Originally Posted by moosemike
Originally Posted by kingston
Originally Posted by moosemike
Originally Posted by Barnstorm

Originally Posted by Barnstorm
Do you understand the How a president is actually elected? Electoral... What?


Way better than you understood my point.


So.... What's your point. Enlighten me...


It was about the majority not always getting their way. In this case a large percentage of those who oppose this are baby boomers. Should they be deciding the future of hunting when in 15 years it will be hard finding a boomer afield?


I can’t imagine this is representative of the commissioners’ actual position.


I have no way of knowing whether it is or isn't.


Determining the preferences of today’s hunters proves challenge enough, let alone speculating what and how future generations are going to think and feel. To then justify policy based on said speculation is insane.


Originally Posted by 16penny
If you put Taco Bell sauce in your ramen noodles it tastes just like poverty