And a Liberal Judge suspended the Grizzly hunt. There's too damned many Grizzlies around for the available habitat. Prayers that the guide is found alive and for the hunter's recovery.
Alot more care is needed today as grizzly populations increase all over so be extra careful even in area's where they previously haven't been known to inhabit. Prayers for a speedy recovery and the guide is found safe.
Several years ago there was an organization called People for the West or something like that. Don't know if they are still active but one of their premises was there is an ongoing effort in government to get people out of rural areas and concentrate the population along the interstate highway system. The goal is to make it easier to control the population. Endangered species, public land grabs and many other tools enter into this.
JACKSON HOLE, WYO – Two hunters were involved in a bear attack Friday, September 14, in the Teton Wilderness while field dressing an elk near Terrace Mountain, approximately 5.8 miles northeast of the Turpin Meadow Trailhead.
Florida resident Corey Chubon shot an elk during a guided bow hunt late Thursday afternoon. He and his guide, Mark Uptain of Martin Outfitters, were unable to locate the wounded animal before nightfall. The pair returned Friday morning to locate and remove the elk. They found the undisturbed carcass in the early afternoon and were preparing to pack out the elk when they were aggressively charged by two large bears. Mark Uptain, 37, is owner of Blue Sky Restoration and the guide still missing.
Chubon was able to run to his pack a few yards away and retrieve a pistol but was unable to safely fire a shot at the bear that had pounced upon Uptain. The attacking bear then spun, charged Chubon, grabbed his foot and dragged him to the ground. He sustained injuries to his leg, chest, and arm, but was able to throw the gun to Uptain and get loose before running from the scene to phone for help.
Initial reports indicate that the second bear did not engage either Chubon or Uptain.
An interagency helicopter was dispatched to the scene to assist with transport of the injured hunters. Chubon was taken to St. John’s Medical Center for treatment to his wounds. Search and Rescue personnel were unable to locate Uptain before the search was suspended for the evening.
An interagency team from the Teton County Sheriff’s Office, Teton County Search and Rescue, Wyoming Game and Fish Department, Grand Teton National Park, and Bridger-Teton National Forest have resumed the search at 6:30am this morning. Game wardens will look for evidence that may indicate if the bears were grizzlies.
Undersheriff Matt Carr stated, “Search and Rescue is currently in the field, and we’re making every effort to locate and bring Mr. Uptain out from the backcountry.”
An incident command post and helicopter landing zone has been established near Turpin Meadow Ranch. Ground and air resources are being utilized for this search and updates will be provided as available. Other hunters in the area should be aware of the search and rescue operations and the recent bear activity.
Wow, we are Headed to Jackson at the end of the month to do some hiking. The Glock will be on my chest not in my pack. I hope my wife doesn't hear about this.
Several years ago there was an organization called People for the West or something like that. Don't know if they are still active but one of their premises was there is an ongoing effort in government to get people out of rural areas and concentrate the population along the interstate highway system. The goal is to make it easier to control the population. Endangered species, public land grabs and many other tools enter into this.
Natos agenda 21, it's real and the long list of US politician s who signed on is frightening. They may have changed the name as lots of people because aware of the plan.
Pard who is a guide in WY underwent surgery #8 this week since being attacked by a grizz last season while dressing his clients elk. Pretty much an identical scenario, those bears aren’t stupid and know where to find an easy meal. Point being when you put an animal down in bear country and set out to field dress it, someone needs to be standing guard attentively with a rifle. My pard was rushed and set upon in a flash, the fuggers are fast.
Google Jonathan Sheets, newspapers out of Cody did multiple stories, some interesting reading.
Or you can be like Todd Orr and get attacked twice and still endorse bear spray...
During a recent interview with TIME, Orr described how he first spotted the grizzly bear and her cubs while he was hiking through Madison Valley to scout for elk. The next thing he knew, she was charging full speed at him, he said. He used his bear spray, which generally deters aggressive bears, but the grizzly jumped on top of him, biting his head and arms before walking back into the woods.
Let's face it. A lot of people carry guns for defense, but not all have the stones to use them. I'm sure this poor guys' self preservation mechanism kicked in and he high tailed it out of there. I pray for the guide, but fear that the worst may have happened.
why in the hell would he throw the damn gun instead of using it.... dumb ass.
Also, what did Uptain do with the pistol that Chubain tossed to him? Story doesn't make sense to me. Something's missing.
more than likely he was getting killed and didn't even notice the pistol. if you've ever had to fight a animal attacking you, you'd understand. your focus is on that animal not something being tossed to you.
Another case of Bow hunting elk that didn't go right. A elk shot yesterday still full of guts the next afternoon, giving bears a day to find a dead critter...
Just because somethiing is legal dosen't always mean it is a good idea..
Hope the guide is found Ok but I doubt it. Sad situation.
why in the hell would he throw the damn gun instead of using it.... dumb ass.
Also, what did Uptain do with the pistol that Chubain tossed to him? Story doesn't make sense to me. Something's missing.
more than likely he was getting killed and didn't even notice the pistol. if you've ever had to fight a animal attacking you, you'd understand. your focus is on that animal not something being tossed to you.
Probably that's the case.
I was about to smirk at Chubain for keeping the pistol in his pack, not on his person, when I remembered the first caribou I shot. I carried the bloody antlers about two miles back to camp with my rifle slung over my shoulder, unloaded, and the ammo IN MY BACK PACK. We had seen six grizzlies from that camp.
Regarding that People for the West mention above, I worked for them in the late 1990s and the organization folded (lack of money) in 2001 or 2002. But yes, there is the Wildlands Project, Yellowstone to Yukon and all those are directed at "rewilding" huge areas in not just western America (includes Canada). If you hear someone talking about "conservation biology" and "migration corridors" and "keystone species," that's all part of the theory. In practical terms, there's also the idea that wildlife populations should be controlled by the top non-human predators, such as grizzlies and wolves so the ecosystem runs without human interference, that's "deep ecology." While this worldview is not held by many, the fact is, those who DO support this stuff, really support it. If having bears means no hunters, that's okay with them. If having wolves means no ranching, or no hunting, again, okey dokey. And there's so much passion, it results in MONEY and LAWSUITS and POLITICS to the point where the resource sectors and consumptive uses are being singled out and wrecked one by one. THink how this mauling helps the cause.....that little jolt of fear before booking the trip. The frustration over having tags and then being screwed over by some judge after booking a big money trip. What about next time, will you apply, or do something else? That bears and other predators are dangerous to human activity, for most of the wildlands acolytes, that's a GOOD thing.
DS as I recall People for the West was opposed to the Wildlands Project. It is not my intent to hijack this thread, I was only trying to point out how these type incidents play into the agenda of rewilding. Lately there have been several stories about four legged cougars interacting with people, grizzly attacks, etc. As laws are passed protecting apex predators there is more human/predator interaction.
These things rarely end well for the human. Easy to second guess but not being there it is hard to really know. Hope it turns out well for everyone except the bear.
build a fence around all civilized humans. have access doors to the wild side, and sign a certificate that no one will come rescue anyone who chooses to enter on their own accord?
no one wants to be eaten by a carnivore. but the carnivores do have the right to live, right? just not in my backyard. that's what i told the landfill & nuclear power people the other day. they said they heard me. lol.
These are sad stories. I have a friend bow hunting about 30 mi north of YNP now and I will be rifle-hunting in the same area the end of Oct. In 2013 in the same drainages I saw a large grizzly a bit off on a side-hill; and then another, the first bears I’ve seen in the lower 48 outside YNP and the Bob. They are definitely getting around.
Not that the handgun did any good here, but, I’ve said it before — spare me the food-condiment spray speal.
'A Jackson Hole businessman, hunting guide and father of five was found dead Saturday afternoon near where he was attacked while retrieving a client’s elk carcass Friday afternoon.
The body of Mark Uptain, a 37-year-old guide for Martin Outfitters, was discovered around 1:15 p.m. Saturday about a quarter-mile to the northwest of where he and client Corey Chubon were processing an elk that was struck by an arrow Thursday. The elk was located and attack occurred the next day. Pending an investigation, it’s unclear if Uptain had been fed upon, but Teton County Search and Rescue Coordinator and incident commander Jessica King said that his body was intact.'
If these all pan out to be grizzly attacks, people need to send cards/ or victims pictures if they have them to the judge, lawyer and board for the bear protection group every holiday and then be sure to send them on on the birthday of all attacked by grizzlies and be sure to include pictures. STOP as soon as they take legal action to stop it.
If these all pan out to be grizzly attacks, people need to send cards/ or victims pictures if they have them to the judge, lawyer and board for the bear protection group every holiday and then be sure to send them on on the birthday of all attacked by grizzlies and be sure to include pictures. STOP as soon as they take legal action to stop it.
Yes, grizzles should have no part in the wilderness.
If these all pan out to be grizzly attacks, people need to send cards/ or victims pictures if they have them to the judge, lawyer and board for the bear protection group every holiday and then be sure to send them on on the birthday of all attacked by grizzlies and be sure to include pictures. STOP as soon as they take legal action to stop it.
Judges/treehugging hippies think the man being killed is funny - their mentality is ''well he was out there killing stuff - he deserved it'' . The lefty disney pukes view of the world is very twisted .
Damn shame! Could they legally carry a firearm to retrieve the elk? Seems like a tragedy waiting to happen if you have to go about unarmed in bear country.
We were in that same area last fall. A guide and his hunter were dressing an elk when a griz jumped them. One of the hunters pulled a pistol and shot the bear a couple times. Deterred it and it ran into some brush. F&G officers couldn’t find the bear but did find a lot of blood.
All I was carrying was my Model 60 with hard cast 180 gr. But I felt a Hell of a lot better about having that than I would’ve about some pepper spray.
Pard who is a guide in WY underwent surgery #8 this week since being attacked by a grizz last season while dressing his clients elk. Pretty much an identical scenario, those bears aren’t stupid and know where to find an easy meal. Point being when you put an animal down in bear country and set out to field dress it, someone needs to be standing guard attentively with a rifle. My pard was rushed and set upon in a flash, the fuggers are fast.
Google Jonathan Sheets, newspapers out of Cody did multiple stories, some interesting reading.
right.....in grizzly country, if 2 people... 1 stands guard...….bob
If these all pan out to be grizzly attacks, people need to send cards/ or victims pictures if they have them to the judge, lawyer and board for the bear protection group every holiday and then be sure to send them on on the birthday of all attacked by grizzlies and be sure to include pictures. STOP as soon as they take legal action to stop it.
Yes, grizzles should have no part in the wilderness.
If these all pan out to be grizzly attacks, people need to send cards/ or victims pictures if they have them to the judge, lawyer and board for the bear protection group every holiday and then be sure to send them on on the birthday of all attacked by grizzlies and be sure to include pictures. STOP as soon as they take legal action to stop it.
Judges/treehugging hippies think the man being killed is funny - their mentality is ''well he was out there killing stuff - he deserved it'' . The lefty disney pukes view of the world is very twisted .
Rest in peace Mark Uptain ...
and if it was a tree hugger....a lot of people would be cheering......saying they weren't aware of their surroundings......etc...….bob
So the bear dragged the other guy 400 yards? Or he made it that far after the bear left off mauling him?
I take it this was bow season, could those guy have legally brung a rifle or shotgun with them?
Young father of five, seems like a standup guy. What a tragedy!
Bird, I don't know if thier laws allow for it or not. I haven't researched it to find out. I do know my local law forbids me from doing so. Ohio has a "no second weapon allowed " rule during deer season. Makes no sense to me, and I'm trying to get it revoked. Only exception is a CCW, which can not be used for any hunting purpose. I most assuredly would have drawn it in defense. But no one without a CCW can carry while hunting, here.
Wow, we are Headed to Jackson at the end of the month to do some hiking. The Glock will be on my chest not in my pack. I hope my wife doesn't hear about this.
mike r
There’s a lot right about this ^^^^ when hunting, too... It’s not always practical to carry a rifle during a pack out with meat; even a short barreled guide gun can make it an epic PITA. But, carrying a stout caliber pistol or revolver IMO is part and partial when you are smelling like a grocery store to big tooth & clawed predators...Prayers to the guides family and hunter in recovery. 😎
I spent almost a month on Kodiak Island this last spring. Not in town but in spike camps. I seen many brown bears everyday. Some of them very close.
I seen so many that they get to be almost normal. Though I never got complicit. Everywhere I went I had my 375, 44 and a keen awareness of my surroundings. They are massive and powerful animals.
Being around a day old kill is far more dangerous than being around a sow with cubs in my opinion. They had to have known that it was a dicey scenario going in on a day old kill. Bears can smell for miles. Basically, it’s how they do just about everything.
Folks, I do not blame any of the posters for their thoughts on this, as we all wonder what might have been done to avoid the terrible results. Personally, we all are shocked, so I give them some slack.
I have been in a couple of dangerous situations myself, but involving cape buffalo and a leopard in Africa, and maybe others I didn't even know about there. Believe me, in grizzly country I wouldn't take a chance, especially with meat on the ground!
I know nothing about grizzly bears however if you were in this area would you not have had a large bore pistol on your belt? I don't understand the throwing the pistol either, I would like to think I would have fired the pistol at the bear instead of throwing it to the man being killed if I read it correctly. I don't think I would want a 10mm in this case based on the black bear that took 14 or so 10mm rounds and still chewed the guy up pretty bad. I don't know what he had for cartridges though.
No one wants to hear stories like this. We all need to remind ourselves that things can go south real quick. Does not matter if your fishing offshore or hunting the back country. Your not in trouble till you are. Praying for all involved. Hasbeen
I know nothing about grizzly bears however if you were in this area would you not have had a large bore pistol on your belt? I don't understand the throwing the pistol either, I would like to think I would have fired the pistol at the bear instead of throwing it to the man being killed if I read it correctly. I don't think I would want a 10mm in this case based on the black bear that took 14 or so 10mm rounds and still chewed the guy up pretty bad. I don't know what he had for cartridges though.
I hope this never really happened(throwing the pistol at the guide).
The fact the "hunter" left Jackson before the guides body was found speaks spades of his character, fleeing from the scene OMG.
