty around. When I do that I am not giving a directive, but rather that's my way of telling them I am prepared for them to come around. I know full well I am the sacrificial lamb if things go south. I will also hold up my hand in a stop position if a detect a hazard. Again I am not issuing a directive, but rather letting them know I don't think it's safe to come around. I wave to those that are courteous as they pass. It's my way of saying thanks.
Obviously that group of cyclists should have stopped. Do you think each one of those cyclists should have come to a stop and moved individually through the stop sign?
Obviously that group of cyclists should have stopped. Do you think each one of those cyclists should have come to a stop and moved individually through the stop sign?
Should each car stop at the sign, or is it OK for 6 cars to go through!?!?!?
Or am I supposed to GUESS how many at once, and which ones will stop????
Well I'll just tell you up front I find bikers that pick out narrow curves hilly rural roads incredibly rude self centered jerks. Its not that I don't like bikes and I think programs to provide appropriate places to ride such as rails to trails etc fine ideas. I just don't think they belong in the road/street anymore than golf carts, go carts, jazzes kick scooters , riding lawn mowers , skateboards and other means of conveyance. Let me ask you, why don't you just ride on the sidewalk?
Obviously that group of cyclists should have stopped. Do you think each one of those cyclists should have come to a stop and moved individually through the stop sign?
Should each car stop at the sign, or is it OK for 6 cars to go through!?!?!?
Or am I supposed to GUESS how many at once, and which ones will stop????
Let me see if I can do a better job of gauging your thought processes. If you were behind a group of 20 bicyclists, would you rather they stop, then move through as a unit or each one wait until the bike ahead clears then move through as an individual rider? I don't ride in groups of 20, but when I do ride in groups, we move through as a unit as opposed to a bunch of individuals. We do that so that we get out of the way of motorists more quickly. We always yield right of way. I assumed that drivers would appreciate the gesture.
[quote=muffin]Let me see if I can do a better job of gauging your thought processes. If you were behind a group of 20 bicyclists, would you rather they stop, then move through as a unit or each one wait until the bike ahead clears then move through as an individual rider? I don't ride in groups of 20, but when I do ride in groups, we move through as a unit as opposed to a bunch of individuals. We do that so that we get out of the way of motorists more quickly. We always yield right of way. I assumed that drivers would appreciate the gesture.
That's why I damn near ran over 15 of you guys, I was on a straight road, there was a road that 'T' into the road I was on, they had a stop sign, and the pack ran through the sign and into my lane going the same direction as me..........but hey, the guy behind them didn't have to wait!!!!!
plus it's pretty ballsy that the back of the pack trusts the front guy with the decision........
Well I'll just tell you up front I find bikers that pick out narrow curves hilly rural roads incredibly rude self centered jerks. Its not that I don't like bikes and I think programs to provide appropriate places to ride such as rails to trails etc fine ideas. I just don't think they belong in the road/street anymore than golf carts, go carts, jazzes kick scooters , riding lawn mowers , skateboards and other means of conveyance. Let me ask you, why don't you just ride on the sidewalk?
The best research I can do shows accidents are more likely to occur on a sidewalk than on the open road. You won't find a single person who has studied sidewalk bicycling who doesn't strongly recommend against it. I love rura backroads and have managed to ride many thousands of miles on them without an accidental close call. I have had people purposefully brush pass me. I doubt anyone has ever had to back off the gas for more than 30 seconds or so for me. Most of the time it's seconds if at all. Every single day of my life I have to back off the gas for longer than that for a slow driver in the left lane. What's the longest you have ever been held up by a bicyclist?
[quote=muffin]Let me see if I can do a better job of gauging your thought processes. If you were behind a group of 20 bicyclists, would you rather they stop, then move through as a unit or each one wait until the bike ahead clears then move through as an individual rider? I don't ride in groups of 20, but when I do ride in groups, we move through as a unit as opposed to a bunch of individuals. We do that so that we get out of the way of motorists more quickly. We always yield right of way. I assumed that drivers would appreciate the gesture.
That's why I damn near ran over 15 of you guys, I was on a straight road, there was a road that 'T' into the road I was on, they had a stop sign, and the pack ran through the sign and into my lane going the same direction as me..........but hey, the guy behind them didn't have to wait!!!!!
plus it's pretty ballsy that the back of the pack trusts the front guy with the decision........
We are talking about two different scenarios I think. So you are saying they didn't yield right of way? As I said in the previous post I ALWAYS do.
I hike and hunt in a multiple use area that mountain biker also use. What I have to say to them is: Stop throwing your G-D empty gel packs all over the F-N place.
[quote=muffin]Let me see if I can do a better job of gauging your thought processes. If you were behind a group of 20 bicyclists, would you rather they stop, then move through as a unit or each one wait until the bike ahead clears then move through as an individual rider? I don't ride in groups of 20, but when I do ride in groups, we move through as a unit as opposed to a bunch of individuals. We do that so that we get out of the way of motorists more quickly. We always yield right of way. I assumed that drivers would appreciate the gesture.
That's why I damn near ran over 15 of you guys, I was on a straight road, there was a road that 'T' into the road I was on, they had a stop sign, and the pack ran through the sign and into my lane going the same direction as me..........but hey, the guy behind them didn't have to wait!!!!!
plus it's pretty ballsy that the back of the pack trusts the front guy with the decision........
We are talking about two different scenarios I think. So you are saying they didn't yield right of way? As I said in the previous post I ALWAYS do.
Like I said, probably not all are jerks, YES they didn't yield....
you might have thought at least one of them would have looked for oncoming..... herd/pack mentality, IMHO.
Paul Barnard, you are probably a great guy, but IMHO, 'Let me see if I can do a better job of gauging your thought processes' doesn't sound exactly ..... Campfireish????
As long as they stay outta the road IDGAF what they do, even if it is dressing like a herd of sackwashers on the way to a boy george concert!
I will be right there on the road where I have a legal right to be. Your trip to the all you can eat buffet isn't more important than my health. It's fascinating how it's always men, and I assume you are a man, who get hung up on bicyclist apparel. Women who bitch about bicyclist never mention the shorts. Maybe there are more closet gays than I realized.
Paul Barnard, you are probably a great guy, but IMHO, 'Let me see if I can do a better job of gauging your thought processes' doesn't sound exactly ..... Campfireish????
I will try again if it will do any good. I really would like to know if drivers would prefer a group of bicyclists each stop then proceed through individually or stop occupying the space of a single vehicle, yield right of way, then move through together. I always felt like I was doing the right thing moving together as a unit.
Paul Barnard, you are probably a great guy, but IMHO, 'Let me see if I can do a better job of gauging your thought processes' doesn't sound exactly ..... Campfireish????
I will try again if it will do any good. I really would like to know if drivers would prefer a group of bicyclists each stop then proceed through individually or stop occupying the space of a single vehicle, yield right of way, then move through together. I always felt like I was doing the right thing moving together as a unit.
On my way home from work I crossed paths with 2 separate bike riders on the same narrow, winding road. This was a road too narrow to have a centerline painted on it. Thank God I was able to use my superior driving skills as well as the brake and accelerator pedals to avoid tragedy and was able to safely pass by both riders. It was, however, a huge inconvenience to do so.
[quote=muffin]Let me see if I can do a better job of gauging your thought processes. If you were behind a group of 20 bicyclists, would you rather they stop, then move through as a unit or each one wait until the bike ahead clears then move through as an individual rider? I don't ride in groups of 20, but when I do ride in groups, we move through as a unit as opposed to a bunch of individuals. We do that so that we get out of the way of motorists more quickly. We always yield right of way. I assumed that drivers would appreciate the gesture.
That's why I damn near ran over 15 of you guys, I was on a straight road, there was a road that 'T' into the road I was on, they had a stop sign, and the pack ran through the sign and into my lane going the same direction as me..........but hey, the guy behind them didn't have to wait!!!!!
plus it's pretty ballsy that the back of the pack trusts the front guy with the decision........
We are talking about two different scenarios I think. So you are saying they didn't yield right of way? As I said in the previous post I ALWAYS do.
Like I said, probably not all are jerks, YES they didn't yield....
you might have thought at least one of them would have looked for oncoming..... herd/pack mentality, IMHO.
I just now noticed that you are from FL. FL has a bicycle death rate that is twice the national average. I suspect what you saw explains it in part. There is something going on down there. I can honestly say I have never seen a cyclist blow through a traffic control device without looking.
I just now noticed that you are from FL. FL has a bicycle death rate that is twice the national average. I suspect what you saw explains it in part. There is something going on down there. I can honestly say I have never seen a cyclist blow through a traffic control device without looking.
I don't think they drive/cycle any different down here, but being the smallest, geography wise, of the 3 largest state populations, with 365 days of cycling weather, I would expect the numbers to be higher....
On my way home from work I crossed paths with 2 separate bike riders on the same narrow, winding road. This was a road too narrow to have a centerline painted on it. Thank God I was able to use my superior driving skills as well as the brake and accelerator pedals to avoid tragedy and was able to safely pass by both riders. It was, however, a huge inconvenience to do so.
On my way home from work I crossed paths with 2 separate bike riders on the same narrow, winding road. This was a road too narrow to have a centerline painted on it. Thank God I was able to use my superior driving skills as well as the brake and accelerator pedals to avoid tragedy and was able to safely pass by both riders. It was, however, a huge inconvenience to do so.
As long as they stay outta the road IDGAF what they do, even if it is dressing like a herd of sackwashers on the way to a boy george concert!
I will be right there on the road where I have a legal right to be. Your trip to the all you can eat buffet isn't more important than my health. It's fascinating how it's always men, and I assume you are a man, who get hung up on bicyclist apparel. Women who bitch about bicyclist never mention the shorts. Maybe there are more closet gays than I realized.
HMMMM, let me see:
I've been on estrogen for the last 30 years. Have tried to murder every vagina that's ever been put under me. Don't wear panties Don't use drinking straws Drink black coffee and tea Drink scotch whiskey Smoke cigars Shoot guns and kill the hell outta animals, then eat 'em.
After all this kinder gentler medication I've been on, Yup, y'all still dress like girls.
Oh, and you DID ask for it, midol aisle 5, 10lb bags of ice out front, enjoy.
Just a few thoughts. I recently returned from a 3k mile roadtrip through Nv., Id. and Mt. and passed many bicyclists, few of whom pissed me off. I have observed over many years as a hiker, runner, biker and paddler that people on/in motorized conveyances have an attitude resentful of the self powered.
Jet skiers and Atv riders are worthy of a separate discussion by outdoors people.
Other than the hilarous "aero" helmets and silky shorties, I don't mind 'em a bit. Interesting how fast they move out of the way when being overtaken by a 35 ton CLAAS 940 chopper with an 8-row corn head mounted in front..
I think they're more of a pita in the city than on any country road; if for no other reason than they rarely obey any street signs (stop, yield, etc) in larger cities..
YMMV..
Ride safe, Paul..
Those corn farming implements are impressive, and the corn growers are good folks.
Those guys look pizzed-some farmer must have butchered all their farm dates and made hamburger out of 'em.
Paul Barnard, you are probably a great guy, but IMHO, 'Let me see if I can do a better job of gauging your thought processes' doesn't sound exactly ..... Campfireish????
I will try again if it will do any good. I really would like to know if drivers would prefer a group of bicyclists each stop then proceed through individually or stop occupying the space of a single vehicle, yield right of way, then move through together. I always felt like I was doing the right thing moving together as a unit.
What does the Law say?
There is no "the" law. Each state has different laws. Some states have laws that allow more than two abreast. I have never seen the issue of moving through together addressed legally. Even if it were illegal, I'd be inclined to do it if could do so without neglecting my duty to yield right of way.
I said earlier that I often break the law on my bike. Sometimes it's purely for selfish reasons. Sometimes it serves a greater good. I was stopped at a stop light the other day. The vehicle behind me honked. I noticed he had his right turn signal on. There was no cross traffic. I ran the red light. He honked and waved as he made his right. It worked out well for both of us.
If you are interested in looking at something, look at this. Google Pasadena Ave Metairie LA. Look at where it intersects with Metairie road. Then look across at Houma Ave. If I leave my house on Pasadena and want to take Houma because it leads me to the levee bike path, I have two choices. The legal way means I have to take a right and run down narrow congested Metairie road for several hundred yards, hit a U turn, then go back along congested Metairie road for several hundred yards before turning on Houma. Or I can do a quick sprint on Metairie Rd to the U, then when traffic clears go the wrong way on Metairie for 50 yards then turn on Houma.
If I follow the law, I am going to slow traffic considerably and expose myself to greater risks. If I break the law in the way I describe, it will not negatively affect anyone and I won't delay a soul for a second. I will be exposed to lesser risk. What do you think I should do? What do you think most motorists would want me to do?
Well for starters, they should have to be inspected, carry insurance, have a license plate visible just like a car or motorcycle being they want the equal rights and privileges to hog the road.
They should be ticketed for impeding traffic on roads with no shoulder and a double yellow line.
Most are gay like, they seldom obey traffic laws, in general they are a scourge to the safety of the motoring public.
To say they seldom obey traffic laws is being way too generous. They have a total disdain for traffic lights, stop signs, and even which side of the road they should be on. Turn signals are a mystery to them too, but then again, they are a mystery to most car drivers too.
I just now noticed that you are from FL. FL has a bicycle death rate that is twice the national average. I suspect what you saw explains it in part. There is something going on down there. I can honestly say I have never seen a cyclist blow through a traffic control device without looking.
I don't think they drive/cycle any different down here, but being the smallest, geography wise, of the 3 largest state populations, with 365 days of cycling weather, I would expect the numbers to be higher....
but maybe they do!
I had never considered the 365 weather aspect of it. That surely contributes to the numbers.
In all 50 states, people on bikes are required to follow the same laws as other drivers.
Here are a few key principles that underpin all US traffic laws:
First Come, First Served Everyone on the road is entitled to the lane width they need. This includes the space behind, to each side and the space in front. If you want to use someone else’s space you must yield to whoever is using it.
Ride on the Right In the United States, everyone must drive on the right-hand side of the roadway.
Yielding to Crossing Traffic When you come to an intersection, if you don’t have the right of way, you must yield.
Yielding when Changing Lanes If you want to change lanes, you must yield to traffic that is in your new lane of travel.
Speed Positioning The slowest vehicles on the road should be the furthest to the right. Where you position yourself on the road depends on the location of any parked cars, your speed, and your destination. Always pass on the left.
Lane Positioning Bikes can share the same lane with other drivers. If a lane is wide enough to share with another vehicle (about 14 feet), ride three feet to the right of traffic. If the lane is not wide enough to share, “take the lane” by riding in the middle.
Intersection positioning When there is a lane that is used for more than one direction, use the rightmost lane going in the direction you are traveling.
Just a few thoughts. I recently returned from a 3k mile roadtrip through Nv., Id. and Mt. and passed many bicyclists, few of whom pissed me off. I have observed over many years as a hiker, runner, biker and paddler that people on/in motorized conveyances have an attitude resentful of the self powered.
Jet skiers and Atv riders are worthy of a separate discussion by outdoors people.
mike r
I am a motor boater and a kayaker. Kayaks are to motor boaters as bicycles are to motorists.
Just a few thoughts. I recently returned from a 3k mile roadtrip through Nv., Id. and Mt. and passed many bicyclists, few of whom pissed me off. I have observed over many years as a hiker, runner, biker and paddler that people on/in motorized conveyances have an attitude resentful of the self powered.
Jet skiers and Atv riders are worthy of a separate discussion by outdoors people.
mike r
I am a motor boater and a kayaker. Kayaks are to motor boaters as bicycles are to motorists.
That's not exactly right there Paul, the UN-powered vessel HAS the right-of-way.............
Well for starters, they should have to be inspected, carry insurance, have a license plate visible just like a car or motorcycle being they want the equal rights and privileges to hog the road.
They should be ticketed for impeding traffic on roads with no shoulder and a double yellow line.
Most are gay like, they seldom obey traffic laws, in general they are a scourge to the safety of the motoring public.
To say they seldom obey traffic laws is being way too generous. They have a total disdain for traffic lights, stop signs, and even which side of the road they should be on. Turn signals are a mystery to them too, but then again, they are a mystery to most car drivers too.
With all that lawlessness and reckless abandon, you'd think that bicycling deaths would be more common than they are. As it stands the numbers aren't much higher than accidental gun deaths. I suspect that the riders are more in tune to their surroundings than many realize. Do you unfailingly obey every traffic law?
Just a few thoughts. I recently returned from a 3k mile roadtrip through Nv., Id. and Mt. and passed many bicyclists, few of whom pissed me off. I have observed over many years as a hiker, runner, biker and paddler that people on/in motorized conveyances have an attitude resentful of the self powered.
Jet skiers and Atv riders are worthy of a separate discussion by outdoors people.
mike r
I am a motor boater and a kayaker. Kayaks are to motor boaters as bicycles are to motorists.
That's not exactly right there Paul, the UN-powered vessel HAS the right-of-way.............
Can you cite the navigation rule that sets that forth?
Just a few thoughts. I recently returned from a 3k mile roadtrip through Nv., Id. and Mt. and passed many bicyclists, few of whom pissed me off. I have observed over many years as a hiker, runner, biker and paddler that people on/in motorized conveyances have an attitude resentful of the self powered.
Jet skiers and Atv riders are worthy of a separate discussion by outdoors people.
mike r
I am a motor boater and a kayaker. Kayaks are to motor boaters as bicycles are to motorists.
That's not exactly right there Paul, the UN-powered vessel HAS the right-of-way.............
This is true but I believe I must be invisible when in a kayak, or just a slow moving target.
In all 50 states, people on bikes are required to follow the same laws as other drivers.
Here are a few key principles that underpin all US traffic laws:
First Come, First Served Everyone on the road is entitled to the lane width they need. This includes the space behind, to each side and the space in front. If you want to use someone else’s space you must yield to whoever is using it.
Ride on the Right In the United States, everyone must drive on the right-hand side of the roadway.
Yielding to Crossing Traffic When you come to an intersection, if you don’t have the right of way, you must yield.
Yielding when Changing Lanes If you want to change lanes, you must yield to traffic that is in your new lane of travel.
Speed Positioning The slowest vehicles on the road should be the furthest to the right. Where you position yourself on the road depends on the location of any parked cars, your speed, and your destination. Always pass on the left.
Lane Positioning Bikes can share the same lane with other drivers. If a lane is wide enough to share with another vehicle (about 14 feet), ride three feet to the right of traffic. If the lane is not wide enough to share, “take the lane” by riding in the middle.
Intersection positioning When there is a lane that is used for more than one direction, use the rightmost lane going in the direction you are traveling.
That looks deliberate. He moved over on the shoulder to hit them.
I have seen that before. In motorcycle speak I suspect it was target fixation. The rider looked at what he wanted to avoid rather than where he wanted to go. The bike follows the eyes.
I'm planning to get back on my bicycles after a decade of not riding. Motorists playing with their cell phones has scared me off from riding the road bike so I'll ride the mountain bike on some dirt back roads and two tracks.
I've seen bad manners from cyclists and from motorists.
The difference is a motorist with poor road manners can and has killed cyclists while cyclists can only irritate you.
I bike home from work. At least half the route is within a big greenway near the Salt River. It's one of the great blessings in my life. Dunno if I'm supposed to get spandex or not, but seeing as I've made due with regular shorts for about 45 years now, spandex is probably not on my shopping list.
As far as cardio goes, it's a whole lot kinder than running. And in the summer, biking is cooler than walking.
Well I'll just tell you up front I find bikers that pick out narrow curves hilly rural roads incredibly rude self centered jerks. Its not that I don't like bikes and I think programs to provide appropriate places to ride such as rails to trails etc fine ideas. I just don't think they belong in the road/street anymore than golf carts, go carts, jazzes kick scooters , riding lawn mowers , skateboards and other means of conveyance. Let me ask you, why don't you just ride on the sidewalk?
The best research I can do shows accidents are more likely to occur on a sidewalk than on the open road. You won't find a single person who has studied sidewalk bicycling who doesn't strongly recommend against it. I love rura backroads and have managed to ride many thousands of miles on them without an accidental close call. I have had people purposefully brush pass me. I doubt anyone has ever had to back off the gas for more than 30 seconds or so for me. Most of the time it's seconds if at all. Every single day of my life I have to back off the gas for longer than that for a slow driver in the left lane. What's the longest you have ever been held up by a bicyclist?
Actually I have been held up quite a bit of time multiple times, but maybe it just me being too careful, as I would really hate to run over somebody no matter how inconsiderate he/she is. The slow downs are especially long on a local road that leads down to the nearby lake. The road is curvy and hilly with no shoulders and is frequented by cars pulling boats. Often there will be quite a backup as some of these cars with heavy boats cannot safely pass thus traffic backs up considerably. I would say 10 -30 minutes isn't uncommon. I know a lady that lives down that way and she leaves for work on 2nd shift an hour earlier than she would normally as this is becoming a popular spot with the local bikers. Think of that she is giving up 5 hours a week because of folks like you.
Also thank you for your response. regarding the sidewalk. I ask it often and always get some BS anecdotal reference that its too dangerous. Talk about screwed up logic a collision between a 220 lb bike and rider and a 175 lb person is too dangerous but a collision between a 3500 lb block of steel and the same 220 lb bike and rider at much greater speed is OK. Isn't what you are really saying is I don't want to have to maybe slow down and be inconvenienced by watching for pedestrians, Id much rather inconvenience everyone else so I can do what I want. Thats what I hear you saying , and frankly i consider you on the same level as the transexuals wanting to use the other sexes bathroom or any other special interest groups wanting special treatment at everyone else's expense. If the bikers want some place to ride why don't you lobby for a law that requires adequate bike lanes be added or built to hwys and figure out some way to finance it thru taxes. I put forth the excise tax on firearms and ammo and hunting and fishing license fees as good examples. Put a tax on your equipment and require licenses for the roadway and use the money to build places to ride. I also applaude the thought mentioned that all bikes should meet the insurance and safety requirements , (lights, turn signals brake lights etc.) requirements the same as autos on the road. Sorry Bud but your wrong and you know it and no matter how trite your answers and justification is its BS.
Will tell this with a different slant, no pun intended.
Average sized Vietnamese male trying to get out of Dodge on a bike, peddling like a mad man. I would'a been doing something myself if a Charlie model Huey was at my six acting like he was the new sheriff in town, but probably not peddling straight down a dirt trail to Hell.
A H/E quick fuse on a 10# warhead, propelled by a 2.75" FFAR slithered just under the peddler's cheeks, detonated on the seat and whaddya know, bikers can fly!
Made a mess of the bike too.
Lesson here for bike riders is don't pizz off a chopper pilot. Act calm and casual, do not run or peddle fast. Always be polite and don't mince words when he asks for directions to the nearest bar.
I've raced mountain bikes and done a lot of stupid things on motorcycles but I'll never ride another road bike unless it's a closed course. Watched a buddy get taken out by a pickup on a narrow road. He was hugging the right side of the road and the pickup thought he would just squeeze by so as not to wait for the oncoming car to pass. Nope.
I bike home from work. At least half the route is within a big greenway near the Salt River. It's one of the great blessings in my life. Dunno if I'm supposed to get spandex or not, but seeing as I've made due with regular shorts for about 45 years now, spandex is probably not on my shopping list.
As far as cardio goes, it's a whole lot kinder than running. And in the summer, biking is cooler than walking.
My knees are slaughtered. I limit the amount of impact I subject them to.
[s][/s]Get off the road ! . your ride has no lights , can't keep up with traffic u got a perfectly good bike trail 10' on one side of the road or the other .....yet u get in my f/ing way , to top it off u paid no taxes to build or repair any of it !!!!!!!!! ....bikers are like teenage unwed mothers ......easy ,pay for nothing ...take take take....use use use ...
Well I'll just tell you up front I find bikers that pick out narrow curves hilly rural roads incredibly rude self centered jerks. Its not that I don't like bikes and I think programs to provide appropriate places to ride such as rails to trails etc fine ideas. I just don't think they belong in the road/street anymore than golf carts, go carts, jazzes kick scooters , riding lawn mowers , skateboards and other means of conveyance. Let me ask you, why don't you just ride on the sidewalk?
The best research I can do shows accidents are more likely to occur on a sidewalk than on the open road. You won't find a single person who has studied sidewalk bicycling who doesn't strongly recommend against it. I love rura backroads and have managed to ride many thousands of miles on them without an accidental close call. I have had people purposefully brush pass me. I doubt anyone has ever had to back off the gas for more than 30 seconds or so for me. Most of the time it's seconds if at all. Every single day of my life I have to back off the gas for longer than that for a slow driver in the left lane. What's the longest you have ever been held up by a bicyclist?
Actually I have been held up quite a bit of time multiple times, but maybe it just me being too careful, as I would really hate to run over somebody no matter how inconsiderate he/she is. The slow downs are especially long on a local road that leads down to the nearby lake. The road is curvy and hilly with no shoulders and is frequented by cars pulling boats. Often there will be quite a backup as some of these cars with heavy boats cannot safely pass thus traffic backs up considerably. I would say 10 -30 minutes isn't uncommon. I know a lady that lives down that way and she leaves for work on 2nd shift an hour earlier than she would normally as this is becoming a popular spot with the local bikers. Think of that she is giving up 5 hours a week because of folks like you.
Also thank you for your response. regarding the sidewalk. I ask it often and always get some BS anecdotal reference that its too dangerous. Talk about screwed up logic a collision between a 220 lb bike and rider and a 175 lb person is too dangerous but a collision between a 3500 lb block of steel and the same 220 lb bike and rider at much greater speed is OK. Isn't what you are really saying is I don't want to have to maybe slow down and be inconvenienced by watching for pedestrians, Id much rather inconvenience everyone else so I can do what I want. Thats what I hear you saying , and frankly i consider you on the same level as the transexuals wanting to use the other sexes bathroom or any other special interest groups wanting special treatment at everyone else's expense. If the bikers want some place to ride why don't you lobby for a law that requires adequate bike lanes be added or built to hwys and figure out some way to finance it thru taxes. I put forth the excise tax on firearms and ammo and hunting and fishing license fees as good examples. Put a tax on your equipment and require licenses for the roadway and use the money to build places to ride. I also applaude the thought mentioned that all bikes should meet the insurance and safety requirements , (lights, turn signals brake lights etc.) requirements the same as autos on the road. Sorry Bud but your wrong and you know it and no matter how trite your answers and justification is its BS.
That you think bicyclists only interact with pedestrians in sidewalk bicycling is very telling of the amount of thought you have put into it.
I must also say that I am a bit disappointed on a forum like this that so many are advocating for more taxation and more regulation. Hillary appreciates your support!
Get off the road ! . your ride has no lights , can't keep up with traffic u got a perfectly good bike trail 10' on one side of the road or the other .....yet u get in my f/ing way , to top it off u paid no taxes to bold or repair any out it !!!!!!!!!
How much money are you willing to bet on your belief that cyclists don't pay for roadways?
I've raced mountain bikes and done a lot of stupid things on motorcycles but I'll never ride another road bike unless it's a closed course. Watched a buddy get taken out by a pickup on a narrow road. He was hugging the right side of the road and the pickup thought he would just squeeze by so as not to wait for the oncoming car to pass. Nope.
I am sorry about your friend. That is the very reason that many cyclists don't hug the white line. It seems to invite a squeeze pass.
I don't mind the bike riders too much. I wish they would give up on the multi color tour de France outfits that effectively break up their outline though. Especially along rural roads with an autumn foliage back drop. I'm happy to see the solid florescent green becoming popular.
I am sorry about your friend. That is the very reason that many cyclists don't hug the white line. It seems to invite a squeeze pass.
That's because they're holding up traffic flow. And as far as how often and how long do I have to deal with it? Every single time, that's how often, until I can get around them, every single time.
Get's real old. And I detest going into oncoming traffics lane when I have a perfectly good lane being used by some toad on a tricycle.
I don't mind the bike riders too much. I wish they would give up on the multi color tour de France outfits that effectively break up their outline though. Especially along rural roads with an autumn foliage back drop. I'm happy to see the solid florescent green becoming popular.
I stick to paths as much as possible, but when I am in traffic, I always wear bright clothing. I have never been treated more respectfully as I was when I started wearing this American flag and USA shorts combo though. My riding bud who isn't really safety minded even commented how well the motorists were treating us the first time I rode with it. I think when they see it, it somehow humanizes the experience. I am no longer just this irritation they encounter or some Lance wannabe, I am a human. A human who loves this country.
Here we go ...now your to tell me since your a unwed mother ..that u pay taxes to , so the free b's from .gov are part of what is available in the system ...here we go ...I want to see user fees !!!
Here we go ...now your to tell me since your a unwed mother ..that u pay taxes to , so the free b's from .gov are part of what is available in the system ...here we go ...I want to see user fees !!!
Nope, why don't you do some homework on how local, state and federal road construction and maintenance are funded and get back with me.
Some of you guys must absolutely lose it when you get caught at a couple red lights in a row.
Welll what I can say, is I despise lights. We used to have 2 in town. then 3. They just added 3 more. I"m not happy at all.
And the fact I have to yield at stop signs now is what I run around saying... point is, used to be you rarely had to do anything but stop and then go... traffic was a none issue.
But I'm told I'm 100 years too late and born in the wrong state to boot...
I really like riding bikes for exercise. Need to get back to it, but on teh farm and not out on the dang roads.
I ride all the time. I'm not a racer, but I love to ride my mountain bike in the sad hills. I haven't driven anything but my bicycle since Sunday, other than to take my wife to dinner last night. If the weather is nice, and I'm not pulling a boat, why burn gas?
You do have a good law in that one... I've seen it ignored quite often though, but it helps.
No kidding! I'm #11 in this line with more piling up behind me.
We cut across 8? on the way home and end up on the parks.. I hate the parks... But I have to say on the 20th of September most everyone was kind enough to pull over if they were slow. Was a blessing with all the rain and wind.
First year we came up, 86, I'd never heard Mom say much of anything bad.... we were in my truck, and had been all over the state when we come around a curve going up a slope, somewhere around TOK I think... anyway it was Dad, Mom and I in a single seat truck.... and we come around the curve and see a motor home in front. No one says anything, until mom says, great, another MF Motor Home... that was before the law and the first time I"d heard MF from her in my life.... LOL. Dad and I had a great laugh.
Bicyclist have the right away period! just as a pedestrian would.
What the dumbassed prick headed inconsiderate Bicyclist seems to forget sometimes is that the right of way doesn't do you any good when your dead.
Ride smart, stay safe.
No, but it sure helps with the lawsuits. I have a special insurance policy for the express purpose of it being used to file and win a suit if negligence on the part of a motorist kills me.
It occurs to me from my participation in a number of different forums that Americans love to express their rage for bicyclists on the road. I am a bicyclist. It's one of my many passions. So give me your best shot. In the end we may all learn something.
I work in Loudoun County and there is a bike trail which extends all the way to DC. One of the areas where the bike trail winds through Leesburg, I always see bicyclists riding on the paved road while the paved bicycle trail is less than 30 ft away. The trail runs parallel with this winding road with many blind turns. Many times the bicyclists are holding up traffic on this road which has 45 mile an hour speed limit. Why would a bicyclist choose to get on this road and not stay on the trail? I don't understand the mindset.
It occurs to me from my participation in a number of different forums that Americans love to express their rage for bicyclists on the road. I am a bicyclist. It's one of my many passions. So give me your best shot. In the end we may all learn something.
I work in Loudoun County and there is a bike trail which extends all the way to DC. One of the areas where the bike trail winds through Leesburg, I always see bicyclists riding on the paved road while the paved bicycle trail is less than 30 ft away. The trail runs parallel with this winding road with many blind turns. Many times the bicyclists are holding up traffic on this road which has 45 mile an hour speed limit. Why would a bicyclist choose to get on this road and not stay on the trail? I don't understand the mindset.
I don't understand that mindset either. There are some bicycle lanes that run parallel to a parking lane. Some of those lanes are entirely in the door zone of parked cars. I won't ride in those. Around here we have quite a few that are mostly in the door zone. I ride the outer edge of the bike lane. Sometimes motorists buzz me, obviously oblivious to the danger I face riding in a door zone. Dedicated infrastructure like you pointed out though. I'll use it.
Haven't read many but I am an avid bike rider - even during the winter in MN.. Most riders have the elitist mentality that they are more virtuous than you! I hug the fog line, wear ear buds and listen to the radio! No helmet - after 63.9 years, what's the difference? Two or more and they drive down county roads side by side 'til someone comes up from behind. I honk my horn and swear at the axxholes - its a violation of state law. I do wear lycra because it keeps the "boys" in proper order and out of harms way.
Why a 300 pound middle age lard ass in spandex thinks he is entitled and safe to ride on busy rural roads that logging trucks frequent is beyond me. Hwy 49 here in NC is a grease slick waiting to happen.
Amen brother, they ride up and down 421 and the log trucks scare me when I'm in my car.
Haven't read many but I am an avid bike rider - even during the winter in MN.. Most riders have the elitist mentality that they are more virtuous than you! I hug the fog line, wear ear buds and listen to the radio! No helmet - after 63.9 years, what's the difference? Two or more and they drive down county roads side by side 'til someone comes up from behind. I honk my horn and swear at the axxholes - its a violation of state law. I do wear lycra because it keeps the "boys" in proper order and out of harms way.
It sounds like liberal cyclist are the problem (like everything else). Nobody around here would dream of riding in traffic, even if legal.
Bicyclist have the right away period! just as a pedestrian would.
What the dumbassed prick headed inconsiderate Bicyclist seems to forget sometimes is that the right of way doesn't do you any good when your dead.
Ride smart, stay safe.
No, but it sure helps with the lawsuits. I have a special insurance policy for the express purpose of it being used to file and win a suit if negligence on the part of a motorist kills me.
Well I'll just tell you up front I find bikers that pick out narrow curves hilly rural roads incredibly rude self centered jerks. Its not that I don't like bikes and I think programs to provide appropriate places to ride such as rails to trails etc fine ideas. I just don't think they belong in the road/street anymore than golf carts, go carts, jazzes kick scooters , riding lawn mowers , skateboards and other means of conveyance. Let me ask you, why don't you just ride on the sidewalk?
The best research I can do shows accidents are more likely to occur on a sidewalk than on the open road. You won't find a single person who has studied sidewalk bicycling who doesn't strongly recommend against it. I love rura backroads and have managed to ride many thousands of miles on them without an accidental close call. I have had people purposefully brush pass me. I doubt anyone has ever had to back off the gas for more than 30 seconds or so for me. Most of the time it's seconds if at all. Every single day of my life I have to back off the gas for longer than that for a slow driver in the left lane. What's the longest you have ever been held up by a bicyclist?
Actually I have been held up quite a bit of time multiple times, but maybe it just me being too careful, as I would really hate to run over somebody no matter how inconsiderate he/she is. The slow downs are especially long on a local road that leads down to the nearby lake. The road is curvy and hilly with no shoulders and is frequented by cars pulling boats. Often there will be quite a backup as some of these cars with heavy boats cannot safely pass thus traffic backs up considerably. I would say 10 -30 minutes isn't uncommon. I know a lady that lives down that way and she leaves for work on 2nd shift an hour earlier than she would normally as this is becoming a popular spot with the local bikers. Think of that she is giving up 5 hours a week because of folks like you.
Also thank you for your response. regarding the sidewalk. I ask it often and always get some BS anecdotal reference that its too dangerous. Talk about screwed up logic a collision between a 220 lb bike and rider and a 175 lb person is too dangerous but a collision between a 3500 lb block of steel and the same 220 lb bike and rider at much greater speed is OK. Isn't what you are really saying is I don't want to have to maybe slow down and be inconvenienced by watching for pedestrians, Id much rather inconvenience everyone else so I can do what I want. Thats what I hear you saying , and frankly i consider you on the same level as the transexuals wanting to use the other sexes bathroom or any other special interest groups wanting special treatment at everyone else's expense. If the bikers want some place to ride why don't you lobby for a law that requires adequate bike lanes be added or built to hwys and figure out some way to finance it thru taxes. I put forth the excise tax on firearms and ammo and hunting and fishing license fees as good examples. Put a tax on your equipment and require licenses for the roadway and use the money to build places to ride. I also applaude the thought mentioned that all bikes should meet the insurance and safety requirements , (lights, turn signals brake lights etc.) requirements the same as autos on the road. Sorry Bud but your wrong and you know it and no matter how trite your answers and justification is its BS.
