Originally Posted by bsa1917hunter
Originally Posted by SuperCub
Originally Posted by hanco
If I really wanted one, it would be practical to me.

From a pure practical standpoint, the 300WM is a far better choice ....

1. Far more rifles to choose from.
2. Far more factory ammo.
3. Brass is a lot less expensive than the cost for 300H&H.
4. Better selection of dies.
5. More gunsmiths can be found with a 300WM reamer.
6. The more modern case shape would be less prone to stretching than the H&H.
7. More velocity.


BUT .... The 300WM offers way less cool.


I'd take a 300 WSM over a 300 WM.


I’d take a 300 WSM hunting, for LR this new 300 PRC has my interest,
but is there anything a 300 H&H couldn’t do with panache ?