I guess this Monday he will go back to work and tell his co-workers what a harrowing bowhunt he had and how his guide was killed by a Grizzly(s). Probably post this on Facebook. Our society is sure producing some outstanding humans.
I spent almost a month on Kodiak Island this last spring. Not in town but in spike camps. I seen many brown bears everyday. Some of them very close.
I seen so many that they get to be almost normal. Though I never got complicit. Everywhere I went I had my 375, 44 and a keen awareness of my surroundings. They are massive and powerful animals.
Being around a day old kill is far more dangerous than being around a sow with cubs in my opinion. They had to have known that it was a dicey scenario going in on a day old kill. Bears can smell for miles. Basically, it’s how they do just about everything.
Damn shame.
You mean you never participated in a bear mauling alongside a bear? Well, I'm happy to hear that.
I don't think I would want a 10mm in this case based on the black bear that took 14 or so 10mm rounds and still chewed the guy up pretty bad. I don't know what he had for cartridges though.
Could you provide a link to this. I've never heard this story before.
The thought of being eaten by a bear or shark isn't near as terrifying as all the inevitable "What a dumb ass" comments that will spawn across the country immediately after my death.
I spent almost a month on Kodiak Island this last spring. Not in town but in spike camps. I seen many brown bears everyday. Some of them very close.
I seen so many that they get to be almost normal. Though I never got complicit. Everywhere I went I had my 375, 44 and a keen awareness of my surroundings. They are massive and powerful animals.
Being around a day old kill is far more dangerous than being around a sow with cubs in my opinion. They had to have known that it was a dicey scenario going in on a day old kill. Bears can smell for miles. Basically, it’s how they do just about everything.
Damn shame.
You mean you never participated in a bear mauling along side a bear? Well, I'm happy to hear that.
I can't believe anybody would admit to this....geeze, what an ass...
Quote
Chubon was able to run to his pack a few yards away and retrieve a pistol but was unable to safely fire a shot at the bear that had pounced upon Uptain. The attacking bear then spun, charged Chubon, grabbed his foot and dragged him to the ground. He sustained injuries to his leg, chest, and arm, but was able to throw the gun to Uptain and get loose before running from the scene to phone for help.
I love all the armchair quarterbacking based on a sketchy report, full of holes and missing information.
KInd of what I was thinking. WIthout having been there and seen what happened, it's hard to second-guess. Or should be.
Yeah, a video would be nice, but the fact remains that at one time, the hunter/client had a handgun and ended up throwing it towards somebody that was probably already incapable of using it...it ain't hard at all to figure out....guide is dead and the hunter/client ran for help....
.......the fact remains that at one time, the hunter/client had a handgun and ended up throwing it towards somebody that was probably already incapable of using it...
Listen to what you're saying. You start out with "the fact remains" and you end up with "probablyincapable of using it."
You have no idea whether the guide was incapable of using it, hell, he may have even asked the hunter to toss it to him. Shooting a bear while it's on top of a guy would seem to be a dicey proposition, have you ever done it?
The fact remains, you weren't there and you're guessing.
.......the fact remains that at one time, the hunter/client had a handgun and ended up throwing it towards somebody that was probably already incapable of using it...
Listen to what you're saying. You start out with "the fact remains" and you end up with "probablyincapable of using it."
You have no idea whether the guide was incapable of using it, hell, he may have even asked the hunter to toss it to him. Shooting a bear while it's on top of a guy would seem to be a dicey proposition, have you ever done it?
The fact remains, you weren't there and you're guessing.
Guide is dead.....client ran for help....figure it out.
Too many people are conditioned to "go call for help" instead of dealing with the immediate problem on their own. In the backcountry there is no immediate help. Help is many hours away. You are "help." The emergency in this case was immediate and needed to be dealt with inside of several seconds, not hours.
.......the fact remains that at one time, the hunter/client had a handgun and ended up throwing it towards somebody that was probably already incapable of using it...
Listen to what you're saying. You start out with "the fact remains" and you end up with "probablyincapable of using it."
You have no idea whether the guide was incapable of using it, hell, he may have even asked the hunter to toss it to him. Shooting a bear while it's on top of a guy would seem to be a dicey proposition, have you ever done it?
The fact remains, you weren't there and you're guessing.
Guide is dead.....client ran for help....figure it out.
No, you figure it out, and make sure to give everyone your opinion on what happened and why. I don't play that game, not having been in that situation myself.
How about you, how many times have you been attacked by a grizzly bear? How did you handle it?
So the bear dragged the other guy 400 yards? Or he made it that far after the bear left off mauling him?
I take it this was bow season, could those guy have legally brung a rifle or shotgun with them?
Young father of five, seems like a standup guy. What a tragedy!
Which could probably could have been avoided had he been better at his job.
Billy badazz right here...
^ ^
Dumass right there...
Great rebuttal schit for brains. Go [bleep] yourself, the man is dead for phuc sake.
You werent there, so you have no way of knowing what he as a guide did or didn't do. Or were you?
For we all know, the Guide did most things right and something out of his control (or someone) altered the outcome in a worse way. He had to dress the damn elk. Maybe he didn’t know he his six wasn’t being covered. Was he supposed to hold a knife , a gun and watch his back and dress the elk?
Too many people are conditioned to "go call for help" instead of dealing with the immediate problem on their own. In the backcountry there is no immediate help. Help is many hours away. You are "help." The emergency in this case was immediate and needed to be dealt with inside of several seconds, not hours.
This. Going for help in this context was a cop out for losing nerve, i.e., going with the flight reflex at the sight of dread and imminent danger.
Too many people are conditioned to "go call for help" instead of dealing with the immediate problem on their own. In the backcountry there is no immediate help. Help is many hours away. You are "help." The emergency in this case was immediate and needed to be dealt with inside of several seconds, not hours.
This. Going for help in this context was a cop out for losing nerve, i.e., going with the flight reflex at the sight of dread and imminent danger.
How about you, how many time have you been attacked by a grizzly and how did you handle it?
Too many people are conditioned to "go call for help" instead of dealing with the immediate problem on their own. In the backcountry there is no immediate help. Help is many hours away. You are "help." The emergency in this case was immediate and needed to be dealt with inside of several seconds, not hours.
This. Going for help in this context was a cop out for losing nerve, i.e., going with the flight reflex at the sight of dread and imminent danger.
How about you, how many time have you been attacked by a grizzly and how did you handle it?
Where did I say I was immune to the flight reflex? It's a thing. One can only hope one will do the right thing when his test comes. Best way to prepare is to understand that the flight reflex is a thing and to be prepared to not allow it to rule your action.
no one wants to be eaten by a carnivore. but the carnivores do have the right to live, right?
Gus,
I want to be ................................"eaten by a carnivore"................
preferably after I perish.
when it's time for me to leave this life, I hope to be out in the woods, far enough away some "carnivore" can enjoy the resources I've been collecting and storing as flesh for so many years..................before the "authorities" find my remains.
If all they find are the inedible bits, that would suit me fine.
Burial at sea in a cotton canvas shroud would work too, should I happen to die in my sleep at home or...... forbid the notion, ................in a medical facility. My payback to Mother Urth............for years of enjoying "her" bounty.
Condolences to the family and friends of the guide. Sad situation and not entirely understandable by this outdoorsman. Grizzly country, or even a heavily black bear populated one, two folks? One works the carcass the other stands guard. Only one person......head on a swivel and a locked and loaded firearm at the ready.........and hope one could reach it in time.
I wonder what it was like in the Mountain Man times? Lots more bears in lots more areas than there are now. Might have been fun!
Worked a gun/bow shop. Some bowhunters wanted handguns for backup in bear country. Most were NOT gun people.
Peace of mind and actually being able to shoot it.................two different things.
Sounds like the gun was in his backpack, since he had to go get it.
Or it could've been in a holster on his packs hip belt. Fact is, we dont really know what happened or have 10% of the facts of the incident. But like so many other threads here filled with speculation and Billy badassery everyone's hindsight is 20/20, when in actuality most here slinging schit dont have the stones to hunt in griz country.
Where did I say I was immune to the flight reflex? It's a thing.
You said it was a "cop out." If it's a reflex and physiological, how is it a "cop out?"
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Best way to prepare is to understand that the flight reflex is a thing and to be prepared to not allow it to rule your action.
That's like saying that the best way to survive a subzero night out without shelter is to build a snow cave, without ever having built one. You have no idea if it'll work unless you've done it.
Worked a gun/bow shop. Some bowhunters wanted handguns for backup in bear country. Most were NOT gun people.
Peace of mind and actually being able to shoot it.................two different things.
Sounds like the gun was in his backpack, since he had to go get it.
Or it could've been in a holster on his packs hip belt. Fact is, we dont really know what happened or have 10% of the facts of the incident. But like so many other threads here filled with speculation and Billy badassery everyone's hindsight is 20/20, when in actuality most here slinging schit dont have the stones to hunt in griz country.
no one wants to be eaten by a carnivore. but the carnivores do have the right to live, right?
Gus,
I want to be ................................"eaten by a carnivore"................
preferably after I perish.
when it's time for me to leave this life, I hope to be out in the woods, far enough away some "carnivore" can enjoy the resources I've been collecting and storing as flesh for so many years..................before the "authorities" find my remains.
If all they find are the inedible bits, that would suit me fine.
Burial at sea in a cotton canvas shroud would work too, should I happen to die in my sleep at home or...... forbid the notion, ................in a medical facility. My payback to Mother Urth............for years of enjoying "her" bounty.
Condolences to the family and friends of the guide. Sad situation and not entirely understandable by this outdoorsman. Grizzly country, or even a heavily black bear populated one, two folks? One works the carcass the other stands guard. Only one person......head on a swivel and a locked and loaded firearm at the ready.........and hope one could reach it in time.
I wonder what it was like in the Mountain Man times? Lots more bears in lots more areas than there are now. Might have been fun!
Geno
Geno, i am in total agreement on so many levels. to have my carcass dragged down into the woods, and left under a big white oak tree and made available for a feast by the denizens of the forest would not trouble me at all. i wouldn't want to die, but dying in the woods seems like a better choice than being incarcerated in a nursing home for years, then languish in a hospital full of tubes prior to the final demise.
while dying from a bear attack is not to be relished, there's many other ways of dying that are far worse. so, we can regret the accident or whatever it was, but we have to admit if we're cognizant, that not everyone get's to go in such an exciting manner.
no one wants to be eaten by a carnivore. but the carnivores do have the right to live, right?
Gus,
I want to be ................................"eaten by a carnivore"................
preferably after I perish.
when it's time for me to leave this life, I hope to be out in the woods, far enough away some "carnivore" can enjoy the resources I've been collecting and storing as flesh for so many years..................before the "authorities" find my remains.
If all they find are the inedible bits, that would suit me fine.
Burial at sea in a cotton canvas shroud would work too, should I happen to die in my sleep at home or...... forbid the notion, ................in a medical facility. My payback to Mother Urth............for years of enjoying "her" bounty.
Condolences to the family and friends of the guide. Sad situation and not entirely understandable by this outdoorsman. Grizzly country, or even a heavily black bear populated one, two folks? One works the carcass the other stands guard. Only one person......head on a swivel and a locked and loaded firearm at the ready.........and hope one could reach it in time.
I wonder what it was like in the Mountain Man times? Lots more bears in lots more areas than there are now. Might have been fun!
Geno
Geno, i am in total agreement on so many levels. to have my carcass dragged down into the woods, and left under a big white oak tree and made available for a feast by the denizens of the forest would not trouble me at all. i wouldn't want to die, but dying in the woods seems like a better choice than being incarcerated in a nursing home for years, then languish in a hospital full of tubes prior to the final demise.
while dying from a bear attack is not to be relished, there's many other ways of dying that are far worse. so, we can regret the accident or whatever it was, but we have to admit if we're cognizant, that not everyone get's to go in such an exciting manner.
Where did I say I was immune to the flight reflex? It's a thing.
You said it was a "cop out." If it's a reflex and physiological, how is it a "cop out?"
The explanation was a nice way of saying he freaked out and ran away. That's the cop out, not just saying he pissed his pants, threw his gun at the bear, and ran, which is likely closer to what happened.
Lots of guides in that country carry defense guns of some type. Myself included. But you'd be surprised how many don't carry anything, not even bear spray.
Where did I say I was immune to the flight reflex? It's a thing.
You said it was a "cop out." If it's a reflex and physiological, how is it a "cop out?"
The explanation was a nice way of saying he freaked out and ran away. That's the cop out, not just saying he pissed his pants, threw his gun at the bear, and ran, which is likely closer to what happened.
Once again, when you've been attacked by grizzlies, how did you handle it?
Where did I say I was immune to the flight reflex? It's a thing.
You said it was a "cop out." If it's a reflex and physiological, how is it a "cop out?"
The explanation was a nice way of saying he freaked out and ran away. That's the cop out, not just saying he pissed his pants, threw his gun at the bear, and ran, which is likely closer to what happened.
Once again, when you've been attacked by grizzlies, how did you handle it?
Your question is nonsensical in light of anything I've said.
Where did I say I was immune to the flight reflex? It's a thing.
You said it was a "cop out." If it's a reflex and physiological, how is it a "cop out?"
The explanation was a nice way of saying he freaked out and ran away. That's the cop out, not just saying he pissed his pants, threw his gun at the bear, and ran, which is likely closer to what happened.
Once again, when you've been attacked by grizzlies, how did you handle it?
Your question is nonsensical in light of anything I've said.
To the contrary. My question has shown that you're criticizing someone for "copping out" in a situation you've never been in yourself. So you have no idea how you would react, yet you criticize from the comfort of your easy chair.
Your refusal to answer is telling.
Of all the things that could happen to a person that would cause that person to lose it or act irrationally, getting attacked by a grizzly would have to be at the top of the list.
Waiting to see what comes out as the final story. WGFD is holding information back. The chopped up accounts, especially in national news are generally incomplete. That area is pretty thick with griz.
That’s a sad deal, only one person knows the story and I’m sure it will come out. I carry a 44 mag in a crappy uncle mikes holster when bow hunting in grizz country. I want my gun strapped to my hip with retention.
Tragic. I wonder if the guide and hunter discussed the possibility of bear trouble while retrieving an animal the day after it was shot?