I'll go ahead and help you out since you are having a bad day hun. This is more than a BS anecdotal reference, and it's from but one of many studies done on sidewalk cycling. I hope the cramping eases up soon.
Bicyclist have the right away period! just as a pedestrian would.
What the dumbassed prick headed inconsiderate Bicyclist seems to forget sometimes is that the right of way doesn't do you any good when your dead.
Ride smart, stay safe.
No, but it sure helps with the lawsuits. I have a special insurance policy for the express purpose of it being used to file and win a suit if negligence on the part of a motorist kills me.
Well that just speaks volumes.
It sure does. It tells you that I want my loved ones well cared for if some idiot kills me.
Get bigger tires and sidewalks, rocks etc. won't be a problem for you. Unless you're racing or traveling cross country, there is no reason to ride on skinny tires.
Get bigger tires and sidewalks, rocks etc. won't be a problem for you. Unless you're racing or traveling cross country, there is no reason to ride on skinny tires.
Sidewalks are a dangerous place for bicycles. That's why sidewalk bicycling is illegal in so many places. I have fat tire bikes. I use them off road. I use my bikes with road tires when I ride on the road.
Bicyclist have the right away period! just as a pedestrian would.
What the dumbassed prick headed inconsiderate Bicyclist seems to forget sometimes is that the right of way doesn't do you any good when your dead.
Ride smart, stay safe.
No, but it sure helps with the lawsuits. I have a special insurance policy for the express purpose of it being used to file and win a suit if negligence on the part of a motorist kills me.
Well that just speaks volumes.
Pay her no mind Bangeye, this thread was obviously started by a lactating over ovulating hoe who's biological clock went out when fuggin Globes were hot!
That looks deliberate. He moved over on the shoulder to hit them.
I have seen that before. In motorcycle speak I suspect it was target fixation. The rider looked at what he wanted to avoid rather than where he wanted to go. The bike follows the eyes.
The guy who makes those rickymouse youtubes frequently sets his camera up at that spot because it's a notorious decreasing radius curve.
Motorcycles and cars frequently lose control at that spot. Someone who would ride a bicycle around there must have a death wish.
Get bigger tires and sidewalks, rocks etc. won't be a problem for you. Unless you're racing or traveling cross country, there is no reason to ride on skinny tires.
Sidewalks are a dangerous place for bicycles. That's why sidewalk bicycling is illegal in so many places. I have fat tire bikes. I use them off road. I use my bikes with road tires when I ride on the road.
Get bigger tires and sidewalks, rocks etc. won't be a problem for you. Unless you're racing or traveling cross country, there is no reason to ride on skinny tires.
Sidewalks are a dangerous place for bicycles. That's why sidewalk bicycling is illegal in so many places. I have fat tire bikes. I use them off road. I use my bikes with road tires when I ride on the road.
Why do you ride on the road?
To get to where I am going. The same reason I drive on the road.
Can you point out where I said I ride on 70 MPH highways?
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by deflave
Highway 13 is the interstate paralleling Route 2?
Dave
I was looking at the highway 13 that runs south to north connecting Circle, Macon and Scobey. It's a narrow road, but straight with good sight lines. At first glance, it looks like the kind of road I enjoy. Wide open prairie with mountains in the distance. I can't imagine there would be much traffic.
2 and 13 are 70 mph highways.
Mountains in the distance, yeah only about 400 miles away.
I have a special insurance policy for the express purpose of it being used to file and win a suit if negligence on the part of a motorist kills me.
Coulda' saved a lot of bandwidth by just titling this POS thread as such, to start with. Metarie didn't EXIST when I was a boy in NOLa.,....it was founded and populated by a boom in out of state cretins. I see nothing's changed much. You are a self proclaimed prick with ears. GTC
I ride a bike a lot, but I guess I'm on the water to much. I believe that the ROW belongs to the biggest vehicle and cringe at the thought of one of my boats stalling in front of a super tanker.
Can you point out where I said I ride on 70 MPH highways?
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by deflave
Highway 13 is the interstate paralleling Route 2?
Dave
I was looking at the highway 13 that runs south to north connecting Circle, Macon and Scobey. It's a narrow road, but straight with good sight lines. At first glance, it looks like the kind of road I enjoy. Wide open prairie with mountains in the distance. I can't imagine there would be much traffic.
2 and 13 are 70 mph highways.
Mountains in the distance, yeah only about 400 miles away.
You're either trolling or incredibly ignorant.
Either way you lose ass pirate.
I said "at first glance it looks like..." I made it pretty obvious that all I did was pulled it up on the internet and did a Google map and street view. Watch out for those cows on the road. I'll bet they really piss you off.
I have a special insurance policy for the express purpose of it being used to file and win a suit if negligence on the part of a motorist kills me.
Coulda' saved a lot of bandwidth by just titling this POS thread as such, to start with. Metarie didn't EXIST when I was a boy in NOLa.,....it was founded and populated by a boom in out of state cretins. I see nothing's changed much. You are a self proclaimed prick with ears. GTC
I had to check what website I was on again. I simply cannot believe my conservative brethren are here advocating for more taxes, more government and are now voicing an unwillingness to accept responsibility for their own negligence. What the living phuc is going on in this world.
Nothing wrong with riding a bike buddy, but just like everything else, you gotta understand that you're rights end where somebody else's begins. Not necessarily directed at you personally, but there are lots a dumfuks out there that don't understand that. Not just bicyclists.
Just Sunday on my way to work, very quiet, no traffic, 4 bike idiots. Just 4 and they couldn't ride single file in their marked bike lane on the narrowest stretch of the road right in front of a school. There's my reason.
Never outdrive your line of sight. You should never go so fast that you can't react to a hazard around the bend or over the hill. It's dangerous and dumb.
Never outdrive your line of sight. You should never go so fast that you can't react to a hazard around the bend or over the hill. It's dangerous and dumb.
Hell...I am a bicyclist and I stay out of the damn road, or at least out of any lane of traffic. Just because you can do something doesn't mean you should.
Most riders have the elitist mentality that they are more virtuous than you! I hug the fog line, wear ear buds and listen to the radio! No helmet - after 63.9 years, what's the difference? Two or more and they drive down county roads side by side 'til someone comes up from behind. I honk my horn and swear at the axxholes - its a violation of state law.
Yep on all counts. If get hit, I figure its ALWAYS gonna be my fault, and ride with that mindset.
Why a 300 pound middle age lard ass in spandex thinks he is entitled and safe to ride on busy rural roads that logging trucks frequent is beyond me. Hwy 49 here in NC is a grease slick waiting to happen.
By law that person is entitled to use that road. As a motorist I have encountered bicyclists on those kind of roads and have found them easy to go around. Do you have a hard time getting around them?
I have not read the entire thread so I do not know if this has been addressed, but I am not so sure that a bicyclist is entitled to use the road...maybe in some areas (especially cities with established bike lanes and such) but to legally use roads they need to maintain a safe speed, have brake lights/signals or use the hand signals.
People riding their bikes doing 10 MPH right on the white line of a 60 MPH highway piss me the [bleep] off. I have to get in the opposing lane to safely pass them. If a car is coming the other way, I have to slow ways the [bleep] down.
If they'd stay in established bike lanes or well out of the way of regular traffic I wouldn't have any issue with bike riders. I have a HUGE problem with them the way I normally see them doing their thing.
There's a reason bicyclists are scorned across the country. Some people just refuse to see why and instead get on the internet and cry about it.
Spell it out for the "slower" folks that like to dress up and play with bikes on the highway.
They're a PITA on roads designed for automobiles, too slow, and often hog the lane creating passing hazards.
They're arrogant, feel entitled, inconsiderate, self-absorbed, passive aggressive (as opposed to outright aggressive like the motorists they piss off), elitists, and let's admit it, they look ridiculous in spandex outfits with a little foam helmet.
They're what's wrong with American values. Them and Walmart people.
Besides, compared to riding a bicycle in China one would think THAT Cummins smoke is as fresh as a newly blooming tulip..
Not true. There are indeed areas where the air is really bad - Beijing, Guangzhou etc...
But I did 20km in 39:10 last night on my mountain bike, riding here in Haikou. The air is comparable to the USA. It's the most densely populated area on the island. Everywhere else the air is even better.
As for the whole of this thread - All I have to say is "Man, 1st world problems." I'll have to grab some video some time of the electric scooter traffic here. Mind-blowing. Yet, life manages to somehow go on in spite of the utter chaos...
I'm going to go off topic and rant at joggers around here too. WTF is it all about jogging in the street when there is a sidewalk and even nicely groomed DG paths. Are they bicyclists that got a flat and don't know how to fix it?
I'm going to go off topic and rant at joggers around here too. WTF is it all about jogging in the street when there is a sidewalk and even nicely groomed DG paths. Are they bicyclists that got a flat and don't know how to fix it?
Most riders have the elitist mentality that they are more virtuous than you! I hug the fog line, wear ear buds and listen to the radio! No helmet - after 63.9 years, what's the difference? Two or more and they drive down county roads side by side 'til someone comes up from behind. I honk my horn and swear at the axxholes - its a violation of state law.
Yep on all counts. If get hit, I figure its ALWAYS gonna be my fault, and ride with that mindset.
The best way to get away with murder is to run over a bicyclist. If the motorist is sober, it's all but guaranteed there won't be any legal action taken at all. I ride defensively and courteously. It's served me well so far.
Unless a drunk drove through the fence cows aren't allowed on 2 or 13.
Keep googling.
The part of 13 I pulled up south of the Indian Reservation had cows on it.
You also initially referred to it as an interstate.
You are full of chit sport.
Now that you are sober, do you want to quote where I called it an interstate?
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by deflave
If you take pleasure in riding a bicycle on Route 2 through the state of Montana, you are an idiot.
Dave
Why is that Clark? It runs parallel to an interstate. I would think all the traffic in a hurry would be on the interstate. I examined a long stretch on google satellite and it was generally straight with wide lanes and a small stretch of shoulder. I would imagine that there are places it goes through mountain passes where the sightlines are limited and the road narrows.
Edit. Yep, I'd avoid those passes. Beautiful road, beautiful scenery, but too tight in some of those blend bends.
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by deflave
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by deflave
And if I ever witness a bicyclist get hit by a vehicle on 13 or 200 I will only slow down to make sure the motorist's car isn't too badly damaged.
Dave
Jeeze, even if all 400 Montana residents were on that road at one time, seeing a bicyclist on that road shouldn't be an issue. Interestingly enough, the very part of that highway I zoomed in to street view, there were cattle on the road. Yet another reason to never outdrive your line of sight. Are the drivers up there that bad?
Couldn't happen to more deserving people, motorcyclist included. Anybody the rides or drives anything where their butt is higher than their head, deserves a good wreck.
Sam, I called it a highway, not an interstate. Clark mentioned 200 and 13 in one of his posts. I looked at 13 on google and commented that I had seen cattle on it. I didn't mention whether I saw cattle on 13 or 200. He asked which interstate I was referring to and I cleared up what I was referring to by calling it HIGHWAY 13.
I think when Travis asked which interstate I was talking about he was going back to my first response to him after he mentioned Highway 2. I told him what I saw of 2 ( generally straight with a shoulder) looked good with the exception of the passes and that it paralleled an interstate. Further saying most traffic would favor the interstate. I was referring to Interstate 90. 2 parallels 90 where I viewed it.
If you take pleasure in riding a bicycle on Route 2 through the state of Montana, you are an idiot.
Dave
Why is that Clark? It runs parallel to an interstate. I would think all the traffic in a hurry would be on the interstate. I examined a long stretch on google satellite and it was generally straight with wide lanes and a small stretch of shoulder. I would imagine that there are places it goes through mountain passes where the sightlines are limited and the road narrows.
Edit. Yep, I'd avoid those passes. Beautiful road, beautiful scenery, but too tight in some of those blend bends.
Sam, I called it a highway, not an interstate. Clark mentioned 200 and 13 in one of his posts. I looked at 13 on google and commented that I had seen cattle on it. I didn't mention whether I saw cattle on 13 or 200. He asked which interstate I was referring to and I cleared up what I was referring to by calling it HIGHWAY 13.
I think when Travis asked which interstate I was talking about he was going back to my first response to him after he mentioned Highway 2. I told him what I saw of 2 ( generally straight with a shoulder) looked good with the exception of the passes and that it paralleled an interstate. Further saying most traffic would favor the interstate. I was referring to Interstate 90. 2 parallels 90 where I viewed it.
Tell me again why your knickers are in a knot.
I think you've demonstrated why people see most bicyclists as morons.
Sam, I called it a highway, not an interstate. Clark mentioned 200 and 13 in one of his posts. I looked at 13 on google and commented that I had seen cattle on it. I didn't mention whether I saw cattle on 13 or 200. He asked which interstate I was referring to and I cleared up what I was referring to by calling it HIGHWAY 13.
I think when Travis asked which interstate I was talking about he was going back to my first response to him after he mentioned Highway 2. I told him what I saw of 2 ( generally straight with a shoulder) looked good with the exception of the passes and that it paralleled an interstate. Further saying most traffic would favor the interstate. I was referring to Interstate 90. 2 parallels 90 where I viewed it.
Tell me again why your knickers are in a knot.
I think you've demonstrated why people see most bicyclists as morons.
Dave
Because I can't keep your name straight or because I call highways highways and interstates interstates?
A couple years ago my hunting partner and I were hiking up a trail while hunting deer. Idaho doesn't require orange and we weren't wearing it just so we wouldn't be so conspicuous to all the hikers/bikers in the area. A hot shot biker came down the trail past us and the snob SOB said 'why aren't you wearing orange.' I thought too slow but a good response would have been 'why aren't YOU wearing orange?' I was the one with the gun and I wasn't likely to shoot myself. After all, what's the purpose of orange anyway? FWIW, he was wearing a shade of blue that would have looked gray in the right light. He looked much more like a deer than we did.
Most riders have the elitist mentality that they are more virtuous than you! I hug the fog line, wear ear buds and listen to the radio! No helmet - after 63.9 years, what's the difference? Two or more and they drive down county roads side by side 'til someone comes up from behind. I honk my horn and swear at the axxholes - its a violation of state law.
Yep on all counts. If get hit, I figure its ALWAYS gonna be my fault, and ride with that mindset.
The best way to get away with murder is to run over a bicyclist. If the motorist is sober, it's all but guaranteed there won't be any legal action taken at all. I ride defensively and courteously. It's served me well so far.
OTOH don't drive to close to azzholestrong. Aquaintance of a fried evidently was inside the 3 foot rule and sat in jail for some years or such for it.
I'm going to go off topic and rant at joggers around here too. WTF is it all about jogging in the street when there is a sidewalk and even nicely groomed DG paths. Are they bicyclists that got a flat and don't know how to fix it?
Or even folks walking. The black ones around here, some of them just decide they have to be as close to center as they can be, rather than at the curb or on the sidewalk where I would be if I was walking...
Here in Annapolis, capital of all that's PC and yuppie-crap, biking is a really big deal. I don't have an issue with that, per se, but whyinhell do they have to clog the arteries in and out of town at rush hour? The town sits on a narrow peninsula with but a couple of main thoroughfares in and out- what with the roads clogged with asshats shaving/putting on makeup/fixing their hair/yakking on cell phones (illegally)/etc. driving mindlessly and at speed on their way to work, it's a dam wonder more bikeys aren't killed.
I like a good bike ride for the exercise as much as the next guy, but those times I get off my butt and actually do it, I jump on one of the bike trails they converted from railroad lines for that purpose. At least there the only traffic I interfere with is old ladies limping along on the wrong side of the path, and I'm not likely to get plastered by a drunk cell phone talker in a Prius.
I do wear a brain bucket, for the same reason I buckle up in the car. Clothes: any old dammed pair of raggedy-assed shorts that happen to be on top of the pile. Those dweebs that wear the colorful spandex, $100 biking shoes, spiffy aero-helmets while gasping for air on a slight rise make me smile...
An another thing... snowmachines and 4 wheelers make a trail to and from ...state comes along builds a road ...kicking us to the ditch, after a few years they "find funds " to build a bike path ...and boot the snowgo and wheelers off BOTH !aaaa Wholes!!!!
In my area, Charleston SC there is a National Forest. In said National Forest there are a few curvy roads in an otherwise straight road world so to speak..
The leftist cyclers flock to these roads, two wide, four wide etc in big groups, small groups, doubles and singles..
There is no shoulder on these roads and the yellow line is the dirt demarcation zone.
It simply appalls me that someone or some group has so much cushion time on their hands that they feel the need to ride a bike on a dangerous road risking not only my life but theirs.. The only way around them is to pass and to pass is to pass on a blind curve so you are forced to ride behind them or move into the possibility of oncoming traffic..
Physics in the end is getting the best of them as one is smashed into the idiot of soft flesh hambuger that results when a logging truck takes the turn wide... Is it worth it? Spandex must feel incredible or the bike seat up your crotch one..
Personally I think its about as left winged pussy as it comes period, grown adults with nothing better to do than play dress up in pink stockings, eating gel cookies and chest thumping how fast they can go on a bicycle.. Get a MTN bike for Gods sake.. At best a weird group of people that would rather tout health and nature than live the real thing and all the while risking their lives , their childrens future and the lives of others to ride a bike on a paved road no less..
The law in Colorado as I understand it is , If I hit a bicyclist I'm at fault.
There is a "single file law" for the bicyclists to keep them out of traffic but it's not uncommon to roll around a corner in the mountains and have 4 wide, chatting as they mosey along an uphill grade.
If I leave my lane to go around, It's on ME. If I'm travelling at road speed and roll around a corner and hit a rider in the road, It's on ME.
When the traffic light is red, the bikes hit the side walk to keep going and jump back to the street at their convenience, which I'm now obliged to avoid because they are Bikes, It's on Me.
If I grumble too loudly I'll be beaten into submission for not respecting the "rights" of fellow commuters that have no License,Registration,Insurance,and are not responsible for their action, That too is on ME.
Yes, I have a mountain bike and no, I don't ride with cars.
what I hate is how they just blow thru stop signs, think the entire road is for them as a priority since they " 'arent consuming fuel..... being 'green'...."
they all seem to have the same attitudes of arrogance, that they are royalty and the rest of us are all peasants.... just like the average democRAT.....
I'm not against bicycles, its their attitudes I can't stand...
Most riders have the elitist mentality that they are more virtuous than you! I hug the fog line, wear ear buds and listen to the radio! No helmet - after 63.9 years, what's the difference? Two or more and they drive down county roads side by side 'til someone comes up from behind. I honk my horn and swear at the axxholes - its a violation of state law.
Yep on all counts. If get hit, I figure its ALWAYS gonna be my fault, and ride with that mindset.
I ride defensively and courteously. It's served me well so far.
Courteously for you is a pack of cyclists travelling far below traffic speed while tying up a whole lane and presenting a hazard to themselves and others. Almost always this is done for no other purpose other than mere recreation. But hey, other vehicles only had to wait to pass once so that's apparently OK.
Quote
The best way to get away with murder is to run over a bicyclist. If the motorist is sober, it's all but guaranteed there won't be any legal action taken at all.
If a pedestrian or pack thereof were walking anywhere on the road, much less down the middle of a lane, one would be hard-pressed to press charges against anyone who hit them either.
I am 65 and I bike everyday for 12 miles 528 feet of elevation gain, in 45 minutes for a average speed of 16 mph. If those hills were not there it would be 20 mph. I am in a 25 mph or 30 mph zone. Cars pass me on blind corners and blind hills. There is plenty of room for passing me with narrow cars. The trucks pulling trailers that are barely faster than me, that meet another car head on in a hairpin, and then run me into the ditch... those trucks bother me.
Worse are the Ferraris, Lamborghinis, Porsches, BMWs, and Mercedes Benz hot rods that meet me head on as they pass in blind corner.
The absolute worst are cars in a race in 25 mph zone that are sliding sideways using both lanes drifting through a blind hairpin as I am coming the other way leaning into the corner.
Because there are so many fiords on the island where I live, hot motorcycles come from off island to go through all hair pins. They are not very dangerous as they are not very wide.
The law in Colorado as I understand it is , If I hit a bicyclist I'm at fault.
There is a "single file law" for the bicyclists to keep them out of traffic but it's not uncommon to roll around a corner in the mountains and have 4 wide, chatting as they mosey along an uphill grade.
If I leave my lane to go around, It's on ME. If I'm travelling at road speed and roll around a corner and hit a rider in the road, It's on ME.
When the traffic light is red, the bikes hit the side walk to keep going and jump back to the street at their convenience, which I'm now obliged to avoid because they are Bikes, It's on Me.
If I grumble too loudly I'll be beaten into submission for not respecting the "rights" of fellow commuters that have no License,Registration,Insurance,and are not responsible for their action, That too is on ME.
Yes, I have a mountain bike and no, I don't ride with cars.
As it should be. It would be on any motorist if they rounded the bend and hit a mail truck, deliver truck, farm equipment, stalled vehicle, etc.
I am 65 and I bike everyday for 12 miles 528 feet of elevation gain, in 45 minutes for a average speed of 16 mph. If those hills were not there it would be 20 mph. I am in a 25 mph or 30 mph zone. Cars pass me on blind corners and blind hills. There is plenty of room for passing me with narrow cars. The trucks pulling trailers that are barely faster than me, that meet another car head on in a hairpin, and then run me into the ditch... those trucks bother me.
Worse are the Ferraris, Lamborghinis, Porsches, BMWs, and Mercedes Benz hot rods that meet me head on as they pass in blind corner.
The absolute worst are cars in a race in 25 mph zone that are sliding sideways using both lanes drifting through a blind hairpin as I am coming the other way leaning into the corner.
Because there are so many fiords on the island where I live, hot motorcycles come from off island to go through all hair pins. They are not very dangerous as they are not very wide.
I knew what I was getting into when I started this thread Clark. I volunteered to be a punching bag. I hope you have thick skin, they are coming after you!
The law in Colorado as I understand it is , If I hit a bicyclist I'm at fault.
There is a "single file law" for the bicyclists to keep them out of traffic but it's not uncommon to roll around a corner in the mountains and have 4 wide, chatting as they mosey along an uphill grade.
If I leave my lane to go around, It's on ME. If I'm travelling at road speed and roll around a corner and hit a rider in the road, It's on ME.
When the traffic light is red, the bikes hit the side walk to keep going and jump back to the street at their convenience, which I'm now obliged to avoid because they are Bikes, It's on Me.
If I grumble too loudly I'll be beaten into submission for not respecting the "rights" of fellow commuters that have no License,Registration,Insurance,and are not responsible for their action, That too is on ME.
Yes, I have a mountain bike and no, I don't ride with cars.
As it should be. It would be on any motorist if they rounded the bend and hit a mail truck, deliver truck, farm equipment, stalled vehicle, etc.
Although they are in violation of the single file law, I'm still the responsible party with no recourse, and bicyclists wonder why car and truck traffic have no respect/patience for bikes...
I live in a rural area and am used to tractors, combines, mowers and all sorts of machinery so I've gotten to where I'm not bothered by it. It's a slower pace and figure that it would be some beautiful area to bike ride if you're under 16 years old or gay. 😉 I give the bicyclists a wide berth and usually a 5 fingered wave. It's the urban areas where I have to keep my head on a swivel with all the 2 wheeled hornets in spandex buzzing around. I'm far less patient with all the stupidity from everyone, not just bicyclists, in suburbia.
Here they gather in a parking near my house before setting out. If you're at the light to make a right, they all pull up next to you in stead of behind you. So I roll down the window, "hey, if your next to me when I turn right, it's really going to hurt".
Most riders have the elitist mentality that they are more virtuous than you! I hug the fog line, wear ear buds and listen to the radio! No helmet - after 63.9 years, what's the difference? Two or more and they drive down county roads side by side 'til someone comes up from behind. I honk my horn and swear at the axxholes - its a violation of state law.
Yep on all counts. If get hit, I figure its ALWAYS gonna be my fault, and ride with that mindset.
I ride defensively and courteously. It's served me well so far.
Courteously for you is a pack of cyclists travelling far below traffic speed while tying up a whole lane and presenting a hazard to themselves and others. Almost always this is done for no other purpose other than mere recreation. But hey, other vehicles only had to wait to pass once so that's apparently OK.
Quote
The best way to get away with murder is to run over a bicyclist. If the motorist is sober, it's all but guaranteed there won't be any legal action taken at all.
If a pedestrian or pack thereof were walking anywhere on the road, much less down the middle of a lane, one would be hard-pressed to press charges against anyone who hit them either.
Whats the difference?
Birdwatcher
I don't ride in packs taking up the whole lane.
What the hell difference does it make if my reason for being on the road is recreation or fitness. Are you suggesting people on the road for recreational pursuits shouldn't be there? Does that mean the guy slowly trailering his horses to the national forest to ride doesn't belong on the road?
I have encountered packs of people walking down the road before. It wasn't difficult at all avoiding them. Some of them were purposefully discourteous. I let that be their problem, not mine.
Here they gather in a parking near my house before setting out. If you're at the light to make a right, they all pull up next to you in stead of behind you. So I roll down the window, "hey, if your next to me when I turn right, it's really going to hurt".
I turn right they stay put. Good times.
I never filter to the right at stops or lights. I proceed through the intersection with traffic, then duck out of the way as soon as I possibly can.
I went into a Chevrolet dealership today intent on buying a new 2500HD High Country Diesel I'd found in their online inventory. 30 minutes later, I was so infuriated by the cork soaker sales staff that, when I walked out, I contemplated finding the nearest bike shop.
The law in Colorado as I understand it is , If I hit a bicyclist I'm at fault.
There is a "single file law" for the bicyclists to keep them out of traffic but it's not uncommon to roll around a corner in the mountains and have 4 wide, chatting as they mosey along an uphill grade.
If I leave my lane to go around, It's on ME. If I'm travelling at road speed and roll around a corner and hit a rider in the road, It's on ME.
When the traffic light is red, the bikes hit the side walk to keep going and jump back to the street at their convenience, which I'm now obliged to avoid because they are Bikes, It's on Me.
If I grumble too loudly I'll be beaten into submission for not respecting the "rights" of fellow commuters that have no License,Registration,Insurance,and are not responsible for their action, That too is on ME.
Yes, I have a mountain bike and no, I don't ride with cars.
As it should be. It would be on any motorist if they rounded the bend and hit a mail truck, deliver truck, farm equipment, stalled vehicle, etc.
Although they are in violation of the single file law, I'm still the responsible party with no recourse, and bicyclists wonder why car and truck traffic have no respect/patience for bikes...
I was on driving on 550 in Colorado with my wife. We were on one of the downhill sections when we saw two bikes side by side ahead. My wife asked why are they blocking the road. I told her they weren't. Even if they were in single file, to pass them at a safe distance I would have to enter the oncoming lane. I couldn't do that until I had adequate distance with no vehicles approaching. I spend less time in the oncoming lane if they are side by side rather than end to end.
Somewhere earlier you mentioned it was fun to ride with a groups. You ride in groups that DON'T take up the whole lane??
Later you stated how two cyclists riding side by side was "safer" for the motorist.
Quote
What the hell difference does it make if my reason for being on the road is recreation or fitness.
Fitness in this context IS recreation.
Any motorized vehicle (or horse drawn in the case of the Amish) moving that slow on a legal highway or roadway would be properly required by law to be marked with a large reflective warning triangle.
Furthermore, the general public obstructed by such traffic understands that those guys in said vehicles are not out there merely to get their jollies, they are there because they need to be.
Quote
Are you suggesting people on the road for recreational pursuits shouldn't be there?
Are you suggesting it should be legal for folks to walk down the road for recreation and fitness in a manner that obstructs passing traffic? Whats the difference?
Quote
Does that mean the guy slowly trailering his horses to the national forest to ride doesn't belong on the road?
What? Horse trailers always roll down the highway at 10 to 20 miles per hour, slower on the uphills?
You are merely trolling here. You started this thread for attention; a verbal form of putting yourself out there on the road in colorful spandex. But no worries, after your demise its in your will that somebody gets sued or whatever.
Had a ball.......was in the best physical shape of my life...
Ride 30 miles on a single track trail at 9000'...
Beer was cold back at the truck.....lots of hot babes too...
I prefer mountain biking, but there is literally no place to do it in this area. It was about 26 years ago that my bud Lew White got me into mountain bike racing. That was a lot of knee and shoulder surgeries ago. I still enjoy it, but can't ride hard.
You are merely trolling here. You started this thread for attention; a verbal form of putting yourself out there on the road in colorful spandex. But no worries, after your demise its in your will that somebody gets sued or whatever.
I certainly haven't gone back through these 29 pages, but If I were to take a tally, I do believe that Hillary would poll higher with this group than PB.....
So bicyclists are arrogant, elitists, self absorbing, road hogs, stop sign runners, royalty, dangerous, and on and on. Duly noted. No chance any motorist would ever go over the posted speed limit, tailgate, roll a stop sign, cut a corner in the opposing lane, not use a turn signal, ride without a seatbelt, text, phone, blast the the radio, drive drunk, pass in a no passing zone or cut someone off. EVER.
I have been biking the white line on a straight road then get passed and cut off by motorist with the horn blaring. Nearly ran me off the road intentionally. No other traffic, no hill, no curb, no reason to do that other than to be an azzzzhuel. Bubba didn't realize that in addition to being arrogant, self absorbing elitists, bicyclists can read a license plate number.
Somewhere earlier you mentioned it was fun to ride with a groups. You ride in groups that DON'T take up the whole lane??
Later you stated how two cyclists riding side by side was "safer" for the motorist.
Quote
What the hell difference does it make if my reason for being on the road is recreation or fitness.
Fitness in this context IS recreation.
Any motorized vehicle (or horse drawn in the case of the Amish) moving that slow on a legal highway or roadway would be properly required by law to be marked with a large reflective warning triangle.
Furthermore, the general public obstructed by such traffic understands that those guys in said vehicles are not out there merely to get their jollies, they are there because they need to be.
Quote
Are you suggesting people on the road for recreational pursuits shouldn't be there?
Are you suggesting it should be legal for folks to walk down the road for recreation and fitness in a manner that obstructs passing traffic? Whats the difference?
Quote
Does that mean the guy slowly trailering his horses to the national forest to ride doesn't belong on the road?
What? Horse trailers always roll down the highway at 10 to 20 miles per hour, slower on the uphills?
You are merely trolling here. You started this thread for attention; a verbal form of putting yourself out there on the road in colorful spandex. But no worries, after your demise its in your will that somebody gets sued or whatever.
Birdwatcher
I ride in groups. I mentioned that I won't ride with road hogging groups. I will only ride with groups that treat motorists respectfully.
I am pretty sure I didn't say two bicyclists riding side by side was safer for the motorist. It does take less time to pass them if they are side by side rather than end to end.
I don't ride down the middle of the road and obstruct traffic. When someone comes up behind me I make room for them as quickly as I reasonably can.
I didn't say that horse trailers ALWAYS go well below the speed limit. I have been caught behind them in Colorado for several miles, going well below the speed limit. It's much easier to pass a slow moving bicyclist than a slow moving horse trailer or trailer boat as the case may be.
I rode Independence Pass from Twin Lakes to Aspen several years ago. I didn't hold up a single motorist for more than a few seconds. On the downhill into Aspen I was held up for long stretches by cars. I passed a few, but not one made an effort to move over for me. I didn't get worked up about it.
I mentioned earlier that I knew full well coming into this thread what would happen. I offer that every single thread started on the internet is for attention. Attention in the form of conversation. Would you start threads if you knew nobody would respond?
I do have an accidental death rider on my life insurance policy. I have told my wife that if someone was negligent in killing me she should use the extra money on the accidental death insurance to sue the. Ultimately that is up to her. Why is that a problem? I don't want to be sued for what little I have, so I don't drive negligently. I am having a hard time seeing how that's a point of contention at all.
You are merely trolling here. You started this thread for attention; a verbal form of putting yourself out there on the road in colorful spandex. But no worries, after your demise its in your will that somebody gets sued or whatever.
Birdwatcher
Exactly.
You are at liberty not to crash the spread you know?
And when it's right before sundown and bunch of bicyclists are riding the white line on a highway with a mile of people just trying to get home(or to wherever) backed up behind them that's okay?
Talk about creating a problem.
Call me bubba all you want but people trying to get chit done shouldn't be held up by a bunch of FUUCKING idiots trying to get some exercise.
So bicyclists are arrogant, elitists, self absorbing, road hogs, stop sign runners, royalty, dangerous, and on and on. Duly noted. No chance any motorist would ever go over the posted speed limit, tailgate, roll a stop sign, cut a corner in the opposing lane, not use a turn signal, ride without a seatbelt, text, phone, blast the the radio, drive drunk, pass in a no passing zone or cut someone off. EVER.
I have been biking the white line on a straight road then get passed and cut off by motorist with the horn blaring. Nearly ran me off the road intentionally. No other traffic, no hill, no curb, no reason to do that other than to be an azzzzhuel. Bubba didn't realize that in addition to being arrogant, self absorbing elitists, bicyclists can read a license plate number.
Are you suggesting that the very people bitching about bicyclists breaking the law might break the law too. That's troll talk 'round these parts. More and more bicyclists are riding with video cameras these days.
And when it's right before sundown and bunch of bicyclists are riding the white line on a highway with a mile of people just trying to get home(or to wherever) backed up behind them.
Call me bubba all you want but people trying to get chit done shouldn't be held up by a bunch of FUUCKING idiots trying to get some exercise.
Ride your bike down the damn railroad tracks.
I am struggling to visualize a one mile bicycle induced traffic jam in Montana.
And when it's right before sundown and bunch of bicyclists are riding the white line on a highway with a mile of people just trying to get home(or to wherever) backed up behind them.
Call me bubba all you want but people trying to get chit done shouldn't be held up by a bunch of FUUCKING idiots trying to get some exercise.
Ride your bike down the damn railroad tracks.
I am struggling to visualize a one mile bicycle induced traffic jam in Montana.
Not surprised.
Highway 2 is a peaceful little two lane.....
Maybe there is a reason why we try to move large farm equipment at 4-5 AM rather than 5 PM on a Friday afternoon.
The herds of ass phags peddling through during harvest must especially stupid.
And when it's right before sundown and bunch of bicyclists are riding the white line on a highway with a mile of people just trying to get home(or to wherever) backed up behind them.
Call me bubba all you want but people trying to get chit done shouldn't be held up by a bunch of FUUCKING idiots trying to get some exercise.
Ride your bike down the damn railroad tracks.
I am struggling to visualize a one mile bicycle induced traffic jam in Montana.
Not surprised.
Highway 2 is a peaceful little two lane.....
Maybe there is a reason why we try to move large farm equipment at 4-5 AM rather than 5 PM on a Friday afternoon.
The herds of ass phags peddling through during harvest must especially stupid.
I am sorry that their actions are so hurtful to you. Rest assured, I don't hold folks up for more than a few seconds.
And when it's right before sundown and bunch of bicyclists are riding the white line on a highway with a mile of people just trying to get home(or to wherever) backed up behind them.
Call me bubba all you want but people trying to get chit done shouldn't be held up by a bunch of FUUCKING idiots trying to get some exercise.
Ride your bike down the damn railroad tracks.
I am struggling to visualize a one mile bicycle induced traffic jam in Montana.
But I have seen a cattle drive on MT state highway 278 (70 mph posted speed limit) that covered both lanes plus 50 feet on either side. Traffic had to come to a complete stop 300 head of cattle strolled around the stopped cars. Anybody bitchin about that?
I have been biking the white line on a straight road then get passed and cut off by motorist with the horn blaring.
The one thing that pizzes me off about bicyclists, more than anything else, is they will "ride the line" - even with a complete lane on the right ("parking lane")
And when it's right before sundown and bunch of bicyclists are riding the white line on a highway with a mile of people just trying to get home(or to wherever) backed up behind them.
Call me bubba all you want but people trying to get chit done shouldn't be held up by a bunch of FUUCKING idiots trying to get some exercise.
Ride your bike down the damn railroad tracks.
I am struggling to visualize a one mile bicycle induced traffic jam in Montana.
But I have seen a cattle drive on MT state highway 278 (70 mph posted speed limit) that covered both lanes plus 50 feet on either side. Traffic had to come to a complete stop 300 head of cattle strolled around the stopped cars. Anybody bitchin about that?
