Yeah, but the gunsmith tested it and said it was perfect. All I need to know.
To me, static testing is of dubious value. It's useful to potentially save some ammo and heart ache by seeing if a scope is worth mounting to your rig in the first place, but beyond that, what does it prove?
IME, twisting the dials while the scope is clamped to a static mount isn't what causes scopes to go wonky. How a scope handles recoil, bouncing around on rough roads, accidental falls and/or drops while carrying, etc, are what concerns me.
What it does is show you if the optic works in the first place before you mount it, saving you a lot of BS
Do you think that mounting a scope on your rifle, then going out and shooting it at various ranges tells you anything? How do you know when you dial 3.2 mils, that the scope actually moves the reticle 3.2 mils? How do you tell if your reticle subtentions are accurate?
I guess you just take the manufacturer’s word for it
🤡
Originally Posted by Bristoe
The people wringing their hands over Trump's rhetoric don't know what time it is in America.