Before or after the client was asked to show his proficiency with his bow, there should have been a walk-thru plan on big game hunting and retrieval in grizzly country.
Tragic. I wonder if the guide and hunter discussed the possibility of bear trouble while retrieving an animal the day after it was shot?
Before or after the client was asked to show his proficiency with his bow, there should have been a walk-thru plan on big game hunting and retrieval in grizzly country.
So you know that didn't happen? Please share all of the inside information you have. Certainly you're not speculating and talking out your azz again.....right?
Tragic. I wonder if the guide and hunter discussed the possibility of bear trouble while retrieving an animal the day after it was shot?
Before or after the client was asked to show his proficiency with his bow, there should have been a walk-thru plan on big game hunting and retrieval in grizzly country.
So you know that didn't happen? Please share all of the inside information you have. Certainly you're not speculating and talking out your azz again.....right?
Bottom line is you could become bear schitt if you don’t go in fully prepared! Always go fully prepared in bear country, such a terrible Tragedy that coulda been avoided with more preparedness.
The part I find confusing is: "Search and Rescue personnel were unable to locate Uptain before the search was suspended for the evening.Search and Rescue personnel were unable to locate Uptain before the search was suspended for the evening."
How far away from the hunter was the guide eventually found?
Should I find myself hunting in grizzly country, I’ll make in known to my hunting partner that they are to empty their sidearm into any bear that finds its way on top of me. I’d far rather die from a well intentioned gunshot wound than be mauled to death by a bear.
Bottom line is you could become bear schitt if you don’t go in fully prepared! Always go fully prepared in bear country, such a terrible Tragedy that coulda been avoided with more preparedness.
Being prepared is mighty ambiguous. You could enter bear country with a rifle or pump action shotgun loaded with buckshot and slugs and still get mauled. Anyone that thinks he is better than the bear is soon to get an education. I have spent my life in the woods with these bears and I know going in, I could get into a terrible situation, but being prepared will always be too little when you get mauled...
A few years ago while bow hunting Island Park not too far from Yellowstone we were seeing big bear tracks everywhere. I killed my elk early in the season but continued to go up and call for my friend that called mine in for me. I carried my call, my 45/70 guide gun loaded with 350 grain hornady flat noses at almost 2100 fps and my 329 pd full of 300 grain xtps.
I was sitting in the truck waiting for my friend to squat in the woods when a warden pulled up to check me. He asked what I was doing with the rifle and I told him I had already tagged out but was carrying it while I called for my friend because we had seen so much bear sign. He said they had caught 13 different Grizzlies in a live trap that summer just a mile or so up the road towards the store. I asked where they were relocated too and he said they weren't relocated just tagged or collared and released again. He said they are all likely still in the area and a hunter just up the road had just saw 3 together at the same time.
He the proceeded to tell me I shouldn't carry the guns I should just get bear spray. I told him I was more comfortable with the guns. He said you'll think that until you use them and the Feds come down on you and ruin your life. He said even if it is self defense you better have some serious injuries if you shoot a griz because the Feds will investigate it like crazy and do everything they can to ruin your life. He said you can try to fight it in court but they'll bankrupt you in the process and likely let a murderer out of jail to make room for you. He said they bring in teams in helicopters and do intense forensic and crime scene investigation whenever a hunter injures a griz. He was cool about which idaho fish and game cops aren't always. He said he was just letting me know how bad it can get if you defend yourself against a bear with a gun. That was under the Obama regime a few years ago so maybe it's less intense now.
I don't think I would want a 10mm in this case based on the black bear that took 14 or so 10mm rounds and still chewed the guy up pretty bad. I don't know what he had for cartridges though.
Could you provide a link to this. I've never heard this story before.
Yeah, I will believe this only after seeing some credible information.
A few years ago while bow hunting Island Park not too far from Yellowstone we were seeing big bear tracks everywhere. I killed my elk early in the season but continued to go up and call for my friend that called mine in for me. I carried my call, my 45/70 guide gun loaded with 350 grain hornady flat noses at almost 2100 fps and my 329 pd full of 300 grain xtps.
I was sitting in the truck waiting for my friend to squat in the woods when a warden pulled up to check me. He asked what I was doing with the rifle and I told him I had already tagged out but was carrying it while I called for my friend because we had seen so much bear sign. He said they had caught 13 different Grizzlies in a live trap that summer just a mile or so up the road towards the store. I asked where they were relocated too and he said they weren't relocated just tagged or collared and released again. He said they are all likely still in the area and a hunter just up the road had just saw 3 together at the same time.
He the proceeded to tell me I shouldn't carry the guns I should just get bear spray. I told him I was more comfortable with the guns. He said you'll think that until you use them and the Feds come down on you and ruin your life. He said even if it is self defense you better have some serious injuries if you shoot a griz because the Feds will investigate it like crazy and do everything they can to ruin your life. He said you can try to fight it in court but they'll bankrupt you in the process and likely let a murderer out of jail to make room for you. He said they bring in teams in helicopters and do intense forensic and crime scene investigation whenever a hunter injures a griz. He was cool about which idaho fish and game cops aren't always. He said he was just letting me know how bad it can get if you defend yourself against a bear with a gun. That was under the Obama regime a few years ago so maybe it's less intense now.
Bb
My impression is that authorities in Alaska are not nearly as protective of the bears in such a situation. I do know that they require you to forfeit the dead bear and file a report. Of course, Alaska is not short on bears.
Black bears have become common with around 40 miles as the crow flies from Manhattan. Predictably, a hiker was run down and killed by in NJ by a large male bear a few years back, and nuisance bears are now a given around the Delaware Water Gap and the West Point area. We’re just talking black bears here, hundreds of encounters, very rare attacks.
But, the thought of having to hike disarmed in New York State sorta sucked the joy out of the concept; every time I encountered a bear the bear would get to call the shots. Then I think of people sharing the woods with friggin grizzlies
Someone mentioned mountain men. I dunno if grizzlies were actually more aggressive back then. Consider the abundance of grizzlies and then consider the abundance of food odors around any sort of Indian camp. No bear bags in trees, no elaborate precautions. One wonders how they managed to sleep nights.
Some guys proactively took the war over to the grizzlies, traditionally by combat rather than assassination, picking fights with them to collect the claws. IIRC the mortality rate on both sides was about 50%. The Sauk Fox leader Black Hawk from Illinois did this twice as a young man, having to sneak through the territory of the enemy Pawnee (whole magnitudes more dangerous than even grizzlies) coming and going to get to griz territory, going out alone each time, months afield.
I suspect humans were very much a rival apex predator back then, and bears had reason to avoid us. At the very least they were subject to unprovoked attack and serious injury or death when around humans. For today’s grizzlies, not so much.
I don't think I would want a 10mm in this case based on the black bear that took 14 or so 10mm rounds and still chewed the guy up pretty bad. I don't know what he had for cartridges though.
Could you provide a link to this. I've never heard this story before.
I don’t know what he had for cartridges but this kind of negates all the nonsense that the G20 has more stopping power because it carries more cartridges albeit all at lower energy. I think the guys that say “I got 10,500 ft pounds of energy in this pistol with 15 cartridges” are just wrong. That is assuming they are using buffalo bore cartridges with their 220’s at about 700 ft pounds per shot. Granted I don’t know what cartridges this man was using but even a 44 magnum carrying 6 340 grain buffalo bore at only 9600 ft or about 1600 ft pounds per shot and a hell of a lot more penetration, could possibly have been a better solution, of coarse a 454 even better.
I don't think I would want a 10mm in this case based on the black bear that took 14 or so 10mm rounds and still chewed the guy up pretty bad. I don't know what he had for cartridges though.
Could you provide a link to this. I've never heard this story before.
I don’t know what he had for cartridges but this kind of negates all the nonsense that the G20 has more stopping power because it carries more cartridges albeit all at lower energy. I think the guys that say “I got 10,500 ft pounds of energy in this pistol with 15 cartridges” are just wrong. That is using buffalo bore numbers for their 220’s is about 700 ft pounds per shot. Granted I don’t know what cartridges he was using but a 44 magnum carrying 6 340 grain buffalo bore at only 9600 ft pounds could possibly have been a better solution, of coarse a 454 even better.
In my eexperience when useing a handgun on large dangerous animals revolvers with large diameter flat point hardcast of proper hardness or Punch bullets that penetrate very deep and leave large diameter wound channels than smaller diameter cartridges is superior. Not saying the smaller caliber rounds can’t work, just in my experience there is less margin for error.
Forget about foot pounds of energy as it doesn’t rate the wound channel or penetration accurately.
Bottom line is you could become bear schitt if you don’t go in fully prepared! Always go fully prepared in bear country, such a terrible Tragedy that coulda been avoided with more preparedness.
How do you fully prepare to hunt or hike in bear country?
I don't think I would want a 10mm in this case based on the black bear that took 14 or so 10mm rounds and still chewed the guy up pretty bad. I don't know what he had for cartridges though.
Could you provide a link to this. I've never heard this story before.
I don’t know what he had for cartridges but this kind of negates all the nonsense that the G20 has more stopping power because it carries more cartridges albeit all at lower energy. I think the guys that say “I got 10,500 ft pounds of energy in this pistol with 15 cartridges” are just wrong. That is assuming they are using buffalo bore cartridges with their 220’s at about 700 ft pounds per shot. Granted I don’t know what cartridges this man was using but even a 44 magnum carrying 6 340 grain buffalo bore at only 9600 ft or about 1600 ft pounds per shot and a hell of a lot more penetration, could possibly have been a better solution, of coarse a 454 even better.
Some of this assumes you can control the big guns recoil after the first shot, anything more than a 44 mag is HARD for me to control in rapid fire. And it also assumes in a panic, you won't pop off 6 misses. We continue to carry the 10 these days. More chances. After all its what you hit more so than what with, to a point and since Phil killed the charging brown bear with his 9mm all this mine is bigger than yours is kind of moot. Once we found the shot through a chrome bumper every time I was more than impressed....thinking the bear skull isn't any harder than a bumper...
I've heard tell that a 9 mm. In the right hands will kill a charging grizzly. At least in Alaska.
Ya, but is the intrepid gentleman involved anxious for round two?
Might be even the Injuns would call that a lunatic stunt
I don't think you could call it that. One of the most experienced brown bears guides there is, and he chose to carry the weapon that he used to successfully put down the bear that charged his client.
That says more than 25 pages of internet blather on the subject.
Not that it has anything to do with the subject of the original post, or the fact that there is a Gofundme page set up for the guide who had five children.
Grizzly skulls aren't thick, but while the brain is still working, it is deadly. This is a skull from a 7 foot griz I shot when I was a kid. The hole is from a 25-35, which isn't considered much of a hunting cartridge, but it can kill a grizzly.
The revolver I carry when I hunt with a bow is a S&W 686+ which has 7 rounds of 357 magnum. Any round from any cartridge that ends up in the dirt won't deter a bear. It is better to have a gun that you can shoot and shoot well.
I love it when people from Rhode Island, Arkansas and Missouri tell how to live in Grizzly country...
Bottom line is you could become bear schitt if you don’t go in fully prepared! Always go fully prepared in bear country, such a terrible Tragedy that coulda been avoided with more preparedness.
How do you fully prepare to hunt or hike in bear country?
Handy 44mag sidearm on the side, 12 gauge loaded with 000 and slugs, and a partner with the same setup is how I’d go in. But first off I have no desire to go into the bear woods so I’m just putting some ideas out. Tragic situation for sure.
Shrapnel, I do not even know what I don’t know, nor would I pretend to have any knowledge, I like that pistol you have! On the other hand the new custom shop deluxe 629 with 3 inch barrel looks a lot like your 357.
I don't think I would want a 10mm in this case based on the black bear that took 14 or so 10mm rounds and still chewed the guy up pretty bad. I don't know what he had for cartridges though.
Could you provide a link to this. I've never heard this story before.
I don’t know what he had for cartridges but this kind of negates all the nonsense that the G20 has more stopping power because it carries more cartridges albeit all at lower energy. I think the guys that say “I got 10,500 ft pounds of energy in this pistol with 15 cartridges” are just wrong. That is assuming they are using buffalo bore cartridges with their 220’s at about 700 ft pounds per shot. Granted I don’t know what cartridges this man was using but even a 44 magnum carrying 6 340 grain buffalo bore at only 9600 ft or about 1600 ft pounds per shot and a hell of a lot more penetration, could possibly have been a better solution, of coarse a 454 even better.
Some of this assumes you can control the big guns recoil after the first shot, anything more than a 44 mag is HARD for me to control in rapid fire. And it also assumes in a panic, you won't pop off 6 misses. We continue to carry the 10 these days. More chances. After all its what you hit more so than what with, to a point and since Phil killed the charging brown bear with his 9mm all this mine is bigger than yours is kind of moot. Once we found the shot through a chrome bumper every time I was more than impressed....thinking the bear skull isn't any harder than a bumper...
I am guessing this 400 pound black bear did not have any bumpers.
The Grizzly is heavily favored in any encounter with a human and it is not even close. That is the chance one takes when you wander into their neighborhood.
Again my condolences for the deceased and the family he left behind.
Brings to mind something a friend (now deceased), once said years ago. George was wheelchair bound, paraplegic waist down from combat injuries suffered while serving with the USMC in RSVN.
A group of us, mostly younger guys, gathered outside church one Fall evening grabbing a smoke or chew after having a great meal. All of us hunters, archery season opener just days away, so bow hunting quickly became the main topic of discussion. The question of what animal in the whole world we each would like to hunt if we could was posed.
It started out with answers of the usual typically docile animals not common to our part of the country, and soon escalated with each reply getting bigger and more dangerous than previous guy's.
When it got to be George's turn he left everyone slack-jawed (George was a known excellent experienced hunter, especially with a bow) when his reply took it back to something as docile and harmless as possible. When asked why, George replied, "I ain't about to hunt anything that's big and eats meat... ".
Someone else asked, "Why not"?
George answered with a, 'are you really that clueless', look of his, 'picture me and this wheel chair, trying to out-run a pissed-off Grizzly, lion, tiger,...'.