[bleep] around on the highway is one thing, thinking you belong there is another.
I hate cows, unless I am eating it. Then I love them.
I have been biking the white line on a straight road then get passed and cut off by motorist with the horn blaring.
The one thing that pizzes me off about bicyclists, more than anything else, is they will "ride the line" - even with a complete lane on the right ("parking lane")
Trust me. There was only gravel, grass and a ditch to my right.
[/quote]But I have seen a cattle drive on MT state highway 278 (70 mph posted speed limit) that covered both lanes plus 50 feet on either side. Traffic had to come to a complete stop 300 head of cattle strolled around the stopped cars. Anybody bitchin about that? [/quote]
The only time we put cattle on the highway (intentionally) is when there is no other practical way to get "there" from "here"
[/quote]But I have seen a cattle drive on MT state highway 278 (70 mph posted speed limit) that covered both lanes plus 50 feet on either side. Traffic had to come to a complete stop 300 head of cattle strolled around the stopped cars. Anybody bitchin about that?
The only time we put cattle on the highway (intentionally) is when there is no other practical way to get "there" from "here" [/quote]
Not doubting that is the best way to run the cattle drive. Actually I believe cattle drives on the highway is somehow covered under the rules of free ranging. Just like biking is permitted by state law subject to the rules of the road.
I don't mind cyclists as long as they do what I've always done when biking.... don't pretend you're the equal of a 2-ton vehicle. (Oh, and when the signs say "Bicycles use sidewalk", I resent the idiots who drive down one of the two narrow, curbed lanes of the in-town roads.)
Don't mind bike riders at all, except when they ride six abreast on a 22' wide blacktop that runs thru hilly country, run stop crossings without paying attention to what's coming the other way and showing up a functions wearing their smelly azz riding gear. Ragbrai comes thru my part of Iowa every few years and some azzwipes show up everywhere thinking their cool smelling up the place, restaurants, bars, stores ect. Know one around here would walk into the same places covered in pig or cow [bleep], but some riders always do
Used to try to creep up on bicycle people and roll the power window down and my buddy would stick his asscheeks out the window till it almost touched the side of their head.
Was so much fun, we did it to an out county constable too lmao.
Paul, You asked why so many Americans don't like bikes on the road. Dozens of folks have told you why.
Then you keep trying to tell these people that they haven't experienced the incidents that they have described to you.
I think you got plenty of answers to your question. Why don't you make it your mission to get the thousands of inconsiderate, self-centered bike riders to follow your rules of good riding manners? You obviously have all the answers and you can make the world a better place.
One of the problems many people mentioned was the bike riders' sense of arrogance. You yourself may have the best riding manners in the world, as you keep claiming to us, however you also seem to suffer from that common bike-rider malady: extreme arrogance.
You, yourself admit that riding in traffic is dangerous and an easy way to get killed. So dangerous, in fact, that you have added accidental death coverage to your life insurance and instructed your wife to sue if you are killed by an errant motorist.
Then when many Campfire members tell you that we don't like bikes on the road because we consider it too dangerous for them and us, you try to argue that it isn't.
Common sense says that if bikes on the road were not a problem then there wouldn't be very many complaints. Since there are so many complaints, common sense says that bikes on the roads must be a problem. Denying it doesn't change a thing.
I love to ride a bicycle. Seven years ago I broke my leg and almost got it amputated, had to have emergency surgery. Was on crutches for 11 weeks. Doc told me to get with the physical therapy, most especially riding bicycles.
Well I live way out in the woods in the NC mountains. I got my mountain bike geared up and went out and rode for 5 minutes the first day. That was painful but got through it. After a week was riding for a half hour. Felt better every day.
In two months I was riding for 2 hours a day. I can tell you the mountain people of North Carolina have no use for a grown man riding a bicycle. They whiz by you, their mirror missing you by 8 inches. Some yell stuff at you. I do not wear that gay Tour de France outfit, I wear a white t shirt. No gay French helmet for me, I wear a baseball hat, to which I clip my little rear view mirror. This way I can see which vehicle is coming up upon me from behind. No fancy bicycle shoes, just wear tennis shoes.
Definitely a hostile reception from the local NC inhabitants.
Now, I am 6-3 and 225, nobody stopped their car and invited me to a fistfight, I would have gladly joined in on that, and probalby won, but they sure enjoy messing with you while they buzz by at 50 mph.
One point that is constantly brought up is a cyclist legal right to the road.
Caitlyn Jenner has a legal right to use whatever pisser he likes, but start waving your pecker around the ladies room and your gonna get chit on.
Go in, be considerate, take care of your business and leave, chances are no one will bother it/him whatever.
Why the simple concept of being considerate when you are obviously somewhere you don't belong, even when you have a legal right to be there, escapes so many is puzzling.
Was so much fun, we did it to an out county constable too lmao.
True story. More'n a few Cops around here are also bicycle guys. About five of 'em would get off of their late shifts and then ride a ten mile, early hours of the am loop around downtown before going home to sleep.
One night two ex-con type in a passing vehicle cut 'em off and threw a soda, causing one of the Cops to wreck. Shouted insults were exchanged. The car stops, backs up, and the passenger gets out, flashes gang signs, and asks if any of them bicycle pu$$ies wanted a piece of him.
It occurs to me from my participation in a number of different forums that Americans love to express their rage for bicyclists on the road. I am a bicyclist. It's one of my many passions. So give me your best shot. In the end we may all learn something.
17 page thread.... I'm curious. Not sure if I'm THAT curious.
Paul, I'm a cyclist too. It has transformed my life in the last several years and pulled my ass out of a very dark place. I'm typing this from a high altitude deer camp and I won't be huffing and puffing tomorrow because cycling (climbing) has me in very good aerobic shape.
Are the clothes goofy as hell? Yep. Can bikes be annoying? Yep. Do I love cycling? Yep.
Climbing is my thing. My ideal ride is around 30 miles with lots of long steep climbs and ripping downhills. Love the aerobic rush of having a maxed out heart rate. Love going 40 mph on a featherweight carbon fiber frame and tires an inch wide.
I can see where people get aggravated by a peloton of 20 bicyclists, hogging the road and running stop lights etc.
But, I was riding by myself on lonely country roads, not impeding any traffic. In fact, if I was coming up on a curve, and saw in my rear view mirror that a car would have to slow down to pass me, I would just pull over on the shoulder and let the car pass. I am a polite bike rider.
Nonetheless the mountain inhabitants disliked me.
One day I saw four people out in the yard. They had a big dog with them. As I rode by, Fido ran out and ran up towards me. I saw that he was going to bite my ankle! This goes way back to the wolf days, the wolf bites than ankle of the elk and cuts the achilles tendon, the elk cannot run, and the wolves kill it. This mutt was trying to cut my achilles tendon. Hell I already had a broken leg I didn't need a severed achilles tendon. At the last second, I put my foot out and the damn dog bit my tennis shoe. He got a mouth full of rubber, and he backed off, and I rode on down the road.
A few days later I was riding past the same spot and those people were standing near the mailbox. The dog was not there. I stopped and told them that their dog had almost injured me badly. These people told me that they were upset with me. They saw how their dog had bitten my shoe, and were concerned that my shoe could have injured their dog's teeth! All the while they looked at me with a look of contempt.
No, the NC hillbillies have no use for a grown man riding a bicycle.
I ride rural roads primarily. Light traffic. I try to be considerate. Sometimes there's just no way around it, a car has to slow down for a second. The horror! I mean the poor driver had to move their right toe over a couple inches and press a pedal, then move it back! It's a lot to ask.
I don't know if this has been said so I will. It seems like drivers often assume that bikes should be on the shoulder. In Oregon at least, the cyclist has discretion to do what they think is safest; and I'm here to tell y'all that hugging the far edge of the road is often not safest at ALL. For multiple reasons. First, shoulders aren't bike lanes; they can suddenly vanish, have mailboxes sticking into them, debris, dead animals, potholes, etc. One of the most dangerous things a cyclist can do is swerve into the lane, yet, if you ride a shoulder you will be forced to do so with frequency. Not good. Motorists assume that the cyclist is gonna stay over there and don't give enough room. Second, if you are on the shoulder cars will attempt the dreaded "squeeze pass"; it's much better to force cars to respect you as a vehicle and pass accordingly when it's safe to do so. I'm not saying get out in the middle of the lane. I like to ride about a foot from the fog line, that gives me some buffer to my right if I need it, and makes cars pass safely. Better for everybody.
Dogs are a bummer. I've pepper sprayed a half dozen of them. I've considered McGyver'ing a holster in my frame triangle for a Glock, too.
Pages and pages dedicated to a pathetic minority that feels entitled to something they have no right. Highways were made for automobiles and paid for with related taxes. Along comes some self appointed bicyclist and demands room and respect.
Bicyclists are all over the place with an industry that has made a fortune off their stupidity. When we were kids, we rode bikes to get somewhere and didn't need plastic brain pans and spandex to ride the bike. When we rode our bikes, we steered clear of cars and understood the hazards of automobiles. Our town is full of bicycle trails paid for by taxes of city residents and less than 1% of the population even use them.
Now, just like gays, transgenders, and countless other super minoritys, bicyclists make such a outcry for consideration they don't deserve. They peddle their asses all over the place expecting special treatment, when they don't get it, all of a sudden we have an intolerant society.
I have been biking the white line on a straight road then get passed and cut off by motorist with the horn blaring.
The one thing that pizzes me off about bicyclists, more than anything else, is they will "ride the line" - even with a complete lane on the right ("parking lane")
I don't like to see that Mark. Let me ask you this though. Is that bicycle lane completely within the swing radius of parked cars doors? Riding in that "door zone" is extremely dangerous.
But I have seen a cattle drive on MT state highway 278 (70 mph posted speed limit) that covered both lanes plus 50 feet on either side. Traffic had to come to a complete stop 300 head of cattle strolled around the stopped cars. Anybody bitchin about that?
The only time we put cattle on the highway (intentionally) is when there is no other practical way to get "there" from "here" [/quote]
Not doubting that is the best way to run the cattle drive. Actually I believe cattle drives on the highway is somehow covered under the rules of free ranging. Just like biking is permitted by state law subject to the rules of the road. [/quote]
I enjoy watching a good cattle drive. Especially if dogs are being used.
Used to try to creep up on bicycle people and roll the power window down and my buddy would stick his asscheeks out the window till it almost touched the side of their head.
Was so much fun, we did it to an out county constable too lmao.
Paul, You asked why so many Americans don't like bikes on the road. Dozens of folks have told you why.
Then you keep trying to tell these people that they haven't experienced the incidents that they have described to you.
I think you got plenty of answers to your question. Why don't you make it your mission to get the thousands of inconsiderate, self-centered bike riders to follow your rules of good riding manners? You obviously have all the answers and you can make the world a better place.
One of the problems many people mentioned was the bike riders' sense of arrogance. You yourself may have the best riding manners in the world, as you keep claiming to us, however you also seem to suffer from that common bike-rider malady: extreme arrogance.
You, yourself admit that riding in traffic is dangerous and an easy way to get killed. So dangerous, in fact, that you have added accidental death coverage to your life insurance and instructed your wife to sue if you are killed by an errant motorist.
Then when many Campfire members tell you that we don't like bikes on the road because we consider it too dangerous for them and us, you try to argue that it isn't.
Common sense says that if bikes on the road were not a problem then there wouldn't be very many complaints. Since there are so many complaints, common sense says that bikes on the roads must be a problem. Denying it doesn't change a thing.
Bicyclists on the roads don't present a danger at all to an alert motorist. As a bicyclist I use risk mitigation strategies that make bicycling about as safe as driving. I ride with respect to my own vulnerability and with respect to other road users.
Most of the complaints motorists have, based on my experience, are just so much idle whining. I have been driving about 50,000 miles a year for the past decade. From coast to coast on all manner of roadway. On my average commute to work I am held up more by discourteous motorists than I have been by all bicyclists combined over the whole of my life. Most honest people will tell you they have been held up by the actions of one stupid motorist in a single incident more than they have by all bicyclists over the whole of their lives. That's perspective for you.
It's a new world folks. Bicycles are here to stay. Get used to it.
I love to ride a bicycle. Seven years ago I broke my leg and almost got it amputated, had to have emergency surgery. Was on crutches for 11 weeks. Doc told me to get with the physical therapy, most especially riding bicycles.
Well I live way out in the woods in the NC mountains. I got my mountain bike geared up and went out and rode for 5 minutes the first day. That was painful but got through it. After a week was riding for a half hour. Felt better every day.
In two months I was riding for 2 hours a day. I can tell you the mountain people of North Carolina have no use for a grown man riding a bicycle. They whiz by you, their mirror missing you by 8 inches. Some yell stuff at you. I do not wear that gay Tour de France outfit, I wear a white t shirt. No gay French helmet for me, I wear a baseball hat, to which I clip my little rear view mirror. This way I can see which vehicle is coming up upon me from behind. No fancy bicycle shoes, just wear tennis shoes.
Definitely a hostile reception from the local NC inhabitants.
Now, I am 6-3 and 225, nobody stopped their car and invited me to a fistfight, I would have gladly joined in on that, and probalby won, but they sure enjoy messing with you while they buzz by at 50 mph.
I am 5'11" 170. I have invited a few rude jackholes back to talk. Only one took me up on it, and he ended up apologizing. Most those folks that do that crap are bullies and cowards. Interestingly, 80% of the time a motorist does something especially dumb dangerous or discourteous to me, it's an out of shape middle aged white male. That's what I would bet my life most of the spittle launching blowhards look like. I live in an area that has as many blacks as whites. I have never had a black treat me rudely. NOT ONCE.
One point that is constantly brought up is a cyclist legal right to the road.
Caitlyn Jenner has a legal right to use whatever pisser he likes, but start waving your pecker around the ladies room and your gonna get chit on.
Go in, be considerate, take care of your business and leave, chances are no one will bother it/him whatever.
Why the simple concept of being considerate when you are obviously somewhere you don't belong, even when you have a legal right to be there, escapes so many is puzzling.
It occurs to me from my participation in a number of different forums that Americans love to express their rage for bicyclists on the road. I am a bicyclist. It's one of my many passions. So give me your best shot. In the end we may all learn something.
17 page thread.... I'm curious. Not sure if I'm THAT curious.
Paul, I'm a cyclist too. It has transformed my life in the last several years and pulled my ass out of a very dark place. I'm typing this from a high altitude deer camp and I won't be huffing and puffing tomorrow because cycling (climbing) has me in very good aerobic shape.
Are the clothes goofy as hell? Yep. Can bikes be annoying? Yep. Do I love cycling? Yep.
Climbing is my thing. My ideal ride is around 30 miles with lots of long steep climbs and ripping downhills. Love the aerobic rush of having a maxed out heart rate. Love going 40 mph on a featherweight carbon fiber frame and tires an inch wide.
I live at sea level. I love getting to the mountains to ride and do it at least once a year. Talk about a tough transition. Here's my best climb to date.
I can see where people get aggravated by a peloton of 20 bicyclists, hogging the road and running stop lights etc.
But, I was riding by myself on lonely country roads, not impeding any traffic. In fact, if I was coming up on a curve, and saw in my rear view mirror that a car would have to slow down to pass me, I would just pull over on the shoulder and let the car pass. I am a polite bike rider.
Nonetheless the mountain inhabitants disliked me.
One day I saw four people out in the yard. They had a big dog with them. As I rode by, Fido ran out and ran up towards me. I saw that he was going to bite my ankle! This goes way back to the wolf days, the wolf bites than ankle of the elk and cuts the achilles tendon, the elk cannot run, and the wolves kill it. This mutt was trying to cut my achilles tendon. Hell I already had a broken leg I didn't need a severed achilles tendon. At the last second, I put my foot out and the damn dog bit my tennis shoe. He got a mouth full of rubber, and he backed off, and I rode on down the road.
A few days later I was riding past the same spot and those people were standing near the mailbox. The dog was not there. I stopped and told them that their dog had almost injured me badly. These people told me that they were upset with me. They saw how their dog had bitten my shoe, and were concerned that my shoe could have injured their dog's teeth! All the while they looked at me with a look of contempt.
No, the NC hillbillies have no use for a grown man riding a bicycle.
I passed by a trailer where there were a few people in the front yard. Four pit bulls came tearing after me. I had the jump on them so I just rode off. A Sheriffs deputy just happened to be behind me. I let him catch up with me down the road. I told him that if I ever got attacked I was going to deal with it, pointing to my seat bag. He smiled and said "do what you have to do to deal with the threat."
For the most part I do. Sometimes I end up on a highway that's less than ideal for bicycles. When I do, I do my best to protect myself and to not inconvenience motorists. This is the kind of highway I enjoy riding. Low traffic with a good shoulder.
I wish all bicyclists would stay that far right of the fog line. Many won't even move over when there is oncoming traffic, and some can't hear you coming up from behind because of their earbuds. Seems the music is more important to some than their lives!
If the next cyclist I encounter is as couteous as you all is good.
If the next is an AZZhat, that is what he is.
No different than shooters, hunters, drivers and shoppers!
I didn't expect it to change anything. How many minds or attitudes to you think ever get changed in these campfire threads? I have been in these bicycle on the road discussions on a variety of boards. I hear the same complaints. Some valid, and some not so much. Here are some of the common complaints. And the basic response.
You don't pay road taxes. Yes I do. Ad valorem taxes build local roads. Gas taxes don't cover all the expense of state and federal roads, so my income taxes go to that.
You wear spandex. Well, mine is Lycra to be exact, and why do you care what I wear? When you go to the grocery store, do you check out all the men's apparel?
You break the law. So what, you do to. The difference is when I do it, it doesn't endanger you, and sometimes it helps me get out of your way more quickly.
You are in my way. Maybe for a brief moment. In reality though, stupid and inconsiderate motorists hold you up more than bicyclists do.
There's more. I may touch on them later.
I am about to go look at 19 acres of recreational land that's for sale. It has about 8-9 acres of stocked ponds and adjoins government and paper company land.
I always loved bicycles. From the time I was 10 yrs old I would tie my 22 rifle to the handlebars and ride for miles hunting rabbits, tin cans, etc. Great times. Then I moved to Durango, CO. Now I despise those arrogant worthless, spandex clothed, road hogs. I could say much more, but I just repeat whats already been said.
It occurs to me from my participation in a number of different forums that Americans love to express their rage for bicyclists on the road. I am a bicyclist. It's one of my many passions. So give me your best shot. In the end we may all learn something.
Paul,
If you love it, good for you. Some of your colleagues are brain dead and around here a few have left this world as road kill. My wife is a Triathlete. She doesn't train on public roads. Here it is hilly, too many blind curves, and traffic goes from light at midday to bumper to bumper at Rushhour.
Speaking of Rush hour around here in Suburbia, Every Tuesday we have a group of 20-30 that insist on riding as people make there way home. They ride on hilly roads with double yellow "do not pass' the whole way. They string cars back 3/4 of a mile or more. Going up hill, this peloton will slow to 10 mph as these recreation cyclists huff and puff.
They tell me they have the same right to the road as cars. I disagree. I use my car for transportation, they are cycling for recreation. I can't play golf down the middle of a road.
Further along with that thought is cyclists must follow the same rules as motorists. Yeah, right!!! They blow through stop signs, pass on the right, weave in and out of stopped traffic, etc.
You want to ride in flat assed rural Iowa, go for it. Tell your Bernie Sanders Urban and Suburban buddies to GTFO the roads during the week. There. I said it!
I've learned a lot from this thread and decided that I'm going to make an effort to be more courteous to bicyclists with whom I share our roadways.
From here on out I'm going to switch to drinking beer from cans instead of bottles, even though I prefer bottles. That way it won't hurt so much when I toss my empties at them when I go by.
I feel the weight of the world lifted off my shoulders! I feel enlightened and empowered at the same time. I may go vote for Hillary to celebrate my newfound inclusiveness! Ok, maybe not Hillary, but at the least I might think of voting for the pot smoking dude.
If we hypothetically agree that YOU are not the problem, and that YOU are never the problem, will you admit that a considerable number of other bicyclists ARE a problem?
Can you possibly see that we are not all just making up these stories to torment you?
Just yesterday I saw an adult male run a red-light and almost get hit.It was due to inattention on his part apparently and it was a very close call. The alert driver slammed on his brakes and stopped inches from the startled biker.
The alert drivers in the two following vehicles also had to slam on their brakes and barely avoided rear-ending each other.
Even I got a jolt of adrenaline just seeing the incident up close, as I was first in line waiting at the cross-street for my light to turn green.
Fortunately the only result was a few black tire marks left in the intersection.
Paul, are you going to suggest that I didn't see what I saw? Or even suggest that this is the first time I have ever seen such a thing happen?
Bicycles on bike paths or good bike lanes, or well off on wide shoulders, as in your picture, are not a problem, usually.
Bikes carelessly or arrogantly mixing with automobile and truck traffic definitely are a problem. Why can't you understand that?
You absolutely have to see some of the same stuff we see. Do you wave down those bikers and counsel them?
That would be much more productive than trying to tell us that we don't know what we are talking about.
The law is what it is, Nifty. In Oregon a bike is a vehicle; further, you are required to give enough room when passing that if they crashed you'd still miss them (that's a relatively recent law).
Car drivers are in no physical danger from cyclists. Cyclists are in mortal danger from cars 24/7/365. Virtually all of the anti-bike angst expressed here and elsewhere has to do with "feelers" and the psychology of driving a car. Look that up. People's personalities change.
I ride rural roads and do my best to play fair. Nonetheless I've annoyed a few drivers. Funny, they never stop, even when I give them the bird right back with gusto. Any of you ever want to have a heart to heart with a cyclist, look me up. I'm the big guy in bright yellow west of Eugene. Given that most drivers are lardasses and I've got a pretty good pump on when riding, I'd be quite happy to have that little talk.
If we hypothetically agree that YOU are not the problem, and that YOU are never the problem, will you admit that a considerable number of other bicyclists ARE a problem?
Can you possibly see that we are not all just making up these stories to torment you?
Just yesterday I saw an adult male run a red-light and almost get hit.It was due to inattention on his part apparently and it was a very close call. The alert driver slammed on his brakes and stopped inches from the startled biker.
The alert drivers in the two following vehicles also had to slam on their brakes and barely avoided rear-ending each other.
Even I got a jolt of adrenaline just seeing the incident up close, as I was first in line waiting at the cross-street for my light to turn green.
Fortunately the only result was a few black tire marks left in the intersection.
Paul, are you going to suggest that I didn't see what I saw? Or even suggest that this is the first time I have ever seen such a thing happen?
Bicycles on bike paths or good bike lanes, or well off on wide shoulders, as in your picture, are not a problem, usually.
Bikes carelessly or arrogantly mixing with automobile and truck traffic definitely are a problem. Why can't you understand that?
You absolutely have to see some of the same stuff we see. Do you wave down those bikers and counsel them?
That would be much more productive than trying to tell us that we don't know what we are talking about.
I think it goes both ways, as in the video of the retard smoking out the cyclist above.
For every cyclist you see doing something stupid, I guarantee that a rider like Paul has seen an order of magnitude more from douchebag motorists.
I've certainly been on both sides. Being hit by drink bottles, cut off, swerved at, as a cyclist and riding in a car when my buddy driving tossed a full chew spitter out the window and hit a cyclist.
I'd of taken a shot at the prick if it was me on the bike.Lol.
It occurs to me from my participation in a number of different forums that Americans love to express their rage for bicyclists on the road. I am a bicyclist. It's one of my many passions. So give me your best shot. In the end we may all learn something.
"Let Me Have It. I Am a Bicyclist"
I have nothing to say, your life sucks enough as it is.
If we hypothetically agree that YOU are not the problem, and that YOU are never the problem, will you admit that a considerable number of other bicyclists ARE a problem?
Can you possibly see that we are not all just making up these stories to torment you?
Just yesterday I saw an adult male run a red-light and almost get hit.It was due to inattention on his part apparently and it was a very close call. The alert driver slammed on his brakes and stopped inches from the startled biker.
The alert drivers in the two following vehicles also had to slam on their brakes and barely avoided rear-ending each other.
Even I got a jolt of adrenaline just seeing the incident up close, as I was first in line waiting at the cross-street for my light to turn green.
Fortunately the only result was a few black tire marks left in the intersection.
Paul, are you going to suggest that I didn't see what I saw? Or even suggest that this is the first time I have ever seen such a thing happen?
Bicycles on bike paths or good bike lanes, or well off on wide shoulders, as in your picture, are not a problem, usually.
Bikes carelessly or arrogantly mixing with automobile and truck traffic definitely are a problem. Why can't you understand that?
You absolutely have to see some of the same stuff we see. Do you wave down those bikers and counsel them?
That would be much more productive than trying to tell us that we don't know what we are talking about.
I have never seen problems of the scale described here. I don't doubt that there are problems. I know for a fact (from my participation on a bike forum) that there are inconsiderate bicyclists. I wasn't kidding when I said earlier that I have never been held up by a bicyclists for more than a minute. I drive a LOT. I get held up by idiot inconsiderate motorists more than that every day. To be fair though, I live in a flat area with straight roads, so that explains some of it. I have vacationed in NM and CO 7 of the past 10 years. I encounter a lot of bicyclists out there. Never have had a problem. I guess my own experiences unfairly shape my perception of the problem.
I always ask folks to tell me about the time they were most inconvenienced by a bicyclist. Most folks have never really been held up by a bicyclist. Every driver I have ever talked to has been held up by one idiot motorist in a single incident more than they have been held up by all bicyclists over the whole of their lives. I got stuck on a bridge for 3.5 hours as crews cleaned up the mess from a texting driver crash. I mention that just to put bicyclist inconvenience in perspective.
That rider you saw that was inattentive and rolled through the red was just that. Inattentive. As vulnerable as bicyclists are, you don't stay healthy long riding around with your head up your butt. Multiple times every day I encounter inattentive motorists. People by their nature will be inattentive sometimes.
Part of my skepticism relative to the claims people make stems from this. I have seen a lot of videos of bicyclists taken by indignant motorists. Much of the time I see those videos, I wouldn't have an issue negotiating the riders. It's instances like the video posted in this thread where the douchnozzle was rolling coal on bicyclists who were on or to the right of the fog line. I have seen people complain about that kind of bike traffic. On another forum someone posted a video of bicyclists rolling through a stop sign. Only one of 20 or so came to a full stop. During the time the video was rolling not a single car came to a full stop. That's perspective.
Yes there are problem riders. Yes there a problem riders who cause traffic problems. No I have never encountered a single one. Yes I have seen people exaggerate what they perceive as bicycle problems.
It occurs to me from my participation in a number of different forums that Americans love to express their rage for bicyclists on the road. I am a bicyclist. It's one of my many passions. So give me your best shot. In the end we may all learn something.
"Let Me Have It. I Am a Bicyclist"
I have nothing to say, your life sucks enough as it is.
That right there was funny, I don't care who you are.
My bike has 4 wheels, front and rear racks 750cc,and bungee cords holding a case of beer.....and I wear a pair of sweats and a pocket tee wit mybeat up tennie' runners
Well for starters, they should have to be inspected, carry insurance, have a license plate visible just like a car or motorcycle being they want the equal rights and privileges to hog the road.
They should be ticketed for impeding traffic on roads with no shoulder and a double yellow line.
Most are gay like, they seldom obey traffic laws, in general they are a scourge to the safety of the motoring public.
To say they seldom obey traffic laws is being way too generous. They have a total disdain for traffic lights, stop signs, and even which side of the road they should be on. Turn signals are a mystery to them too, but then again, they are a mystery to most car drivers too.
With all that lawlessness and reckless abandon, you'd think that bicycling deaths would be more common than they are. As it stands the numbers aren't much higher than accidental gun deaths. I suspect that the riders are more in tune to their surroundings than many realize. Do you unfailingly obey every traffic law?
Calling BS on this one. When's the last time you saw a bike actually stop for a stop sign, or even pause before pullling out onto a street. They don't do it.
It occurs to me from my participation in a number of different forums that Americans love to express their rage for bicyclists on the road. I am a bicyclist. It's one of my many passions. So give me your best shot. In the end we may all learn something.
Paul,
If you love it, good for you. Some of your colleagues are brain dead and around here a few have left this world as road kill. My wife is a Triathlete. She doesn't train on public roads. Here it is hilly, too many blind curves, and traffic goes from light at midday to bumper to bumper at Rushhour.
Speaking of Rush hour around here in Suburbia, Every Tuesday we have a group of 20-30 that insist on riding as people make there way home. They ride on hilly roads with double yellow "do not pass' the whole way. They string cars back 3/4 of a mile or more. Going up hill, this peloton will slow to 10 mph as these recreation cyclists huff and puff.
They tell me they have the same right to the road as cars. I disagree. I use my car for transportation, they are cycling for recreation. I can't play golf down the middle of a road.
Further along with that thought is cyclists must follow the same rules as motorists. Yeah, right!!! They blow through stop signs, pass on the right, weave in and out of stopped traffic, etc.
You want to ride in flat assed rural Iowa, go for it. Tell your Bernie Sanders Urban and Suburban buddies to GTFO the roads during the week. There. I said it!
I have a good bud who is an APD detective. I was driving around with him a few years back and saw one of those groups during the tail end of rush hour traffic right in the middle of downtown ATL. I wouldn't have anything to do with that schidt. I'd rather slam my junk in the sliding glass door than to be a part of that. Oddly though, they didn't have traffic backed up behind them. Maybe at a point bikes are faster in congested areas.
Well for starters, they should have to be inspected, carry insurance, have a license plate visible just like a car or motorcycle being they want the equal rights and privileges to hog the road.
They should be ticketed for impeding traffic on roads with no shoulder and a double yellow line.
Most are gay like, they seldom obey traffic laws, in general they are a scourge to the safety of the motoring public.
To say they seldom obey traffic laws is being way too generous. They have a total disdain for traffic lights, stop signs, and even which side of the road they should be on. Turn signals are a mystery to them too, but then again, they are a mystery to most car drivers too.
With all that lawlessness and reckless abandon, you'd think that bicycling deaths would be more common than they are. As it stands the numbers aren't much higher than accidental gun deaths. I suspect that the riders are more in tune to their surroundings than many realize. Do you unfailingly obey every traffic law?
Calling BS on this one. When's the last time you saw a bike actually stop for a stop sign, or even pause before pullling out onto a street. They don't do it.
I think you misunderstood my post. Yes they break the law, but probably not without exercising a degree of care in doing so. Do you come to a full stop at every stop sign? Signal every turn and lane change? Never go over the speed limit?
You keep mentioning that many car drivers are inattentive and do stupid stuff and don't obey the laws. Yes, that is true. So what? That is not what this thread is about. You asked why drivers have problems with bicyclists. That is what we are all talking about.
If you are defending the bad behavior of many bikers by saying that many drivers are worse, you are certainly not elevating the cause of bicyclists.
Whether drivers are good or bad doesn't change the fact that motor vehicles and bicycles are not a good mix.
Studies of highway traffic have shown that when vehicles are traveling at close to the same speed, accident numbers are reduced. The same studies show that when vehicle speeds vary by more than 20 mph on the same road, regardless of vehicle type, accident rates go up. That certainly includes bicycles using the same road.
You mentioned that being delayed momentarily by a bicycle is no different than being delayed by a mail truck, etc. I beg to differ. Mail trucks, garbage trucks, and school buses are providing an essential service to all in the community. Bicyclists using the road for fun and fitness are not in the same category.
The person that said that drivers are not in any physical danger from bicyclists only gets half a point for their argument. Ask any driver that has caused a death if it has had a major effect on their life. Twenty years ago my niece killed a pedestrian with her car. It haunts her to this day, despite the fact that she wasn't found at fault and the pedestrian was on drugs and stepped out right into her path, possibly on purpose.
Common sense on the part of drivers and bicyclists would eliminate most problems. In that statement I include most bicycles staying out of most traffic lanes most of the time. In my mind that is common sense. Unfortunately common sense is hard to legislate, and we don't want more laws and restrictions.
I always figured a guy who acts like an entitled douchebag on a bike probably acts like an entitled douchebag when driving a car. Yes I do ride, but mostly gravel roads because there is a lot less traffic to deal with. No I don't wear spandex.
He's making roads safer for all of us, you should thank him.
Funny how he can't comprehend why people hate cyclists...
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
I disregard laws quite frequently in the name of safety, and it is not BS. I'll give you an example. I want to get from my house on Pasadena Ave in Metairie LA to the MS River MUP. I pedal south on Pasadena to its intersection with West Metairie Rd. I need to get to Houma Ave. I have two choices. I can take a right onto W. Metairie travel west all the way down to the next U turn then come back to Houma. That would put me on a high volume narrow 4 lane road that rarely sees any bicycle traffic with 40-45 MPH vehicular traffic for a total of about a half mile. Or I can take a quick right on W Metairie, shoot across the the nearby U turn then wait for a break in traffic and go the wrong way down W Metairie for about 100 yards to Houma. The way the traffic lights are timed, I can always get a reasonable break in traffic to do the 100 yard wrong way sprint. Take a look at it on Google maps and you will see what I am talking about. I can assure you it is much safer for me to go down the wrong side of the street for 100 yards than it is for me to try to mingle with traffic for that half mile. I can go on and on giving examples of how breaking the law is safer than complying.
I always figured a guy who acts like an entitled douchebag on a bike probably acts like an entitled douchebag when driving a car. Yes I do ride, but mostly gravel roads because there is a lot less traffic to deal with. No I don't wear spandex.
You'll never get these guys to stare longingly at you dressing like that.
You keep mentioning that many car drivers are inattentive and do stupid stuff and don't obey the laws. Yes, that is true. So what? That is not what this thread is about. You asked why drivers have problems with bicyclists. That is what we are all talking about.
If you are defending the bad behavior of many bikers by saying that many drivers are worse, you are certainly not elevating the cause of bicyclists.
Whether drivers are good or bad doesn't change the fact that motor vehicles and bicycles are not a good mix.
Studies of highway traffic have shown that when vehicles are traveling at close to the same speed, accident numbers are reduced. The same studies show that when vehicle speeds vary by more than 20 mph on the same road, regardless of vehicle type, accident rates go up. That certainly includes bicycles using the same road.
You mentioned that being delayed momentarily by a bicycle is no different than being delayed by a mail truck, etc. I beg to differ. Mail trucks, garbage trucks, and school buses are providing an essential service to all in the community. Bicyclists using the road for fun and fitness are not in the same category.
The person that said that drivers are not in any physical danger from bicyclists only gets half a point for their argument. Ask any driver that has caused a death if it has had a major effect on their life. Twenty years ago my niece killed a pedestrian with her car. It haunts her to this day, despite the fact that she wasn't found at fault and the pedestrian was on drugs and stepped out right into her path, possibly on purpose.
Common sense on the part of drivers and bicyclists would eliminate most problems. In that statement I include most bicycles staying out of most traffic lanes most of the time. In my mind that is common sense. Unfortunately common sense is hard to legislate, and we don't want more laws and restrictions.
I am not at all defending bad behavior in bicyclists. I abhor it. I don't consider slow rolling stops, not signaling turns and speeding on a bicycle, when they don't affect other road users to be bad behavior. Certainly no worse than it is driving a car. I ride my bike the way I drive my car. I am courteous to other road users and I bend the law a little when in my learned opinion I can safely and courteously do so. Don't we all?
I didn't ask why motorists have a problem with bicycles. I know why and I offered myself up as the target of your rage. I didn't say I wouldn't shine a little perspective on the subject while you tee off on me.
Why is the reason a vehicle is on the road important? Should delivery vehicles have priority over a family driving to Disney World since the delivery vehicle is providing an essential service and the family going to Disney World is on the road purely for recreational reasons. When I am towing my boat, should I get out of the way of people driving to work?
Not only are drivers not in danger from bicyclists, they have a hell of a lot of control over whether they run over one or not. If you are unfortunate enough to be involved in a not at fault fatality with a bicyclist, I can't imagine it would be any more traumatic than being involved in a not at fault fatality with a motorist.
You are right in that there is an elevated risk associated with speed disparity. Especially given a bicyclists vulnerability. I do my best to mitigate that risk by riding lightly traveled roads, using strategies to make myself more visible and staying out of the way as much as practicable.
I am a safety specialist by profession. There is no such thing as the absence of risk. We all have a threshold for what we consider acceptable risk. Some people are afraid to fly.
