Originally Posted by 16bore
Nobody likes to get beat with a $200 scope.



True that.........though the classics are pretty good. The 3-9 HD is WAY better.

I just pulled the LRTS 3-12 off this...............................

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

So I could do this...............
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]


The only circles ran weren't by the LRTS 3-12...............Field of view, depth of view, contrast, lack of tunneling all went to the SWFA.

Not the best view through a camera lense, but you'll see neither one is really any different than the other optically. Except, if you were here with me looking, you'd say SWFA is the winner.

Both scopes set on 4x and then on 9x.............Blue Toyota is about 150 yards away......


LRTS on 4x
[img]https://i.imgur.com/NHfi6T5.jpg?1[/img]


SWFA on 4x
[img]https://i.imgur.com/cBhkP8d.jpg?1[/img]


LRTS on 9x
[img]https://i.imgur.com/WNWf86A.jpg?1[/img]


SWFA on 9x
[img]https://i.imgur.com/iKGRduY.jpg?1[/img]