I don't think you could call it that. One of the most experienced brown bears guides there is, and he chose to carry the weapon that he used to successfully put down the bear that charged his client.
That says more than 25 pages of internet blather on the subject.
I had thought I was expressing admiration for the gentleman in question.
Quote
Not that it has anything to do with the subject of the original post....
A grizzly attack?
Quote
...or the fact that there is a Gofundme page set up for the guide who had five children.
Shrapnel, I do not even know what I don’t know, nor would I pretend to have any knowledge, I like that pistol you have! On the other hand the new custom shop deluxe 629 with 3 inch barrel looks a lot like your 357.
Think of what 7 rounds from a manageable gun can do compared to 6 with considerable recoil. I find that bullets in the dirt don’t work as well as bullets in the bear...
IIRC the 9mm example was a compact nine (3.5” barrel), eight rounds delivered to the head and neck, Buffalo Bore147gr +P+ solids.
Down here I had been packing a 10mm Glock 29 in the woods after encountering a testy really big feral boar, after that Alaska grizzly incident I went back to my Glock 19, faster and easier to shoot.
They now say the hunter was pulled off of his horse, and the Glock pistol found at the scene was the guides handgun, the guide did have bear spray and the dead sow had traces of pepper spray on her when she charged rescuers and was shot dead by the Fish and game team that was part of the rescue effort. Its sad day for all involved, especially a young widow and 5 fatherless children.
Bears destroyed? For what? They were attacking other animals (as far as they were concerned) that were messing with the meal they discovered laying there that morning. That's the nature of a bear.
The bears were not feeding on the elk, it has been reported that the animal was found intact, the sow bear attacked two grown men, killing only one because the other mounted his horse and escaped, the the bear drug the guide 3-4 hundred yards and proceeded to feed on his body, the year old cub was caught in a snare and the sow attacked the rescuers and was shot dead.
A few years ago while bow hunting Island Park not too far from Yellowstone we were seeing big bear tracks everywhere. I killed my elk early in the season but continued to go up and call for my friend that called mine in for me. I carried my call, my 45/70 guide gun loaded with 350 grain hornady flat noses at almost 2100 fps and my 329 pd full of 300 grain xtps.
I was sitting in the truck waiting for my friend to squat in the woods when a warden pulled up to check me. He asked what I was doing with the rifle and I told him I had already tagged out but was carrying it while I called for my friend because we had seen so much bear sign. He said they had caught 13 different Grizzlies in a live trap that summer just a mile or so up the road towards the store. I asked where they were relocated too and he said they weren't relocated just tagged or collared and released again. He said they are all likely still in the area and a hunter just up the road had just saw 3 together at the same time.
He the proceeded to tell me I shouldn't carry the guns I should just get bear spray. I told him I was more comfortable with the guns. He said you'll think that until you use them and the Feds come down on you and ruin your life. He said even if it is self defense you better have some serious injuries if you shoot a griz because the Feds will investigate it like crazy and do everything they can to ruin your life. He said you can try to fight it in court but they'll bankrupt you in the process and likely let a murderer out of jail to make room for you. He said they bring in teams in helicopters and do intense forensic and crime scene investigation whenever a hunter injures a griz. He was cool about which idaho fish and game cops aren't always. He said he was just letting me know how bad it can get if you defend yourself against a bear with a gun. That was under the Obama regime a few years ago so maybe it's less intense now.
Bb
My impression is that authorities in Alaska are not nearly as protective of the bears in such a situation. I do know that they require you to forfeit the dead bear and file a report. Of course, Alaska is not short on bears.
However, if anyone can correct this, feel free.
Norm
BTDT and you are pretty much spot on with your take. The old adage about having to have claw or bite marks before you DLP a bear is nonsense, we shot that sow at about 15 yards as she was charging us and the troopers had no issue with us killing that bear. When it comes to dealing with bears, I don't give a hoot about the law or what the feds are going to do when it comes to shooting an attacking bear, self preservation is first and foremost.
I'll go out on a limb here and say because they attacked two people and killed one.
Bears are known to kill other animals they perceive are messing with their food. They don't classify us as something distinct from other animals, that they can't kill for fear of prosecution and punishment from the authorities.
I'll go out on a limb here and say because they attacked two people and killed one.
Bears are known to kill other animals they perceive are messing with their food. They don't classify us as something distinct from other animals, that they can't kill for fear of prosecution and punishment from the authorities.
You really are that dense aren't you. Bears who attack people with impunity will do it again. What they classify us as is irrelevant.
Very tragic story. Sounds like the guide hit her with bear spray. It's getting very dangerous to hunt elk in NW Wyoming. Grizzly populations are growing. Seems like it was just a couple years ago that another hunter got jumped by a griz that was on his elk.
You really are that dense aren't you. Bears who attack people with impunity will do it again. What they classify us as is irrelevant.
If that's your position, you'd better advocate for eliminating bears from places where people hunt, since none of them know it's against the law to kill people messing with a meal they've decided belongs to them. Rather, you should advocate for people in bear country being armed and ready to defend themselves from bears that attack. Seeking revenge on bears makes no sense, however.
You really are more dense than I thought, which I didn't think was possible.
It's not revenge, it's prevention. The majority of bears don't attack people, and don't become problems. When they do, they need to be taken out.
It's really simple if you think about it.
With all due respect, grizzly bears are apex predators. When hungry, any of them may choose to attack a person messing with what they've determined is their next meal.
With all due respect, a man with a gun is at the top of the apex. Most grizzlies comport themselves accordingly; those that don't need to be eliminated from the population. If not they will continue and in this case teach their offspring.
With all due respect, a man with a gun is at the top of the apex. Most grizzlies comport themselves accordingly; those that don't need to be eliminated from the population. If not they will continue and in this case teach their offspring.
None of them will comport themselves by your standard, given similar circumstances to the present case.
You may as well launch cruise missiles into the lake every time someone drowns in it. Makes just as much sense.
Now, the case of a bear who has been habituated to eating human offerings, or from garbage cans, is a different case, and the only solution in those cases may well be destruction. But there is no evidence that this was the situation in the present case. These bears were in their own habitat, just doing what grizzlies do, tragedy though it may be for the human victims.
With all due respect, a man with a gun is at the top of the apex. Most grizzlies comport themselves accordingly; those that don't need to be eliminated from the population. If not they will continue and in this case teach their offspring.
+1 in this case the Sow taught the cub that killing a man was warranted. That's why the cub was eliminated as well.
With all due respect, a man with a gun is at the top of the apex. Most grizzlies comport themselves accordingly; those that don't need to be eliminated from the population. If not they will continue and in this case teach their offspring.
+1 in this case the Sow taught the cub that killing a man was warranted. That's why the cub was eliminated as well.
You're operating under the assumption that bears are ordinarily born with the belief that humans are always off limits.
A few years ago while bow hunting Island Park not too far from Yellowstone we were seeing big bear tracks everywhere. I killed my elk early in the season but continued to go up and call for my friend that called mine in for me. I carried my call, my 45/70 guide gun loaded with 350 grain hornady flat noses at almost 2100 fps and my 329 pd full of 300 grain xtps.
I was sitting in the truck waiting for my friend to squat in the woods when a warden pulled up to check me. He asked what I was doing with the rifle and I told him I had already tagged out but was carrying it while I called for my friend because we had seen so much bear sign. He said they had caught 13 different Grizzlies in a live trap that summer just a mile or so up the road towards the store. I asked where they were relocated too and he said they weren't relocated just tagged or collared and released again. He said they are all likely still in the area and a hunter just up the road had just saw 3 together at the same time.
He the proceeded to tell me I shouldn't carry the guns I should just get bear spray. I told him I was more comfortable with the guns. He said you'll think that until you use them and the Feds come down on you and ruin your life. He said even if it is self defense you better have some serious injuries if you shoot a griz because the Feds will investigate it like crazy and do everything they can to ruin your life. He said you can try to fight it in court but they'll bankrupt you in the process and likely let a murderer out of jail to make room for you. He said they bring in teams in helicopters and do intense forensic and crime scene investigation whenever a hunter injures a griz. He was cool about which idaho fish and game cops aren't always. He said he was just letting me know how bad it can get if you defend yourself against a bear with a gun. That was under the Obama regime a few years ago so maybe it's less intense now.
Bb
My impression is that authorities in Alaska are not nearly as protective of the bears in such a situation. I do know that they require you to forfeit the dead bear and file a report. Of course, Alaska is not short on bears.
However, if anyone can correct this, feel free.
Norm
BTDT and you are pretty much spot on with your take. The old adage about having to have claw or bite marks before you DLP a bear is nonsense, we shot that sow at about 15 yards as she was charging us and the troopers had no issue with us killing that bear. When it comes to dealing with bears, I don't give a hoot about the law or what the feds are going to do when it comes to shooting an attacking bear, self preservation is first and foremost.
Keep in mind that the Grizzlies in the lower 48 were on the federal endangered species list at the time I talked to this warden. Those in alaska were not listed so I doubt guys up there have to deal with the feds after a problem. Now that they're delisted here it might be less of a legal battle after a run in. All I know is it's terrible that that guide died and left his kids behind. The last thing I want to do in a situation would be to hesitate because of worrying about the feds. I wish that warden wouldn't have tried to get in my head with that crap.
Most places where you would hunt elk and encounter a bear are pretty remote, if a man were forced to shoot a bear to protect one's own life, I don't think I would be in to big a hurry to tell anyone about it, in a day or so another bear will be feeding on that carcass anyways.
With all due respect, a man with a gun is at the top of the apex. Most grizzlies comport themselves accordingly; those that don't need to be eliminated from the population. If not they will continue and in this case teach their offspring.
+1 in this case the Sow taught the cub that killing a man was warranted. That's why the cub was eliminated as well.
You're operating under the assumption that bears are ordinarily born with the belief that humans are always off limits.
No , that cub was killed because it learned how to kill a man by its mother. Do I have to repeat that again? I tell you what why don't you ask someone in Wyoming F&G why they did that.
With all due respect, a man with a gun is at the top of the apex. Most grizzlies comport themselves accordingly; those that don't need to be eliminated from the population. If not they will continue and in this case teach their offspring.
+1 in this case the Sow taught the cub that killing a man was warranted. That's why the cub was eliminated as well.
You're operating under the assumption that bears are ordinarily born with the belief that humans are always off limits.
You are under the assumption that you have a clue. News flash, you dont.
With all due respect, a man with a gun is at the top of the apex. Most grizzlies comport themselves accordingly; those that don't need to be eliminated from the population. If not they will continue and in this case teach their offspring.
None of them will comport themselves by your standard, given similar circumstances to the present case.
You may as well launch cruise missiles into the lake every time someone drowns in it. Makes just as much sense.
Now, the case of a bear who has been habituated to eating human offerings, or from garbage cans, is a different case, and the only solution in those cases may well be destruction. But there is no evidence that this was the situation in the present case. These bears were in their own habitat, just doing what grizzlies do, tragedy though it may be for the human victims.
Bullsh**. Avoiding humans is 100% a learned behavior, and it can be unlearned. Both by individual animals and generationally.
I hiked, climbed and hunted in Mt., WY., and Idaho for >30 years before seeing my 1st Griz outside of a National Park. In the last 5 years my wife and I have been w/in 100 yards of grizzlys 3 times while dayhiking in Wyoming and Montana and have seen 2 more while driving FS roads. We were south of Yellowstone's South entrance in May and watched a sow griz w/ 2 older cubs from the road for over an hour before they walked past us and about 50 other people who had retreated to their cars and showed no fear of humans at all.
Not a statistical absolute but it would seem that there are more griz outside of the extreme back country and they are less skittish around humans. I am now much more 'Bear Aware' than I was 5 years ago. We are Headed to Jackson in 2 weeks and I find comfort in my Glock, Guide Gun and the fact that I can outrun my wife since her knee surgery. Be safe out there.
With all due respect, a man with a gun is at the top of the apex. Most grizzlies comport themselves accordingly; those that don't need to be eliminated from the population. If not they will continue and in this case teach their offspring.
None of them will comport themselves by your standard, given similar circumstances to the present case.
You may as well launch cruise missiles into the lake every time someone drowns in it. Makes just as much sense.
Now, the case of a bear who has been habituated to eating human offerings, or from garbage cans, is a different case, and the only solution in those cases may well be destruction. But there is no evidence that this was the situation in the present case. These bears were in their own habitat, just doing what grizzlies do, tragedy though it may be for the human victims.
I would guess you might be a defense attorney, your logic is so skewed. Depleted Uranium has nothing on you for being dense...
I’ve read several reports but did not read the hunter’s perspective on the whole thing that was linked here; regardless, it’s a tragedy for too many and also really not completely preventable short of having no grizzlies prowling about. And I would not want that either.
It seems the guide had a Glock that was found somewhere nearby and apparently the hunter had a handgun also — so there were two handguns that were not put into action, or, did the guide get off any shot(s)? I can fully understand if not, and even if so, two very experienced DG guys carrying 458’s could be ambushed and one killed in seconds in some scenario.
I’ve also read that there was “bear spray” present but I don’t know if it was used. Regardless, does anyone believe, or want to bet his life, that this apparently very motivated grizzly, that attacked two guys probably in seconds, then returned to the first and killed him (was he already deceased?), before dragging his body off almost a quarter of a mile, would have been deterred by some pepper spray?
I’ve already speculated a bit, but even if there is the time to reach for something, I’m not reaching for any bear spray.
I've heard no word on if any shots were fired, but the Fish and game guys said that the sow was found to have bear spray residue on her, and the guide was reportedly caring bear spray.
Some of the posts here are surprising and lot of arm chair quarter backing. Until you live here and deal with the bears here it is easy to say "should have, would have and could have". We have one grizzly in town here in Cody within the city limits that the game and fish are trying to trap. There has been 3 maulings so far this year and every year for the past several there are at least that many. The bears can come so quickly you don't have a chance to use your pistol or bear spray or what ever. Who ever said the guide didn't do his job doesn't have a clue. Especially for not being there, you don't know if he had a pistol on his hip or not or any other circumstance. I am sure he had a sidearm and if not bear spray.