I have poured over volumes of data on bicycle accidents and fatalities. Bicycle fatality rates are on the decrease and have been for years. When I look at the leading causes of bicycle fatalities, I see risks I can eliminate. There are just over 700 bicycle deaths per year. If I don't ride on the wrong side of the road, don't ride under the influence and don't ride at night without lights, That number is cut in about half.
Then if I don't ride in door zones, use extreme caution and slow down at intersections and road entrances, I further reduce the chances I'll be killed. Further yet if I am alert for right hooks and stay out of door zones.
That leaves sideswipes and rear end strikes as the chief remaining type of fatality. The best strategies for eliminating this risk are unfortunately the very strategies that piss motorists off. Riding off of the fog line increases visibility and discourages squeeze passes. Riding in groups increases visibility and discourages bullying behavior.
I rarely ride in groups. Most often alone or with one other person. I am keenly aware of traffic behind me. I wear bright colors. When a vehicle is well off behind me I often tend toward the middle of the lane and weave a little to increase my conspicuity. Then I look over my shoulder to let the motorist know I am aware they are there. Then I move as far to the right as practicable. At that point I am at their mercy. I monitor them closely and am prepared to bail if I have to and have time. That technique has served me well. I have stripped away all the manageable risks and am left at what I consider an acceptable risk.
Even with all of the risks associated with bicycling, studies have shown it adds to longevity.
There are almost as many accidental gun discharge death in the US each year as there are bicycle deaths. That doesn't dissuade any of us. We feel confident that we can manage the successfully manage the risks.
Paul you said.... '...Not only are drivers not in danger from a bicyclist, they have a hell of a lot of control over whether they run over one or not...'
I beg to differ, when 'the pack' ran the stop sign, I was left with the choice of driving up their collective AZZes or leaving the lane....I did not have time to slow down. I DID have control over whether I ran over them or choose to move into the oncoming lane, and as I passed them they were still coming through the stop sign. Had a car been coming in the opposite lane I would absolutely have been in danger.
I spent 24 years as an Air Traffic Controller, lots of 'routine tasks', but mostly looking for things that would, could, might go wrong and fixing it before babies and Samsonite were scattered all over several counties.
It strikes me odd that a Safety Specialist could not possibly forsee the possibility that a bicycle could be a causal factor in creating DANGER to a driver.
Paul you said.... '...Not only are drivers not in danger from a bicyclist, they have a hell of a lot of control over whether they run over one or not...'
I beg to differ, when 'the pack' ran the stop sign, I was left with the choice of driving up their collective AZZes or leaving the lane....I did not have time to slow down. I DID have control over whether I ran over them or choose to move into the oncoming lane, and as I passed them they were still coming through the stop sign. Had a car been coming in the opposite lane I would absolutely have been in danger.
I spent 24 years as an Air Traffic Controller, lots of 'routine tasks', but mostly looking for things that would, could, might go wrong and fixing it before babies and Samsonite were scattered all over several counties.
It strikes me odd that a Safety Specialist could not possibly forsee the possibility that a bicycle could be a causal factor in creating DANGER to a driver.
By that's just my opinion!
I get what you are saying. I didn't do a good job of explaining what I meant. A motorist is not likely to be killed or injured by a bicyclist. In your case the bicyclists could have been a catalytic force in a crash. Situations like that are a relative rarity I would think. I can't say I have ever read about a bicyclist being a catalytic factor in an accident. I feel certain it has happened but would reckon it to be so rare as to make it almost a non-issue.
...I'm a cyclist too. It has transformed my life...
On that we agree.
I am fortunate in that I can commute to work on a bicycle, I live just 15 minutes away but by taking longer routes I can turn it into up to a two-hour commute each way. I love this self-imposed hardship, the necessity of rolling out before dawn and the fact that being out there in the weather, whatever it is, has become part of my daily routine.
More than that the opportunity for epic endeavors. I have ridden from Texas to New York, and recently England, Scotland, Ireland and France. I used to think of my motorcycles as freedom machines, and I suppose they still are. The sight of a loaded-up motorcycle in the driveway, camping gear and bags attached and the world waiting at the end of your driveway, is a fine thing.
Heading out for distant places on a bicycle is like that, but better. You never know what the day will bring, or where darkness will catch up to you, or upon what patch of ground you will spend the night. I could live that way, easily.
I do not wear that gay Tour de France outfit, I wear a white t shirt. No gay French helmet for me, I wear a baseball hat, to which I clip my little rear view mirror. This way I can see which vehicle is coming up upon me from behind. No fancy bicycle shoes, just wear tennis shoes......
In fact, if I was coming up on a curve, and saw in my rear view mirror that a car would have to slow down to pass me, I would just pull over on the shoulder and let the car pass. I am a polite bike rider.
Sounds like you and I are on the same page. I am forever aware that I am the one putting myself out there in or in immediate proximity to public roadways, and act accordingly. If I get hit, it will always be my fault.
I will say I ride slower than the spandex crowd commonly does. Part of this is the fact that the faster you go, the more your eyes have to be fixed on nothing but the pavement ahead of your front wheel, I actually like to be able to look around when I ride.
Another reason for going slower is I will bail off of the asphalt and onto the roadside grass in a heartbeat rather than impede traffic. You cant do that very well when you're rolling fast.
Ragbrai comes thru my part of Iowa every few years and some azzwipes show up everywhere thinking their cool smelling up the place, restaurants, bars, stores ect. Know one around here would walk into the same places covered in pig or cow [bleep], but some riders always do
Just so you know, a major part of that reek is the padding of their crotch pads That alone would prevent me from ever wearing one.
...I'm a cyclist too. It has transformed my life...
On that we agree.
I am fortunate in that I can commute to work on a bicycle, I live just 15 minutes away but by taking longer routes I can turn it into up to a two-hour commute each way. I love this self-imposed hardship, the necessity of rolling out before dawn and the fact that being out there in the weather, whatever it is, has become part of my daily routine.
More than that the opportunity for epic endeavors. I have ridden from Texas to New York, and recently England, Scotland, Ireland and France. I used to think of my motorcycles as freedom machines, and I suppose they still are. The sight of a loaded-up motorcycle in the driveway, camping gear and bags attached and the world waiting at the end of your driveway, is a fine thing.
Heading out for distant places on a bicycle is like that, but better. You never know what the day will bring, or where darkness will catch up to you, or upon what patch of ground you will spend the night. I could live that way, easily.
Birdwatcher
Do you ever go to the advnture motorcycling website advrider.com
I am getting ready to head out on a 32 mile loop. It goes right through the heart of New Orleans. Most of it is on dedicated bike paths or in bike lanes. This time of the morning on a weekend I have the roads almost completely to myself. The stench of Bourbon Street at this hour stings the nostrils.
Local traffic cop who gives a road report every morning told a story of coming up behind two bicycles riding side by side blocking the traffic flow, which is illegal in Oregon.
He gave a little beep of his horn, and one of the cyclists gave him the finger over his shoulder without looking.
Local traffic cop who gives a road report every morning told a story of coming up behind two bicycles riding side by side blocking the traffic flow, which is illegal in Oregon.
He gave a little beep of his horn, and one of the cyclists gave him the finger over his shoulder without looking.
yes I slow down for folks on a bike, get pissed when the bikers stay 4 or 5 abreast on a country road and won't move over and even more so when they have no give a crap about what you are traveling with because they are having their merry way. No I don't get worked up about bikes but most of the riders are dipshits
I was wearing a Wolverine flannel shirt and some Dickies carpenter trousers. I just found my 2X cycling shorts, since I can squeeze into them, I'll wear them tomorrow on my next ride if it isn't raining.
Managing weight, blood pressure, and pre-diabetes. I'm going to ride the bike until I can try cross country skiing again.
Riding a bike beats spending even more time walking for the same effect.
I was wearing a Wolverine flannel shirt and some Dickies carpenter trousers. I just found my 2X cycling shorts, since I can squeeze into them, I'll wear them tomorrow on my next ride if it isn't raining.
Managing weight, blood pressure, and pre-diabetes. I'm going to ride the bike until I can try cross country skiing again.
Riding a bike beats spending even more time walking for the same effect.
Bicycling is easy on the knees too as long as you are spinning rather than pushing big gears.
might be the first time I ever rode on a high dollar bicycle with nice grips, a comfortable seat and good shifters. Makes all the difference in the world
Once upon a time..early 90's...I was a die hard sprocket head
Mountain biked all all CO & Utah...best physical condition of my life
Chics were hawt for sprocket heads.........time goes on.....you get older
get new hobbies.....still have the same ole Trek 8000....should & could still ride.....but do not
The skinny tire street bikes never at all interested me......but still great exercise..traffic scares me......
pic..1991..me on the left...Manti Range Utah....31 mile loop through single track timber & forest roads @ 9000'
I'd much prefer that kind of riding to the concrete jungle I live in. I have to get exercise somehow though. I spend a lot of time on our dedicated bike paths on our levees. They are traffic free and some pass through some relatively pretty places.
I'll bump this one from time to time. I think it's therapeutic for some folks to beyotch about bicyclists.
It occurs to me from my participation in a number of different forums that Americans love to express their rage for bicyclists on the road. I am a bicyclist. It's one of my many passions. So give me your best shot. In the end we may all learn something.
I rode for a long time - mostly to campus - and generally have no issues with sensible bike riders. I appreciate the "bike lanes" as well. It is the occasional brazen idiot on a bike that bothers me - yes - those who insist on riding on the very left edge of the bike lane, or even past it onto my driving lane. That creates some real temptation on my part. So far - so good.
It occurs to me from my participation in a number of different forums that Americans love to express their rage for bicyclists on the road. I am a bicyclist. It's one of my many passions. So give me your best shot. In the end we may all learn something.
I rode for a long time - mostly to campus - and generally have no issues with sensible bike riders. I appreciate the "bike lanes" as well. It is the occasional brazen idiot on a bike that bothers me - yes - those who insist on riding on the very left edge of the bike lane, or even past it onto my driving lane. That creates some real temptation on my part. So far - so good.
It is interesting that you mention the very left edge of the bicycle lane. There may be a legitimate reason for riding there.
It is the occasional brazen idiot on a bike that bothers me - yes - those who insist on riding on the very left edge of the bike lane, or even past it onto my driving lane. That creates some real temptation on my part. So far - so good.
So, Paul...are you saying you ain't missed one yet?
It is interesting that you mention the very left edge of the bicycle lane. There may be a legitimate reason for riding there.
OK - I think I am still educable. So, if "there may be a legitimate reason for riding there" - thus exposing the bicyclist to harm by my vehicle and exposing a legitimate vehicle driver to danger and a possible accident responsibility (and citation or lawsuit), what "might" that "legitimate" reason be?
It is interesting that you mention the very left edge of the bicycle lane. There may be a legitimate reason for riding there.
OK - I think I am still educable. So, if "there may be a legitimate reason for riding there" - thus exposing the bicyclist to harm by my vehicle and exposing a legitimate vehicle driver to danger and a possible accident responsibility (and citation or lawsuit), what "might" that "legitimate" reason be?
On St Charles street in New Orleans the bike lane is almost completely within the door zone of parked cars. Cyclist are regularly hurt and killed by doors swinging open in their path. Smart cyclists who ride in that bike lane will hug the outer left edge. While the driving lane is narrow, I still have room to move far left in the driving lane to give the cyclists a little extra measure of comfort.
I just noticed your location. Also during our morning ride we spoke of drivers. I was telling my bud that drivers in the Rockies are the most courteous I have encountered anywhere. Thank you.
It is interesting that you mention the very left edge of the bicycle lane. There may be a legitimate reason for riding there.
OK - I think I am still educable. So, if "there may be a legitimate reason for riding there" - thus exposing the bicyclist to harm by my vehicle and exposing a legitimate vehicle driver to danger and a possible accident responsibility (and citation or lawsuit), what "might" that "legitimate" reason be?
On St Charles street in New Orleans the bike lane is almost completely within the door zone of parked cars. Cyclist are regularly hurt and killed by doors swinging open in their path. Smart cyclists who ride in that bike lane will hug the outer left edge. While the driving lane is narrow, I still have room to move far left in the driving lane to give the cyclists a little extra measure of comfort.
Thanks - good explanation of a particular in-town situation where the old streets are narrow and there is motor parking to the right of the bike lane. I would not ride a bike in those conditions and, probably never will go to NO again, let alone haul my bike to that place. My comment about idiot bike riders pushing to the left edge of their lane (and over it) has to do with the open road situations where we encounter most biking.
The road didn't have a bike lane and he couldn't ride far enough over to allow cars to pass. He could have ridden on the sidewalk.
There must be some kind of stigma against riding a bike on the sidewalk. Maybe a "badge of honor" to not do it.
Paul?
In many locations sidewalk cycling is illegal. When it is not, it is rife with hazards. People aren't expecting to encounter a bicyclist traveling at 15 MPH. Bicycle safety experts will advise strongly against it. The closest I have ever come to hitting a cyclist was one that was on a sidewalk. When riding I have been known to hit a stretch of sidewalk just to get the hell out of the way. When I do, I slow to just above walking pace.
I have encountered cyclists who may have deserved that. Those cyclists were on the narrow shoulder and not in the way. That's a good way to create unnecessary conflict between two user groups and to get your ass kicked.
The road didn't have a bike lane and he couldn't ride far enough over to allow cars to pass. He could have ridden on the sidewalk.
There must be some kind of stigma against riding a bike on the sidewalk. Maybe a "badge of honor" to not do it.
Paul?
In many locations sidewalk cycling is illegal. When it is not, it is rife with hazards. People aren't expecting to encounter a bicyclist traveling at 15 MPH. Bicycle safety experts will advise strongly against it. The closest I have ever come to hitting a cyclist was one that was on a sidewalk. When riding I have been known to hit a stretch of sidewalk just to get the hell out of the way. When I do, I slow to just above walking pace.
makes sense. the speed difference is pretty appreciable.
Once upon a time..early 90's...I was a die hard sprocket head
Mountain biked all all CO & Utah...best physical condition of my life
Chics were hawt for sprocket heads.........time goes on.....you get older
get new hobbies.....still have the same ole Trek 8000....should & could still ride.....but do not
The skinny tire street bikes never at all interested me......but still great exercise..traffic scares me......
pic..1991..me on the left...Manti Range Utah....31 mile loop through single track timber & forest roads @ 9000'
Cool pic Tikkanut. I started riding mtn bikes in 1986 on a Ritchey Montare and raced the local circuit for couple years in CO. before I moved to MT. in 90'. Bet that ride in the high Aspens was as good as it gets. Haven't been up in those mountains but some day....
Clown show. 3-4 of them have been mowed over on the overcrowded roads here this year, but they still think they own the road. Do you guys seriously have to wear that gay looking gear just to ride a bike?
I have not read the whole thing but he seems to be avoiding taking any criticism personally. well played, I would say Paul
I knew what was coming, and I don't take it personally. People really do need to rant about cyclists, though I doubt as much as 5% of the membership here has lost more than a minute of their lives on account of cyclists. On very rare occasion, folks may read my explanation of why a cyclist may do something and understand.
Clown show. 3-4 of them have been mowed over on the overcrowded roads here this year, but they still think they own the road. Do you guys seriously have to wear that gay looking gear just to ride a bike?
This particular outfit is gayerd 'n schidt, but I'll be damned if it didn't net me much more respect on the roads than the usual garb.
Clown show. 3-4 of them have been mowed over on the overcrowded roads here this year, but they still think they own the road. Do you guys seriously have to wear that gay looking gear just to ride a bike?
This particular outfit is gayerd 'n schidt, but I'll be damned if it didn't net me much more respect on the roads than the usual garb.
what a sprocket head stud.........
babes lined up after the ride..............or during.............
Clown show. 3-4 of them have been mowed over on the overcrowded roads here this year, but they still think they own the road. Do you guys seriously have to wear that gay looking gear just to ride a bike?
This particular outfit is gayerd 'n schidt, but I'll be damned if it didn't net me much more respect on the roads than the usual garb.
what a sprocket head stud.........
babes lined up after the ride..............or during.............
I wanna say that the cyclists around here are a pretty polite and agreeable bunch. Lot's of organized and charity rides in our neighborhood and they police themselves well and keep things going well and safely.
The annual Reagan Run and Ride is a huge draw and brings lots of business to locals...
I have not read the whole thing but he seems to be avoiding taking any criticism personally. well played, I would say Paul
I knew what was coming, and I don't take it personally. People really do need to rant about cyclists, though I doubt as much as 5% of the membership here has lost more than a minute of their lives on account of cyclists. ..
You clearly don't live in Western Oregon. Oh don't worry, it's coming to you. The Left makes much of "entitlement".. there is no group of users on the road who more accurately personify that descriptor than bike riders.
I have encountered cyclists who may have deserved that. Those cyclists were on the narrow shoulder and not in the way. That's a good way to create unnecessary conflict between two user groups and to get your ass kicked.
For those who were well within the shoulder - I agree with you.
And, that vid also shows a few of the white-line-riding idiots mentioned earlier When they move over onto the boundary of their bike/shoulder zone - they also are smack onto the boundary of the motor vehicle zone. If the motor vehicle driver chooses to ride his/her right side line, bad stuff can happen, especially for the biker. That is not a narrow street in old New Orleans - carless idiots choose to ride that line
Bicyclist's are one of THE most hazardous things on the road! They wear earbuds, do not obey any traffic signs, do not buy a license, no insurance, ride into traffic-- and then it is the vehicle drivers fault!
Bicyclist's are one of THE most hazardous things on the road! They wear earbuds, do not obey any traffic signs, do not buy a license, no insurance, ride into traffic-- and then it is the vehicle drivers fault!
Except for all those that don't wear earbuds, have a license, insurance and follow the laws, and still get crushed by a pickup truck. And still it's the bike's fault.
Judge orders Boise cyclist struck by car to pay fine; says she disobeyed traffic light The July crash left the cyclist hospitalized with a badly fractured ankle. Author: Tommy Simmons, Idaho Press Published: 9:21 AM MDT September 30, 2019 Updated: 8:14 AM MDT October 1, 2019 BOISE, Idaho — After about 90 minutes of trial, an Ada County magistrate judge on Thursday found a Boise cyclist guilty of causing the July car crash that left her hospitalized with a badly fractured ankle. Her attorney said he’d never seen a similar case in his 25 years of experience. Nobody involved in the case disputed Elizabeth Hilton, 43, was struck by a car the morning of July 19 in the area of the three-way intersection of Emerald Street, Latah Street and Americana Boulevard. Boise city prosecutors, however, successfully argued she disobeyed the traffic lights at the intersection and rode through it when it wasn’t safe. Magistrate Judge Theodore Tollefson found her guilty of failing to obey a traffic control device, and ordered her to pay a $90 fine.
Holy Kshizzle! 47 pages already, I thought we just had this thread.
OK..... I AM A BICYCLIST TOO.......
I do not wear Spandex, ride in packs or tie up traffic lanes.
At 62 I ride a bicycle because I don't even want to think about what sort of physical shape I would be in right now if I didn't. I don't ride a bicycle to stay in shape, I ride a bicycle while I still can. I think its pretty damned cool that a 62 year old guy can ride his bicycle across West Texas, get to the New Mexico State Line, and then decide to hang a right and get to Montana up the Plains instead.
I wanna say that the cyclists around here are a pretty polite and agreeable bunch. Lot's of organized and charity rides in our neighborhood and they police themselves well and keep things going well and safely.
The annual Reagan Run and Ride is a huge draw and brings lots of business to locals...
That is very encouraging to hear. What area is that?
Most but not all ashwipes. Blocking traffic, trying to take over areas they've deemed "theirs". Granola crunching, liberals for the most part. I will say there are some very good folks on pedals but they are few and far between.
Most but not all ashwipes. Blocking traffic, trying to take over areas they've deemed "theirs". Granola crunching, liberals for the most part. I will say there are some very good folks on pedals but they are few and far between.
When I see the words, "SHARE THE ROAD" I emphatically exclaim "GET OFF THE ROAD! "
Mother$phucqkers that go out of their way to make it more hazardous for others damned well better watch out because the possibility of a bad outcome is high!
When your recreational pastime is to impede traffic by moving a full 50mph under the posted speed limit on a highway with 12 inches of pavement outside the white line, you might be an azzhole. Got a bike lane? Mountain bike? All good.
When your recreational pastime is to impede traffic by moving a full 50mph under the posted speed limit on a highway with 12 inches of pavement outside the white line, you might be an azzhole. Got a bike lane? Mountain bike? All good.
I have never experienced difficulty going around a cyclist. If you experience difficulty, maybe it's you?
When your recreational pastime is to impede traffic by moving a full 50mph under the posted speed limit on a highway with 12 inches of pavement outside the white line, you might be an azzhole. Got a bike lane? Mountain bike? All good.
I have never experienced difficulty going around a cyclist. If you experience difficulty, maybe it's you?
Oh geeze Paul, OF COURSE I have “experienced difficulty going around a cyclist”, who hasn’t besides yourself?
Such smug declarations are a big part of what makes bicyclists so unpopular among the rest of us.
All in all its about the same as passing a pedestrian in the roadway, and jaywalking is illegal for a reason.
I'm another cyclist. All those that have attitudes toward cyclists have attitudes about every other thing too. They don't want to change because they don't care about anything except what they have already chosen to care about.
When your recreational pastime is to impede traffic by moving a full 50mph under the posted speed limit on a highway with 12 inches of pavement outside the white line, you might be an azzhole. Got a bike lane? Mountain bike? All good.
I have never experienced difficulty going around a cyclist. If you experience difficulty, maybe it's you?
Not so fast you cycling beaver rapist....I lived on an island for years that provided a scenery of farmland and wildlife. It was almost a daily situation for me to have to deal with spandex wearing, sponsored riders who would ride side x side taking up the two lane road.
Slow down, follow behind, lightly tap the horn to try to persuade some of the riders to ride single file while I passed. The County even put up signs with a picture of a bicycle and to ride single file.
A lot of riders were great, but a significant number of them required words of encouragement to move...Some cyclists are no different than some drivers...Dumb Fùcks! 😎
I have found road bicyclists are often snobbish and elitists. To put it nicely.
They quite often do not obey traffic laws. Don't know how many times I have been say at a 4 way stop intersection just to see them go on through. And have seen when they do this, if the car that had the right of way proceeds after stopping, they get flipped off by the bicyclist because they proceeded even though the bicyclist should have stopped. They run red lights. It's like they use traffic laws at times for their convienence to the point of indignation and when traffic laws are inconvenient for them, they disregard the traffic laws and they are ok with it. It's seems as though they see themselves as "special" because they are on a bike.
And those wide shoulders along a road they are supposed to ride on. You know, the ones they get to ride on paid for by fuel taxes which of course that bicycle didn't pay for. You know, even when they have that say 4 to 8 foot wide shoulder, they still ride next to the white line. When I ask why they do that, they say it's because the shoulders have small rocks, debris, and broken glass. So they call the local transportation department to clean the shoulders more often sometimes requesting it weekly. And you guessed it - those shoulders are swept with funding from that fuel tax again. They get the benefits of all these shoulders but pay for none of it.
And let's not even get into why bicyclist ride several abreast beyond that shoulder area to the point they are riding out in the travel lane. And get pissed off if you go around them kinda close. As mentioned, they are "special" so we should all yield to them.
Mountain bikers are a little better, but they too their own set of issues. I don't know how many times I have nearly been run over while hiking because some mountain biker didn't want to yield to a pedestrian. Yet pedestrians have the right of way. Across many places, they have restricted motorized travel (say a quad), but are creating mountain bike trails. Yet actually those mountain bike trails are often very destructive to the environment because they cause erosion - the same erosion that Is cited by environmental groups saying quads cause erosion and are therefore restricted. The ground pressure by a bike tire is much much more than a quad with its ballon tires. Those bike trails can get feet deep in spots causing altered water flow and scour. Yet mountain bikes can go wherever they want to go in a forest. And yep, as mentioned above, they don't pay for any of those trails.
No, generally, don't think much of bicyclists.
I'd feel better about bicyclists if they would pay their way for what they are using and also abided by traffic laws instead of flipping back and forth with those laws depending on their convenience and with their attitude of "I'm special so get outta my way."
I'm another cyclist. All those that have attitudes toward cyclists have attitudes about every other thing too. They don't want to change because they don't care about anything except what they have already chosen to care about.
Oh brother, yet another smug post from a cyclist 🙄
Could it be one of the things they have chosen to care about is not running your a$$ over and all the multitudes of difficulties that would bring for all concerned?
Did you ever consider that those cyclists you claim don't pay fuel taxes more than likely also own and drive motor vehicles?
Yes, I have.
They pay fuel taxes when they drive a gas or diesel powered vehicle. But when they are riding on their bike, on that shoulder, or that trail through the woods or along that river, that bike didn't pay for any of what they are riding on. Something else did.
I would love if someone else paid for a travel lane just for me so I don't have to deal with rush hour traffic. And when I complain that my special lane is getting dirty, the ones that paid for my special lane gotta come over and take care of it. And I don't have to pay anything for my special lane.
But not only is that messed up, they have the gall to act like what they got for free is some sort of right or entitlement that they are owed. And complain about its condition. So I gotta get outta their way.
Walla Walla Wa. just spent a butt load of money rebuilding a stretch of road that a bicycler was hit and killed on. They widened it and put a wide concrete bike lane on one side of the road for the bikes. Millions of dollars spent on this project. After it was completed officials noticed and after receiving many complaints the bikes were not using the bike path but were still riding in the road. The bicyclist stated that they did not like riding over the concrete joints. So the city went back in and on the opposite side of the road they expanded the shoulder and made an asphalt bike path for them. Low and behold they still wont use the new bike path because they feel unsafe riding that close to the bank. i was visiting with one of the landowners beside the new stretch of road that farms ground and when they installed the entryways into the fields they go into the field a ways to get the correct slope and now he has to farm around the entryways.He has also been told not to spray any chemicals on his crops if there is a possibility that there may be bike traffic going by. Personally I have no use for people who ride bikes on the road, they think they own the road and are a hazard.
When your recreational pastime is to impede traffic by moving a full 50mph under the posted speed limit on a highway with 12 inches of pavement outside the white line, you might be an azzhole. Got a bike lane? Mountain bike? All good.
I have never experienced difficulty going around a cyclist. If you experience difficulty, maybe it's you?
Oh geeze Paul, OF COURSE I have “experienced difficulty going around a cyclist”, who hasn’t besides yourself?
Such smug declarations are a big part of what makes bicyclists so unpopular among the rest of us.
All in all its about the same as passing a pedestrian in the roadway, and jaywalking is illegal for a reason.
It's the truth. I have had to slow for a curve or two. That's about the extent of it.
I have found road bicyclists are often snobbish and elitists. To put it nicely.
They quite often do not obey traffic laws. Don't know how many times I have been say at a 4 way stop intersection just to see them go on through. And have seen when they do this, if the car that had the right of way proceeds after stopping, they get flipped off by the bicyclist because they proceeded even though the bicyclist should have stopped. They run red lights. It's like they use traffic laws at times for their convienence to the point of indignation and when traffic laws are inconvenient for them, they disregard the traffic laws and they are ok with it. It's seems as though they see themselves as "special" because they are on a bike.
And those wide shoulders along a road they are supposed to ride on. You know, the ones they get to ride on paid for by fuel taxes which of course that bicycle didn't pay for. You know, even when they have that say 4 to 8 foot wide shoulder, they still ride next to the white line. When I ask why they do that, they say it's because the shoulders have small rocks, debris, and broken glass. So they call the local transportation department to clean the shoulders more often sometimes requesting it weekly. And you guessed it - those shoulders are swept with funding from that fuel tax again. They get the benefits of all these shoulders but pay for none of it.
And let's not even get into why bicyclist ride several abreast beyond that shoulder area to the point they are riding out in the travel lane. And get pissed off if you go around them kinda close. As mentioned, they are "special" so we should all yield to them.
Mountain bikers are a little better, but they too their own set of issues. I don't know how many times I have nearly been run over while hiking because some mountain biker didn't want to yield to a pedestrian. Yet pedestrians have the right of way. Across many places, they have restricted motorized travel (say a quad), but are creating mountain bike trails. Yet actually those mountain bike trails are often very destructive to the environment because they cause erosion - the same erosion that Is cited by environmental groups saying quads cause erosion and are therefore restricted. The ground pressure by a bike tire is much much more than a quad with its ballon tires. Those bike trails can get feet deep in spots causing altered water flow and scour. Yet mountain bikes can go wherever they want to go in a forest. And yep, as mentioned above, they don't pay for any of those trails.
No, generally, don't think much of bicyclists.
I'd feel better about bicyclists if they would pay their way for what they are using and also abided by traffic laws instead of flipping back and forth with those laws depending on their convenience and with their attitude of "I'm special so get outta my way."
What makes you think bicyclists don't pay their way? Local and county roads are built and maintained largely with the ad valorem taxes cyclists pay. Gas taxes have fallen way short of funding state and federal roadways for many years. General tax funds, which bicyclists pay, fund much of roadways these days.
I'll use Crested Butte CO as an example. The Crested Butte Mountain Bike Association built and maintains hundreds of miles of multi use trails. The trails that are in the worst shape are the ones motorcyclists and ATVs use. No motorcycle or ATV group does routine maintenance on the trails. Hiking groups do very little. Almost everywhere I have ever been mountain bikers carry more than there fare share of the maintenance burden.
On roads that are so narrow that a passing motorist has to enter the oncoming lane to pass a cyclist at a safe distance, it has been demonstrated that it is faster for motorists to pass them if they are riding abreast rather than strung out. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8NGdQDEkWCE
I'm another cyclist. All those that have attitudes toward cyclists have attitudes about every other thing too. They don't want to change because they don't care about anything except what they have already chosen to care about.
Oh brother, yet another smug post from a cyclist 🙄
Could it be one of the things they have chosen to care about is not running your a$$ over and all the multitudes of difficulties that would bring for all concerned?
Not running over cyclists hasn't proven much of a challenge to me. Save for an occasional sidewalk or wrong way cyclist, I have never had an issue. I can't say that about my fellow motorists. Dodging idiot motorists is a daily affair for me.
Phucqk bicyclists taking up a whole lane dicking around at 10 mph especially riding two, three, four abreast. Phucqk giving them more clearance than anything else. Don't like it, get off the damned road.
Did you ever consider that those cyclists you claim don't pay fuel taxes more than likely also own and drive motor vehicles?
Yes, I have.
But when they are riding on their bike, on that shoulder, or that trail through the woods or along that river, that bike didn't pay for any of what they are riding on.
Have you ever done any research into how roads are funded?
Where I biked on 25 mph county roads, most of the money for roads comes from property taxes, not gas taxes. The average motorist pays $5/day in gas taxes. I pay about $50/day in property tax on my home.
Don't tell me I don't have a right to bike on county roads.
Without question cyclists are the nerdiest/quirkiest of all those groups. Today my wife and I did a 15 mile road. The route was mixed between subdivisions, bicycle lanes and dedicated bike trails. The dedicated trail is wide enough to go 3 riders wide, but it's tight. When I ride with my wife I ride beside her. I pull ahead of her or drop behind her when a rider comes from ahead or behind. I keep my head on a swivel and go single file well ahead of the arrival of another rider.
Today I looked behind me and saw another rider coming. When he was several hundred yards back, I pulled in ahead of my wife. He passed about a minute after I did and said "ride single file." Not sure I heard him right I asked "what did you say?" He said "ride single file." I laid into him. "I was single file you dumb mother ffuukker." He snarked back "you weren't" I said "I singled up well before you got here you goddam dumb mother ffuukker."
Meh, it wasn't any skin off my back telling him what I thought. I asked my wife if that embarrassed her when I said stuff like that. She said not when you say it to an idiot mother ffuukker.
He is presently regretting his tempestuousness from jail. It would have been no issue for that driver to have finished a safe pass.
He is the typical rager. Most ragers check multiple boxes in the following demographics.
Middle age White Male Out of shape Lower intellect
What's really interesting is that blacks rarely ever get bent out of shape.
what a pile of horse chit. laughing. You ask the question in the first place, and then show just how agenda driven you really are. Folks know all about their rights, but seem to care little about their responsibilities. Your black folks must be different than the black folks here. Just saying...........
He is presently regretting his tempestuousness from jail. It would have been no issue for that driver to have finished a safe pass.
He is the typical rager. Most ragers check multiple boxes in the following demographics.
Middle age White Male Out of shape Lower intellect
What's really interesting is that blacks rarely ever get bent out of shape.
It that case, that dickhead on the bike should have been to the extreme right and he's damned lucky to have survived the day. Too many experiences with dickheads on bikes to give a damn. LOL Type all you want, I think the majority of bike folks are ku nts.
He is presently regretting his tempestuousness from jail. It would have been no issue for that driver to have finished a safe pass.
He is the typical rager. Most ragers check multiple boxes in the following demographics.
Middle age White Male Out of shape Lower intellect
What's really interesting is that blacks rarely ever get bent out of shape.
what a pile of horse chit. laughing. You ask the question in the first place, and then show just how agenda driven you really are. Folks know all about their rights, but seem to care little about their responsibilities. Your black folks must be different than the black folks here. Just saying...........
I have made it clear from the onset that my agenda was to provide facts in hopes of educating. What particular part of reality are you struggling with?
He is presently regretting his tempestuousness from jail. It would have been no issue for that driver to have finished a safe pass.
He is the typical rager. Most ragers check multiple boxes in the following demographics.
Middle age White Male Out of shape Lower intellect
What's really interesting is that blacks rarely ever get bent out of shape.
It that case, that dickhead on the bike should have been to the extreme right
It would have made NO difference if the cyclist was to the far right. The motorist had more than enough real estate to pass. Much ado about NOTHING. The motorists feelings were hurt because he wasn't feeling respected.
He is presently regretting his tempestuousness from jail. It would have been no issue for that driver to have finished a safe pass.
He is the typical rager. Most ragers check multiple boxes in the following demographics.
Middle age White Male Out of shape Lower intellect
What's really interesting is that blacks rarely ever get bent out of shape.
It that case, that dickhead on the bike should have been to the extreme right
It would have made NO difference if the cyclist was to the far right. The motorist had more than enough real estate to pass. Much ado about NOTHING. The motorists feelings were hurt because he wasn't feeling respected.
He is presently regretting his tempestuousness from jail. It would have been no issue for that driver to have finished a safe pass.
He is the typical rager. Most ragers check multiple boxes in the following demographics.
Middle age White Male Out of shape Lower intellect
What's really interesting is that blacks rarely ever get bent out of shape.
It that case, that dickhead on the bike should have been to the extreme right
It would have made NO difference if the cyclist was to the far right. The motorist had more than enough real estate to pass. Much ado about NOTHING. The motorists feelings were hurt because he wasn't feeling respected.
Or maybe he just wasn’t paying attention, or just underestimated the speed of the bicycle.
He is presently regretting his tempestuousness from jail. It would have been no issue for that driver to have finished a safe pass.
He is the typical rager. Most ragers check multiple boxes in the following demographics.
Middle age White Male Out of shape Lower intellect
What's really interesting is that blacks rarely ever get bent out of shape.
It that case, that dickhead on the bike should have been to the extreme right
It would have made NO difference if the cyclist was to the far right. The motorist had more than enough real estate to pass. Much ado about NOTHING. The motorists feelings were hurt because he wasn't feeling respected.
Or maybe he just wasn’t paying attention, or just underestimated the speed of the bicycle.
And didn't notice the sound of the collision and kept driving. Yeah, that's likely. Too bad he couldn't persuade the justice system he didn't do it out of malice.
Did you ever consider that those cyclists you claim don't pay fuel taxes more than likely also own and drive motor vehicles?
They pay fuel taxes when they drive a gas or diesel powered vehicle. But when they are riding on their bike, on that shoulder, or that trail through the woods or along that river, that bike didn't pay for any of what they are riding on. Something else did.
So with that logic, pedestrians have no right to walk down that shoulder or trail because they aren't burning gas or deisel. Got it - makes perfect sense...
Wish I would have known that when I was a kid delivering newspapers on my bike riding on public roads, or when I had to take my vehicle in for repairs so rode my bike to work as I had no other transportation, or had to walk a couple miles down the shoulder of the road when my vehicle broke down. I sure feel enlightened now...
