Hmmmm I'm starting to think as long as an officer has reasonable suspicion a crime has occurred he can stop someone. Which doesn't even involve charging someone with a crime.......huh....maybe you don't know s hit.....
Where did I state an officer has no right to stop someone, LIMP BRAIN?
And as you stated above, "reasonable suspicion a crime has occurred", the person being pulled over has a "legal right" to know, otherwise it is "ILLEGAL DETAINMENT".
You model the definition of LIMP BRAIN very well.
Hmmm explain a wall stop then for me lol...
How could it be that the Supreme Court ruled it legal based off your vast knowledge (let us not forget per your wisdom all that is alleged in civil suits is gospel)
Typical democrat move, obfuscate, throw out a strawman argument, when you're losing the debate.
There is no f ucking law or case law that requires a cop to advise a driver of why they are being stopped. Charged or cited? Ya.
Dumb fugk
Your words, "Suspicion a crime has occurred". Citizen has a right to know what crime he is being charged with.
So in your opinion the word "suspicion" is the same as "charged"?
