Originally Posted by Dogger
Or is it all just nostalgia?

thanks in advance for your replies...

I know it's already been said but ...

IMHO, yes. The .300 H&H and .300 WSM are near identical once the bullet leaves the barrel. Some actions, like 700s, really don't feed WSMs very well. I've had 2, was dissatisfied with both. Though you have to go with a long / magnum action, 700s feed the .300 H&H slicker than snot on a buttered doorknob. (Not that a .300 Win Mag might not be an even easier alternative.)

However, nostalgia is a pretty suitable reason. I like muzzleloaders, single shots and lever actions, single action revolvers .. why wouldn't I like the .300 H&H? Truly, what's not to like?

Tom


Anyone who thinks there's two sides to everything hasn't met a M�bius strip.

Here be dragons ...