Don't get me wrong - I've seen cyclists I felt deserved to get their asses run over. I do ride a bike on roads and trails and am very considerate of motorists - fortunately where I live and ride, motorists treat me the same way and I've never experienced the hostility towards cyclists that's expressed here. Carry on - don't give a chit one way or the other...
Bicyclists have never bothered me any but we don't have many around here. Those Amish with their damn buggies going 10 mph on a winding road are a huge PITA though. Cheap fuggers aughtta get with the program and buy a car.
Bicyclists have never bothered me any but we don't have many around here. Those Amish with their damn buggies going 10 mph on a winding road are a huge PITA though. Cheap fuggers aughtta get with the program and buy a car.
LOL, good point - if those buggies aren't burning gas or deisel, they best get off the fuggin road 'cause they aren't paying their fair share
Did you ever consider that those cyclists you claim don't pay fuel taxes more than likely also own and drive motor vehicles?
They pay fuel taxes when they drive a gas or diesel powered vehicle. But when they are riding on their bike, on that shoulder, or that trail through the woods or along that river, that bike didn't pay for any of what they are riding on. Something else did.
So with that logic, pedestrians have no right to walk down that shoulder or trail because they aren't burning gas or deisel. Got it - makes perfect sense...
Wish I would have known that when I was a kid delivering newspapers on my bike riding on public roads, or when I had to take my vehicle in for repairs so rode my bike to work as I had no other transportation, or had to walk a couple miles down the shoulder of the road when my vehicle broke down. I sure feel enlightened now...
Don't get me wrong - I've seen cyclists I felt deserved to get their asses run over. I do ride a bike on roads and trails and am very considerate of motorists - fortunately where I live and ride, motorists treat me the same way and I've never experienced the hostility towards cyclists that's expressed here. Carry on - don't give a chit one way or the other...
We need to strap a license plate to those pedestrian's asses too.
He is presently regretting his tempestuousness from jail. It would have been no issue for that driver to have finished a safe pass.
He is the typical rager. Most ragers check multiple boxes in the following demographics.
Middle age White Male Out of shape Lower intellect
What's really interesting is that blacks rarely ever get bent out of shape.
It that case, that dickhead on the bike should have been to the extreme right
It would have made NO difference if the cyclist was to the far right. The motorist had more than enough real estate to pass. Much ado about NOTHING. The motorists feelings were hurt because he wasn't feeling respected.
Or maybe he just wasn’t paying attention, or just underestimated the speed of the bicycle.
And didn't notice the sound of the collision and kept driving. Yeah, that's likely. Too bad he couldn't persuade the justice system he didn't do it out of malice.
What? That dickhead on the bike riding two wide was the cause of the whole deal. Ride like that you gonna die die die mofos. LOL! Phucqk'em.
Bicyclists have never bothered me any but we don't have many around here. Those Amish with their damn buggies going 10 mph on a winding road are a huge PITA though. Cheap fuggers aughtta get with the program and buy a car.
LOL, good point - if those buggies aren't burning gas or deisel, they best get off the fuggin road 'cause they aren't paying their fair share
Yah, they're like bunny huggers enjoying the wildlife refuges for free. Bitches, get some engines!
He is presently regretting his tempestuousness from jail. It would have been no issue for that driver to have finished a safe pass.
He is the typical rager. Most ragers check multiple boxes in the following demographics.
Middle age White Male Out of shape Lower intellect
What's really interesting is that blacks rarely ever get bent out of shape.
It that case, that dickhead on the bike should have been to the extreme right and he's damned lucky to have survived the day. Too many experiences with dickheads on bikes to give a damn. LOL Type all you want, I think the majority of bike folks are ku nts.
As much as a pain in the ass they can be Bicyclers always have the right of way............That said when one of these snarky bikers is saying how he has the right of way I tell them yeah you're right but ask yourself one thing, what good does the right of way do ya when your dead?
Today I looked behind me and saw another rider coming. When he was several hundred yards back, I pulled in ahead of my wife. He passed about a minute after I did and said "ride single file." Not sure I heard him right I asked "what did you say?" He said "ride single file." I laid into him. "I was single file you dumb mother ffuukker." He snarked back "you weren't" I said "I singled up well before you got here you goddam dumb mother ffuukker."
Yep - the bike loses every time which is why a cyclist with half a brain will treat motorists with the upmost respect which unfortunately isn't always the case.
Yep - the bike loses every time which is why a cyclist with half a brain will treat motorists with the upmost respect which unfortunately isn't always the case.
Today I looked behind me and saw another rider coming. When he was several hundred yards back, I pulled in ahead of my wife. He passed about a minute after I did and said "ride single file." Not sure I heard him right I asked "what did you say?" He said "ride single file." I laid into him. "I was single file you dumb mother ffuukker." He snarked back "you weren't" I said "I singled up well before you got here you goddam dumb mother ffuukker."
When faags meet...
TFF!
Ohhh stop it! No, you stop it! I swear I'm going get mad! Go ahead I dare you!
I asked my wife if that embarrassed her when I said stuff like that. She said not when you say it to an idiot mother ffuukker.
Lol, I never knew my wife had a twin sister...........
Wife and I had a pedestrian so absorbed in texting that he ran into our car and fell right onto our hood just as we were parallel parking one day this summer. The windows were down and wife immediately yelled at the top of her lungs "watch where you're going you fuuckin ass hole". Guy looked at her as if in a daze, started to say something, then looked at me and turned around and left. Worlds full of morons these days.
I asked my wife if that embarrassed her when I said stuff like that. She said not when you say it to an idiot mother ffuukker.
Lol, I never knew my wife had a twin sister...........
Wife and I had a pedestrian so absorbed in texting that he ran into our car and fell right onto our hood just as we were parallel parking one day this summer. The windows were down and wife immediately yelled at the top of her lungs "watch where you're going you fuuckin ass hole". Guy looked at her as if in a daze, started to say something, then looked at me and turned around and left. Worlds full of morons these days.
I wish I'd had the nerve to say that. Bicycles on roads with speed limits over 15 mph are a pain because there are so many and so many seem like odd folks that hog the road and feel privileged to do so. The occasional tractor or Amish buggy are few and far between. I'm ok with motorcycles, they move along.
I wish I'd had the nerve to say that. Bicycles on roads with speed limits over 15 mph are a pain because there are so many and so many seem like odd folks that hog the road and feel privileged to do so. The occasional tractor or Amish buggy are few and far between. I'm ok with motorcycles, they move along.
Depends on where you live I'd guess. Some areas of upstate NY are getting downright infested with Amish and their damned buggies.
I wish I'd had the nerve to say that. Bicycles on roads with speed limits over 15 mph are a pain because there are so many and so many seem like odd folks that hog the road and feel privileged to do so. The occasional tractor or Amish buggy are few and far between. I'm ok with motorcycles, they move along.
I guess it depends where you live - I get slowed down by farm and construction equipment moving around on the roads I drive far more than bicycles, and they're a hell of alot harder to get around. Don't get me started on the local ranchers moving cattle on the roads... (seriously - all in good fun).
I guess the way I see it, there's a lot more hazardous chit to worry about on the road than bicycles. Deer on the road cause more issues around here and concern me a lot more.
Yep - the bike loses every time which is why a cyclist with half a brain will treat motorists with the upmost respect which unfortunately isn't always the case.
For my own part I ride with the attitude that if I ever get hit it’s ALWAYS my fault , for being in close proximity to motor vehicles while on a friggin’ bicycle.
Yep - the bike loses every time which is why a cyclist with half a brain will treat motorists with the upmost respect which unfortunately isn't always the case.
For my own part I ride with the attitude that if I ever get hit it’s ALWAYS my fault , for being in close proximity to motor vehicles while on a friggin’ bicycle.
Oh man, not me. I do everything humanly possible to peacefully coexist on the roadways. I make myself very easy to avoid. I have read books on cycling safety and study it regularly. I ride with my eyes wide open and my head on a swivel. There's not a minute of my time on a public road that I am not processing safety and riding with an eye toward cooperative use. I ride with the attitude that if someone hits me they pulled off a remarkably moronic feat.
I wish I'd had the nerve to say that. Bicycles on roads with speed limits over 15 mph are a pain because there are so many and so many seem like odd folks that hog the road and feel privileged to do so. The occasional tractor or Amish buggy are few and far between. I'm ok with motorcycles, they move along.
I never realized that northwest LA had so many cyclists that they had become a burden.
I never realized that northwest LA had so many cyclists that they had become a burden.
We don't have many. My wife and I travel a good bit. They are all over California and Colorado even on mountain and rural roads. Motorcycles also, but like I said motorcycles move along. Fort Collins Colorado was the worst I ever saw, even at night.
Last one was in Montana, in a cold rain towards evening. I was standing while on my bikes on the shoulder of the highway trying to get the wet screen on my iPhone to work. my back to oncoming traffic.
Wasn’t paying attention, a semi riding the fog stripe missed me by way-too-close, woulda killed me in an instant. I’d have never known what hit me.
All day long, for many days in a row, I had been paying attention, that one human lapse coulda killed me.
Did you ever consider that those cyclists you claim don't pay fuel taxes more than likely also own and drive motor vehicles?
Yes, I have.
But when they are riding on their bike, on that shoulder, or that trail through the woods or along that river, that bike didn't pay for any of what they are riding on.
Have you ever done any research into how roads are funded?
Actually, I retired as a transportation manager for a County so I know quite a bit about transportation funding. I did it for a living.
The first article you sent says car don’t pay taxes. That’s true. But it doesn’t mention fuel taxes, or Highway Users Revenue Fund, or HURF. That’s collected by the government for every gallon or gas or diesel collected. Depends on the individual State, but it’s typically around $.40/gallon. That money is then dispersed to fund road construction and maintenance. Which by the way, are not getting a passing grade like most of the infrastructure (dams, bridges, water delivery systems, roads, etc.) rating here in the US.
So no, that bicycle shoulder on the side of the road is not in any way paid directly for that shoulder. True, that bicyclist probably buys gas and diesel too, but so does everyone else. But they don’t get special stuff for their fuel tax. By the bicycle community does.
If bicyclist had to pay say $20/day to use that bike path or shoulder construction and maintenance, I am guessing many wouldn’t. But they are getting it free now. And fricken complain about the condition of what they are getting free and don’t abide by traffic laws like the car next to them has to. The car that has fuel in it that paid the tax. Which that bike didn’t.
Did you ever consider that those cyclists you claim don't pay fuel taxes more than likely also own and drive motor vehicles?
They pay fuel taxes when they drive a gas or diesel powered vehicle. But when they are riding on their bike, on that shoulder, or that trail through the woods or along that river, that bike didn't pay for any of what they are riding on. Something else did.
So with that logic, pedestrians have no right to walk down that shoulder or trail because they aren't burning gas or deisel. Got it - makes perfect sense...
Wish I would have known that when I was a kid delivering newspapers on my bike riding on public roads, or when I had to take my vehicle in for repairs so rode my bike to work as I had no other transportation, or had to walk a couple miles down the shoulder of the road when my vehicle broke down. I sure feel enlightened now...
Don't get me wrong - I've seen cyclists I felt deserved to get their asses run over. I do ride a bike on roads and trails and am very considerate of motorists - fortunately where I live and ride, motorists treat me the same way and I've never experienced the hostility towards cyclists that's expressed here. Carry on - don't give a chit one way or the other...
Pedestrians have a right to walk on a shoulders. Just as a bicyclist does. Or a farm tractor (if he is not burning the highway diesel - there are two kinds of diesel sold here in the US - stuff that is taxed for roads and stuff that isn’t). But when you boil it down, none are directly paying for that shoulder or sidewalk.
My rub is not so much that, it’s that the bicycle community can be so demanding about what they are getting for free. Not one time have I heard that farmer complain about the condition of a road that they aren’t directly paying to use. But the bicycle community is in your face about it. That’s what gets me. It’s that snobbish elitist attitude.
I never realized that northwest LA had so many cyclists that they had become a burden.
We don't have many. My wife and I travel a good bit. They are all over California and Colorado even on mountain and rural roads. Motorcycles also, but like I said motorcycles move along. Fort Collins Colorado was the worst I ever saw, even at night.
Bicycles are all over the place on the Colorado front range. I encounter them frequently when I am out there. Yeah, I have to let off the gas at times. Hustle around them at times. Shake my head wondering sometimes. That said, I'd still much rather deal with them than dumb, dangerous, distracted and impaired drivers that litter our roadways. In the grand scheme of things cyclists simply aren't a blip on the radar.
When driving the mountain west the cyclists I have encountered were easy to negotiate. When I have bicycled the mountain west I did it on relatively lightly traveled roadways. Motorists would sometimes come up behind me on a blind bend and have to wait a few seconds to safely get around. They were always respectful and were met with a friendly wave. When there was any real estate on the right of the white line, I'd move to the outside of it so motorists wouldn't have to slow at all. If it looked like a motorist would have to slow for more than a few seconds, sometimes I'd pull off the road and stop so they could get around.
Last summer I was pedaling CO 114 between Gunnison and Saguache. The western section of that road is narrow with nothing to the right of the white fog line. At one point I had a semi coming from in front of me and one coming from behind me. They were going to arrive at the same time. I dismounted and got off on the little stretch of land between the road and the ditch. It was unnerving as the semi passed within a few feet at 55 MPH. It was inconvenient for me. Ultimately it was the right thing to do. When semis would come from behind and there was no oncoming traffic, they happily moved well over when they passed. They were greeted with a friendly wave. To me it was an ideal environment of road users treating each other with respect.
At one point on that road I had not been passed in 20 minutes or so. It seemed odd to me. There wasn't much traffic, but a car would come from behind every 3-4 minutes. I had pulled off the road to take a pic. An RV passed me and had a dozen or so vehicles stacked up behind it. There were a number of places the RV could have pulled off and let traffic vent.
Did you ever consider that those cyclists you claim don't pay fuel taxes more than likely also own and drive motor vehicles?
Yes, I have.
But when they are riding on their bike, on that shoulder, or that trail through the woods or along that river, that bike didn't pay for any of what they are riding on.
Have you ever done any research into how roads are funded?
Actually, I retired as a transportation manager for a County so I know quite a bit about transportation funding. I did it for a living.
The first article you sent says car don’t pay taxes. That’s true. But it doesn’t mention fuel taxes, or Highway Users Revenue Fund, or HURF. That’s collected by the government for every gallon or gas or diesel collected. Depends on the individual State, but it’s typically around $.40/gallon. That money is then dispersed to fund road construction and maintenance. Which by the way, are not getting a passing grade like most of the infrastructure (dams, bridges, water delivery systems, roads, etc.) rating here in the US.
So no, that bicycle shoulder on the side of the road is not in any way paid directly for that shoulder. True, that bicyclist probably buys gas and diesel too, but so does everyone else. But they don’t get special stuff for their fuel tax. By the bicycle community does.
If bicyclist had to pay say $20/day to use that bike path or shoulder construction and maintenance, I am guessing many wouldn’t. But they are getting it free now. And fricken complain about the condition of what they are getting free and don’t abide by traffic laws like the car next to them has to. The car that has fuel in it that paid the tax. Which that bike didn’t.
That’s messed up.
So you do understand that cyclists do pay for roads. In every jurisdiction I have studied, ad valorem taxes pay for municipality and county roads and general tax fund money is used for state and federal roads. Glad we were able to dispense with the myth that cyclists don't pay for roads.
Did you ever consider that those cyclists you claim don't pay fuel taxes more than likely also own and drive motor vehicles?
They pay fuel taxes when they drive a gas or diesel powered vehicle. But when they are riding on their bike, on that shoulder, or that trail through the woods or along that river, that bike didn't pay for any of what they are riding on. Something else did.
So with that logic, pedestrians have no right to walk down that shoulder or trail because they aren't burning gas or deisel. Got it - makes perfect sense...
Wish I would have known that when I was a kid delivering newspapers on my bike riding on public roads, or when I had to take my vehicle in for repairs so rode my bike to work as I had no other transportation, or had to walk a couple miles down the shoulder of the road when my vehicle broke down. I sure feel enlightened now...
Don't get me wrong - I've seen cyclists I felt deserved to get their asses run over. I do ride a bike on roads and trails and am very considerate of motorists - fortunately where I live and ride, motorists treat me the same way and I've never experienced the hostility towards cyclists that's expressed here. Carry on - don't give a chit one way or the other...
Pedestrians have a right to walk on a shoulders. Just as a bicyclist does. Or a farm tractor (if he is not burning the highway diesel - there are two kinds of diesel sold here in the US - stuff that is taxed for roads and stuff that isn’t). But when you boil it down, none are directly paying for that shoulder or sidewalk.
My rub is not so much that, it’s that the bicycle community can be so demanding about what they are getting for free. Not one time have I heard that farmer complain about the condition of a road that they aren’t directly paying to use. But the bicycle community is in your face about it. That’s what gets me. It’s that snobbish elitist attitude.
Bicyclists aren't getting anything for free as long as ad valorem and general tax fund money pays for any of the building or maintenance of roads.
You invited opinions. You got opinions. Bicyclists are not overly appreciated by a lot of folks who have to navigate around them and anticipate what they might do in order to not inadvertently kill them.
You invited opinions. You got opinions. Bicyclists are not overly appreciated by a lot of folks who have to navigate around them and anticipate what they might do in order to not inadvertently kill them.
And one of my goals was to offer facts to counter opinions that are based on falsehoods. Who doesn't like to learn?
Road bicycling was my recovery exercise after I had a hip and knee replacement, so now I can hunt deer in the mountains. I’m all for it. That said, I don’t like the jerky club riders, they are a bunch of weenies!
As far as road taxes go, so what if bicyclist don’t pay direct fees/taxes, almost all of them drive cars and pay taxes for the roads anyway.
He is presently regretting his tempestuousness from jail. It would have been no issue for that driver to have finished a safe pass.
He is the typical rager. Most ragers check multiple boxes in the following demographics.
Middle age White Male Out of shape Lower intellect
What's really interesting is that blacks rarely ever get bent out of shape.
what a pile of horse chit. laughing. You ask the question in the first place, and then show just how agenda driven you really are. Folks know all about their rights, but seem to care little about their responsibilities. Your black folks must be different than the black folks here. Just saying...........
I have made it clear from the onset that my agenda was to provide facts in hopes of educating. What particular part of reality are you struggling with?
laughing. If you don't want answers that upset you, don't ask questions. The only one struggling with reality is you trying to invent one that fits your kooky world view. No [bleep] wonder most folks hate dickhead bicyclists.
I wonder how many innocent people's lives have been ruined while trying to make a living by accidently hitting some asswhole on a bike who died because he was in the right.
He is presently regretting his tempestuousness from jail. It would have been no issue for that driver to have finished a safe pass.
He is the typical rager. Most ragers check multiple boxes in the following demographics.
Middle age White Male Out of shape Lower intellect
What's really interesting is that blacks rarely ever get bent out of shape.
what a pile of horse chit. laughing. You ask the question in the first place, and then show just how agenda driven you really are. Folks know all about their rights, but seem to care little about their responsibilities. Your black folks must be different than the black folks here. Just saying...........
I have made it clear from the onset that my agenda was to provide facts in hopes of educating. What particular part of reality are you struggling with?
laughing. If you don't want answers that upset you, don't ask questions. The only one struggling with reality is you trying to invent one that fits your kooky world view. No [bleep] wonder most folks hate dickhead bicyclists.
Don't let my correction of errors lead you to believe I am upset. I invited input for the express purpose of clearing up bad information. Every post is an opportunity to for me to present facts.
How many dead bicyclists have you interviewed? Have you not yet learned that you need to bring your A game with me?
Many dead bikers had that attitude also.
You remind me of the asswhole pediatrician we had in the multidisiplinary clinic I practiced at until the evening he pushed his luck too far and got plastered by a lady in a car.
How many dead bicyclists have you interviewed? Have you not yet learned that you need to bring your A game with me?
Many dead bikers had that attitude also.
You remind me of the asswhole pediatrician we had in the multidisiplinary clinic I practiced at until the evening he pushed his luck too far and got plastered by a lady in a car.
You won't see me argue that there are not a lot of bad drivers out there.
How many dead bicyclists have you interviewed? Have you not yet learned that you need to bring your A game with me?
Most certainly a dickhead, bicycle and all. ^^^^^^
What could I have possibly said to hurt your feelings? You'd never know from the responses here that they are coming from the rough and tough, freedom loving party of personal responsibility.
Did you ever consider that those cyclists you claim don't pay fuel taxes more than likely also own and drive motor vehicles?
Yes, I have.
But when they are riding on their bike, on that shoulder, or that trail through the woods or along that river, that bike didn't pay for any of what they are riding on.
Have you ever done any research into how roads are funded?
Actually, I retired as a transportation manager for a County so I know quite a bit about transportation funding. I did it for a living.
The first article you sent says car don’t pay taxes. That’s true. But it doesn’t mention fuel taxes, or Highway Users Revenue Fund, or HURF. That’s collected by the government for every gallon or gas or diesel collected. Depends on the individual State, but it’s typically around $.40/gallon. That money is then dispersed to fund road construction and maintenance. Which by the way, are not getting a passing grade like most of the infrastructure (dams, bridges, water delivery systems, roads, etc.) rating here in the US.
So no, that bicycle shoulder on the side of the road is not in any way paid directly for that shoulder. True, that bicyclist probably buys gas and diesel too, but so does everyone else. But they don’t get special stuff for their fuel tax. By the bicycle community does.
If bicyclist had to pay say $20/day to use that bike path or shoulder construction and maintenance, I am guessing many wouldn’t. But they are getting it free now. And fricken complain about the condition of what they are getting free and don’t abide by traffic laws like the car next to them has to. The car that has fuel in it that paid the tax. Which that bike didn’t.
That’s messed up.
So you do understand that cyclists do pay for roads. In every jurisdiction I have studied, ad valorem taxes pay for municipality and county roads and general tax fund money is used for state and federal roads. Glad we were able to dispense with the myth that cyclists don't pay for roads.
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by flagstaff
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by flagstaff
Originally Posted by JGray
Did you ever consider that those cyclists you claim don't pay fuel taxes more than likely also own and drive motor vehicles?
Yes, I have.
But when they are riding on their bike, on that shoulder, or that trail through the woods or along that river, that bike didn't pay for any of what they are riding on.
Have you ever done any research into how roads are funded?
Actually, I retired as a transportation manager for a County so I know quite a bit about transportation funding. I did it for a living.
The first article you sent says car don’t pay taxes. That’s true. But it doesn’t mention fuel taxes, or Highway Users Revenue Fund, or HURF. That’s collected by the government for every gallon or gas or diesel collected. Depends on the individual State, but it’s typically around $.40/gallon. That money is then dispersed to fund road construction and maintenance. Which by the way, are not getting a passing grade like most of the infrastructure (dams, bridges, water delivery systems, roads, etc.) rating here in the US.
So no, that bicycle shoulder on the side of the road is not in any way paid directly for that shoulder. True, that bicyclist probably buys gas and diesel too, but so does everyone else. But they don’t get special stuff for their fuel tax. By the bicycle community does.
If bicyclist had to pay say $20/day to use that bike path or shoulder construction and maintenance, I am guessing many wouldn’t. But they are getting it free now. And fricken complain about the condition of what they are getting free and don’t abide by traffic laws like the car next to them has to. The car that has fuel in it that paid the tax. Which that bike didn’t.
That’s messed up.
So you do understand that cyclists do pay for roads. In every jurisdiction I have studied, ad valorem taxes pay for municipality and county roads and general tax fund money is used for state and federal roads. Glad we were able to dispense with the myth that cyclists don't pay for roads.
Bicyclists pay for the road only if they are buying gas or diesel. Which I have never seen a bicycle filled with gas by the way.
This issue is the same as say, a tourist from Germany who stops and fills his rental car with gas. Except we don’t give him a special lane to drive on. But we do bicyclist. And also sidewalks for pedestrians for that matter. And the biggest rub: the tourist doesn’t complain about the condition of his special lane and act entitled and snobbish like he is “owed” that lane like the bicycle community often does.
In my State, unless the voters approve a special tax to fund roads, zero ad vsloreum or general taxes are used to fund road construction or maintenance. But even if the voters do approve it, those taxes are not “sold” to the to fund bicycle paths as that tax would not be approved by the majority of the voters.
Road bicycling was my recovery exercise after I had a hip and knee replacement, so now I can hunt deer in the mountains. I’m all for it. That said, I don’t like the jerky club riders, they are a bunch of weenies!
As far as road taxes go, so what if bicyclist don’t pay direct fees/taxes, almost all of them drive cars and pay taxes for the roads anyway.
Well, I personally don’t like to see the taxes I pay for get siphoned off to fund something else of which is not paying for their fair share. And then have the nerve to complain about it.
Would you be willing then to, say, from taxes your paying, to fund a special lane on the road for people with blue cars, or teachers, or single moms, or whatever knowing you are not part of that special group? I’m not.
Nothin special, just a POS liberal @sshole, usin bikin steada gun control to display his/its? chronic assholia.
Self-centered POS qweer know-it-not, tryin ta lecture normal people.
Dress up in qweer clothes, so other qweers will know what ya are, and ta shove your get a lifestyle in normal people's faces.
End up, only other qweers, dykes and @ssholes will be around ya.
Special "shorts" that ya pay extra for, cause they got a insert that lets your ass take a poundin all day.
And be ready ta take a poundin the next day, too.
Bicycle seat specially shaped like a cock and balls, pointier the better for comfort, with a quick-detach feature in case ya see some bushes and can't wait til ya get home.
Just another antifag, cept ya use a bike ta block the road and harrass good people.
Then act like a big pussy when your ass gets properly kicked.
Claim ta be "in shape" but if you actually was, you wouldn't need 18,634 gears ta go up a hill.
Pussies and qweers get all the attention in society anymore, certainly the attraction for a loser that doesn't have the skill ta build up, but only drag others down.
Ride where you like. It's free. Internal combustion is paying your way. Personally I will never submit my life to the driving skills of an unknown driver apart from me by the width of a white line. Death is inches away and can created by a multitude of simple human actions; a sneeze, a glance to the side, dropped phone, simple inattention, a wild card event resulting in a weave or 12" or less into the legally designated bike lane. 2 tons vs 50 lbs. Who's the winner? Does it matter who had the right of way? NO. Unarguable. Dead is dead. Play the odds, take your chances.
When your recreational pastime is to impede traffic by moving a full 50mph under the posted speed limit on a highway with 12 inches of pavement outside the white line, you might be an azzhole. Got a bike lane? Mountain bike? All good.
I have never experienced difficulty going around a cyclist. If you experience difficulty, maybe it's you?
Dude. I pedal. I have never ran a biker off the road while driving, but have come across many idiots that put themselves in grave danger while riding. Pedaling at 15-20mph on a 70mph blacktop with literally 12 inches of pavement out side the white line for recreation is reckless, although legal. What is your opinion on canoeing in major shipping lanes?
Bicyclists pay for the road only if they are buying gas or diesel.
In my State, unless the voters approve a special tax to fund roads, zero ad vsloreum or general taxes are used to fund road construction or maintenance.
I learned something Arizona is not yet using other tax monies for county and city roads. Unless they accept state monies to help with funding, which almost always happens. Just remember if you ever drive through a city where you haven't paid for gas you are stealing the use of that road!
Ride where you like. It's free. Internal combustion is paying your way. Personally I will never submit my life to the driving skills of an unknown driver apart from me by the width of a white line. Death is inches away and can created by a multitude of simple human actions; a sneeze, a glance to the side, dropped phone, simple inattention, a wild card event resulting in a weave or 12" or less into the legally designated bike lane. 2 tons vs 50 lbs. Who's the winner? Does it matter who had the right of way? NO. Unarguable. Dead is dead. Play the odds, take your chances.
The rule of gross tonnage is often invoked when human decency and operating skill fall short. I am surprised to learn that so many of the 'fire members struggle with the basic driving skill needed to negotiate the occasional cyclist. Maybe some should reevaluate whether guns are safe in their hands. Get hit with a stray bullet, Who's the winner? Does it matter who had the right of way? NO. Unarguable. Dead is dead. Play the odds, take your chances. Right?
Death is inches away and can created by a multitude of simple human actions; a sneeze, a glance to the side, dropped phone, simple inattention, a wild card event resulting in a weave or 12" or less into the legally designated bike lane. 2 tons vs 50 lbs. Who's the winner? Does it matter who had the right of way? NO. Unarguable. Dead is dead. Play the odds, take your chances.
Ya, but you’ll be in really good shape until then 🙂
Actually, I’m not seeking death, but at this point in my life there’s worse ways to go.
The biggest downside would be inflicting on someone else the burden of having killed me.
At 62, because of bicycles I can be athletic, every day. And at 62 I can ride a bicycle all the way across West Texas in summer, and then decide to turn right at the NM State Line and go up the Plains instead.
Did you have a bike when I you were a kid? Just as much fun now
And easy on the knees.
Apart from around town Birdie there is not a lot one can do with a bicycle here, sort of an out of the way place where b-doubles, road trains, and b-triples rule the road and the tyranny of distance dampens enthusiasm.
Death is inches away and can created by a multitude of simple human actions; a sneeze, a glance to the side, dropped phone, simple inattention, a wild card event resulting in a weave or 12" or less into the legally designated bike lane. 2 tons vs 50 lbs. Who's the winner? Does it matter who had the right of way? NO. Unarguable. Dead is dead. Play the odds, take your chances.
Ya, but you’ll be in really good shape until then 🙂
Actually, I’m not seeking death, but at this point in my life there’s worse ways to go.
The biggest downside would be inflicting on someone else the burden of having killed me.
At 62, because of bicycles I can be athletic, every day. And at 62 I can ride a bicycle all the way across West Texas in summer, and then decide to turn right at the NM State Line and go up the Plains instead.
So for me it’s worth the risk.
I can't tell anyone in this limited space what cycling has done for me. I've rode over 60 miles in the last 2 days. I couldn't even walk a mile last year because of bad knees and back and being over weight. I was on 4 pain pills a day and 4 injections every 3 months. I have no pain now with no meds or injections,and my weight has gone from 330 to 175. I'm 51 and feel better and can do more physically than I have ever been able to do.
Death is inches away and can created by a multitude of simple human actions; a sneeze, a glance to the side, dropped phone, simple inattention, a wild card event resulting in a weave or 12" or less into the legally designated bike lane. 2 tons vs 50 lbs. Who's the winner? Does it matter who had the right of way? NO. Unarguable. Dead is dead. Play the odds, take your chances.
Ya, but you’ll be in really good shape until then 🙂
Actually, I’m not seeking death, but at this point in my life there’s worse ways to go.
The biggest downside would be inflicting on someone else the burden of having killed me.
At 62, because of bicycles I can be athletic, every day. And at 62 I can ride a bicycle all the way across West Texas in summer, and then decide to turn right at the NM State Line and go up the Plains instead.
So for me it’s worth the risk.
I have read studies that showed that cycling can extend your life expectancy even when you factor in accidental deaths.
About 900 cyclists a year get killed in the US. Many of those are cyclists who are not allowed to have a driver's license. Many are those who are riding on the wrong side of the road. Many of those are killed at night while riding with no lights. Many of those are impaired. Eliminate those risks and the raw number of cyclists killed probably amounts to one a day.
Identify the other ways that cyclists are killed. Develop mitigation strategies and you find yourself in a relatively safe situation. Unfortunately the mitigation strategies for avoiding certain types of accidents involve positioning yourself in the lane. We see from reading the rants here the issues that causes. Would I rather be alive or be the source of emotional distress for an overweight, angry, middle-aged white male?
When your recreational pastime is to impede traffic by moving a full 50mph under the posted speed limit on a highway with 12 inches of pavement outside the white line, you might be an azzhole. Got a bike lane? Mountain bike? All good.
I have never experienced difficulty going around a cyclist. If you experience difficulty, maybe it's you?
Dude. I pedal. I have never ran a biker off the road while driving, but have come across many idiots that put themselves in grave danger while riding. Pedaling at 15-20mph on a 70mph blacktop with literally 12 inches of pavement out side the white line for recreation is reckless, although legal. What is your opinion on canoeing in major shipping lanes?
You encountered people doing dumb things and you didn't kill them. That sounds pretty simple to me. Are the skills and thought processes you employed in not running over them anything special or do you feel like any licensed driver could pull it off?
What kind of special skills or thinking does it take to go around a bicyclist on a road like this?
I am a kayaker too. You wouldn't believe the level of butthurt motor boaters feel over the presence of paddlers.
I can't tell anyone in this limited space what cycling has done for me. I've rode over 60 miles in the last 2 days. I couldn't even walk a mile last year because of bad knees and back and being over weight. I was on 4 pain pills a day and 4 injections every 3 months. I have no pain now with no meds or injections,and my weight has gone from 330 to 175. I'm 51 and feel better and can do more physically than I have ever been able to do.
Ya, all of that
But now you have a moral obligation to ride it to California 🙂
I can't tell anyone in this limited space what cycling has done for me. I've rode over 60 miles in the last 2 days. I couldn't even walk a mile last year because of bad knees and back and being over weight. I was on 4 pain pills a day and 4 injections every 3 months. I have no pain now with no meds or injections,and my weight has gone from 330 to 175. I'm 51 and feel better and can do more physically than I have ever been able to do.
Ya, all of that
But now you have a moral obligation to ride it to California 🙂
For starters...........
I would actually like to ride it to Colorado but I'm afraid of all the distracted haters in automobiles.
I can't tell anyone in this limited space what cycling has done for me. I've rode over 60 miles in the last 2 days. I couldn't even walk a mile last year because of bad knees and back and being over weight. I was on 4 pain pills a day and 4 injections every 3 months. I have no pain now with no meds or injections,and my weight has gone from 330 to 175. I'm 51 and feel better and can do more physically than I have ever been able to do.
Ya, all of that
But now you have a moral obligation to ride it to California 🙂
For starters...........
I would actually like to ride it to Colorado but I'm afraid of all the distracted haters in automobiles.
Good mirrors, no earbuds or music, a place slow enough (~10mph) that you really CAN have your head on a swivel AND bail off the shoulder into the grass at a moment’s notice.
I can't tell anyone in this limited space what cycling has done for me. I've rode over 60 miles in the last 2 days. I couldn't even walk a mile last year because of bad knees and back and being over weight. I was on 4 pain pills a day and 4 injections every 3 months. I have no pain now with no meds or injections,and my weight has gone from 330 to 175. I'm 51 and feel better and can do more physically than I have ever been able to do.
Ya, all of that
But now you have a moral obligation to ride it to California 🙂
For starters...........
I would actually like to ride it to Colorado but I'm afraid of all the distracted haters in automobiles.
I may have mentioned this over on Bike Forums. Read a book titled "The Art of Cycling."
I can't tell anyone in this limited space what cycling has done for me. I've rode over 60 miles in the last 2 days. I couldn't even walk a mile last year because of bad knees and back and being over weight. I was on 4 pain pills a day and 4 injections every 3 months. I have no pain now with no meds or injections,and my weight has gone from 330 to 175. I'm 51 and feel better and can do more physically than I have ever been able to do.
Ya, all of that
But now you have a moral obligation to ride it to California 🙂
For starters...........
Get in the swimming pool. It's the best exercise there is, and easier on the joints. Much safer too, obviously, with less dorks on the road.
My comments were not in jest or derogotory. A skinny az 2 wheeler stands no chance against the 2 ton and more 4 wheeler driven by a distracted, obnoxious, or aggressive pilot. Literally, ride the asphalt if that is your desire but take your chances without complaint when confronted by those described. They are there. Waiting. Some interaction unintentional but some quite intentional. The dimensional separation between life and death is measured in inches and right of way is of no benefit in the final measure. In my area of existence bike lanes are common and I for one make way for the spandex brigade. Speaking only for myself and definitely not for skinny wheeled bikers I value life more than a share of a congested 4 lane. Ride where you wish with my blessing if at all relevant. But when fate meets opportunity and the flat spot on the asphat is you none of this will matter in the least.
My comments were not in jest or derogotory. A skinny az 2 wheeler stands no chance against the 2 ton and more 4 wheeler driven by a distracted, obnoxious, or aggressive pilot. Literally, ride the asphalt if that is your desire but take your chances without complaint when confronted by those described. They are there. Waiting. Some interaction unintentional but some quite intentional. The dimensional separation between life and death is measured in inches and right of way is of no benefit in the final measure. In my area of existence bike lanes are common and I for one make way for the spandex brigade. Speaking only for myself and definitely not for skinny wheeled bikers I value life more than a share of a congested 4 lane. Ride where you wish with my blessing if at all relevant. But when fate meets opportunity and the flat spot on the asphat is you none of this will matter in the least.
