Originally Posted by ElkSlayer91
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Originally Posted by ElkSlayer91
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by ElkSlayer91
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by gregintenn

Hard to have a conversation with two pricks pointing guns and screaming at you.

Why was he able to engage in the conversations that he did but not able to say what I suggested?
Why was he assaulted with pepper spray when it was clear he wasn't a threat?

You only use pepper spray to stop a physical confrontation, not on someone sitting "still" and not being "aggressive".

You must be retired LEO. It is more than obvious you are attempting to cover these deranged psychos for their actions.

When someone is lawfully pulled over, he's obliged by the conditions of his drivers license to follow a police officer's instructions related to the stop. Was the cop supposed to engage him in syllogistic debate for hours on end?

The officer is legally required to answer his "SINGLE" question as to why he was being pulled over. Your ignoring that FACT speaks how dishonest you are.

Oh, and nice throwing out the "strawman argument" concerning debating for hours. That's what happens when you're getting your azz handed to you.


I totally believe this could be possible, so educate me Please. What is the Virginia law that requires an officer to advise a driver of the infraction prior to the driver complying with lawful commands.

Go find in the Constitution where you have no right to know what you're being charged with, and get back to me.


Hmmmm I'm starting to think as long as an officer has reasonable suspicion a crime has occurred he can stop someone. Which doesn't even involve charging someone with a crime.......huh....maybe you don't know s hit.....