There are so many bears now it is crazy. A guy at work drew a sheep tag this year and filled it opening day. He went scouting at least 6 times and every time but one he saw at least 5 grizzlies. He went to a different drainage every time till he found the sheep he was looking for. A large percentage of the time you encounter a bear it runs off or at the least ignores you. This story is one of the time they didn't. Animals are conditioned to be scared of humans. In the past week there have been two people in Mammoth in Yellowstone that have gotten attacked by the bull elk. People are all around watching them and this one elk is so aggresive that he attacks people. Granted people in the park are really stupid but if you are hunting elk in the wild and calling them in to archery range I have never heard of one attacking a hunter. Ever one I have seen splits so fast it is amazing if they see, smell or hear you.
The story sounds a little fishy to me with the hunter leaving him and throwing a pistol to the guide, then getting flown out meanwhile leaving the guide and then flying back to Florida before the guy is even found. I don't know if his flight was scheduled for that day or what but it just seems strange to me. I wouldn't be surprised if more comes out of this story.
Most grizzlies comport themselves accordingly; those that don't need to be eliminated from the population. If not they will continue and in this case teach their offspring.
If they are anything like dogs and wolves, certainly individual bears must vary in personality, aggressiveness etc. much of which behavior is inherited (compare your average golden retriever to your average Jack Russel for example). I'm wondering if, back in the days, those grizzlies innately less fearful of people were more likely to be targeted, at least in retaliation, by humans. Even surviving getting stuck with arrows might seriously impede the subsequent survival of the bear.
In modern times it could be that this selection pressure against "problem" bears has decreased. I am not aware of accounts of guys being actively challenged for their kills much by grizzles in historic times as seems to regularly happen to hunters today, and while there are a few accounts of bears charging Indian camps back then, can one imagine the problems we would worry about if one set up an arch-typical Indian or Mountain Man-type camp in bear country today, especially if grizzlies today were as common and widespread as they were back then.
On the main topic, I'm inclined to view any large predator that doesn't turn and run at the sight or scent of humans as a suitable candidate for elimination, much more so for those that have already "crossed the line".
Most grizzlies comport themselves accordingly; those that don't need to be eliminated from the population. If not they will continue and in this case teach their offspring.
If they are anything like dogs and wolves, certainly individual bears must vary in personality, aggressiveness etc. much of which behavior is inherited (compare your average golden retriever to your average Jack Russel for example). I'm wondering if, back in the days, those grizzlies innately less fearful of people were more likely to be targeted, at least in retaliation, by humans. Even surviving getting stuck with arrows might seriously impede the subsequent survival of the bear.
In modern times it could be that this selection pressure against "problem" bears has decreased. I am not aware of accounts of guys being actively challenged for their kills much by grizzles in historic times as seems to regularly happen to hunters today, and while there are a few accounts of bears charging Indian camps back then, can one imagine the problems we would worry about if one set up an arch-typical Indian or Mountain Man-type camp in bear country today, especially if grizzlies today were as common and widespread as they were back then.
On the main topic, I'm inclined to view any large predator that doesn't turn and run at the sight or scent of humans as a suitable candidate for elimination, much more so for those that have already "crossed the line".
I am going to go out on a limb and say that grizzly populations were evenly disbursed in the good old days. There are accounts of them on the great plains .
Most grizzlies comport themselves accordingly; those that don't need to be eliminated from the population. If not they will continue and in this case teach their offspring.
If they are anything like dogs and wolves, certainly individual bears must vary in personality, aggressiveness etc. much of which behavior is inherited (compare your average golden retriever to your average Jack Russel for example). I'm wondering if, back in the days, those grizzlies innately less fearful of people were more likely to be targeted, at least in retaliation, by humans. Even surviving getting stuck with arrows might seriously impede the subsequent survival of the bear.
In modern times it could be that this selection pressure against "problem" bears has decreased. I am not aware of accounts of guys being actively challenged for their kills much by grizzles in historic times as seems to regularly happen to hunters today, and while there are a few accounts of bears charging Indian camps back then, can one imagine the problems we would worry about if one set up an arch-typical Indian or Mountain Man-type camp in bear country today, especially if grizzlies today were as common and widespread as they were back then.
On the main topic, I'm inclined to view any large predator that doesn't turn and run at the sight or scent of humans as a suitable candidate for elimination, much more so for those that have already "crossed the line".
Maybe the fact that the injuns and Mt. men were mostly illiterate could account for the lack of stories about bear attacks in historical times. I'm not a history teacher so that is just a guess on my part.
Most grizzlies comport themselves accordingly; those that don't need to be eliminated from the population. If not they will continue and in this case teach their offspring.
If they are anything like dogs and wolves, certainly individual bears must vary in personality, aggressiveness etc. much of which behavior is inherited (compare your average golden retriever to your average Jack Russel for example). I'm wondering if, back in the days, those grizzlies innately less fearful of people were more likely to be targeted, at least in retaliation, by humans. Even surviving getting stuck with arrows might seriously impede the subsequent survival of the bear.
In modern times it could be that this selection pressure against "problem" bears has decreased. I am not aware of accounts of guys being actively challenged for their kills much by grizzles in historic times as seems to regularly happen to hunters today, and while there are a few accounts of bears charging Indian camps back then, can one imagine the problems we would worry about if one set up an arch-typical Indian or Mountain Man-type camp in bear country today, especially if grizzlies today were as common and widespread as they were back then.
On the main topic, I'm inclined to view any large predator that doesn't turn and run at the sight or scent of humans as a suitable candidate for elimination, much more so for those that have already "crossed the line".
Maybe the fact that the injuns and Mt. men were mostly illiterate could account for the lack of stories about bear attacks in historical times. I'm not a history teacher so that is just a guess on my part.
Yet we have a large number of accounts and journals from our history from those individuals who were literate describing the lifestyles of those around them who were not. These written accounts increase greatly towards the end of the Nineteenth Century as the population and literacy rates increased and mass produced printed material become more popular. One of the best and most detailed written accounts is an early one; The Journals of Lewis and Clark. Those guys had a number of tussles with the "white bears" in their travels, most often initiated when they peppered said bears first with one or more round lead rifle balls
We have a number of detailed biographies of Mountain Men, often in their own words, and certainly by the early Twentieth Century numerous authors were recording the accounts and reminiscences of elderly Plains Indians.
One of the most famous 19th Century Plains Indians who's life we know about in detail was the Cheyenne leader Dull Knife (1810-1883), who's life encompasses much of our Western History. Dull Knife is famous as the guy who led the breakout of the Northern Cheyenne from Oklahoma in 1878, and again the mid-Winter escape from Fort Robinson, Nebraska in the middle of a blizzard in the middle of winter.
The name "Dull Knife" reportedly came from an incident that had occurred when he was a young man. A grizzly charged the column when the camp was on the move, whereupon Dull Knife, who plainly weren't no slouch, put himself between the column and the bear, engaging it with a knife which turned out to be not as sharp (or pointy?) as he would have liked.
I picked up "Lewis and Clark Among the Grizzlies" by Paul Schullery at the used book emporium the other day. I'll let you guys know how it turns out after I read it.
Maybe the fact that the injuns and Mt. men were mostly illiterate could account for the lack of stories about bear attacks in historical times. I'm not a history teacher so that is just a guess on my part.
mike r
When mountain men and Indians roamed the west, grizzly bears were on the plains. It is only in our lifetime that they have inhabited the mountains. So if mountain men were in the mountains where the bears weren’t, no conflict. If the Indians were in the plains where the bears were, they could see them for miles, again no conflict...
When mountain men and Indians roamed the west, grizzly bears were on the plains. It is only in our lifetime that they have inhabited the mountains. So if mountain men were in the mountains where the bears weren’t, no conflict. If the Indians were in the plains where the bears were, they could see them for miles, again no conflict...
Seems a bit simplistic.
What has changed about the mountains today that precluded grizzlies in early times? The friggin things are/were found from the Arctic tundra clear to Southern California. Surely every area of habitat that was habitable by grizzlies, was.
For that matter seems a real puzzle why they didn't occur clear to the Eastern Seaboard, for example early accounts speak of the waterways back east chock full of migrating salmon and shad in season to an extent unimaginable today..
Even Mountain Men had to cross the Plains, often, and ya can't see grizzlies for miles at night, when all the cooking fires of a large Indian camp would be sending food odors across the Plains.
[quote] One of the best and most detailed written accounts is an early one; The Journals of Lewis and Clark. Those guys had a number of tussles with the "white bears" in their travels, most often initiated when they peppered said bears first with one or more round lead rifle balls
I have been doing a deep dive through Lewis and Clark's journals the last few months, and we hit a bunch of significant L&C historical spots on vacation this year. They absolutely hated the white and brown bears (they had not decided whether they were seeing different species or different color phases). Once, when they planned to attack one, they kept two people back to cover the retreat by holding fire and sent 4 people in the attack party. Four solid holes in the bear just got it mad. It still continued after taking the other two rounds, one breaking a shoulder. Lewis said that the only way to kill them with a single shot was by shooting them through the brains, which was difficult. He also said in the same passage that he would rather fight two Indians than one bear.
What has changed about the mountains today that precluded grizzlies in early times? The friggin things are/were found from the Arctic tundra clear to Southern California. Surely every area of habitat that was habitable by grizzlies, was. .
Lewis and Clark nearly starved to death in the Rocky Mountains, nothing to eat. Grizzlies weren’t there for the same reason. You can’t judge frontier America by what today’s conditions are...
What has changed about the mountains today that precluded grizzlies in early times? The friggin things are/were found from the Arctic tundra clear to Southern California. Surely every area of habitat that was habitable by grizzlies, was. .
Lewis and Clark nearly starved to death in the Rocky Mountains, nothing to eat. Grizzlies weren’t there for the same reason. You can’t judge frontier America by what today’s conditions are...
One often hears the Lewis and Clark argument. But Lewis and Clark were 30 guys trying to feed themselves through hunting while essentially sampling along a single transect, which arguments seek to represent the whole Rocky Mountains. Rather.than being free to move about and look for game they have to remain on course and follow valleys so steep-sided they lose horses tumbling off of cliffs, even so, one of their party in the middle of all that reports a bear track, griz or black we ain’t told.
Twenty and thirty years later did the Mountain Men themselves starve? Or was it intermittent periods of hardship and sometimes plenty, much as L&C had experienced?
Wasn't on that mountain, won't pretend to know what did or didn't happen.
But reading here - I sure hope that those gentlemen didn't employ the spray first with the hopes of avoiding the pistol. Seems like if I thought I'd need the spray, I probably needed the pistol. Having a choice would seem to complicate things. I'd rather swing big and KNOW I was using the strongest deterrent available at the time that I had than 1/2 way and hope it was enough. I hope that wasn't the case that they worried about backlash and tried the spray first because of fear of prosecution or harassment from Treadwells later.
Now before someone gets wound up - spent very little to no time in Griz country. BUT when I was 14 I did get charged by a wounded black bear and shot him at a distance of about 20 inches. Measured and witnessed by 3 other people. I've been in a "high excitement" situation with something that weighed more than I did and could eat me. I'm not saying 1:1 comparison or that I'd do the same now. Just saying - my perspective.
You seem compelled to defend some perhaps poor judgement / professionalism on the part of the guide here.
Why is this that, because he died?
What you don't know would fill a Presidential Library. Somehow you think your experience is relevant and you have never seen a Grizzly bear, let alone encountered one. I don't know where you are from, but it is easily hundreds of miles from Wyoming and nowhere near where this incident took place, yet you have personal knowledge of the situation.
I have lived my life in Grizzly country, I have seen them charge, kill cattle and killed them myself. The last Grizzly sighting I had was last week at 75 yards. I have seen first hand how fast and powerful they are.
I have not defended the actions of the guide, I have not condemned him for what happened because I know enough to say that he may have done everything he could and still ended up dead. You, however, make indicting comments from a living room in some house so far removed from the country where bears and people coexist and wonder why your comments are irrelevant...
You seem compelled to defend some perhaps poor judgement / professionalism on the part of the guide here.
Why is this that, because he died?
What you don't know would fill a Presidential Library. Somehow you think your experience is relevant and you have never seen a Grizzly bear, let alone encountered one. I don't know where you are from, but it is easily hundreds of miles from Wyoming and nowhere near where this incident took place, yet you have personal knowledge of the situation.
I have lived my life in Grizzly country, I have seen them charge, kill cattle and killed them myself. The last Grizzly sighting I had was last week at 75 yards. I have seen first hand how fast and powerful they are.
I have not defended the actions of the guide, I have not condemned him for what happened because I know enough to say that he may have done everything he could and still ended up dead. You, however, make indicting comments from a living room in some house so far removed from the country where bears and people coexist and wonder why your comments are irrelevant...
You seem compelled to defend some perhaps poor judgement / professionalism on the part of the guide here.
Why is this that, because he died?
What you don't know would fill a Presidential Library. Somehow you think your experience is relevant and you have never seen a Grizzly bear, let alone encountered one. I don't know where you are from, but it is easily hundreds of miles from Wyoming and nowhere near where this incident took place, yet you have personal knowledge of the situation.
I have lived my life in Grizzly country, I have seen them charge, kill cattle and killed them myself. The last Grizzly sighting I had was last week at 75 yards. I have seen first hand how fast and powerful they are.
I have not defended the actions of the guide, I have not condemned him for what happened because I know enough to say that he may have done everything he could and still ended up dead. You, however, make indicting comments from a living room in some house so far removed from the country where bears and people coexist and wonder why your comments are irrelevant...
This post redeemed your ground slucing.
good post......I will say there seems to be some inconsistent statements with the stories….don't buy the horse account
did you guys hear about the grizzly hit on the road here a couple days ago?...…..here is paradise valley....have seen pics of it...….bob
shrapnel; Top of the morning to you sir, I hope the day looks as promising on your side of the medicine line as it does here.
While I don't have anywhere near the personal experience with grizzly bears that you do, we've hiked, tented and hunted in areas where they're known to frequent for the past 30+ years.
As well, and I'm not comparing the two - but we're very much familiar with their black bear cousins - saw two pretty fair ones hunting this past weekend in fact and can testify to how incredibly powerful AND fast a black bear can be sometimes.