The rule of gross tonnage again. Are we consistent with the way we apply it?
When you read the comments following an auto vs pedestrian crash news article, do people celebrate the death of the pedestrian and aggressively assert pedestrians don't belong on the road with 2 ton vehicles? You know, about 5 times as many pedestrians are killed each year than cyclists.
When you read the comments following an auto vs motorcycle crash news article, do people celebrate the death of the motorcyclist and aggressively assert motorcyclists don't belong on the road with 2 ton vehicles? Motorcyclist have the same vulnerability as cyclists with much more speed added to the impact.
When you read the comments following a tractor trailer vs passenger car crash news article, do people celebrate the death of the motorist and aggressively assert passenger cars don't belong on the road with 20 ton vehicles? Tractor trailer owners pay FAR more taxes.
A few days ago I was driving my wife's little car. A great big 4WD pick up drifted over into my lane. The rule of gross tonnage says I shouldn't have been there just like it does when a motorist drifts into the bicycle lane.
We are consistent in our thoughts about gross tonnage, right?
Bicyclists pay for the road only if they are buying gas or diesel.
In my State, unless the voters approve a special tax to fund roads, zero ad vsloreum or general taxes are used to fund road construction or maintenance.
I learned something Arizona is not yet using other tax monies for county and city roads. Unless they accept state monies to help with funding, which almost always happens. Just remember if you ever drive through a city where you haven't paid for gas you are stealing the use of that road!
The State monies you are referring to are the HURF or gas taxes dispersed by the State to fund transportation projects. So still, gas taxes pay for that bike lane.
Bicyclists pay for the road only if they are buying gas or diesel.
In my State, unless the voters approve a special tax to fund roads, zero ad vsloreum or general taxes are used to fund road construction or maintenance.
I learned something Arizona is not yet using other tax monies for county and city roads. Unless they accept state monies to help with funding, which almost always happens. Just remember if you ever drive through a city where you haven't paid for gas you are stealing the use of that road!
The State monies you are referring to are the HURF or gas taxes dispersed by the State to fund transportation projects. So still, gas taxes pay for that bike lane.
Well hell, I'll never ride a bike on an Arizona road then. I don't want to feel guilty about stealing. Am I allowed to drive on them if I have never purchased gas in Arizona?
Most ragers check multiple boxes in the following demographics.
Middle age White Male Out of shape Lower intellect
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Today I looked behind me and saw another rider coming. When he was several hundred yards back, I pulled in ahead of my wife. He passed about a minute after I did and said "ride single file." Not sure I heard him right I asked "what did you say?" He said "ride single file." I laid into him. "I was single file you dumb mother ffuukker." He snarked back "you weren't" I said "I singled up well before you got here you goddam dumb mother ffuukker."
Meh, it wasn't any skin off my back telling him what I thought. I asked my wife if that embarrassed her when I said stuff like that. She said not when you say it to an idiot mother ffuukker.
Most ragers check multiple boxes in the following demographics.
Middle age White Male Out of shape Lower intellect
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Today I looked behind me and saw another rider coming. When he was several hundred yards back, I pulled in ahead of my wife. He passed about a minute after I did and said "ride single file." Not sure I heard him right I asked "what did you say?" He said "ride single file." I laid into him. "I was single file you dumb mother ffuukker." He snarked back "you weren't" I said "I singled up well before you got here you goddam dumb mother ffuukker."
Meh, it wasn't any skin off my back telling him what I thought. I asked my wife if that embarrassed her when I said stuff like that. She said not when you say it to an idiot mother ffuukker.
Bicyclists pay for the road only if they are buying gas or diesel.
In my State, unless the voters approve a special tax to fund roads, zero ad vsloreum or general taxes are used to fund road construction or maintenance.
I learned something Arizona is not yet using other tax monies for county and city roads. Unless they accept state monies to help with funding, which almost always happens. Just remember if you ever drive through a city where you haven't paid for gas you are stealing the use of that road!
The State monies you are referring to are the HURF or gas taxes dispersed by the State to fund transportation projects. So still, gas taxes pay for that bike lane.
Well hell, I'll never ride a bike on an Arizona road then. I don't want to feel guilty about stealing. Am I allowed to drive on them if I have never purchased gas in Arizona?
Ride your bike wherever you want. The weather here in AZ is often conducive to flying, sitting by a pool, hiking, or about anything outside.
But maybe you’ll now better understand the funding for those bike paths and shoulders you ride your bike on wherever you are from, because the State you live probably is wrestling with the same funding issue I have explained.
Again, my experience with the bicycling community is the act like they are owed or entitled to ride that bike and are very vocal about their expectations. And they ain’t paying for that shoulder or path. If there was say a user fee or tax to pay for that shoulder or oath, then I’d say that got a legit bitch. If that fee was say $20 per day for using it, then they would’ve correct in bitching about it. They are getting it for free now though. And bitching about it’s condition.
Today I looked behind me and saw another rider coming. When he was several hundred yards back, I pulled in ahead of my wife. He passed about a minute after I did and said "ride single file." Not sure I heard him right I asked "what did you say?" He said "ride single file." I laid into him. "I was single file you dumb mother ffuukker." He snarked back "you weren't" I said "I singled up well before you got here you goddam dumb mother ffuukker."
Meh, it wasn't any skin off my back telling him what I thought. I asked my wife if that embarrassed her when I said stuff like that. She said not when you say it to an idiot mother ffuukker.
Given the fact you look all of 130 skinny lbs, and you wear a clown suit, I find it highly unlikely you said anything close to that unless you were talking to a woman or little kid. Otherwise you likely spent the next 15 minutes picking your teeth up off the highway.
Bicyclists pay for the road only if they are buying gas or diesel.
In my State, unless the voters approve a special tax to fund roads, zero ad vsloreum or general taxes are used to fund road construction or maintenance.
I learned something Arizona is not yet using other tax monies for county and city roads. Unless they accept state monies to help with funding, which almost always happens. Just remember if you ever drive through a city where you haven't paid for gas you are stealing the use of that road!
The State monies you are referring to are the HURF or gas taxes dispersed by the State to fund transportation projects. So still, gas taxes pay for that bike lane.
Well hell, I'll never ride a bike on an Arizona road then. I don't want to feel guilty about stealing. Am I allowed to drive on them if I have never purchased gas in Arizona?
Ride your bike wherever you want. The weather here in AZ is often conducive to flying, sitting by a pool, hiking, or about anything outside.
But maybe you’ll now better understand the funding for those bike paths and shoulders you ride your bike on wherever you are from, because the State you live probably is wrestling with the same funding issue I have explained.
Again, my experience with the bicycling community is the act like they are owed or entitled to ride that bike and are very vocal about their expectations. And they ain’t paying for that shoulder or path. If there was say a user fee or tax to pay for that shoulder or oath, then I’d say that got a legit bitch. If that fee was say $20 per day for using it, then they would’ve correct in bitching about it. They are getting it for free now though. And bitching about it’s condition.
That’s messed up. Like I said all along.
Arizona is the only state I have researched that relies so heavily on fuel and vehicle taxes and fees.
Quote: "About 900 cyclists a year get killed in the U.S." I bet there are more than that. And a whole lot more maimed and crippled for life. If you want to get out there and mix it up with cars I'm all for you as long as you don't hold up traffic.
Today I looked behind me and saw another rider coming. When he was several hundred yards back, I pulled in ahead of my wife. He passed about a minute after I did and said "ride single file." Not sure I heard him right I asked "what did you say?" He said "ride single file." I laid into him. "I was single file you dumb mother ffuukker." He snarked back "you weren't" I said "I singled up well before you got here you goddam dumb mother ffuukker."
Meh, it wasn't any skin off my back telling him what I thought. I asked my wife if that embarrassed her when I said stuff like that. She said not when you say it to an idiot mother ffuukker.
Given the fact you look all of 130 skinny lbs, and you wear a clown suit, I find it highly unlikely you said anything close to that unless you were talking to a woman or little kid. Otherwise you likely spent the next 15 minutes picking your teeth up off the highway.
On top of being skinny and wearing a clown suit, I also don't have a whole lot of use of my right arm on account of 5 shoulder surgeries. That won't keep me from calling out a dumbffuukk.
Quote: "About 900 cyclists a year get killed in the U.S." I bet there are more than that. And a whole lot more maimed and crippled for life. If you want to get out there and mix it up with cars I'm all for you as long as you don't hold up traffic.
I suspect the number killed is pretty good. I know for a fact the accident data beyond that is bad. It's the same with our boating statistics. I'd rather be killed than relegated to a wheelchair for life. I take an extremely cooperative approach to sharing the road. I don't like holding anyone up. My wife thinks I am weird for sprinting across crosswalks to minimize the time I delay waiting motorists. So while I advocate strongly for cyclists rights and for motorists to be patient and respectful, I also treat fellow road users with respect until otherwise indicated.
2100 miles of happiness this year pedaling and no issues with any traffic. It doesn't always have to be a fight but I always ride alone.
I think I only had one minor conflict out on the road this year. On an early morning ride through downtown New Orleans when there was very little traffic, I was riding in the left lane of a two lane one way road with curbside parking on both sides. A taxi driver got behind me and laid into his horn. There was nobody in the other lane and he could have easily gone around, but I guess it was easier to press the horn than to apply gentle pressure to the steering wheel. I told him what I thought about him.
Today I looked behind me and saw another rider coming. When he was several hundred yards back, I pulled in ahead of my wife. He passed about a minute after I did and said "ride single file." Not sure I heard him right I asked "what did you say?" He said "ride single file." I laid into him. "I was single file you dumb mother ffuukker." He snarked back "you weren't" I said "I singled up well before you got here you goddam dumb mother ffuukker."
Meh, it wasn't any skin off my back telling him what I thought. I asked my wife if that embarrassed her when I said stuff like that. She said not when you say it to an idiot mother ffuukker.
Given the fact you look all of 130 skinny lbs, and you wear a clown suit, I find it highly unlikely you said anything close to that unless you were talking to a woman or little kid. Otherwise you likely spent the next 15 minutes picking your teeth up off the highway.
On top of being skinny and wearing a clown suit, I also don't have a whole lot of use of my right arm on account of 5 shoulder surgeries. That won't keep me from calling out a dumbffuukk.
You couldn't swat the flies off your asss. Get real.
When it comes to road cycling, I find there’s usually a direct correlation between the volume of the complaint and the fasassedness of the complainer.
Maybe? But it's undeniable the correlation between pedal bikers and homosexuality. Read somewhere they like the narrow seats because it keeps their butt plugs in.
When it comes to road cycling, I find there’s usually a direct correlation between the volume of the complaint and the fasassedness of the complainer.
Maybe? But it's undeniable the correlation between pedal bikers and homosexuality. Read somewhere they like the narrow seats because it keeps their butt plugs in.
The fact that you are [bleep] stupid enough to write and post such a thing,and that there seems to be several just like you always posting beyond dumb [bleep], is the main reason I have stopped hanging around here.
When it comes to road cycling, I find there’s usually a direct correlation between the volume of the complaint and the fasassedness of the complainer.
Maybe? But it's undeniable the correlation between pedal bikers and homosexuality. Read somewhere they like the narrow seats because it keeps their butt plugs in.
The fact that you are [bleep] stupid enough to write and post such a thing,and that there seems to be several just like you always posting beyond dumb [bleep], is the main reason I have stopped hanging around here.
Don't let the door hit ya on your azz as you leave
When it comes to road cycling, I find there’s usually a direct correlation between the volume of the complaint and the fasassedness of the complainer.
Maybe? But it's undeniable the correlation between pedal bikers and homosexuality. Read somewhere they like the narrow seats because it keeps their butt plugs in.
The fact that you are [bleep] stupid enough to write and post such a thing,and that there seems to be several just like you always posting beyond dumb [bleep], is the main reason I have stopped hanging around here.
To which poster are you replying? They guy insulting motorists or the guy replying in kind about pedal bikers?
When it comes to road cycling, I find there’s usually a direct correlation between the volume of the complaint and the fasassedness of the complainer.
Maybe? But it's undeniable the correlation between pedal bikers and homosexuality. Read somewhere they like the narrow seats because it keeps their butt plugs in.
The fact that you are [bleep] stupid enough to write and post such a thing,and that there seems to be several just like you always posting beyond dumb [bleep], is the main reason I have stopped hanging around here.
To which poster are you replying? They guy insulting motorists or the guy replying in kind about pedal bikers?
Either way have a blessed Sunday.
You do seem to have an unnatural obsession with homosexuality.
You do seem to have an unnatural obsession with homosexuality.
Latent desires perhaps?
If that's an offer to explore further, I'll politely decline. But I'm flattered.
Read the title of the post. The OP has been in multiple flame wars over pedal bikers and decided to dedicating a thread to just that. That it inflamed some vaginas is pretty funny.
And having run into quite a few of them in gas stations here over the last couple years, many are very femme. If that observation bugs you, I'm not sure what I can say to make it any easier.
There's no doubt about it.......... Paulie be one bad mofo............
Nope. Not a badass at all. When I bicycle I do so with a great deal of respect for motorists. Really no different from the way I drive. When I drive I do so in deference to the vulnerability of pedestrians and cyclists, and also with great respect. I encounter cyclists and pedestrians on my commute every day. Some of them behave remarkably dumb. Even with that they are never a threat to my safety and never much more than a fleeting inconvenience. I can't say the same thing about the motorists that I encounter on a daily basis. I can't even begin to comprehend how entitled some of you must feel to take such great offense to the rare and limited inconvenience cyclists pose to them. But by God we'll all be tough enough to go to war if our guns are banned.
I haven't read all the posts here, but I will offer my opinion. I live on a rural road. There are no shoulders, no sidewalks and the lanes aren't as wide as an interstate by any means. And the roads aren't straight, many curves and hills, you can't see what is ahead half the time. Why cyclists pick these roads to ride I ave no idea, especially since they ride in the middle of the lane. In my view, they are asking for an accident, because sooner or later it will happen. Either the cyclist will get run over, pushed off the road and wreck, or cause a head on with an on coming car. It's not safe for anyone, yet they still do it. It should be restricted to proper roads only, where everyone's safety is as best as can be.
I haven't read all the posts here, but I will offer my opinion. I live on a rural road. There are no shoulders, no sidewalks and the lanes aren't as wide as an interstate by any means. And the roads aren't straight, many curves and hills, you can't see what is ahead half the time. Why cyclists pick these roads to ride I ave no idea, especially since they ride in the middle of the lane. In my view, they are asking for an accident, because sooner or later it will happen. Either the cyclist will get run over, pushed off the road and wreck, or cause a head on with an on coming car. It's not safe for anyone, yet they still do it. It should be restricted to proper roads only, where everyone's safety is as best as can be.
Or drivers could simply not outdrive their line of sight, and everything would be fine. But I certainly understand the mentality that finds fault with the cyclist when a motorist outdrives their line of sight. I really like the part about the cyclist "causing" a head-on! Nice work.
I haven't read all the posts here, but I will offer my opinion. I live on a rural road. There are no shoulders, no sidewalks and the lanes aren't as wide as an interstate by any means. And the roads aren't straight, many curves and hills, you can't see what is ahead half the time. Why cyclists pick these roads to ride I ave no idea, especially since they ride in the middle of the lane. In my view, they are asking for an accident, because sooner or later it will happen. Either the cyclist will get run over, pushed off the road and wreck, or cause a head on with an on coming car. It's not safe for anyone, yet they still do it. It should be restricted to proper roads only, where everyone's safety is as best as can be.
Or drivers could simply not outdrive their line of sight, and everything would be fine. But I certainly understand the mentality that finds fault with the cyclist when a motorist outdrives their line of sight. I really like the part about the cyclist "causing" a head-on! Nice work.
Only a mentally deficient mind would think it was OK for bicycles to ride like that risking lives is alright.
I haven't read all the posts here, but I will offer my opinion. I live on a rural road. There are no shoulders, no sidewalks and the lanes aren't as wide as an interstate by any means. And the roads aren't straight, many curves and hills, you can't see what is ahead half the time. Why cyclists pick these roads to ride I ave no idea, especially since they ride in the middle of the lane. In my view, they are asking for an accident, because sooner or later it will happen. Either the cyclist will get run over, pushed off the road and wreck, or cause a head on with an on coming car. It's not safe for anyone, yet they still do it. It should be restricted to proper roads only, where everyone's safety is as best as can be.
Or drivers could simply not outdrive their line of sight, and everything would be fine. But I certainly understand the mentality that finds fault with the cyclist when a motorist outdrives their line of sight. I really like the part about the cyclist "causing" a head-on! Nice work.
Only a mentally deficient mind would think it was OK for bicycles to ride like that risking lives is alright.
When I am driving, no cyclist can endanger my life by riding in a traffic lane on a winding road. So if the cyclist "endangers" one motorist and not the next, maybe it's the motorist that is the issue.
I haven't read all the posts here, but I will offer my opinion. I live on a rural road. There are no shoulders, no sidewalks and the lanes aren't as wide as an interstate by any means. And the roads aren't straight, many curves and hills, you can't see what is ahead half the time. Why cyclists pick these roads to ride I ave no idea, especially since they ride in the middle of the lane. In my view, they are asking for an accident, because sooner or later it will happen. Either the cyclist will get run over, pushed off the road and wreck, or cause a head on with an on coming car. It's not safe for anyone, yet they still do it. It should be restricted to proper roads only, where everyone's safety is as best as can be.
Or drivers could simply not outdrive their line of sight, and everything would be fine. But I certainly understand the mentality that finds fault with the cyclist when a motorist outdrives their line of sight. I really like the part about the cyclist "causing" a head-on! Nice work.
Only a mentally deficient mind would think it was OK for bicycles to ride like that risking lives is alright.
Yup. It's the entitled mentality of many unfortunately.
I've said it before on here, but I'll reiterate. In my area, there are hundreds if not thousands of miles of state and Forest Service roads that a pedal biker can use to recreate on. Not to mention gated roads that have no motorized traffic. But instead, many choose to pedal along on 2 lane, no shoulder, 70 mph highways that are already clogged with tourists pulling campers, boats, etc. and local traffic. Simple arrogance, no other way to put it. Bad enough to deal with the poofters in towns where they have their own special lane, up here it's ridiculous.
We have a lot of bicyclists around here that love to ride right in the middle of the road clogging up traffic. Most of the local roads are curvy 2 lanes and more than once I have come out of a steep blind curve and damned near ran over some idiot in a spandex suit laboring up a steep grade.
I haven't read all the posts here, but I will offer my opinion. I live on a rural road. There are no shoulders, no sidewalks and the lanes aren't as wide as an interstate by any means. And the roads aren't straight, many curves and hills, you can't see what is ahead half the time. Why cyclists pick these roads to ride I ave no idea, especially since they ride in the middle of the lane. In my view, they are asking for an accident, because sooner or later it will happen. Either the cyclist will get run over, pushed off the road and wreck, or cause a head on with an on coming car. It's not safe for anyone, yet they still do it. It should be restricted to proper roads only, where everyone's safety is as best as can be.
Or drivers could simply not outdrive their line of sight, and everything would be fine. But I certainly understand the mentality that finds fault with the cyclist when a motorist outdrives their line of sight. I really like the part about the cyclist "causing" a head-on! Nice work.
These are the type of Roads that I haul farm and Industrial Equipment quite often, 14 and 16 ft wide down and find some [bleep] dumb bicyclist at the bottom of a hill in a curve that can't pedal up the next f****** help son of a b**** ass need to go back to town where you came from
ALL the cyclists where I live are self entitled stupid jerks who think they own the streets. They ride expensive looking skinny tired bikes with skinny seats and dress like wanna be bike racers. I'm sure that almost all of them are transplanted Democrats from Austin. They've screwed up Austin (bike lane Capital) and are trying to screw up the surrounding towns. Sometimes they ride 4 wide in the street taking up a whole traffic lane even when there are bike lanes available and blow through stop signs/red lights. When they do ride in a bike lane they ride right on the line nearest the auto traffic. I rode a bike a lot when I was kid but was a very careful rider and stayed out of the way of traffic. My bike had big soft balloon tires and a big sprung well padded seat that you could sit straight up in if you wanted to. I haven't ridden a bicycle in years because I don't want to sit on my gonads like the guys around here do on their narrow skinny seats.
Yup. It's the entitled mentality of many unfortunately.
I've said it before on here, but I'll reiterate. In my area, there are hundreds if not thousands of miles of state and Forest Service roads that a pedal biker can use to recreate on. Not to mention gated roads that have no motorized traffic. But instead, many choose to pedal along on 2 lane, no shoulder, 70 mph highways that are already clogged with tourists pulling campers, boats, etc. and local traffic. Simple arrogance, no other way to put it. Bad enough to deal with the poofters in towns where they have their own special lane, up here it's ridiculous.
You did a great job of providing perspective. The roads are clogged with motor vehicles. Doesn't sound like bicyclists are the problem. I may be the only one on this forum that believes that bicycles are infinitely easier to get around than F-350s towing a 5th wheel at 60 MPH, but that's been my experience. I rode on a rural 55 MPH highway in Colorado last summer. It was a lightly traveled road. Most vehicles that encountered me never had to lift off the gas. At one point I realized I had not been passed in 10-15 minutes. I pulled over to take a few pics. When I did, a slow moving motor home came by with about a dozen or so motorists jammed up behind it. But yes, I understand how some of you have difficulty negotiating bicyclists. You have made it very clear.
I've got zero problems with cyclists as long as they keep outside the white line if there's a paved shoulder or as far over as safe if not. Its the odd twit(s) that think the center of the lane is their spot and could care less if they hold up traffic. That is dangerous for everybody but mainly them. IME having driven tons of highway miles with work and otherwise I'd say the problem cyclists in my mind would make up less than 10%. And a lot of them really have their schit wired, are aware of traffic and do the right things.
Can you explain the difficulty in not creating an (unnecessary)hazard on public roadways?
Or, if they decide to ride the public ways.............why many feel the rules of the road don't app!y to them. Those same cyclists who bitch about traffic not yielding won't give an inch to a runner.
We have a lot of bicyclists around here that love to ride right in the middle of the road clogging up traffic. Most of the local roads are curvy 2 lanes and more than once I have come out of a steep blind curve and damned near ran over some idiot in a spandex suit laboring up a steep grade.
Can you explain the difficulty in not creating an (unnecessary)hazard on public roadways?
Or, if they decide to ride the public ways.............why many feel the rules of the road don't app!y to them. Those same cyclists who bitch about traffic not yielding won't give an inch to a runner.
Cyclists don't break laws with any greater frequency than motorists do. A number of studies have shown this. When cyclists do break laws they often cite safety reasons for doing so. Motorists say they most often break the law for reasons of convenience. When cyclists break the law they don't present much of a danger to others at all. The same cannot be said for motorists.
Hey dumbass, ever wonder why hitchhikers don't walk out in traffic?
Can you explain to me the difficulty you have in going around a bicycle on the road?
Logging truck coming toward us in the other lane of a narrow winding 50 mph highway. No way to go around the bicycle. The 15 mile stretch I most hate to share the road with bicyclists is 30 miles from the nearest town and where cyclists are so rare you gotta be kidding about creeping around corners to look for one in the unlikely case one is in my lane. Logging trucks and bicycles are an unwise mix, FWIW. This is the Far West, where time is money to loggers, ranchers and miners who use the roads. Unless it is icy or heavy fog, they are going to drive the speed limit, at least. It is NOT pastoral lanes in New England...
Hey dumbass, ever wonder why hitchhikers don't walk out in traffic?
Can you explain to me the difficulty you have in going around a bicycle on the road?
Logging truck coming toward us in the other lane of a narrow winding 50 mph highway 30 miles from the nearest town and where cyclists are so rare you gotta be kidding about creeping around corners to look for one in the unlikely case one is in my lane. Logging trucks and bicycles are an unwise mix, FWIW. This is the Far West, where time is money to loggers, ranchers and miners who use the roads. Unless it is icy or heavy fog, they are going to drive the speed limit, at least. It is NOT pastoral lanes in New England...
What if another logging truck was broken down around that corner? Boulder in the road? Car accident? Someone who drives for a living shouldn't have to be told not to outdrive his line of sight. But I guess such is the state of modern "professional" drivers.
Can you explain the difficulty in not creating an (unnecessary)hazard on public roadways?
Or, if they decide to ride the public ways.............why many feel the rules of the road don't app!y to them. Those same cyclists who bitch about traffic not yielding won't give an inch to a runner.
Cyclists don't break laws with any greater frequency than motorists do. A number of studies have shown this. When cyclists do break laws they often cite safety reasons for doing so. Motorists say they most often break the law for reasons of convenience. When cyclists break the law they don't present much of a danger to others at all. The same cannot be said for motorists.
Translation: it's okay for cyclists to break laws because of the perception of safety. I'm sure running stop signs and lit intersections squares with that theory. Explain again how not yielding to runners fits that theory?
Do you see yourself as some sort of liaison that is going to convince “neutral” people to embrace the idea of bicycles on the roads?...or are you simply trolling for attention because it amuses you?
If it’s the former, then I can tell you you’re badly missing the mark. You’re coming across as an azzhole partner, and I truly mean that with the least offense possible. If it’s the latter, then by all means press on and enjoy yourself and all the associated discontent.
I’ll state for the record I’m largely indifferent about the topic, and ride my bike to work with some degree of frequency during the summer on a combination of roads and trails. I’ll also state for the record I come across as an azzhole at times as well.
Can you explain the difficulty in not creating an (unnecessary)hazard on public roadways?
Or, if they decide to ride the public ways.............why many feel the rules of the road don't app!y to them. Those same cyclists who bitch about traffic not yielding won't give an inch to a runner.
Cyclists don't break laws with any greater frequency than motorists do. A number of studies have shown this. When cyclists do break laws they often cite safety reasons for doing so. Motorists say they most often break the law for reasons of convenience. When cyclists break the law they don't present much of a danger to others at all. The same cannot be said for motorists.
Translation: it's okay for cyclists to break laws because of the perception of safety. I'm sure running stop signs and lit intersections squares with that theory. Explain again how not yielding to runners fits that theory?
I give pedestrians and runners the same wide berth I like motor vehicles to give me. When space won't allow, I scrub off speed to pass with minimal disparity and I politely announce my presence. There are plenty of places it makes safety sense for me to run red lights on my bicycle. Are you going to tell me you never break the speed limit? Always come to a complete stop for stop signs and right turn on red? Signal every turn and lane change? because if you do, that bring the grand total of people I know who obey every motor vehicle law up to a grand total of 1.
Do you see yourself as some sort of liaison that is going to convince “neutral” people to embrace the idea of bicycles on the roads?...or are you simply trolling for attention because it amuses you?
If it’s the former, then I can tell you you’re badly missing the mark. You’re coming across as an azzhole partner, and I truly mean that with the least offense possible. If it’s the latter, then by all means press on and enjoy yourself and all the associated discontent.
I’ll state for the record I’m largely indifferent about the topic, and ride my bike to work with some degree of frequency during the summer on a combination of roads and trails. I’ll also state for the record I come across as an azzhole at times as well.
Dave
I am not presenting myself as an ambassador for bicycling on the road at all. People have made up their mind, and I won't move the needle at all. If someone wants to have a discussion, I'll have one. If someone wants to whine, I'll tell them they are whining. If someone wants to try to make bicyclists on the road out to be a "problem" I'll illustrate how they aren't. I have learned that people feel a need to bitch about bicyclists. This is a place for them to do that. It seems folks are enjoying themselves.
Do you see yourself as some sort of liaison that is going to convince “neutral” people to embrace the idea of bicycles on the roads?...or are you simply trolling for attention because it amuses you?
If it’s the former, then I can tell you you’re badly missing the mark. You’re coming across as an azzhole partner, and I truly mean that with the least offense possible. If it’s the latter, then by all means press on and enjoy yourself and all the associated discontent.
I’ll state for the record I’m largely indifferent about the topic, and ride my bike to work with some degree of frequency during the summer on a combination of roads and trails. I’ll also state for the record I come across as an azzhole at times as well.
Dave
I am not presenting myself as an ambassador for bicycling on the road at all. People have made up their mind, and I won't move the needle at all. If someone wants to have a discussion, I'll have one. If someone wants to whine, I'll tell them they are whining. If someone wants to try to make bicyclists on the road out to be a "problem" I'll illustrate how they aren't. I have learned that people feel a need to bitch about bicyclists. This is a place for them to do that. It seems folks are enjoying themselves.
I'll correct the highlighted portion of your post. You'll throw bullchit out there and paint a pic with your bloody tampon that isn't close to reality. But carry on, it is funny.
The OP loves the attention, yes. That's the point of his threads.....
That's the point of ALL social media posts.
Eehhh...agree to disagree. Lots of people simply answering questions on this site (and others). Lots of people just asking questions too.
Lots of “look at me” stuff too. I’ve done some of that on my hunting posts if I’m being totally honest. I guess in my mind at least, a FEW people enjoy the story though. That’s the intent at least.
I was just trying to figure out where your motivations lay with this one. You answered the question.
Yup. It's the entitled mentality of many unfortunately.
I've said it before on here, but I'll reiterate. In my area, there are hundreds if not thousands of miles of state and Forest Service roads that a pedal biker can use to recreate on. Not to mention gated roads that have no motorized traffic. But instead, many choose to pedal along on 2 lane, no shoulder, 70 mph highways that are already clogged with tourists pulling campers, boats, etc. and local traffic. Simple arrogance, no other way to put it. Bad enough to deal with the poofters in towns where they have their own special lane, up here it's ridiculous.
You did a great job of providing perspective. The roads are clogged with motor vehicles. Doesn't sound like bicyclists are the problem. I may be the only one on this forum that believes that bicycles are infinitely easier to get around than F-350s towing a 5th wheel at 60 MPH, but that's been my experience. I rode on a rural 55 MPH highway in Colorado last summer. It was a lightly traveled road. Most vehicles that encountered me never had to lift off the gas. At one point I realized I had not been passed in 10-15 minutes. I pulled over to take a few pics. When I did, a slow moving motor home came by with about a dozen or so motorists jammed up behind it. But yes, I understand how some of you have difficulty negotiating bicyclists. You have made it very clear.
Pedal bikers if encountered alone and on the appropriate stretch of highway are not a big deal. But traffic on those aforementioned 2 lane roads is bi-directional. I'll let you work that out.
Simply slowing down and going around them isn't often an option, though you'd have the detached reader believe it so.
It's apparent to anyone reading you don't care. Honestly I don't care about the pedal biker/motorized vehicle traffic in LA. I do care about it here, as I and my family deal with it.
I don't hate bicyclists. I just think many of them are extremely foolish in the risks they take with their lives, which is OK with me except that their risk involves drivers of other vehicles. That kind are arrogant elitists who insist that all traffic and the rest of the world give way, go around them no matter how inconvenient or unsafe, and leave their little slowly moving patch of roadway sacrosanct. FWIW, on the stretch of curvy highway heavy with logging traffic, I have come around a corner with rockslide boulders on the road, deer and elk in the road, a tree down in the dark one morning.. and have hit none of them. None of them have been as much hassle or hazard as a bicyclist claiming the lane as his and requiring everyone to cross the center line to go around him.
I do hate some bicycle traffic channels that are designed to cause bike/vehicle collisions for those who obey the traffic signs. Don't know if it is still there but there used to be a designed disaster bike lane on a quarter mile long hill in the north end of the Seattle sprawl. A four lane street with a 35 mph speed limit ran straight down the medium steep slope, with a couple of cross streets, the one near the bottom of the hill with a stop light. The traffic folks added a bike lane on the far right hand side of the downhill lanes.
Bikes going down the hill could easily get up to 35 mph. A driver going downhill who was turning right at a green stoplight could have a bicyclist speeding past him on his right perfectly timed to hit the side of his car. It is normally illegal to make a right turn from a center lane, due to the risk of a vehicle on the right of the one turning... but this fiasco is DESIGNED that way! Both the car turning right and the cyclist going straight through have a green light!
I learned to not only look for pedestrians and cross traffic but to watch for some hard-to-see nitwit bicyclist with a green light whizzing past me on my right as I made a right turn. I never hit one but it was not due to cyclist caution, ever. They had a green light and seemed oblivious to other traffic. That suicide bike lane is one of the reasons I'm glad I moved.
Do you see yourself as some sort of liaison that is going to convince “neutral” people to embrace the idea of bicycles on the roads?...or are you simply trolling for attention because it amuses you?
If it’s the former, then I can tell you you’re badly missing the mark. You’re coming across as an azzhole partner, and I truly mean that with the least offense possible. If it’s the latter, then by all means press on and enjoy yourself and all the associated discontent.
I’ll state for the record I’m largely indifferent about the topic, and ride my bike to work with some degree of frequency during the summer on a combination of roads and trails. I’ll also state for the record I come across as an azzhole at times as well.
Dave
I am not presenting myself as an ambassador for bicycling on the road at all. People have made up their mind, and I won't move the needle at all. If someone wants to have a discussion, I'll have one. If someone wants to whine, I'll tell them they are whining. If someone wants to try to make bicyclists on the road out to be a "problem" I'll illustrate how they aren't. I have learned that people feel a need to bitch about bicyclists. This is a place for them to do that. It seems folks are enjoying themselves.
I'll correct the highlighted portion of your post. You'll throw bullchit out there and paint a pic with your bloody tampon that isn't close to reality. But carry on, it is funny.
Didn't think we could find any lower IQ people from a Democrat trolls on the campfire. But I was wrong. Spandex wearing monkey wins the stupidity contest
I haven't read all the posts here, but I will offer my opinion. I live on a rural road. There are no shoulders, no sidewalks and the lanes aren't as wide as an interstate by any means. And the roads aren't straight, many curves and hills, you can't see what is ahead half the time. Why cyclists pick these roads to ride I ave no idea, especially since they ride in the middle of the lane. In my view, they are asking for an accident, because sooner or later it will happen. Either the cyclist will get run over, pushed off the road and wreck, or cause a head on with an on coming car. It's not safe for anyone, yet they still do it. It should be restricted to proper roads only, where everyone's safety is as best as can be.
Or drivers could simply not outdrive their line of sight, and everything would be fine. But I certainly understand the mentality that finds fault with the cyclist when a motorist outdrives their line of sight. I really like the part about the cyclist "causing" a head-on! Nice work.
These are the type of Roads that I haul farm and Industrial Equipment quite often, 14 and 16 ft wide down and find some [bleep] dumb bicyclist at the bottom of a hill in a curve that can't pedal up the next f****** help son of a b**** ass need to go back to town where you came from
Notice super Paula has not addressed this .... pussy
I don't hate bicyclists. I just think many of them are extremely foolish in the risks they take with their lives, which is OK with me except that their risk involves drivers of other vehicles. That kind are arrogant elitists who insist that all traffic and the rest of the world give way, go around them no matter how inconvenient or unsafe, and leave their little slowly moving patch of roadway sacrosanct. FWIW, on the stretch of curvy highway heavy with logging traffic, I have come around a corner with rockslide boulders on the road, deer and elk in the road, a tree down in the dark one morning.. and have hit none of them. None of them have been as much hassle or hazard as a bicyclist claiming the lane as his and requiring everyone to cross the center line to go around him.
I do hate some bicycle traffic channels that are designed to cause bike/vehicle collisions for those who obey the traffic signs. Don't know if it is still there but there used to be a designed disaster bike lane on a quarter mile long hill in the north end of the Seattle sprawl. A four lane street with a 35 mph speed limit ran straight down the medium steep slope, with a couple of cross streets, the one near the bottom of the hill with a stop light. The traffic folks added a bike lane on the far right hand side of the downhill lanes.
Bikes going down the hill could easily get up to 35 mph. A driver going downhill who was turning right at a green stoplight could have a bicyclist speeding past him on his right perfectly timed to hit the side of his car. It is normally illegal to make a right turn from a center lane, due to the risk of a vehicle on the right of the one turning... but this fiasco is DESIGNED that way! Both the car turning right and the cyclist going straight through have a green light!
I learned to not only look for pedestrians and cross traffic but to watch for some hard-to-see nitwit bicyclist with a green light whizzing past me on my right as I made a right turn. I never hit one but it was not due to cyclist caution, ever. They had a green light and seemed oblivious to other traffic. That suicide bike lane is one of the reasons I'm glad I moved.
