When you intentionally misquote what was said (like you clearly did) in order to support your position, then your position is a weak position.
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
"I don't know therefore GOD" "It's beyond my comprehension therefore GOD." "It's so wonderous therefore GOD." "Science is too hard for me to understand therefore GOD."
How every you want to paraphrase it they are all bad arguments.
"I don't know therefore NO GOD" "It's beyond my comprehension therefore NO GOD." "It's so wondrous therefore NO GOD." "Science is too hard for me to understand therefore NO GOD."
How ever you want to paraphrase it, the above are all WORSE arguments.
The fact remains that it is evidence that justifies a conviction of truth, and as we have zero evidence for the existence of any of the countless versions of God and gods that people have believed in and worshipped, there is no reason to be convinced that any of them exist.
Which is where faith and its drivers, the promise of eternal life, desire for meaning, fear of annihilation, etc, comes into play.
And again, what is written in old scrolls about God or gods is not evidence for their existence.
Faith, despite your protests, is a belief held without the support of evidence.