Anyway, I thought that this "because I know enough to say that he may have done everything he could and still ended up dead" pretty much sums it up, for me anyway.
A good buddy a couple hours north of us worked with a young lady whose brother and his hunting partner were killed by a grizzly out of Canal Flats about 20 years back. They had a bull elk down and two loaded rifles were found at the scene, though one apparently jammed.
Speaking personally, I've come to grips with the fact that I'm not going to live forever and if folks like you and I keep going into grizzly country, it just might be that's the cause of getting our ticket punched. Odds are in my case however some wonderful BC driver will take me out on the highway before I hit the logging road into grizzly country.
Anyway sir, all the best to you and your fine family and good luck on your hunts this fall.
We are Headed to Jackson in 2 weeks and I find comfort in my Glock, Guide Gun and the fact that I can outrun my wife since her knee surgery. Be safe out there.
That strategy seemed to have worked well for the client....
Wyoming Game and Fish Department says deceased guide Mark Uptain did deploy bear spray. Found a used can beside his body. Sow bear captured and killed did have pepper residue on her. Department says the bears were not known to them and had never been handled by their agency.
We are Headed to Jackson in 2 weeks and I find comfort in my Glock, Guide Gun and the fact that I can outrun my wife since her knee surgery. Be safe out there.
That strategy seemed to have worked well for the client....
Another misconception about running away. All you have to do is remember that bears will chase what runs, so if you are slower, just stop and let the bear continue to chase the athlete. In most cases the bear loses because good runners are usually tough and sinewy, not that good to eat...
After being drug off a horse, I wanna' know how the heck the horse stuck around long enough for the hunter to catch it and ride out of there.........
FWIW, and IMHO, the "clients story" has changed a couple of times....and I wouldn't trust him enough to go ANYWHERE with him...fight or flight type thing...
We are Headed to Jackson in 2 weeks and I find comfort in my Glock, Guide Gun and the fact that I can outrun my wife since her knee surgery. Be safe out there.
That strategy seemed to have worked well for the client....
Personally, I wouldn't be too hard on the client. It's not his responsibility to keep the guide safe, it's the other way around.
And I wouldn't blame the guide either. No one on this board has enough information to know what happened. What is it that causes people who have no knowledge of or involvement in a tragedy like this to feel the need to place blame?
We are Headed to Jackson in 2 weeks and I find comfort in my Glock, Guide Gun and the fact that I can outrun my wife since her knee surgery. Be safe out there.
That strategy seemed to have worked well for the client....
Personally, I wouldn't be too hard on the client. It's not his responsibility to keep the guide safe, it's the other way around.
And I wouldn't blame the guide either. No one on this board has enough information to know what happened. What is it that causes people who have no knowledge of or involvement in a tragedy like this to feel the need to place blame?
You’re right, No one really happened. But this for sure - two armed men were attacked my a single bear. The guide my be an amateur
We are Headed to Jackson in 2 weeks and I find comfort in my Glock, Guide Gun and the fact that I can outrun my wife since her knee surgery. Be safe out there.
That strategy seemed to have worked well for the client....
What is it that causes people who have no knowledge of or involvement in a tragedy like this to feel the need to place blame?
For those condemning the hunter, he probably has no experience with bears. He found himself in the middle of what is probably one of the most terrifying scenarios in which a human being can find himself. It's easy to judge his actions, after the fact, from the safety of our homes or offices as we read this thread and type away. Even foresight of what we should do and could do in anticipation of the possibility of a grizzly attack can in no way prepare one for the shear terror we may face. The hunter reacted in a manner that many on this forum may. I'm sure he, after the fact, in a cool headed, non adrenalin and panic filled state, is probably saying to himself, some of the same things as are being said here about him and what he should have done. He is not unique among even otherwise brave and cool-headed men who have behaved in a "questionable manner" when faced with high-stress panic-laden situations.
I have had several bear encounters while hunting. Coming across a grizzly at close range really does create instant panic, moreso than even combat. Each situation I faced was resolved without me becoming dinner. The closest I've come to my own demise is while bowhunting I got between a momma black bear and two cubs. I thank heaven that once I discovered my predicament I was able to gather my wits quick enough to drop my bow and climb a tree just before she began her charge.
We are Headed to Jackson in 2 weeks and I find comfort in my Glock, Guide Gun and the fact that I can outrun my wife since her knee surgery. Be safe out there.
That strategy seemed to have worked well for the client....
Personally, I wouldn't be too hard on the client. It's not his responsibility to keep the guide safe, it's the other way around.
And I wouldn't blame the guide either. No one on this board has enough information to know what happened. What is it that causes people who have no knowledge of or involvement in a tragedy like this to feel the need to place blame?
You’re right, No one really happened. But this for sure - two armed men were attacked my a single bear. The guide my be an amateur
Punctuation, grammar and spelling are important to not look like an amateur.
But this for sure - two armed men were attacked my a single bear.
No, it's not for sure. And the only first-hand account I've read said the attack happened while they were on horseback dragging the elk out of cover, at least one of them.
So all the uninformed blather about having one guy stand guard while the other works on the carcass is just that--uninformed blather.
[quote=lvmiker] We are Headed to Jackson in 2 weeks and I find comfort in my Glock, Guide Gun and the fact that I can outrun my wife since her knee surgery. Be safe out there.
What is it that causes people who have no knowledge of or involvement in a tragedy like this to feel the need to place blame?
Retardation
I didn't realize I was placing blame...I was commenting on the account provided by the client and my comments were directed more at the content of his character...."HE'S" the one that'll have to live with his actions/inactions.
i have had some close encounters with black bear, but have not with a grizz. what captivates me is the choice of ammunition and the glock. few years ago i was hunting in an area of colorado where the state said no grizz. this contradicted with my brothers in law, both cattlemen, that knew the area. They said not many, but they were there. we were sleeping in a outfitter's canvas tent, and i sure felt better at night with a 7inch barrel vaquero in 45 colt. using this ammo. https://www.buffalobore.com/index.php?l=product_detail&p=38 i still have those two boxes. i checked both buffalo and underwood last night, both had better ammo that the i think article described 165 grain stuff in this situation. we have both black bear and mt lion living within the city limits of prescott, az. it's only a matter of time. there are a lot of new people, mostly california, in the area getting freaked out about encountering coyotes while out walking their dog. signs along hiking paths in case of lion rattle a can with rocks in it., a bear in the parking lot of a walmart store, and people taking pictures of a cat just few feet from their kids in a popular lake. Response was just a purty cat. the problem is people unfamilar with these animals invading so to speak their territory. i was arguing a few years ago with a guy who did own guns, had a mt lion sleeping on his front porch. i kept telling him to kill it, which he didn't want to do.
For those condemning the hunter, he probably has no experience with bears. He found himself in the middle of what is probably one of the most terrifying scenarios in which a human being can find himself. It's easy to judge his actions, after the fact, from the safety of our homes or offices as we read this thread and type away. Even foresight of what we should do and could do in anticipation of the possibility of a grizzly attack can in no way prepare one for the shear terror we may face. .
[quote=lvmiker] We are Headed to Jackson in 2 weeks and I find comfort in my Glock, Guide Gun and the fact that I can outrun my wife since her knee surgery. Be safe out there.
What is it that causes people who have no knowledge of or involvement in a tragedy like this to feel the need to place blame?
Retardation
I didn't realize I was placing blame...I was commenting on the account provided by the client and my comments were directed more at the content of his character...."HE'S" the one that'll have to live with his actions/inactions.
FWIW, my comment about placing blame wasn't aimed at you. But reading your quote above, especially the parts about "the content of his character" and "He's the one that'll have to live with his actions," and your other comment to the effect that you wouldn't trust him to go anywhere, it sure sounds like you're placing blame. You can't have it both ways.
FWIW, my comment about placing blame wasn't aimed at you. But reading your quote above, especially the parts about "the content of his character" and "He's the one that'll have to live with his actions," and your other comment to the effect that you wouldn't trust him to go anywhere, it sure sounds like you're placing blame. You can't have it both ways.
Would you volunteer to help him pack out an elk???
I’ve got neither condemnation nor approval for what happened. I’ve spent a fair amount of time in both grizzly (brown bear) territory and black bear country and have seen how fast a “normal” situation can turn into a life and death struggle despite all the best intentions and preparations. A bear can be amazingly quiet for such a big and cumbersome animal and even more amazingly how much ground a determined bear can cover when its mind is made up.
If I hire a guide to take me elk hunting I expect my guide to get me on elk, not to protect me in every possible scenario. The only situation that I might feel differently is in Alaska where the state requires non-residents to hire a guide. Since Alaska is owned by the guides association and they require non-residents hunt with a guide (non-resident guides in many cases) I put more responsibility on the guide (and the guides union/association and the state).
Hiring an elk guide doesn’t mean you hired a body guard and as far as I can tell the guide saved his client and sacrificed himself. That client sounds like a coward of the first order. Having been tested more than a few times I know that my first response is NOT flight therefore my opinion is that a grown man that chooses flight over fight in this situation is a coward. That clown should never hunt in places where bears, cats, or big rocks abound.
Hiring an elk guide doesn’t mean you hired a body guard and as far as I can tell the guide saved his client and sacrificed himself. That client sounds like a coward of the first order. Having been tested more than a few times I know that my first response is NOT flight therefore my opinion is that a grown man that chooses flight over fight in this situation is a coward. That clown should never hunt in places where bears, cats, or big rocks abound.
I agree...I can't imagine leaving anybody laying on the ground getting his ass chewed up...
My 'puter shows 12 pages on this, would be 4 without quotes on quotes on quotes.
Your ‘puter is providing you with 12 pages, so far, of free arm-chair-quarterbacking entertainment, by people who have no clue how horses or people react during a bear confrontation.
IThat client sounds like a coward of the first order. Having been tested more than a few times I know that.....
You don't know squat. Unless you've been dragged off a horse by your ankle.
Is that how you were "tested more than a few times?"
I’ll trust what I know over your guessing.
You can use partial quotes and take statements out of context all you want (typical liberal reaction) but it makes you look stupid. You have become more and more argumentative for no good reason, not just this thread but many of the ones you insert yourself in. I don’t know if loneliness and old age is your excuse but either way you just come across as a washed up old crank that gets off on picking internet arguments because you lack excitement in your elderly life. Keep on keeping on champ....you’re always good for a laugh at your own expense.
Take a look at what the stupid phugk who calls himself Quynhu is doing on the Go Fund Me page. And it's only been days the family's been grieving. Low life liberal scum.
Wish I could reach out and touch that sonofabitch.
Take a look at what the stupid phugk who calls himself Quynhu is doing on the Go Fund Me page. And it's only been days the family's been grieving. Low life liberal scum.
Wish I could reach out and touch that sonofabitch.
It is only one on a very long list that needs to be dealt with. It's day will come.
IThat client sounds like a coward of the first order. Having been tested more than a few times I know that.....
You don't know squat. Unless you've been dragged off a horse by your ankle.
Is that how you were "tested more than a few times?"
I’ll trust what I know over your guessing.
You can use partial quotes and take statements out of context all you want (typical liberal reaction) but it makes you look stupid. You have become more and more argumentative for no good reason, not just this thread but many of the ones you insert yourself in. I don’t know if loneliness and old age is your excuse but either way you just come across as a washed up old crank that gets off on picking internet arguments because you lack excitement in your elderly life. Keep on keeping on champ....you’re always good for a laugh at your own expense.
You're a clueless [bleep]. Been tested my ass. Once again I'll ask the question--what is it that makes people like you with no knowledge of or connection to a tragedy like this feel the need to place blame?
Take a look at what the stupid phugk who calls himself Quynhu is doing on the Go Fund Me page. And it's only been days the family's been grieving. Low life liberal scum.
Wish I could reach out and touch that sonofabitch.
It is only one on a very long list that needs to be dealt with. It's day will come.
Careful there....you don’t want to belittle the coward because he’s old man polesmoker’s idol.
“I threw the gun to the guide but it didn’t get to him”. Good plan and great throw. 🙄
I like how the coward gives advice on carrying the proper ammo. WTF does carrying the proper ammo have to do with anything if you’re too scared to use the pistol?
Apparently polesmoker is a coward too. She thinks running away is preferable to standing up like a man. Throwing your pistol to someone getting attacked is preferable to using the pistol in defense of your and your guides life. Leaving a man to die as he fights for his life is okay if you throw him your pistol before taking flight.
The coward showed us his minor scratches (none apparently needed stitches as shown in the video) but I’m sure that the “gore” suffered by the coward reassured old polesmoker that his propensity to run away is warranted.lol
This thread, if nothing else, proves that Polesmoker is a runner not a fighter.....way to go champ. 👍
If I hire a guide to take me elk hunting I expect my guide to get me on elk, not to protect me in every possible scenario......
Who said anything about the guide protecting the client in any possible scenario there ace? Sure as hell wasn't me.
If a guide accepts paying clients and hunts in an area with lots of grizzlies, he has a responsibility to understand how to operate in that environment and do what he can to keep his clients safe.
And if they drop an elk and leave it overnight, the likelihood of having to deal with bears goes way up. So that situation is hardly "every possible scenario," it's something a guide should reasonably expect.
So a guide in that situation has some responsibility to manage what happens, unlike a guy from Florida who may not have ever seen a grizzly much less been drug off a horse by one.
I'm not blaming the guide either, as already noted by everyone with half a functioning brain cell, none of us knows what happened. Just making the observation that a client's responsibilities are much different than a guide's, in response to the previous poster who blamed the client for what happened.
IThat client sounds like a coward of the first order. Having been tested more than a few times I know that.....
You don't know squat. Unless you've been dragged off a horse by your ankle.
Is that how you were "tested more than a few times?"
I’ll trust what I know over your guessing.
You can use partial quotes and take statements out of context all you want (typical liberal reaction) but it makes you look stupid. You have become more and more argumentative for no good reason, not just this thread but many of the ones you insert yourself in. I don’t know if loneliness and old age is your excuse but either way you just come across as a washed up old crank that gets off on picking internet arguments because you lack excitement in your elderly life. Keep on keeping on champ....you’re always good for a laugh at your own expense.
Thank You. Thank You. Thank You. Thank You.