Okanagan is spot on.
I ride a fair bit in the warmer months but limit it to back roads and trails. I get fairly disgusted with what I call the "roadie" mentality by many bikers that maintain the attitude that Okanagan describes. Arrogance and stupidity rules the day with many of these people and they pay the price for it at times.
Paul, you are correct that the amount of time it takes a driver to move around a slower "biker" is not much in the big scheme of things, in many cases, but as Billy Goat Gruff mentioned, the traffic here in this part of MT. has gotten too crazy for sane people to spend much time on the highways riding their bikes. I used to ride sections of our local HWY 93 to access forest service roads but have stopped that because of of increased traffic and the danger involved. Instead I drive my truck to the trailhead/FS road for access. When I do ride pavement on the farm roads I ride outside the white line if there is one and am more than willing to pull off into the ditch to let traffic go by if there may be a safety issue. It takes me no longer to do that and get going again than it does the motorist to slow down and go around me. And contrary to popular opinion, I defer to laws of physics long before I ever look to traffic laws to claim innocence.
I have never been to Louisiana, but I can tell you(as an example) anyone who rides a bike on what we refer to as the High Line(hwy 2) from the Flathead in the west corner of the state east to where SamO lives is an idiot. This is a narrow two lane hwy with 70 mph speed limits and many miles between towns where people need to make up time traveling long distances to get the basics, like food.
I had a near head on with two "roadies" coming off Marias pass on hwy 2 last summer when trying to pass a motor home. There was plenty of time between oncoming traffic but the two bikers were in a section of highway with guard rail on both sides. Because of the angle of the curve and timing they were hidden behind the motor home because of their size. A car would be easy to see but two bikers side by side hunched over their handle bars hugging the inside left lane guard rail disappeared until I moved into the left lane to pass. As soon as I did I saw them and hit the breaks and moved back into my lane. They may have had the right to ride the road but they were idiots for doing so, especially on that section during summer time traffic.
On the flip side, albeit very rarely, I've had a motorist act like a total Ricardo Cabeza for no reason other than they hate "bikers" and honk just as they pass, try to side swipe me with their mirrors, make threats etc. This has occurred while riding on back roads, no oncoming traffic, or any other excuse for them to be a-holes, and me minding my own business, riding in a safe manner.
Thing is, a-holes come in all shapes and sizes, operating all kinds of vehicles/ objects. It's part of life and the trick is to hold blame where it belongs, with the individual, not the entire population who use the same "thing" they are associated with. Kinda like guns. ,
Thing is, a-holes come in all shapes and sizes, operating all kinds of vehicles/ objects. It's part of life and the trick is to hold blame where it belongs, with the individual, not the entire population who use the same "thing" they are associated with. ,
The OP loves the attention, yes. That's the point of his threads.....
That's the point of ALL social media posts.
Umm, no. But it explains your contributions succinctly....
It takes a little depth of thought to comprehend this, but responses/attention are why people post on social media. Anyone that says otherwise isn't being honest or isn't thinking. Whether you post something entertaining, educational, enlightening or otherwise you are hoping people pay attention to it. If everyone on the forum had you on ignore, would you post?
There can be a fine line between trolling and a thread like this. Trolls will not engage in intellectually honest discussion. While I full well knew most of the responses would be of the "Spandex monkey" type, I happily engaged in thoughtful exchange when respondents wanted it. Trolls don't do that.
I created this thread as a place for people to vent about bicyclists. With that said when I felt like people had serious questions or concerns I responded politely, often providing links to support my comments. I have pointed to behaviors some bicyclists engage in that I will not. I have cited the law. When it appeared people wanted banter, I played right along. I have steadfastly put the "problem" of bicycles on the road in the correct perspective. In the grand scheme of things they are scarcely a blip on the radar. Very easy to deal with. More so than the other motorists on the road. Yet when you look at the responses, the emotion, the anger, the irrationality put on display you'd think they were a bigger deal than distracted or drunk drivers.
Going back to why I created the thread. You are here. If you hadn't found some kind of value in the thread, you wouldn't be here. You do know that you could quietly drift away from it if you don't find value right?
Hell, I might even buy a bike this spring. But I will not ride on highways with oilfield traffic. I will find trails meant for bikes.
I much prefer trails to roads, but trails do not exist in some parts of the country. I'd encourage you to get a bike. It's great exercise and easy on the old joints. I think you'll also find that you get some of the same joy out of cycling that you do out of hunting when you are bicycling out away from it all. You may even find the bicycle a great way to scout.
The OP loves the attention, yes. That's the point of his threads.....
That's the point of ALL social media posts.
Umm, no. But it explains your contributions succinctly....
It takes a little depth of thought to comprehend this, but responses/attention are why people post on social media. Anyone that says otherwise isn't being honest or isn't thinking. Whether you post something entertaining, educational, enlightening or otherwise you are hoping people pay attention to it. If everyone on the forum had you on ignore, would you post?
There can be a fine line between trolling and a thread like this. Trolls will not engage in intellectually honest discussion. While I full well knew most of the responses would be of the "Spandex monkey" type, I happily engaged in thoughtful exchange when respondents wanted it. Trolls don't do that.
I created this thread as a place for people to vent about bicyclists. With that said when I felt like people had serious questions or concerns I responded politely, often providing links to support my comments. I have pointed to behaviors some bicyclists engage in that I will not. I have cited the law. When it appeared people wanted banter, I played right along. I have steadfastly put the "problem" of bicycles on the road in the correct perspective. In the grand scheme of things they are scarcely a blip on the radar. Very easy to deal with. More so than the other motorists on the road. Yet when you look at the responses, the emotion, the anger, the irrationality put on display you'd think they were a bigger deal than distracted or drunk drivers.
Going back to why I created the thread. You are here. If you hadn't found some kind of value in the thread, you wouldn't be here. You do know that you could quietly drift away from it if you don't find value right?
You know what doesn't take a lot of depth of thought? You are one arrogant, passive agressive dude....
The OP loves the attention, yes. That's the point of his threads.....
That's the point of ALL social media posts.
Umm, no. But it explains your contributions succinctly....
It takes a little depth of thought to comprehend this, but responses/attention are why people post on social media. Anyone that says otherwise isn't being honest or isn't thinking. Whether you post something entertaining, educational, enlightening or otherwise you are hoping people pay attention to it. If everyone on the forum had you on ignore, would you post?
There can be a fine line between trolling and a thread like this. Trolls will not engage in intellectually honest discussion. While I full well knew most of the responses would be of the "Spandex monkey" type, I happily engaged in thoughtful exchange when respondents wanted it. Trolls don't do that.
I created this thread as a place for people to vent about bicyclists. With that said when I felt like people had serious questions or concerns I responded politely, often providing links to support my comments. I have pointed to behaviors some bicyclists engage in that I will not. I have cited the law. When it appeared people wanted banter, I played right along. I have steadfastly put the "problem" of bicycles on the road in the correct perspective. In the grand scheme of things they are scarcely a blip on the radar. Very easy to deal with. More so than the other motorists on the road. Yet when you look at the responses, the emotion, the anger, the irrationality put on display you'd think they were a bigger deal than distracted or drunk drivers.
Going back to why I created the thread. You are here. If you hadn't found some kind of value in the thread, you wouldn't be here. You do know that you could quietly drift away from it if you don't find value right?
You know what doesn't take a lot of depth of thought? You are one arrogant, passive agressive dude....
Great thoughtful, substantive post! I do apologize if I came off as passive in any way.
This is an old thread, and all I can add to it is that an old friend was killed on a rural Utah highway by a distracted teenager doing 70 mph. My brother-in-law and a good friend's son were killed on their motorcycles. The roads are more dangerous than ever.
ALL the cyclists where I live are self entitled stupid jerks who think they own the streets. They ride expensive looking skinny tired bikes with skinny seats and dress like wanna be bike racers. I'm sure that almost all of them are transplanted Democrats from........
I think this pretty well nails it. Judging from the pompous remarks from the OP, confirms it.
ALL the cyclists where I live are self entitled stupid jerks who think they own the streets. They ride expensive looking skinny tired bikes with skinny seats and dress like wanna be bike racers. I'm sure that almost all of them are transplanted Democrats from........
I think this pretty well nails it. Judging from the pompous remarks from the OP, confirms it.
Quote the most pompous thing you think I posted in this thread.
I haven't read the entire thread but do have a comment. For over 30 years I made my living working in the traffic engineering field. One of the basics of traffic engineering philosophy is to minimize speed disparity between vehicles. i.e. the greater the speed differential the greater the potential hazard. In order to overcome this it seems everything has to be dumbed down sufficiently to accommodate the cyclists.
I haven't read the entire thread but do have a comment. For over 30 years I made my living working in the traffic engineering field. One of the basics of traffic engineering philosophy is to minimize speed disparity between vehicles. i.e. the greater the speed differential the greater the potential hazard. In order to overcome this it seems everything has to be dumbed down sufficiently to accommodate the cyclists.
A group of twenty or so come through the neighborhood and go down an adjacent road like a swarm of angry bees.....ought to be a weight range on spandex, one could have been mistaken for a yellow school bus.
A group of twenty or so come through the neighborhood and go down an adjacent road like a swarm of angry bees.....ought to be a weight range on spandex, one could have been mistaken for a yellow school bus.
I'll yield the lane to you until there is a safe spot to pass. Just don't make it unnecessarily hard to find a safe place....
That's the spirit. I ride with the mindset that once someone comes up behind me, I am going to get them around me as quickly as I reasonably can. With one exception, I don't think anyone has been behind me for more than 30 seconds. Most of the time it's far less than that.
That's the spirit. I ride with the mindset that once someone comes up behind me, I am going to get them around me as quickly as I reasonably can. With one exception, I don't think anyone has been behind me for more than 30 seconds. Most of the time it's far less than that.
I'll yield the lane to you until there is a safe spot to pass. Just don't make it unnecessarily hard to find a safe place....
That's the spirit. I ride with the mindset that once someone comes up behind me, I am going to get them around me as quickly as I reasonably can. With one exception, I don't think anyone has been behind me for more than 30 seconds. Most of the time it's far less than that.
Well at least you're not like those idiots in GA, that motion me to pass the gaggle, on a hill, around a curve and with a double yellow!?!?!?!?!?!?
Do they know that if I get beside them and I encounter traffic I'm going to push THEM into the ditch?
What is it with bikers anyway, you ride on the road and then you get all upset if there is a car behind you?
I'll yield the lane to you until there is a safe spot to pass. Just don't make it unnecessarily hard to find a safe place....
That's the spirit. I ride with the mindset that once someone comes up behind me, I am going to get them around me as quickly as I reasonably can. With one exception, I don't think anyone has been behind me for more than 30 seconds. Most of the time it's far less than that.
So just to be clear, you were talking about the bicycle thing right?
Ugghh, you know what? Nevermind. Forget I mentioned it - of course you are...
df, you really seem to go for those kinds of dances. Where and when did you video this one?
SheRoy,
When are you going to PROVE that you're not a lesbian?
LMFAO.
Clark, I am impressed with the progress we made this evening. I am taking Shadow to the dog park now. Hopefully the hot Cuban girl who wants me to go cycling with her is there. We can take a deeper dive into this when I return. Be well my friend!
df, you really seem to go for those kinds of dances. Where and when did you video this one?
SheRoy,
When are you going to PROVE that you're not a lesbian?
LMFAO.
Clark, I am impressed with the progress we made this evening. I am taking Shadow to the dog park now. Hopefully the hot Cuban girl who wants me to go cycling with her is there. We can take a deeper dive into this when I return. Be well my friend!
df, you really seem to go for those kinds of dances. Where and when did you video this one?
Give it up. You’re never going to find a man to take you up on your [bleep] around here. You need to find a website for your own kind. . .
I'm certainly not going to even try to find a man to go to one of those events. Seems deflave is quite the "mans lady" so to speak. He has always been enamored of gayness ,and I suppose this is why.
I'll yield the lane to you until there is a safe spot to pass. Just don't make it unnecessarily hard to find a safe place....
That's the spirit. I ride with the mindset that once someone comes up behind me, I am going to get them around me as quickly as I reasonably can. With one exception, I don't think anyone has been behind me for more than 30 seconds. Most of the time it's far less than that.
I'm certainly not going to even try to find a man to go to one of those events.
Most lesbians ease their way out the closet.
SheRoy uses a breaching tool.
LOL
I have nothing to be in a closet about nor to come out, being a boring straight guy. But I am impressed with your bravery for posting video of your dancing.
I have nothing to be in a closet about nor to come out, being a boring straight guy. But I am impressed with your bravery for posting video of your dancing.
Remember when you said that you could PROVE that you weren't a lesbian???
Cuban girl who wants me to go cycling with her is there. We can take a deeper dive into this when I return. Be well my friend!
Beware, a hot young South American twenty something cyclist wanted me to take her hiking in the woods by moonlight the last full moon cycle. I got an erection when she asked.
First time we set it up, a line of thunderstorms came through, couldn’t do it.
Second time we set it up she brung a guy friend her age. I am so glad she did, I’ve been hiking those same trails for twenty years but I was so outclassed physically by these two people forty years younger’n me it woulda been pathetic if it had been just me and her.
Cuban girl who wants me to go cycling with her is there. We can take a deeper dive into this when I return. Be well my friend!
Beware, a hot young South American twenty something cyclist wanted me to take her hiking in the woods by moonlight the last full moon cycle. I got an erection when she asked.
First time we set it up, a line of thunderstorms came through, couldn’t do it.
Second time we set it up she brung a guy friend her age. I am so glad she did, I’ve been hiking those same trails for twenty years but I was so outclassed physically by these two people forty years younger’n me it woulda been pathetic if it had been just me and her.
I love cycling. Have done "serious" (120+ mile days), long distance touring/riding since 1975.
But, in the age of cellphones and distracted driving, I think it's foolish to be on the road on a bike. Around town, fine. On a long road trip, forget it.
And yeah, as a group, cyclists have replaced fly fisherman as the arrogant A-Hole Award Winners.
Some of the anger expressed by motorists is self-inflicted...
Cuban girl who wants me to go cycling with her is there. We can take a deeper dive into this when I return. Be well my friend!
Beware, a hot young South American twenty something cyclist wanted me to take her hiking in the woods by moonlight the last full moon cycle. I got an erection when she asked.
First time we set it up, a line of thunderstorms came through, couldn’t do it.
Second time we set it up she brung a guy friend her age. I am so glad she did, I’ve been hiking those same trails for twenty years but I was so outclassed physically by these two people forty years younger’n me it woulda been pathetic if it had been just me and her.
Cuban girl who wants me to go cycling with her is there. We can take a deeper dive into this when I return. Be well my friend!
Beware, a hot young South American twenty something cyclist wanted me to take her hiking in the woods by moonlight the last full moon cycle. I got an erection when she asked.
First time we set it up, a line of thunderstorms came through, couldn’t do it.
Second time we set it up she brung a guy friend her age. I am so glad she did, I’ve been hiking those same trails for twenty years but I was so outclassed physically by these two people forty years younger’n me it woulda been pathetic if it had been just me and her.
I have nothing to be in a closet about nor to come out, being a boring straight guy. But I am impressed with your bravery for posting video of your dancing.
Remember when you said that you could PROVE that you weren't a lesbian???
I have nothing to be in a closet about nor to come out, being a boring straight guy. But I am impressed with your bravery for posting video of your dancing.
Remember when you said that you could PROVE that you weren't a lesbian???
LMFAO.
You stupid dyke.
Hahahaha. Tff.
The part that really killed me is when he closed with “You stupid Dyke”... 🤣
df, you really seem to go for those kinds of dances. Where and when did you video this one?
SheRoy,
When are you going to PROVE that you're not a lesbian?
LMFAO.
Clark, I am impressed with the progress we made this evening. I am taking Shadow to the dog park now. Hopefully the hot Cuban girl who wants me to go cycling with her is there. We can take a deeper dive into this when I return. Be well my friend!
Pics or tit didn’t happen!
Meet my friend Lis Arias on the right. She said she bicycled in Cuba because she had to. Here she does it because she wants to. That's shadow with her tongue hanging out. She's like her Daddy.
df, you really seem to go for those kinds of dances. Where and when did you video this one?
SheRoy,
When are you going to PROVE that you're not a lesbian?
LMFAO.
Clark, I am impressed with the progress we made this evening. I am taking Shadow to the dog park now. Hopefully the hot Cuban girl who wants me to go cycling with her is there. We can take a deeper dive into this when I return. Be well my friend!
Pics or tit didn’t happen!
Meet my friend Lis Arias on the right. She said she bicycled in Cuba because she had to. Here she does it because she wants to. That's shadow with her tongue hanging out. She's like her Daddy.
You done good my friend. Now you need to keep em coming... 😃👍🏻
I take it shadow is the black lab. That white shepherd is gorgeous. Is it hers?
df, you really seem to go for those kinds of dances. Where and when did you video this one?
SheRoy,
When are you going to PROVE that you're not a lesbian?
LMFAO.
Clark, I am impressed with the progress we made this evening. I am taking Shadow to the dog park now. Hopefully the hot Cuban girl who wants me to go cycling with her is there. We can take a deeper dive into this when I return. Be well my friend!
Pics or tit didn’t happen!
Meet my friend Lis Arias on the right. She said she bicycled in Cuba because she had to. Here she does it because she wants to. That's shadow with her tongue hanging out. She's like her Daddy.
You done good my friend. Now you need to keep em coming... 😃👍🏻
I take it shadow is the black lab. That white shepherd is gorgeous. Is it hers?
Yep, Shadow is the lab. Elsa is hers. Lis is really friendly. I'll bet she'd like to go out on the boat too.
I have a Trek mountain bike I bought back around 1993 when I needed to be in shape for work, now I'm old and want to stay alive, have been thinking about taking it up to a bike shop in Ft. Smith for new rubber, seat, and a good servicing.
Meet my friend Lis Arias on the right. She said she bicycled in Cuba because she had to. Here she does it because she wants to. That's shadow with her tongue hanging out. She's like her Daddy.
I have a Trek mountain bike I bought back around 1993 when I needed to be in shape for work, now I'm old and want to stay alive, have been thinking about taking it up to a bike shop in Ft. Smith for new rubber, seat, and a good servicing.
I'd do it for you if you were close. Bicycles are about the only thing in the world I can successfully work on.
Meet my friend Lis Arias on the right. She said she bicycled in Cuba because she had to. Here she does it because she wants to. That's shadow with her tongue hanging out. She's like her Daddy.
I have a Trek mountain bike I bought back around 1993 when I needed to be in shape for work, now I'm old and want to stay alive, have been thinking about taking it up to a bike shop in Ft. Smith for new rubber, seat, and a good servicing.
I'd do it for you if you were close. Bicycles are about the only thing in the world I can successfully work on.
Thanks! I dirt roaded the hell out of that thing back in the day riding out to the Old Fort Gun Club, would meet up with Buds coming over from Ft Chaffee, they always brought enough chit to shoot! ; ]
Meet my friend Lis Arias on the right. She said she bicycled in Cuba because she had to. Here she does it because she wants to. That's shadow with her tongue hanging out. She's like her Daddy.
Spayed?
Credit where credit is due. Nicely done!
Ha, I knew you'd laugh at that one. Anybody that wouldn't doesn't know how.
Meet my friend Lis Arias on the right. She said she bicycled in Cuba because she had to. Here she does it because she wants to. That's shadow with her tongue hanging out. She's like her Daddy.
It occurs to me from my participation in a number of different forums that Americans love to express their rage for bicyclists on the road. I am a bicyclist. It's one of my many passions. So give me your best shot. In the end we may all learn something.
My problem with bicyclists?
1.) They use roads for recreation not transportation. Outside of ultra urban areas and college towns that have beaucoup bike lanes, I got 'em out here riding in pelotons of 25 and more that can't do 12 mph up a hill. We have many hills here. I only see 2 type of true bicycle communters here: a.) Man bun 30 year olds and b.) DUI recipients that have no drivers license.
2.) They insist on having 5 pm rides that start in the center of town and ride through suburbia during rush hour backing traffic a 1/4 mile behind them on double yellow roads.
3.) too many do not follow the rules of the road, weave in and out of stopped traffic, ignore traffic lights and then piss all down their legs if some car doesn't see them sneaking up from behind and cuts them off.
4.) Idiots will ride alone on our curvy hilly roads at odd hour and occasionally become statistics when they are riding in the middle of a lane at 16 mph and a cars overtakes them coming around a blind curve.
Biking is a great exercise and sport. My wife is a triathlete and bikes. Just not on public roads. She's had several friends involved in incidents with autos. They lost the confrontation.
It occurs to me from my participation in a number of different forums that Americans love to express their rage for bicyclists on the road. I am a bicyclist. It's one of my many passions. So give me your best shot. In the end we may all learn something.
My problem with bicyclists?
1.) They use roads for recreation not transportation. Outside of ultra urban areas and college towns that have beaucoup bike lanes, I got 'em out here riding in pelotons of 25 and more that can't do 12 mph up a hill. We have many hills here. I only see 2 type of true bicycle communters here: a.) Man bun 30 year olds and b.) DUI recipients that have no drivers license.
2.) They insist on having 5 pm rides that start in the center of town and ride through suburbia during rush hour backing traffic a 1/4 mile behind them on double yellow roads.
3.) too many do not follow the rules of the road, weave in and out of stopped traffic, ignore traffic lights and then piss all down their legs if some car doesn't see them sneaking up from behind and cuts them off.
4.) Idiots will ride alone on our curvy hilly roads at odd hour and occasionally become statistics when they are riding in the middle of a lane at 16 mph and a cars overtakes them coming around a blind curve.
Biking is a great exercise and sport. My wife is a triathlete and bikes. Just not on public roads. She's had several friends involved in incidents with autos. They lost the confrontation.
Every time you see a bicyclist splattered on the road, an angel gets his wings.
Why is it that a bicyclist, while driving his car, can lose his chit if the vehicle in front of him, say a John Deere tractor, is going 15 MPH under the speed limit and the car driver can’t pass the tractor. But if that same car driver is now riding his bike and doing the same 15 MPH under the limit and other people can’t pass him, it’s totally ok.
Why is it that a bicyclist, while driving his car, can lose his chit if the vehicle in front of him, say a John Deere tractor, is going 15 MPH under the speed limit and the car driver can’t pass the tractor. But if that same car driver is now riding his bike and doing the same 15 MPH under the limit and other people can’t pass him, it’s totally ok.
How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
It occurs to me from my participation in a number of different forums that Americans love to express their rage for bicyclists on the road. I am a bicyclist. It's one of my many passions. So give me your best shot. In the end we may all learn something.
My problem with bicyclists?
1.) They use roads for recreation not transportation. Outside of ultra urban areas and college towns that have beaucoup bike lanes, I got 'em out here riding in pelotons of 25 and more that can't do 12 mph up a hill. We have many hills here. I only see 2 type of true bicycle communters here: a.) Man bun 30 year olds and b.) DUI recipients that have no drivers license.
2.) They insist on having 5 pm rides that start in the center of town and ride through suburbia during rush hour backing traffic a 1/4 mile behind them on double yellow roads.
3.) too many do not follow the rules of the road, weave in and out of stopped traffic, ignore traffic lights and then piss all down their legs if some car doesn't see them sneaking up from behind and cuts them off.
4.) Idiots will ride alone on our curvy hilly roads at odd hour and occasionally become statistics when they are riding in the middle of a lane at 16 mph and a cars overtakes them coming around a blind curve.
Biking is a great exercise and sport. My wife is a triathlete and bikes. Just not on public roads. She's had several friends involved in incidents with autos. They lost the confrontation.
I have seen some of those rush hour rides there. I want no part of that. Where does your wife ride her bicycle training for and during triathlons?
All road users need to drive within their line of sight on hills and blind curves.
Why is it that a bicyclist, while driving his car, can lose his chit if the vehicle in front of him, say a John Deere tractor, is going 15 MPH under the speed limit and the car driver can’t pass the tractor. But if that same car driver is now riding his bike and doing the same 15 MPH under the limit and other people can’t pass him, it’s totally ok.
Why is it that a bicyclist, while driving his car, can lose his chit if the vehicle in front of him, say a John Deere tractor, is going 15 MPH under the speed limit and the car driver can’t pass the tractor. But if that same car driver is now riding his bike and doing the same 15 MPH under the limit and other people can’t pass him, it’s totally ok.
That doesn't describe me or anyone else I know.
So you have never been impatient or irritated by a slow moving vehicle you were following and couldn’t get around.
I have a Trek mountain bike I bought back around 1993 when I needed to be in shape for work, now I'm old and want to stay alive, have been thinking about taking it up to a bike shop in Ft. Smith for new rubber, seat, and a good servicing.
That’s why I ride, it’s the only way I get to be athletic anymore.
Recently I hiked over rough terrain with two twenty-somethings, I was left in the dust. When I ride with a bunch of the same age I can run with most of ‘em.
I’m fixing to head out this morning and put 40 miles in, back before noon, never woulda thought that possible before I got into it age 56.
I have a Trek mountain bike I bought back around 1993 when I needed to be in shape for work, now I'm old and want to stay alive, have been thinking about taking it up to a bike shop in Ft. Smith for new rubber, seat, and a good servicing.
Do it.........my 1991 Trek 8000 is still going strong......
Why a 300 pound middle age lard ass in spandex thinks he is entitled and safe to ride on busy rural roads that logging trucks frequent is beyond me. Hwy 49 here in NC is a grease slick waiting to happen.
Thats the truth....I live right off hwy 49 and travel it every day to work....
Why is it that a bicyclist, while driving his car, can lose his chit if the vehicle in front of him, say a John Deere tractor, is going 15 MPH under the speed limit and the car driver can’t pass the tractor. But if that same car driver is now riding his bike and doing the same 15 MPH under the limit and other people can’t pass him, it’s totally ok.
That doesn't describe me or anyone else I know.
So you have never been impatient or irritated by a slow moving vehicle you were following and couldn’t get around.
Go it.
Yes, but I didn't "lose my schidt."
I am never okay with a motorist being behind me when I am pedaling at 15 either. They matter to me, and I am going to work them around as soon as I reasonably can.
Paul, im glad to hear you are one of the few conscientious, noncontentious bikers out there.
You must still take care, as there are a lot of hispanic dimocrap women on welfare driving F -250s out there.
The most dangerous drivers are old folks. That's part of the reason Florida has a bicycle death rate 2 times the national average. The angriest drivers are middle age, out of shape, white males.
Why is it that a bicyclist, while driving his car, can lose his chit if the vehicle in front of him, say a John Deere tractor, is going 15 MPH under the speed limit and the car driver can’t pass the tractor. But if that same car driver is now riding his bike and doing the same 15 MPH under the limit and other people can’t pass him, it’s totally ok.
That doesn't describe me or anyone else I know.
So you have never been impatient or irritated by a slow moving vehicle you were following and couldn’t get around.
Go it.
Yes, but I didn't "lose my schidt."
I am never okay with a motorist being behind me when I am pedaling at 15 either. They matter to me, and I am going to work them around as soon as I reasonably can.
PaulBarnard: Does "this" describe you? Last month on a narrow two lane highway (one lane in each direction) between Alder, Montana and Virginia City, Montana I am driving along and come upon a slow moving bicyclist that had attached to his bicycle a 5' long stick with flag attached at the end. Problem was the "stick/flag" was extending horizontally not vertically! And said stick stuck into his lane of travel at least 4 1/2'!!! Causing folks travelling in his lane (ME!) to slow down and travel in the ONCOMING lane to pass around him! WTF I said to myself as I and the car behind me went into the oncoming lane and had to slow down in a limited sight section of the road. I was miffed at this dimwit bicyclist's idiocy but went on my way. The fellow in the car behind me DID NOT! He pulled in front of the bike/bicyclist and turned his car so the "biker" had to stop! I slowed as I watched in the rear view mirror - last I saw was the fellow in the car opening his door and getting out of the car - obviously to speak with the bicyclist in question. He-he I thought. I continue on to the gunshop in Ennis, Montana do my business and start backtracking towards my home on the route I had came. Who do I come across but said idiot bicyclist and he no longer has the long stick and flag extending into the lane of travel! It MAY have been shoved up his ass - I don't know? I myself worry about bicyclist using auto lanes and not keeping up to speed or staying on the shoulder as many roads where I live have NO shoulders. Bike safe! Hold into the wind VarmintGuy
PaulBarnard: Does "this" describe you? Last month on a narrow two lane highway (one lane in each direction) between Alder, Montana and Virginia City, Montana I am driving along and come upon a slow moving bicyclist that had attached to his bicycle a 5' long stick with flag attached at the end. Problem was the "stick/flag" was extending horizontally not vertically! And said stick stuck into his lane of travel at least 4 1/2'!!! Causing folks travelling in his lane (ME!) to slow down and travel in the ONCOMING lane to pass around him! WTF I said to myself as I and the car behind me went into the oncoming lane and had to slow down in a limited sight section of the road. I was miffed at this dimwit bicyclist's idiocy but went on my way. The fellow in the car behind me DID NOT! He pulled in front of the bike/bicyclist and turned his car so the "biker" had to stop! I slowed as I watched in the rear view mirror - last I saw was the fellow in the car opening his door and getting out of the car - obviously to speak with the bicyclist in question. He-he I thought. I continue on to the gunshop in Ennis, Montana do my business and start backtracking towards my home on the route I had came. Who do I come across but said idiot bicyclist and he no longer has the long stick and flag extending into the lane of travel! It MAY have been shoved up his ass - I don't know? I myself worry about bicyclist using auto lanes and not keeping up to speed or staying on the shoulder as many roads where I live have NO shoulders. Bike safe! Hold into the wind VarmintGuy
Thanks for making my day with that story... 😃👍🏻
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by deflave
Originally Posted by gunner500
have been thinking about taking it up to a bike shop in Ft. Smith for new rubber, seat, and a good servicing.
Paul, im glad to hear you are one of the few conscientious, noncontentious bikers out there.
You must still take care, as there are a lot of hispanic dimocrap women on welfare driving F -250s out there.
The most dangerous drivers are old folks. That's part of the reason Florida has a bicycle death rate 2 times the national average. The angriest drivers are middle age, out of shape, white males.
I have a Trek mountain bike I bought back around 1993 when I needed to be in shape for work, now I'm old and want to stay alive, have been thinking about taking it up to a bike shop in Ft. Smith for new rubber, seat, and a good servicing.
That’s why I ride, it’s the only way I get to be athletic anymore.
Recently I hiked over rough terrain with two twenty-somethings, I was left in the dust. When I ride with a bunch of the same age I can run with most of ‘em.
I’m fixing to head out this morning and put 40 miles in, back before noon, never woulda thought that possible before I got into it age 56.
Agreed, BTDT, both, for fun, and 15 damn years ago I jumped on a PT course with some young dudes, those cats were running past me so fast they were hitting me in the face with chit off their boots.....................go home old man is what that told me ; ]
Just done 300 miles on a Harley Springer this morning, I wasn't peddling, but it damn sure feels like a good workout to me, no windshield or fairing has abs flexed I guess to keep from getting blown off the damn thing.
I have a Trek mountain bike I bought back around 1993 when I needed to be in shape for work, now I'm old and want to stay alive, have been thinking about taking it up to a bike shop in Ft. Smith for new rubber, seat, and a good servicing.
Do it.........my 1991 Trek 8000 is still going strong......
PaulBarnard: Does "this" describe you? Last month on a narrow two lane highway (one lane in each direction) between Alder, Montana and Virginia City, Montana I am driving along and come upon a slow moving bicyclist that had attached to his bicycle a 5' long stick with flag attached at the end. Problem was the "stick/flag" was extending horizontally not vertically! And said stick stuck into his lane of travel at least 4 1/2'!!! Causing folks travelling in his lane (ME!) to slow down and travel in the ONCOMING lane to pass around him! WTF I said to myself as I and the car behind me went into the oncoming lane and had to slow down in a limited sight section of the road. I was miffed at this dimwit bicyclist's idiocy but went on my way. The fellow in the car behind me DID NOT! He pulled in front of the bike/bicyclist and turned his car so the "biker" had to stop! I slowed as I watched in the rear view mirror - last I saw was the fellow in the car opening his door and getting out of the car - obviously to speak with the bicyclist in question. He-he I thought. I continue on to the gunshop in Ennis, Montana do my business and start backtracking towards my home on the route I had came. Who do I come across but said idiot bicyclist and he no longer has the long stick and flag extending into the lane of travel! It MAY have been shoved up his ass - I don't know? I myself worry about bicyclist using auto lanes and not keeping up to speed or staying on the shoulder as many roads where I live have NO shoulders. Bike safe! Hold into the wind VarmintGuy
There are a lot of different angles on that. First off, it is very prickish of the cyclist to do that. While I say that, I will also say that I wouldn't pass a cyclist on that road without moving into the oncoming lane. I might if he moved to the tiny strip of pavement to the right of the fog line and I crawled past him. Montana law requires a "safe" distance in passing a cyclist. I am going to go for a minimum of 3 feet. I will most often move completely into the oncoming lane. It's really easy to do on lightly traveled rural roads like that. Some states require it. A few states require more than 3 feet. 3 feet seems to be the most common minimum established by law.
The guy that got out of his car was as big of a prick as the cyclist. What in the name of fuukk makes people comfortable getting out and taking up issues with cyclists. Those same people don't do it with motorists.
But wasn't it pretty much a non-issue for you and the other driver? That's not a high traffic road, and while it's got some curves, sight lines are generally good enough to pass a slow moving cyclist.
I like riding on roads like that. I ride in the middle of the lane. When a vehicle comes up from behind, I glance over my shoulder. I continue doing over the shoulder checks as they close the distance. I do this so that they know I know they are there. I do allow that they may be distracted morons and not notice me. The way it usually plays out is I see them start drifting over to set up to pass. As they do that, I drift to the right side of the lane to create a cushion an as a sign of courtesy. I wave as they pass at a safe distance. I was riding a road like that last year in CO. A semi was coming from both directions. I got the hell of the road. The bottom line is that I choose the strategy that my intuition and experience leads me to. I am prepared to bail hard right at any moment.
Why do I ride in the middle of the lane? There are several reasons. It makes me more visible. Motorists are much less likely to buzz pass me. As they approach, if I sense a buzz pass, I still have some real estate to move over into to create a safer distance.
That rider must have been slow as hell if you had time to go into a gun store and come back out and him still be on that less than 10 mile stretch of road.
Have you wondered what would prompt a cyclist to do something like that one did?
PaulBarnard: Does "this" describe you? Last month on a narrow two lane highway (one lane in each direction) between Alder, Montana and Virginia City, Montana I am driving along and come upon a slow moving bicyclist that had attached to his bicycle a 5' long stick with flag attached at the end. Problem was the "stick/flag" was extending horizontally not vertically! And said stick stuck into his lane of travel at least 4 1/2'!!! Causing folks travelling in his lane (ME!) to slow down and travel in the ONCOMING lane to pass around him! WTF I said to myself as I and the car behind me went into the oncoming lane and had to slow down in a limited sight section of the road. I was miffed at this dimwit bicyclist's idiocy but went on my way. The fellow in the car behind me DID NOT! He pulled in front of the bike/bicyclist and turned his car so the "biker" had to stop! I slowed as I watched in the rear view mirror - last I saw was the fellow in the car opening his door and getting out of the car - obviously to speak with the bicyclist in question. He-he I thought. I continue on to the gunshop in Ennis, Montana do my business and start backtracking towards my home on the route I had came. Who do I come across but said idiot bicyclist and he no longer has the long stick and flag extending into the lane of travel! It MAY have been shoved up his ass - I don't know? I myself worry about bicyclist using auto lanes and not keeping up to speed or staying on the shoulder as many roads where I live have NO shoulders. Bike safe! Hold into the wind VarmintGuy
There are a lot of different angles on that. First off, it is very prickish of the cyclist to do that. While I say that, I will also say that I wouldn't pass a cyclist on that road without moving into the oncoming lane. I might if he moved to the tiny strip of pavement to the right of the fog line and I crawled past him. Montana law requires a "safe" distance in passing a cyclist. I am going to go for a minimum of 3 feet. I will most often move completely into the oncoming lane. It's really easy to do on lightly traveled rural roads like that. Some states require it. A few states require more than 3 feet. 3 feet seems to be the most common minimum established by law.
