The 3-12x is very easy to get behind, IME. The DMRII is a step in the wrong direction, if you ask me.
Thanks for the info Jordan.
I've never used a DMR II (yet!), so I don't know about the image quality differences, but everyone that I have communicated with regarding the LRTS and DMR II have stated that the DMR II has a better eyebox and is easier to get behind. I think the 3-12x LRTS is a nice scope, but am looking for something a bit better in terms of eyebox. The 4.5-18x isn't my cup of tea either, but the one that I had possessed a really nice image for the price.
The form factor and weight of the DMR II is not a concern for me. Eyebox was the main question.
Jason