I knew there had to be other intelligent people out here, who have read this clown for what he truly is.
He posts from sunrise to midnight every 1-2 hours some days, just click his name and look at his posting history at the end of a day.
I knew he had loose screws when he attacked me in the 7-08 thread, Elk Hunters, just recently when I simply offered some advice to the OP that didn't even concern him, and in that very thread, he attacked Wyocoyotehunter on page three for no reason, just to ride his azz about magnums. Then he inserted his azz, and answered Pharmseller's posting to me, and rode my azz for 9 more pages, and he and Pharmseller even stalked me into another thread to try to trash me.
I dealt with someone like him on a forum in my industry a little over 10 years ago. Same exact M.O. Same uneducated argumentative crap while inserting himself into every post all over the forum. These types know "just enough" to look like they know what they are talking about to the not-so-experienced members. To those who have much experience, the experienced people know they are fakes, and most just let it ride while not wanting to waste their time with a confrontation. I've been so tempted to bust fakepole in a few threads here recently to show his advice was BS, and he didn't know what he was talking about, but just let it go.
Back to the other guy 10 years ago I had the same issue with, it turned out a year later, the guy admitted he had mental issues, and was on medication for it. Hell, I knew right off the bat just by his postings, just like I knew it here, and as you obviously too with your very well detailed post.
Again, thank you so much for pointing this out. If I were to have pointed this out on this site being a new poster, and not a member here for very long, I would have gotten attacked, again, by his fans here, and probably still will for this posting.
Ask me if I care.
EDIT: Here’s the link to fakepole starting to ride wyocoyotehunter I referenced:
Elkslayer, Old man Polesmoker has nothing else in his sad and argumentative existence except picking fights over parsed words. I generally ignore his stupidity because anything he gets involved with devolves into his little piss ant mini rants. He is known to be a pain in the ass by many that’s why he has to lash out in his interactions here otherwise he’d be ignored completely. Like the old saying about little kids goes it’s also pertinent to grumpy elderly men....negative attention is better than no attention at all.
Old man smokepole needs to tighten the Velcro on his tenny runners with orthopedic insoles and get ready to flee from danger, it’s lurking around every corner of his 1 bedroom 1/2 bath apartment. 😁
If I hire a guide to take me elk hunting I expect my guide to get me on elk, not to protect me in every possible scenario......
Originally Posted by smokepole
Who said anything about the guide protecting the client in any possible scenario there ace? Sure as hell wasn't me.
Originally Posted by smokepole
Personally, I wouldn't be too hard on the client. It's not his responsibility to keep the guide safe, it's the other way around.
Yes, it sure the hell was you.
No fakepole. The guide is not hired to be a bodyguard during a bear attack. The client is responsible for his own defense in a bear attack, just like a customer is responsible for their own defense / protection during a robbery in a store.
Originally Posted by smokepole
If a guide accepts paying clients and hunts in an area with lots of grizzlies, he has a responsibility to understand how to operate in that environment and do what he can to keep his clients safe.
Typical liberal thought pattern here, it’s the guide’s responsibility to “help/protect” me, even when fakepole is knowingly inserting himself into a dangerous situation, grizzly country. 100% from the book of how a liberal thinks.
If that right there doesn’t show you people fakepole has no clue what he is talking about when hunting in the back country, you’re helpless.
Originally Posted by smokepole
And if they drop an elk and leave it overnight, the likelihood of having to deal with bears goes way up. So that situation is hardly "every possible scenario," it's something a guide should reasonably expect.
Again, let’s cop the liberal blame the guide. No fakepole, true back country hunters know in “any” country, not just grizzly country, you are putting your life in jeopardy once you hike in. The guide is not responsible for ”every possible scenario”, including and up to your life.
Originally Posted by smokepole
So a guide in that situation has some responsibility to manage what happens, unlike a guy from Florida who may not have ever seen a grizzly much less been drug off a horse by one.
More fakepole liberal thought here. The guide is hired to put you on the Elk and help extract the Elk, not protect you, the liberal, who wants others responsible for your safety, even in the back country.
Originally Posted by smokepole
I'm not blaming the guide either, as already noted by everyone with half a functioning brain cell, none of us knows what happened. Just making the observation that a client's responsibilities are much different than a guide's, in response to the previous poster who blamed the client for what happened.
When you, the liberal, state the guide is responsible for the client’s safety, as you just did more than once above, you “are” blaming the guide, Fakepole.
Sidestep here, but for the big but very, very light 329PD, Buff Bore developed a 44 “low-recoil” load. It’s a 255-gr Keith hard cast at ~1300+ fps — “controllable” (a personal determination) but with enough ooomph to penetrate a beach ball-sized noggin, or most other body parts at coffee-table range.
Sidestep here, but for the big but very, very light 329PD, Buff Bore developed a 44 “low-recoil” load. It’s a 255-gr Keith hard cast at ~1300+ fps — “controllable” (a personal determination) but with enough ooomph to penetrate a beach ball-sized noggin, or most other body parts at coffee-table range.
Low recoil might be ok for practice, but when you're shooting at something that's trying to kill you, you're not gonna remember the gun kicking or even consciously thinking about it ...
I'd still like to see somebody that would volunteer to help the young man pack out an elk.....not me....
But this for sure - two armed men were attacked my a single bear.
No, it's not for sure. And the only first-hand account I've read said the attack happened while they were on horseback dragging the elk out of cover, at least one of them.
So all the uninformed blather about having one guy stand guard while the other works on the carcass is just that--uninformed blather.
i will put it another way........if there are 2 of you , it would not be a bad idea for 1 of you, to kinda stand guard......in grizzly country.......you don't live or hunt in grizzly country .....do you?.......bob
smokepole....i was going to give you an answer....but, i dont think it would matter to you......reading your posts, i dont think you have much experience, with ...hunting...horses....bears...or common sense....bob
My 'puter shows 12 pages on this, would be 4 without quotes on quotes on quotes.
Your ‘puter is providing you with 12 pages, so far, of free arm-chair-quarterbacking entertainment, by people who have no clue how horses or people react during a bear confrontation.
No blame game here. And I have not read all the pages. But an observation.......
There is a definite downside to sticking an arrow in an Elk in the afternoon. Bone soured in the morning......plus a grizzly buffet!
Afternoon thermals can also be wish washy.
if the elk was shot in the afternoon, and gotten to the next day.....it was more than likely spoiled.......at that point you need to assume, a bear will be on it.......lets wait and see what smokepole has to say....he should be able to google...spoiled elk, and grizzly bear....and get back to us.....bob
Take a look at what the stupid phugk who calls himself Quynhu is doing on the Go Fund Me page. And it's only been days the family's been grieving. Low life liberal scum.
Wish I could reach out and touch that sonofabitch.
It is only one on a very long list that needs to be dealt with. It's day will come.
smokepole....i was going to give you an answer....but, i dont think it would matter to you......reading your posts, i dont think you have much experience, with ...hunting...horses....bears...or common sense....bob
It hurted so freaking bad, I waz beginning to wonder if I should just let the bear eat me.
Ruger Super Hawks 4 me! Houge grip, or bisley grip!
BTW
Smoke Troll = Fake News. JMO
I carry a three screw Super Blackhawk on my hip...full loads. I want all the punch I can send down that 7.5 barrel if I have a confrontation with a lion or bear, if I don't happen to have my 7RM in my hands at the time.
You don't have time to "experiment" with whether spray will work. You get one try in the back country in that situation, no mulligan, and you better put as many odds in your favor as you can when / if that time ever comes, a big wheel gun that won't jam.
Sidestep here, but for the big but very, very light 329PD, Buff Bore developed a 44 “low-recoil” load. It’s a 255-gr Keith hard cast at ~1300+ fps — “controllable” (a personal determination) but with enough ooomph to penetrate a beach ball-sized noggin, or most other body parts at coffee-table range.
Low recoil might be ok for practice, but when you're shooting at something that's trying to kill you, you're not gonna remember the gun kicking or even consciously thinking about it ...
I'd still like to see somebody that would volunteer to help the young man pack out an elk.....not me....
The factory grips leave the metal back strap exposed and even one full power load is painful. I replaced it with an aftermarket grip and full power loads are doable, but not pleasant.
I load 240 gr rnfp at 1100 FPS for fun shooting and for everyday carry. I hunt with my SBH 44 Mag with full power loads.
Were I hunting in bear country, I’d carry my 329pd due to lightweight but it would have full power 255 gr hard cast in it.
No blame game here. And I have not read all the pages. But an observation.......
There is a definite downside to sticking an arrow in an Elk in the afternoon. Bone soured in the morning......plus a grizzly buffet!
Afternoon thermals can also be wish washy.
if the elk was shot in the afternoon, and gotten to the next day.....it was more than likely spoiled.......at that point you need to assume, a bear will be on it.......lets wait and see what smokepole has to say....he should be able to google...spoiled elk, and grizzly bear....and get back to us.....bob
The guide had to have known it was a 99.9% chance they would just find green meat.
My only thought here is the guide, knowing it was a wound shot and not a kill shot, was hoping they could find a weak and alive, wounded bull, and finish him and still have good meat to pack-out.
The man lived and died, doing what he loved, we won't all be lucky enough to have that option, it's a sad and trying time for a young widow, and a busy mother, I don't think it would hurt anyone here to add some cash to the Gofundme page, and maybe some people that we should think about this coming Christmas, lets make something good come from this terrible situation.
If anyone knows much about this family, please let us know so we can try to make their lives a little better after such a devastating loss.
I actually don’t think bear spray is effective and this attack appears, on the surface, proves that it wasn’t effective because they found the empty can close to the corpse. BUT the seasoning spray was useful because it helped identify the guilty bear, after the guy was dead.
The moral of the story.... carrying and properly deploying bear spray is useful in identifying the bear that killed you. 😉
No blame game here. And I have not read all the pages. But an observation.......
There is a definite downside to sticking an arrow in an Elk in the afternoon. Bone soured in the morning......plus a grizzly buffet!
Afternoon thermals can also be wish washy.
if the elk was shot in the afternoon, and gotten to the next day.....it was more than likely spoiled.......at that point you need to assume, a bear will be on it.......lets wait and see what smokepole has to say....he should be able to google...spoiled elk, and grizzly bear....and get back to us.....bob
The guide had to have known it was a 99.9% chance they would just find green meat.
My only thought here is the guide, knowing it was a wound shot and not a kill shot, was hoping they could find a weak, and alive, wounded bull, and finish him, and still have good meat to pack-out.
Your "only thought" is a guess. Good work. I guess your friends are more correct than your mom and dad. Do you encounter a lot of bears in Texas?
Almost all I know about bears is from reading, however I've formed the opinion that if I am ever in Griz or Brown country I'll carry nothing less than a 338 WM loaded with 250 Noslers or a hot loaded 45-70. As said above, and I have known most of my life, I alone am responsible for my life and I reserve the right to make decisions regarding doing that. Win or lose, Mr. Bear gonna know he was in a fight.
But this for sure - two armed men were attacked my a single bear.
No, it's not for sure. And the only first-hand account I've read said the attack happened while they were on horseback dragging the elk out of cover, at least one of them.
So all the uninformed blather about having one guy stand guard while the other works on the carcass is just that--uninformed blather.
i will put it another way........if there are 2 of you , it would not be a bad idea for 1 of you, to kinda stand guard......in grizzly country.......you don't live or hunt in grizzly country .....do you?.......bob
It's a good idea Bob, I think that's obvious. Still doesn't change the fact that no one commenting here knows what really happened.
But this for sure - two armed men were attacked my a single bear.
No, it's not for sure. And the only first-hand account I've read said the attack happened while they were on horseback dragging the elk out of cover, at least one of them.
So all the uninformed blather about having one guy stand guard while the other works on the carcass is just that--uninformed blather.
i will put it another way........if there are 2 of you , it would not be a bad idea for 1 of you, to kinda stand guard......in grizzly country.......you don't live or hunt in grizzly country .....do you?.......bob
It's a good idea Bob, I think that's obvious. Still doesn't change the fact that no one commenting here knows what really happened.
No blame game here. And I have not read all the pages. But an observation.......
There is a definite downside to sticking an arrow in an Elk in the afternoon. Bone soured in the morning......plus a grizzly buffet!
Afternoon thermals can also be wish washy.
if the elk was shot in the afternoon, and gotten to the next day.....it was more than likely spoiled.......at that point you need to assume, a bear will be on it.......lets wait and see what smokepole has to say....he should be able to google...spoiled elk, and grizzly bear....and get back to us.....bob
The guide had to have known it was a 99.9% chance they would just find green meat.
No experience there, but I once let a cackler hang for a day and a half....best tasting goose I ever ate...I doubt a elk would spoil that quick.
At this point in time, all that is known as actual facts is that something involving two human beings, two bears, and a dead elk happened and went incredibly wrong, probably in a matter of a few seconds. The end result is one of the humans is dead and the two bears have been killed. Maybe more will unfold in the coming days.......and maybe not.
Anything else is speculation at this point no matter whether you're a "good guy" or a "bad guy" in the discussion here about the events.
As for a personal weapon in bear country, a long barrel like a 7.5" one on a Super Blackhawk is not your best friend when things go bad. A much shorter barrel such as a 4 3/4" Super Blackhawk in 44 Mag or a 4" barreled Redhawk in 45 Colt will be a lot handier when things are quickly going sideways. You won't need a longer site radius at that point as it will probably be point and shoot range at best, and clearing a long barrel from a holster might not happen as quickly. Those words paraphrase what my guide told me in prepartation for the hunt.
JMO - from having almost been there once with a 4" stainless Redhawk in 45 Colt cleared and ready at the behest of my guide. Fortunately the bear bluffed and didn't get closer than about 30 yards before he woofed and turned and ran the other direction as the guide was being very vocal with arms waving. I was caribou hunting at the time and the sound of gunshots were apparently like a dinner bell ringing for brown bears. Fortunately I'm here to tell about it. I provided "security" with a 12 gauge pump that the guide carried as an extra security weapon while he quickly gutted the animal, and I had the Redhawk in a chest/shoulder holster as extra back-up just in case. The last we saw of the bear was at probably 400 yards, and he was hot footing it in the other direction. But we had no idea if he had other friends nearby at the time.