The guy that got out of his car was as big of a prick as the cyclist. What in the name of fuukk makes people comfortable getting out and taking up issues with cyclists. Those same people don't do it with motorists.
But wasn't it pretty much a non-issue for you and the other driver? That's not a high traffic road, and while it's got some curves, sight lines are generally good enough to pass a slow moving cyclist.
I like riding on roads like that. I ride in the middle of the lane. When a vehicle comes up from behind, I glance over my shoulder. I continue doing over the shoulder checks as they close the distance. I do this so that they know I know they are there. I do allow that they may be distracted morons and not notice me. The way it usually plays out is I see them start drifting over to set up to pass. As they do that, I drift to the right side of the lane to create a cushion an as a sign of courtesy. I wave as they pass at a safe distance. I was riding a road like that last year in CO. A semi was coming from both directions. I got the hell of the road. The bottom line is that I choose the strategy that my intuition and experience leads me to. I am prepared to bail hard right at any moment.
Why do I ride in the middle of the lane? There are several reasons. It makes me more visible. Motorists are much less likely to buzz pass me. As they approach, if I sense a buzz pass, I still have some real estate to move over into to create a safer distance.
That rider must have been slow as hell if you had time to go into a gun store and come back out and him still be on that less than 10 mile stretch of road.
Have you wondered what would prompt a cyclist to do something like that one did?
I think Louisiana Law requires 6’ of separation when a vehicle encounters bicyclist.
It occurs to me from my participation in a number of different forums that Americans love to express their rage for bicyclists on the road. I am a bicyclist. It's one of my many passions. So give me your best shot. In the end we may all learn something.
My problem with bicyclists?
1.) They use roads for recreation not transportation. Outside of ultra urban areas and college towns that have beaucoup bike lanes, I got 'em out here riding in pelotons of 25 and more that can't do 12 mph up a hill. We have many hills here. I only see 2 type of true bicycle communters here: a.) Man bun 30 year olds and b.) DUI recipients that have no drivers license.
2.) They insist on having 5 pm rides that start in the center of town and ride through suburbia during rush hour backing traffic a 1/4 mile behind them on double yellow roads.
3.) too many do not follow the rules of the road, weave in and out of stopped traffic, ignore traffic lights and then piss all down their legs if some car doesn't see them sneaking up from behind and cuts them off.
4.) Idiots will ride alone on our curvy hilly roads at odd hour and occasionally become statistics when they are riding in the middle of a lane at 16 mph and a cars overtakes them coming around a blind curve.
Biking is a great exercise and sport. My wife is a triathlete and bikes. Just not on public roads. She's had several friends involved in incidents with autos. They lost the confrontation.
I have seen some of those rush hour rides there. I want no part of that. Where does your wife ride her bicycle training for and during triathlons?
All road users need to drive within their line of sight on hills and blind curves.
Either the Greenway we have here or the Budweiser complex in Cartersville on the weekends.
PaulBarnard: Does "this" describe you? Last month on a narrow two lane highway (one lane in each direction) between Alder, Montana and Virginia City, Montana I am driving along and come upon a slow moving bicyclist that had attached to his bicycle a 5' long stick with flag attached at the end. Problem was the "stick/flag" was extending horizontally not vertically! And said stick stuck into his lane of travel at least 4 1/2'!!! Causing folks travelling in his lane (ME!) to slow down and travel in the ONCOMING lane to pass around him! WTF I said to myself as I and the car behind me went into the oncoming lane and had to slow down in a limited sight section of the road. I was miffed at this dimwit bicyclist's idiocy but went on my way. The fellow in the car behind me DID NOT! He pulled in front of the bike/bicyclist and turned his car so the "biker" had to stop! I slowed as I watched in the rear view mirror - last I saw was the fellow in the car opening his door and getting out of the car - obviously to speak with the bicyclist in question. He-he I thought. I continue on to the gunshop in Ennis, Montana do my business and start backtracking towards my home on the route I had came. Who do I come across but said idiot bicyclist and he no longer has the long stick and flag extending into the lane of travel! It MAY have been shoved up his ass - I don't know? I myself worry about bicyclist using auto lanes and not keeping up to speed or staying on the shoulder as many roads where I live have NO shoulders. Bike safe! Hold into the wind VarmintGuy
There are a lot of different angles on that. First off, it is very prickish of the cyclist to do that. While I say that, I will also say that I wouldn't pass a cyclist on that road without moving into the oncoming lane. I might if he moved to the tiny strip of pavement to the right of the fog line and I crawled past him. Montana law requires a "safe" distance in passing a cyclist. I am going to go for a minimum of 3 feet. I will most often move completely into the oncoming lane. It's really easy to do on lightly traveled rural roads like that. Some states require it. A few states require more than 3 feet. 3 feet seems to be the most common minimum established by law.
The guy that got out of his car was as big of a prick as the cyclist. What in the name of fuukk makes people comfortable getting out and taking up issues with cyclists. Those same people don't do it with motorists.
But wasn't it pretty much a non-issue for you and the other driver? That's not a high traffic road, and while it's got some curves, sight lines are generally good enough to pass a slow moving cyclist.
I like riding on roads like that. I ride in the middle of the lane. When a vehicle comes up from behind, I glance over my shoulder. I continue doing over the shoulder checks as they close the distance. I do this so that they know I know they are there. I do allow that they may be distracted morons and not notice me. The way it usually plays out is I see them start drifting over to set up to pass. As they do that, I drift to the right side of the lane to create a cushion an as a sign of courtesy. I wave as they pass at a safe distance. I was riding a road like that last year in CO. A semi was coming from both directions. I got the hell of the road. The bottom line is that I choose the strategy that my intuition and experience leads me to. I am prepared to bail hard right at any moment.
Why do I ride in the middle of the lane? There are several reasons. It makes me more visible. Motorists are much less likely to buzz pass me. As they approach, if I sense a buzz pass, I still have some real estate to move over into to create a safer distance.
That rider must have been slow as hell if you had time to go into a gun store and come back out and him still be on that less than 10 mile stretch of road.
Have you wondered what would prompt a cyclist to do something like that one did?
I think Louisiana Law requires 6’ of separation when a vehicle encounters bicyclist.
PaulBarnard: Does "this" describe you? Last month on a narrow two lane highway (one lane in each direction) between Alder, Montana and Virginia City, Montana I am driving along and come upon a slow moving bicyclist that had attached to his bicycle a 5' long stick with flag attached at the end. Problem was the "stick/flag" was extending horizontally not vertically! And said stick stuck into his lane of travel at least 4 1/2'!!! Causing folks travelling in his lane (ME!) to slow down and travel in the ONCOMING lane to pass around him! WTF I said to myself as I and the car behind me went into the oncoming lane and had to slow down in a limited sight section of the road. I was miffed at this dimwit bicyclist's idiocy but went on my way. The fellow in the car behind me DID NOT! He pulled in front of the bike/bicyclist and turned his car so the "biker" had to stop! I slowed as I watched in the rear view mirror - last I saw was the fellow in the car opening his door and getting out of the car - obviously to speak with the bicyclist in question. He-he I thought. I continue on to the gunshop in Ennis, Montana do my business and start backtracking towards my home on the route I had came. Who do I come across but said idiot bicyclist and he no longer has the long stick and flag extending into the lane of travel! It MAY have been shoved up his ass - I don't know? I myself worry about bicyclist using auto lanes and not keeping up to speed or staying on the shoulder as many roads where I live have NO shoulders. Bike safe! Hold into the wind VarmintGuy
There are a lot of different angles on that. First off, it is very prickish of the cyclist to do that. While I say that, I will also say that I wouldn't pass a cyclist on that road without moving into the oncoming lane. I might if he moved to the tiny strip of pavement to the right of the fog line and I crawled past him. Montana law requires a "safe" distance in passing a cyclist. I am going to go for a minimum of 3 feet. I will most often move completely into the oncoming lane. It's really easy to do on lightly traveled rural roads like that. Some states require it. A few states require more than 3 feet. 3 feet seems to be the most common minimum established by law.
The guy that got out of his car was as big of a prick as the cyclist. What in the name of fuukk makes people comfortable getting out and taking up issues with cyclists. Those same people don't do it with motorists.
But wasn't it pretty much a non-issue for you and the other driver? That's not a high traffic road, and while it's got some curves, sight lines are generally good enough to pass a slow moving cyclist.
I like riding on roads like that. I ride in the middle of the lane. When a vehicle comes up from behind, I glance over my shoulder. I continue doing over the shoulder checks as they close the distance. I do this so that they know I know they are there. I do allow that they may be distracted morons and not notice me. The way it usually plays out is I see them start drifting over to set up to pass. As they do that, I drift to the right side of the lane to create a cushion an as a sign of courtesy. I wave as they pass at a safe distance. I was riding a road like that last year in CO. A semi was coming from both directions. I got the hell of the road. The bottom line is that I choose the strategy that my intuition and experience leads me to. I am prepared to bail hard right at any moment.
Why do I ride in the middle of the lane? There are several reasons. It makes me more visible. Motorists are much less likely to buzz pass me. As they approach, if I sense a buzz pass, I still have some real estate to move over into to create a safer distance.
That rider must have been slow as hell if you had time to go into a gun store and come back out and him still be on that less than 10 mile stretch of road.
Have you wondered what would prompt a cyclist to do something like that one did?
I think Louisiana Law requires 6’ of separation when a vehicle encounters bicyclist.
Paul, im glad to hear you are one of the few conscientious, noncontentious bikers out there. You must still take care, as there are a lot of hispanic dimocrap women on welfare driving F -250s out there.
The most dangerous drivers are old folks. REALLY? - THEY ARE MORE DANGEROUS THAN DRUNKS AND DRUGGIES? That's part of the reason Florida has a bicycle death rate 2 times the national average. MAYBE THAT'S BECAUSE THE OLD BIKE/TRIKE RIDERS ARE SO INEPT. The angriest drivers are middle age, out of shape, white males. OBVIOUSLY YOU HAVE NOT EXPERIENCED THE CRAZY YOUNG COWGIRLS DRIVING PICKUPS OUT THIS WAY - OR THE LESBIANS DRIVING THOSE SUBARUS
PaulBarnard: Does "this" describe you? Last month on a narrow two lane highway (one lane in each direction) between Alder, Montana and Virginia City, Montana I am driving along and come upon a slow moving bicyclist that had attached to his bicycle a 5' long stick with flag attached at the end. Problem was the "stick/flag" was extending horizontally not vertically! And said stick stuck into his lane of travel at least 4 1/2'!!! Causing folks travelling in his lane (ME!) to slow down and travel in the ONCOMING lane to pass around him! WTF I said to myself as I and the car behind me went into the oncoming lane and had to slow down in a limited sight section of the road. I was miffed at this dimwit bicyclist's idiocy but went on my way. The fellow in the car behind me DID NOT! He pulled in front of the bike/bicyclist and turned his car so the "biker" had to stop! I slowed as I watched in the rear view mirror - last I saw was the fellow in the car opening his door and getting out of the car - obviously to speak with the bicyclist in question. He-he I thought. I continue on to the gunshop in Ennis, Montana do my business and start backtracking towards my home on the route I had came. Who do I come across but said idiot bicyclist and he no longer has the long stick and flag extending into the lane of travel! It MAY have been shoved up his ass - I don't know? I myself worry about bicyclist using auto lanes and not keeping up to speed or staying on the shoulder as many roads where I live have NO shoulders. Bike safe! Hold into the wind VarmintGuy
There are a lot of different angles on that. First off, it is very prickish of the cyclist to do that. While I say that, I will also say that I wouldn't pass a cyclist on that road without moving into the oncoming lane. I might if he moved to the tiny strip of pavement to the right of the fog line and I crawled past him. Montana law requires a "safe" distance in passing a cyclist. I am going to go for a minimum of 3 feet. I will most often move completely into the oncoming lane. It's really easy to do on lightly traveled rural roads like that. Some states require it. A few states require more than 3 feet. 3 feet seems to be the most common minimum established by law.
The guy that got out of his car was as big of a prick as the cyclist. What in the name of fuukk makes people comfortable getting out and taking up issues with cyclists. Those same people don't do it with motorists.
But wasn't it pretty much a non-issue for you and the other driver? That's not a high traffic road, and while it's got some curves, sight lines are generally good enough to pass a slow moving cyclist.
I like riding on roads like that. I ride in the middle of the lane. When a vehicle comes up from behind, I glance over my shoulder. I continue doing over the shoulder checks as they close the distance. I do this so that they know I know they are there. I do allow that they may be distracted morons and not notice me. The way it usually plays out is I see them start drifting over to set up to pass. As they do that, I drift to the right side of the lane to create a cushion an as a sign of courtesy. I wave as they pass at a safe distance. I was riding a road like that last year in CO. A semi was coming from both directions. I got the hell of the road. The bottom line is that I choose the strategy that my intuition and experience leads me to. I am prepared to bail hard right at any moment.
Why do I ride in the middle of the lane? There are several reasons. It makes me more visible. Motorists are much less likely to buzz pass me. As they approach, if I sense a buzz pass, I still have some real estate to move over into to create a safer distance.
That rider must have been slow as hell if you had time to go into a gun store and come back out and him still be on that less than 10 mile stretch of road.
Have you wondered what would prompt a cyclist to do something like that one did?
I think Louisiana Law requires 6’ of separation when a vehicle encounters bicyclist.
It occurs to me from my participation in a number of different forums that Americans love to express their rage for bicyclists on the road. I am a bicyclist. It's one of my many passions. So give me your best shot. In the end we may all learn something.
My problem with bicyclists?
1.) They use roads for recreation not transportation. Outside of ultra urban areas and college towns that have beaucoup bike lanes, I got 'em out here riding in pelotons of 25 and more that can't do 12 mph up a hill. We have many hills here. I only see 2 type of true bicycle communters here: a.) Man bun 30 year olds and b.) DUI recipients that have no drivers license.
2.) They insist on having 5 pm rides that start in the center of town and ride through suburbia during rush hour backing traffic a 1/4 mile behind them on double yellow roads.
3.) too many do not follow the rules of the road, weave in and out of stopped traffic, ignore traffic lights and then piss all down their legs if some car doesn't see them sneaking up from behind and cuts them off.
4.) Idiots will ride alone on our curvy hilly roads at odd hour and occasionally become statistics when they are riding in the middle of a lane at 16 mph and a cars overtakes them coming around a blind curve.
Biking is a great exercise and sport. My wife is a triathlete and bikes. Just not on public roads. She's had several friends involved in incidents with autos. They lost the confrontation.
I have seen some of those rush hour rides there. I want no part of that. Where does your wife ride her bicycle training for and during triathlons?
All road users need to drive within their line of sight on hills and blind curves.
Either the Greenway we have here or the Budweiser complex in Cartersville on the weekends.
We are very fortunate to have some dedicated paths on the lake and river levees here. If we didn't, I wouldn't ride. These roads and drivers are ill suited for harmonious sharing. The rural roads of south MS where my camp is are great. 35 miles into my ride this past weekend, I had been overtaken by just 3 autos. Because cycling is becoming more common, the drivers are getting acclimated and the whole situation is pretty good. My number may be up next time I ride there, but it won't be because I was rude or not on high alert. Hell, it may be up on my drive this evening.
PaulBarnard: Does "this" describe you? Last month on a narrow two lane highway (one lane in each direction) between Alder, Montana and Virginia City, Montana I am driving along and come upon a slow moving bicyclist that had attached to his bicycle a 5' long stick with flag attached at the end. Problem was the "stick/flag" was extending horizontally not vertically! And said stick stuck into his lane of travel at least 4 1/2'!!! Causing folks travelling in his lane (ME!) to slow down and travel in the ONCOMING lane to pass around him! WTF I said to myself as I and the car behind me went into the oncoming lane and had to slow down in a limited sight section of the road. I was miffed at this dimwit bicyclist's idiocy but went on my way. The fellow in the car behind me DID NOT! He pulled in front of the bike/bicyclist and turned his car so the "biker" had to stop! I slowed as I watched in the rear view mirror - last I saw was the fellow in the car opening his door and getting out of the car - obviously to speak with the bicyclist in question. He-he I thought. I continue on to the gunshop in Ennis, Montana do my business and start backtracking towards my home on the route I had came. Who do I come across but said idiot bicyclist and he no longer has the long stick and flag extending into the lane of travel! It MAY have been shoved up his ass - I don't know? I myself worry about bicyclist using auto lanes and not keeping up to speed or staying on the shoulder as many roads where I live have NO shoulders. Bike safe! Hold into the wind VarmintGuy
There are a lot of different angles on that. First off, it is very prickish of the cyclist to do that. While I say that, I will also say that I wouldn't pass a cyclist on that road without moving into the oncoming lane. I might if he moved to the tiny strip of pavement to the right of the fog line and I crawled past him. Montana law requires a "safe" distance in passing a cyclist. I am going to go for a minimum of 3 feet. I will most often move completely into the oncoming lane. It's really easy to do on lightly traveled rural roads like that. Some states require it. A few states require more than 3 feet. 3 feet seems to be the most common minimum established by law.
The guy that got out of his car was as big of a prick as the cyclist. What in the name of fuukk makes people comfortable getting out and taking up issues with cyclists. Those same people don't do it with motorists.
But wasn't it pretty much a non-issue for you and the other driver? That's not a high traffic road, and while it's got some curves, sight lines are generally good enough to pass a slow moving cyclist.
I like riding on roads like that. I ride in the middle of the lane. When a vehicle comes up from behind, I glance over my shoulder. I continue doing over the shoulder checks as they close the distance. I do this so that they know I know they are there. I do allow that they may be distracted morons and not notice me. The way it usually plays out is I see them start drifting over to set up to pass. As they do that, I drift to the right side of the lane to create a cushion an as a sign of courtesy. I wave as they pass at a safe distance. I was riding a road like that last year in CO. A semi was coming from both directions. I got the hell of the road. The bottom line is that I choose the strategy that my intuition and experience leads me to. I am prepared to bail hard right at any moment.
Why do I ride in the middle of the lane? There are several reasons. It makes me more visible. Motorists are much less likely to buzz pass me. As they approach, if I sense a buzz pass, I still have some real estate to move over into to create a safer distance.
That rider must have been slow as hell if you had time to go into a gun store and come back out and him still be on that less than 10 mile stretch of road.
Have you wondered what would prompt a cyclist to do something like that one did?
I think Louisiana Law requires 6’ of separation when a vehicle encounters bicyclist.
PaulBarnard: Does "this" describe you? Last month on a narrow two lane highway (one lane in each direction) between Alder, Montana and Virginia City, Montana I am driving along and come upon a slow moving bicyclist that had attached to his bicycle a 5' long stick with flag attached at the end. Problem was the "stick/flag" was extending horizontally not vertically! And said stick stuck into his lane of travel at least 4 1/2'!!! Causing folks travelling in his lane (ME!) to slow down and travel in the ONCOMING lane to pass around him! WTF I said to myself as I and the car behind me went into the oncoming lane and had to slow down in a limited sight section of the road. I was miffed at this dimwit bicyclist's idiocy but went on my way. The fellow in the car behind me DID NOT! He pulled in front of the bike/bicyclist and turned his car so the "biker" had to stop! I slowed as I watched in the rear view mirror - last I saw was the fellow in the car opening his door and getting out of the car - obviously to speak with the bicyclist in question. He-he I thought. I continue on to the gunshop in Ennis, Montana do my business and start backtracking towards my home on the route I had came. Who do I come across but said idiot bicyclist and he no longer has the long stick and flag extending into the lane of travel! It MAY have been shoved up his ass - I don't know? I myself worry about bicyclist using auto lanes and not keeping up to speed or staying on the shoulder as many roads where I live have NO shoulders. Bike safe! Hold into the wind VarmintGuy
There are a lot of different angles on that. First off, it is very prickish of the cyclist to do that. While I say that, I will also say that I wouldn't pass a cyclist on that road without moving into the oncoming lane. I might if he moved to the tiny strip of pavement to the right of the fog line and I crawled past him. Montana law requires a "safe" distance in passing a cyclist. I am going to go for a minimum of 3 feet. I will most often move completely into the oncoming lane. It's really easy to do on lightly traveled rural roads like that. Some states require it. A few states require more than 3 feet. 3 feet seems to be the most common minimum established by law.
The guy that got out of his car was as big of a prick as the cyclist. What in the name of fuukk makes people comfortable getting out and taking up issues with cyclists. Those same people don't do it with motorists.
But wasn't it pretty much a non-issue for you and the other driver? That's not a high traffic road, and while it's got some curves, sight lines are generally good enough to pass a slow moving cyclist.
I like riding on roads like that. I ride in the middle of the lane. When a vehicle comes up from behind, I glance over my shoulder. I continue doing over the shoulder checks as they close the distance. I do this so that they know I know they are there. I do allow that they may be distracted morons and not notice me. The way it usually plays out is I see them start drifting over to set up to pass. As they do that, I drift to the right side of the lane to create a cushion an as a sign of courtesy. I wave as they pass at a safe distance. I was riding a road like that last year in CO. A semi was coming from both directions. I got the hell of the road. The bottom line is that I choose the strategy that my intuition and experience leads me to. I am prepared to bail hard right at any moment.
Why do I ride in the middle of the lane? There are several reasons. It makes me more visible. Motorists are much less likely to buzz pass me. As they approach, if I sense a buzz pass, I still have some real estate to move over into to create a safer distance.
That rider must have been slow as hell if you had time to go into a gun store and come back out and him still be on that less than 10 mile stretch of road.
Have you wondered what would prompt a cyclist to do something like that one did?
I think Louisiana Law requires 6’ of separation when a vehicle encounters bicyclist.
Have you wondered what would prompt a cyclist to do something like that one did?
Douche-baggery?
That's certainly a possibility, but I am going to guess, and this is based on experience, that it is due to too many unnecessarily close passes.
We’ve had discussions like this before and we’ve both laid out our positions so there’s no real need to hash it out again. But as for what you just said, you know I ride bikes and motorcycles. I’ve had plenty of close calls from close passes on both. Never once though did it occur to me to place a board with a flag on the end on either side to claim a lane.
Dude has balls though, I’ll say that much for him... 😁
PaulBarnard: Does "this" describe you? Last month on a narrow two lane highway (one lane in each direction) between Alder, Montana and Virginia City, Montana I am driving along and come upon a slow moving bicyclist that had attached to his bicycle a 5' long stick with flag attached at the end. Problem was the "stick/flag" was extending horizontally not vertically! And said stick stuck into his lane of travel at least 4 1/2'!!! Causing folks travelling in his lane (ME!) to slow down and travel in the ONCOMING lane to pass around him! WTF I said to myself as I and the car behind me went into the oncoming lane and had to slow down in a limited sight section of the road. I was miffed at this dimwit bicyclist's idiocy but went on my way. The fellow in the car behind me DID NOT! He pulled in front of the bike/bicyclist and turned his car so the "biker" had to stop! I slowed as I watched in the rear view mirror - last I saw was the fellow in the car opening his door and getting out of the car - obviously to speak with the bicyclist in question. He-he I thought. I continue on to the gunshop in Ennis, Montana do my business and start backtracking towards my home on the route I had came. Who do I come across but said idiot bicyclist and he no longer has the long stick and flag extending into the lane of travel! It MAY have been shoved up his ass - I don't know? I myself worry about bicyclist using auto lanes and not keeping up to speed or staying on the shoulder as many roads where I live have NO shoulders. Bike safe! Hold into the wind VarmintGuy
There are a lot of different angles on that. First off, it is very prickish of the cyclist to do that. While I say that, I will also say that I wouldn't pass a cyclist on that road without moving into the oncoming lane. I might if he moved to the tiny strip of pavement to the right of the fog line and I crawled past him. Montana law requires a "safe" distance in passing a cyclist. I am going to go for a minimum of 3 feet. I will most often move completely into the oncoming lane. It's really easy to do on lightly traveled rural roads like that. Some states require it. A few states require more than 3 feet. 3 feet seems to be the most common minimum established by law.
The guy that got out of his car was as big of a prick as the cyclist. What in the name of fuukk makes people comfortable getting out and taking up issues with cyclists. Those same people don't do it with motorists.
But wasn't it pretty much a non-issue for you and the other driver? That's not a high traffic road, and while it's got some curves, sight lines are generally good enough to pass a slow moving cyclist.
I like riding on roads like that. I ride in the middle of the lane. When a vehicle comes up from behind, I glance over my shoulder. I continue doing over the shoulder checks as they close the distance. I do this so that they know I know they are there. I do allow that they may be distracted morons and not notice me. The way it usually plays out is I see them start drifting over to set up to pass. As they do that, I drift to the right side of the lane to create a cushion an as a sign of courtesy. I wave as they pass at a safe distance. I was riding a road like that last year in CO. A semi was coming from both directions. I got the hell of the road. The bottom line is that I choose the strategy that my intuition and experience leads me to. I am prepared to bail hard right at any moment.
Why do I ride in the middle of the lane? There are several reasons. It makes me more visible. Motorists are much less likely to buzz pass me. As they approach, if I sense a buzz pass, I still have some real estate to move over into to create a safer distance.
That rider must have been slow as hell if you had time to go into a gun store and come back out and him still be on that less than 10 mile stretch of road.
Have you wondered what would prompt a cyclist to do something like that one did?
I think Louisiana Law requires 6’ of separation when a vehicle encounters bicyclist.
Paul, im glad to hear you are one of the few conscientious, noncontentious bikers out there. You must still take care, as there are a lot of hispanic dimocrap women on welfare driving F -250s out there.
The most dangerous drivers are old folks. REALLY? - THEY ARE MORE DANGEROUS THAN DRUNKS AND DRUGGIES? That's part of the reason Florida has a bicycle death rate 2 times the national average. MAYBE THAT'S BECAUSE THE OLD BIKE/TRIKE RIDERS ARE SO INEPT. The angriest drivers are middle age, out of shape, white males. OBVIOUSLY YOU HAVE NOT EXPERIENCED THE CRAZY YOUNG COWGIRLS DRIVING PICKUPS OUT THIS WAY - OR THE LESBIANS DRIVING THOSE SUBARUS
A drunk driver would be more of a threat, but because of the sheer numbers of older folks in FL they present a greater threat. Cycling accident data is not great, but the folks that live down that way will tell you it's the old folks.
The Subaru drivers in CO are unequivocally the most courteous group of drivers I encounter anywhere. Full size Chevy/GM truck and SUV drivers the worst by a good margin.
We are very fortunate to have some dedicated paths on the lake and river levees here. If we didn't, I wouldn't ride. These roads and drivers are ill suited for harmonious sharing. The rural roads of south MS where my camp is are great. 35 miles into my ride this past weekend, I had been overtaken by just 3 autos. Because cycling is becoming more common, the drivers are getting acclimated and the whole situation is pretty good. My number may be up next time I ride there, but it won't be because I was rude or not on high alert. Hell, it may be up on my drive this evening.
Sounds like the perfect place to ride. Low traffic, and southern MS is flat and straight as I recall. Go ahead!
I don’t ride a bike like these guys with the spandex shorts and helmets do. I’ve had the same bike since around 2004. Every now and then I’ll jump on it - with whatever clothes I happen to be wearing at the time - for the hell of it and ride it around the neighborhood.
When I get a wild hair, if I get on a road and there’s no bike lane, I’ll either get on the sidewalk or pull over in the dirt and let cars pass if I’m in their way.
I see jackasses all over the place here riding in the middle of the lane as though they’re on full blown motorcycles instead of a gay ass bikes.
9 times out of 10, they are phagity old, gray ass university professors. I live about one minute up the block from the university. Biggest douche bags on the face of the earth.
I use lights with cameras in them and have them on both front and rear. I figure the wife may be a millionaire if I get hit. I don't wear the spandex. Used the shorts once and hated them and I won't go out in public with my stuff hanging out. Even as short as it is at almost 69 years old. Be Well, Rustyzipper.
9 times out of 10, they are phagity old, gray ass university professors. I live about one minute up the block from the university. Biggest douche bags on the face of the earth.
And yet you choose to live there - and complain. Oh yes, the is the 24hrcrybaby forum.
We are very fortunate to have some dedicated paths on the lake and river levees here. If we didn't, I wouldn't ride. These roads and drivers are ill suited for harmonious sharing. The rural roads of south MS where my camp is are great. 35 miles into my ride this past weekend, I had been overtaken by just 3 autos. Because cycling is becoming more common, the drivers are getting acclimated and the whole situation is pretty good. My number may be up next time I ride there, but it won't be because I was rude or not on high alert. Hell, it may be up on my drive this evening.
Sounds like the perfect place to ride. Low traffic, and southern MS is flat and straight as I recall. Go ahead!
There are some slow rolling hills and blind curves. It's certainly something that I take into consideration when I am driving and riding.
9 times out of 10, they are phagity old, gray ass university professors. I live about one minute up the block from the university. Biggest douche bags on the face of the earth.
And yet you choose to live there - and complain. Oh yes, the is the 24hrcrybaby forum.
9 times out of 10, they are phagity old, gray ass university professors. I live about one minute up the block from the university. Biggest douche bags on the face of the earth.
And yet you choose to live there - and complain. Oh yes, the is the 24hrcrybaby forum.
Shut your c o c k hole phag. Men are talking...
Then maybe you should be quiet, girl. Cry quietly for once.
PaulBarnard: Does "this" describe you? Last month on a narrow two lane highway (one lane in each direction) between Alder, Montana and Virginia City, Montana I am driving along and come upon a slow moving bicyclist that had attached to his bicycle a 5' long stick with flag attached at the end. Problem was the "stick/flag" was extending horizontally not vertically! And said stick stuck into his lane of travel at least 4 1/2'!!! Causing folks travelling in his lane (ME!) to slow down and travel in the ONCOMING lane to pass around him! WTF I said to myself as I and the car behind me went into the oncoming lane and had to slow down in a limited sight section of the road. I was miffed at this dimwit bicyclist's idiocy but went on my way. The fellow in the car behind me DID NOT! He pulled in front of the bike/bicyclist and turned his car so the "biker" had to stop! I slowed as I watched in the rear view mirror - last I saw was the fellow in the car opening his door and getting out of the car - obviously to speak with the bicyclist in question. He-he I thought. I continue on to the gunshop in Ennis, Montana do my business and start backtracking towards my home on the route I had came. Who do I come across but said idiot bicyclist and he no longer has the long stick and flag extending into the lane of travel! It MAY have been shoved up his ass - I don't know? I myself worry about bicyclist using auto lanes and not keeping up to speed or staying on the shoulder as many roads where I live have NO shoulders. Bike safe! Hold into the wind VarmintGuy
If you're going to or coming from West Yellowstone and Yellowstone NP you're prob'ly gonna ride through Ennis.
July 14, 2019, maybe ten miles south of Ennis: I was southbound, met these guys coming up the other way. Two Australians, 72 years of age, riding 3,300 miles from Yorktown VA to Astoria OR "while they still could", here they were 55 days and 2,500 miles out of Yorktown
It would be a shame if these guys got hit. That storm in back went on to dump major hail on Ennis, and prob'ly them too, but I'm sure they handled it.
PaulBarnard: Does "this" describe you? Last month on a narrow two lane highway (one lane in each direction) between Alder, Montana and Virginia City, Montana I am driving along and come upon a slow moving bicyclist that had attached to his bicycle a 5' long stick with flag attached at the end. Problem was the "stick/flag" was extending horizontally not vertically! And said stick stuck into his lane of travel at least 4 1/2'!!! Causing folks travelling in his lane (ME!) to slow down and travel in the ONCOMING lane to pass around him! WTF I said to myself as I and the car behind me went into the oncoming lane and had to slow down in a limited sight section of the road. I was miffed at this dimwit bicyclist's idiocy but went on my way. The fellow in the car behind me DID NOT! He pulled in front of the bike/bicyclist and turned his car so the "biker" had to stop! I slowed as I watched in the rear view mirror - last I saw was the fellow in the car opening his door and getting out of the car - obviously to speak with the bicyclist in question. He-he I thought. I continue on to the gunshop in Ennis, Montana do my business and start backtracking towards my home on the route I had came. Who do I come across but said idiot bicyclist and he no longer has the long stick and flag extending into the lane of travel! It MAY have been shoved up his ass - I don't know? I myself worry about bicyclist using auto lanes and not keeping up to speed or staying on the shoulder as many roads where I live have NO shoulders. Bike safe! Hold into the wind VarmintGuy
If you're going to or coming from West Yellowstone and Yellowstone NP you're prob'ly gonna ride through Ennis.
July 14, 2019, maybe ten miles south of Ennis: I was southbound, met these guys coming up the other way. Two Australians, 72 years of age, riding 3,300 miles from Yorktown VA to Astoria OR "while they still could", here they were 55 days and 2,500 miles out of Yorktown
It would be a shame if these guys got hit. That storm in back went on to dump major hail on Ennis, and prob'ly them too, but I'm sure they handled it.
I’ve discovered a life-saving device that allows cyclists to protect themselves and take back the road: the pool noodle.
Find one for about $2 anywhere: dollar stores, shopping malls, even the supermarket. Choose from the array of fun colors and use a bungee cord to strap this light, flexible toy to your bike rack so that it sticks out to the left side (or the right side, if you’re in a country where cars drive on the left). Start pedaling and watch as car after car moves over to the other lane.....
On roads with zero road shoulder, the pool noodle becomes our shoulder. It makes us more visible to passing cars and the 18-wheelers that used to skim us constantly.
The pool noodle is also a tool for advocacy. To every other vehicle on the road, that $2 piece of foam visualizes what the minimum three feet of safe passing distance looks like that is our legal right in more than 30 states in the US. As more urban dwellers take up cycling, think of the attention we can bring to sharing the road if we all strapped a pool noodle to the back of our bicycles.
I started in Great Falls and rode the Upper Missouri, later hopping over a divide to the Jefferson and then along the Madison en route to Yellowstone
Beautiful country the whole way, really surprised me, when you ride it you feel like you want to stop every 100 yards and take a photo. Also in Montana it is legal to ride the shoulders of the Interstate which for many stretches is far easier/safer than the backroads and just as scenic.
I15 maybe 40 miles west of Great Falls
Further up, closer to Wolf Creek, the Missouri is fast-flowing here and Louis and Clark's crew had to pole against the current, hardly seemed possible, but they did it.
''Nother I 15 shot, maybe 25 miles south of Helena which is in the low spot way in the background, took me half the day to climb that grade...
Over the top and down to high mountain meadows, five miles to Boulder....
All of this, and I hadn't got off the Interstate yet, got off and headed south at Boulder.
PaulBarnard: Does "this" describe you? Last month on a narrow two lane highway (one lane in each direction) between Alder, Montana and Virginia City, Montana I am driving along and come upon a slow moving bicyclist that had attached to his bicycle a 5' long stick with flag attached at the end. Problem was the "stick/flag" was extending horizontally not vertically! And said stick stuck into his lane of travel at least 4 1/2'!!! Causing folks travelling in his lane (ME!) to slow down and travel in the ONCOMING lane to pass around him! WTF I said to myself as I and the car behind me went into the oncoming lane and had to slow down in a limited sight section of the road. I was miffed at this dimwit bicyclist's idiocy but went on my way. The fellow in the car behind me DID NOT! He pulled in front of the bike/bicyclist and turned his car so the "biker" had to stop! I slowed as I watched in the rear view mirror - last I saw was the fellow in the car opening his door and getting out of the car - obviously to speak with the bicyclist in question. He-he I thought. I continue on to the gunshop in Ennis, Montana do my business and start backtracking towards my home on the route I had came. Who do I come across but said idiot bicyclist and he no longer has the long stick and flag extending into the lane of travel! It MAY have been shoved up his ass - I don't know? I myself worry about bicyclist using auto lanes and not keeping up to speed or staying on the shoulder as many roads where I live have NO shoulders. Bike safe! Hold into the wind VarmintGuy
If you're going to or coming from West Yellowstone and Yellowstone NP you're prob'ly gonna ride through Ennis.
July 14, 2019, maybe ten miles south of Ennis: I was southbound, met these guys coming up the other way. Two Australians, 72 years of age, riding 3,300 miles from Yorktown VA to Astoria OR "while they still could", here they were 55 days and 2,500 miles out of Yorktown
It would be a shame if these guys got hit. That storm in back went on to dump major hail on Ennis, and prob'ly them too, but I'm sure they handled it.
It is beyond cool that retards can locate one another whilst traversing unfamiliar ground.