I think it's interesting how Dem/Comms and their tools in the media remain totally silent when a Dem/Comm commits a crime , just like cops.
We have a few cops and ex-cops on this forum. Isn't it interesting how none of them are outspoken and outraged when another cops violates someone eases rights or commit crimes themselves?
They are pro "good cop" (as are nearly all of us) but are 100% silent when we see bad cops doing the bidding of communists traitors. Just like all Dem Comms. Seems like a match to me.
Anyone else notice this?
Not true, Szhin. We have spoken more than once. And I have expressed my distrust of my political leaders and displeasure at dishonest cops.
I have lost the ability long ago when confronting, politely, my superiors at work when they veered into gray areas when charging people, especially with gun crimes. I have lost half the time. The charges have lost more but I will never promote/ i have lost choice assignments and now have lost a lousy assignment that worked for me. This for defending a stranger's rights and freedom.
But go on hating ALL cops for the actions of a bad few or the mistakes of an ill led department.
If you were average powerless Joe Citizen and were falsely accused or in a compromising situation not of your making how many of your co-workers would you trust? Just curious
Trust to do what? Let someone go because you like them, even though "probable cause exists that a crime has been committed?
Very, very few. The same few who have risked their livelihood by listening to my arguments. The same arguments most here would make based on a simple observable test of right and long, filtered through the law and the Justice System. Which is twisted beyond belief by the likes of Kamala Harris and every petty political person between her and you.
Most decent cops would feel bad in that they are a cog in the system which is often unfair and beyond their ability to fix. They know that they are not allowed tobe judge and jury - that is what juries and judges and attorneys and public defenders are there for. You are supposed to get your day in court.
I got into serious trouble for not arresting a man for domestic violence. His wife claimed he savagely beat her arms with both his fists while she lay there covered up and taking the blows. But I could see, since she was wearing a sleeveless top, that there wasn''t a mark on her body at all. When I finally located the husband I made a pretense to shake his had. His grip was so strong that he could have easily crushed mine. The woman clearly lied and I documented her statement and took photos of her arms, with her pointing to where the man had allegedly struck, her, and booked it all in the report. I served the man with the restraining order his wife had requested, as that is the LAW in California, but I did not arrest him on felony domestic violence. Later that night when the sergeants were reviewing the reports they aghast that I violated policy by not arresting a(n innocent) man.; Long arguments were made (These sergeants were good enough to let me explain) and these good sergeants made more than a few phone calls to keep their jobs and me out of jail.
In this Dem chithole of a city the politics are unbelievable. So do I quit? Soon. Then there will be almost no one to stand up to procedural injustice. The courts will process innocence. Right
Check out our District Attorney:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chesa_Boudin Are all cops saints? Not hardly, but they are not gearing up to slaughter patriots either.
Someone here was mad that I did not walk into Nancy Pelosi's office and arrest her for not following the oath she swore to defend the Constitution. There are some things even I can't fix.
But we can all discuss the best and most capable solutions. And right now that is by voting the bastards out and voting decent people in.
