Originally Posted by tjm10025
Originally Posted by Aught6

I agree on that one. If you got enough sense to park your ride and sleep it off you should not be screwed with.


I'm in favor of the "or in control" statutes, and I'm sorry that Indiana's isn't written that way.

The reasoning is that a drunk will wake up after a while, feel better and still be too drunk to realize that he's still too drunk to drive.

When a state has the "in control" wording in the DUI statute, you can reasonably bet there were some high-profile instances of a drunk doing exactly that and killing someone.



I am sure you will agree that Indiana handles some drunk drivers the right way though.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/08/1...officer-fatal-crash-blood-test-concerns/



although they seem to have gotten a little overzealous on a subsequent incident:

http://articles.latimes.com/2013/apr/28/nation/la-na-nn-indiana-drunk-driving-20130428


"My message to my troops is if you see anybody carrying a gun on the streets of Milwaukee, we'll put them on the ground, take the gun away and then decide whether you have a right to carry it." - Milwaukee Police Chief Ed Flynn