Elkslayer, Old man Polesmoker has nothing else in his sad and argumentative existence except picking fights over parsed words. I generally ignore his stupidity because anything he gets involved with devolves into his little piss ant mini rants. He is known to be a pain in the ass by many that’s why he has to lash out in his interactions here otherwise he’d be ignored completely. Like the old saying about little kids goes it’s also pertinent to grumpy elderly men....negative attention is better than no attention at all.
Old man smokepole needs to tighten the Velcro on his tenny runners with orthopedic insoles and get ready to flee from danger, it’s lurking around every corner of his 1 bedroom 1/2 bath apartment. 😁
LOL, you're the one calling a guy you've never met a coward, over a situation you have no first hand knowledge of. Ok And Im the grumpy one. As far as being old, I'm 60 and i guarantee i could run your punk ass into the ground.
And go ahead, cast your lot with old elkslayer there, a self-professed expert who got dogpiled for giving stupid advice and he's still feeling the sting.
At this point in time, all that is known as actual facts is that something involving two human beings, two bears, and a dead elk happened and went incredibly wrong, probably in a matter of a few seconds. The end result is one of the humans is dead and the two bears have been killed. Maybe more will unfold in the coming days.......and maybe not.
Anything else is speculation at this point no matter whether you're a "good guy" or a "bad guy" in the discussion here about the events.
As for a personal weapon in bear country, a long barrel like a 7.5" one on a Super Blackhawk is not your best friend when things go bad. A much shorter barrel such as a 4 3/4" Super Blackhawk in 44 Mag or a 4" barreled Redhawk in 45 Colt will be a lot handier when things are quickly going sideways. You won't need a longer site radius at that point as it will probably be point and shoot range at best, and clearing a long barrel from a holster might not happen as quickly. Those words paraphrase what my guide told me in prepartation for the hunt.
JMO - from having almost been there once with a 4" stainless Redhawk in 45 Colt cleared and ready at the behest of my guide. Fortunately the bear bluffed and didn't get closer than about 30 yards before he woofed and turned and ran the other direction as the guide was being very vocal with arms waving. I was caribou hunting at the time and the sound of gunshots were apparently like a dinner bell ringing for brown bears. Fortunately I'm here to tell about it. I provided "security" with a 12 gauge pump that the guide carried as an extra security weapon while he quickly gutted the animal, and I had the Redhawk in a chest/shoulder holster as extra back-up just in case. The last we saw of the bear was at probably 400 yards, and he was hot footing it in the other direction. But we had no idea if he had other friends nearby at the time.
Shrapnel, I do not even know what I don’t know, nor would I pretend to have any knowledge, I like that pistol you have! On the other hand the new custom shop deluxe 629 with 3 inch barrel looks a lot like your 357.
Think of what 7 rounds from a manageable gun can do compared to 6 with considerable recoil. I find that bullets in the dirt don’t work as well as bullets in the bear...
Warning shots have worked well for me in the past.
No blame game here. And I have not read all the pages. But an observation.......
There is a definite downside to sticking an arrow in an Elk in the afternoon. Bone soured in the morning......plus a grizzly buffet!
Afternoon thermals can also be wish washy.
if the elk was shot in the afternoon, and gotten to the next day.....it was more than likely spoiled.......at that point you need to assume, a bear will be on it.......lets wait and see what smokepole has to say....he should be able to google...spoiled elk, and grizzly bear....and get back to us.....bob
The guide had to have known it was a 99.9% chance they would just find green meat.
My only thought here is the guide, knowing it was a wound shot and not a kill shot, was hoping they could find a weak, and alive, wounded bull, and finish him, and still have good meat to pack-out.
Originally Posted by lvmiker
Your "only thought" is a guess. Good work.
It was a well thought out theory, based on many years of hunting experience. A troll such as yourself would not recognize that.
Originally Posted by lvmiker
I guess your friends are more correct than your mom and dad.
I am so happy you enjoyed reading my signature. You obviously barely survive on the left-side of the Bell Curve or you would have recognized the sarcasm.
Originally Posted by lvmiker
Do you encounter a lot of bears in Texas?
Actually, I have encountered a bear, many years ago. He was 2-3 feet from my face. It happened at Philmont Scout Ranch in New Mexico, which happens to reside in the Republic of TEXAS.
Go smoke some weed with your fakepole boyfriend. You obviously are upset we outed him.
If I hire a guide to take me elk hunting I expect my guide to get me on elk, not to protect me in every possible scenario......
Originally Posted by smokepole
Who said anything about the guide protecting the client in any possible scenario there ace? Sure as hell wasn't me.
Originally Posted by smokepole
Personally, I wouldn't be too hard on the client. It's not his responsibility to keep the guide safe, it's the other way around.
Yes, it sure the hell was you.
No fakepole. The guide is not hired to be a bodyguard during a bear attack. The client is responsible for his own defense in a bear attack, just like a customer is responsible for their own defense / protection during a robbery in a store.
Originally Posted by smokepole
If a guide accepts paying clients and hunts in an area with lots of grizzlies, he has a responsibility to understand how to operate in that environment and do what he can to keep his clients safe.
Typical liberal thought pattern here, it’s the guide’s responsibility to “help/protect” me, even when fakepole is knowingly inserting himself into a dangerous situation, grizzly country. 100% from the book of how a liberal thinks.
If that right there doesn’t show you people fakepole has no clue what he is talking about when hunting in the back country, you’re helpless.
Originally Posted by smokepole
And if they drop an elk and leave it overnight, the likelihood of having to deal with bears goes way up. So that situation is hardly "every possible scenario," it's something a guide should reasonably expect.
Again, let’s cop the liberal blame the guide. No fakepole, true back country hunters know in “any” country, not just grizzly country, you are putting your life in jeopardy once you hike in. The guide is not responsible for ”every possible scenario”, including and up to your life.
Originally Posted by smokepole
So a guide in that situation has some responsibility to manage what happens, unlike a guy from Florida who may not have ever seen a grizzly much less been drug off a horse by one.
More fakepole liberal thought here. The guide is hired to put you on the Elk and help extract the Elk, not protect you, the liberal, who wants others responsible for your safety, even in the back country.
Originally Posted by smokepole
I'm not blaming the guide either, as already noted by everyone with half a functioning brain cell, none of us knows what happened. Just making the observation that a client's responsibilities are much different than a guide's, in response to the previous poster who blamed the client for what happened.
When you, the liberal, state the guide is responsible for the client’s safety, as you just did more than once above, you “are” blaming the guide, Fakepole.
You are such an ignorant [bleep]. Nowhere did I blame the guide.
I actually don’t think bear spray is effective and this attack appears, on the surface, proves that it wasn’t effective because they found the empty can close to the corpse. BUT the seasoning spray was useful because it helped identify the guilty bear, after the guy was dead.
The moral of the story.... carrying and properly deploying bear spray is useful in identifying the bear that killed you. 😉
Throwing rocks at em only pisses em off too...especially if they're dining on plumbs in the back of your pickup....talk about stink eye....
At this point in time, all that is known as actual facts is that something involving two human beings, two bears, and a dead elk happened and went incredibly wrong, probably in a matter of a few seconds. The end result is one of the humans is dead and the two bears have been killed. Maybe more will unfold in the coming days.......and maybe not.
Anything else is speculation at this point no matter whether you're a "good guy" or a "bad guy" in the discussion here about the events.
As for a personal weapon in bear country, a long barrel like a 7.5" one on a Super Blackhawk is not your best friend when things go bad. A much shorter barrel such as a 4 3/4" Super Blackhawk in 44 Mag or a 4" barreled Redhawk in 45 Colt will be a lot handier when things are quickly going sideways. You won't need a longer site radius at that point as it will probably be point and shoot range at best, and clearing a long barrel from a holster might not happen as quickly. Those words paraphrase what my guide told me in prepartation for the hunt.
JMO - from having almost been there once with a 4" stainless Redhawk in 45 Colt cleared and ready at the behest of my guide. Fortunately the bear bluffed and didn't get closer than about 30 yards before he woofed and turned and ran the other direction as the guide was being very vocal with arms waving. I was caribou hunting at the time and the sound of gunshots were apparently like a dinner bell ringing for brown bears. Fortunately I'm here to tell about it. I provided "security" with a 12 gauge pump that the guide carried as an extra security weapon while he quickly gutted the animal, and I had the Redhawk in a chest/shoulder holster as extra back-up just in case. The last we saw of the bear was at probably 400 yards, and he was hot footing it in the other direction. But we had no idea if he had other friends nearby at the time.
So you think the client is a liar?
I never said that, and I have no idea what the full truth is at this time. As I thought that I stated in my original post, I'm willing to leave all of the jumping to conclusions to others who were no closer to the actual event than I was.
No experience there, but I once let a cackler hang for a day and a half....best tasting goose I ever ate...I doubt a elk would spoil that quick.
Difference is a goose cools quickly, especially if you gut it & pull the feathers off. A dead elk covered in warm fur with only an arrow hole to let out the heat is going to spoil quickly. Plus an elk has 100x the body mass to hold heat.
I never said that, and I have no idea what the full truth is at this time. As I thought that I stated in my original post, I'm willing to leave all of the jumping to conclusions to others who were no closer to the actual event than I was.
And I didn't say you had, just asked. The video I post has an interview with the client. He states that bear grabbed him while on his horse, threw him around a bit and then went after the guide. The client states that he threw the gun and ran for his life.
I never said that, and I have no idea what the full truth is at this time. As I thought that I stated in my original post, I'm willing to leave all of the jumping to conclusions to others who were no closer to the actual event than I was.
Your avatar pic looks a lot like Maser...in that case, I understand your feelings....hiding from gramps thing....
No blame game here. And I have not read all the pages. But an observation.......
There is a definite downside to sticking an arrow in an Elk in the afternoon. Bone soured in the morning......plus a grizzly buffet!
Afternoon thermals can also be wish washy.
if the elk was shot in the afternoon, and gotten to the next day.....it was more than likely spoiled.......at that point you need to assume, a bear will be on it.......lets wait and see what smokepole has to say....he should be able to google...spoiled elk, and grizzly bear....and get back to us.....bob
The guide had to have known it was a 99.9% chance they would just find green meat.
No experience there, but I once let a cackler hang for a day and a half....best tasting goose I ever ate...I doubt a elk would spoil that quick.
This time of year in warm weather, you have to get them opened ASAP after a kill. You can't leave them overnight, especially one not field dressed.
After watching that video, the hunter is a coward and someone needs to kick his sorry ass, he admits running away from his friend and guide to save his own sorry ass, I hope the nightmares haunt him for a long time !
After watching that video, the hunter is a coward and someone needs to kick his sorry ass, he admits running away from his friend and guide to save his own sorry ass, I hope the nightmares haunt him for a long time !
I wouldn't co-pilot with him, that's for damn sure.
I never said that, and I have no idea what the full truth is at this time. As I thought that I stated in my original post, I'm willing to leave all of the jumping to conclusions to others who were no closer to the actual event than I was.
Your avatar pic looks a lot like Maser...in that case, I understand your feelings....hiding from gramps thing....
As for a personal weapon in bear country, a long barrel like a 7.5" one on a Super Blackhawk is not your best friend when things go bad. A much shorter barrel such as a 4 3/4" Super Blackhawk in 44 Mag or a 4" barreled Redhawk in 45 Colt will be a lot handier when things are quickly going sideways. You won't need a longer site radius at that point as it will probably be point and shoot range at best, and clearing a long barrel from a holster might not happen as quickly. Those words paraphrase what my guide told me in prepartation for the hunt.
That was your guide's standard speech for all clients, especially geared towards city slickers, who think they are gun savvy.
It does not apply to someone who has handled wheel guns their whole life, and is very proficient with them.
You yourself went on to state you pulled out your gun when the bear was still at a distance. What makes you think a 3.5 inch longer barrel would matter when you have pulled out the gun, when the bear is 30-50 yards away?
I never said that, and I have no idea what the full truth is at this time. As I thought that I stated in my original post, I'm willing to leave all of the jumping to conclusions to others who were no closer to the actual event than I was.
Your avatar pic looks a lot like Maser...in that case, I understand your feelings....hiding from gramps thing....
After watching that video, the hunter is a coward and someone needs to kick his sorry ass, he admits running away from his friend and guide to save his own sorry ass, I hope the nightmares haunt him for a long time !
Two grizzlies present, him no longer in possession of a weapon. I would like to think I would have the presence of mind, clear-headedness and enough disregard for my own life to go coolly looking for my thrown handgun to use on the bears even after I had just been bit, gouged on and pulled off of my horse by one of said enraged grizzlies. But until I pass that particular test I don't figure I'm qualified to be overly judgmental.
After watching that video, the hunter is a coward and someone needs to kick his sorry ass, he admits running away from his friend and guide to save his own sorry ass, I hope the nightmares haunt him for a long time !
Two grizzlies present, him no longer in possession of a weapon. I would like to think I would have the presence of mind, clear-headedness and enough disregard for my own life to go coolly looking for my thrown handgun to use on the bears even after I had just been bit, gouged on and pulled off of my horse by one of said enraged grizzlies. But until I pass that particular test I don't figure I'm qualified to be overly judgmental.
I'm sure the first thing I would do is throw the gun whilst said bear is chewing on my leg
. He didn't look to injured to me. I've been more scratched up giving my cat a pill.
Elkslayer, Old man Polesmoker has nothing else in his sad and argumentative existence except picking fights over parsed words. I generally ignore his stupidity because anything he gets involved with devolves into his little piss ant mini rants. He is known to be a pain in the ass by many that’s why he has to lash out in his interactions here otherwise he’d be ignored completely. Like the old saying about little kids goes it’s also pertinent to grumpy elderly men....negative attention is better than no attention at all.
Old man smokepole needs to tighten the Velcro on his tenny runners with orthopedic insoles and get ready to flee from danger, it’s lurking around every corner of his 1 bedroom 1/2 bath apartment. 😁
LOL, you're the one calling a guy you've never met a coward, over a situation you have no first hand knowledge of. Ok And Im the grumpy one. As far as being old, I'm 60 and i guarantee i could run your punk ass into the ground.
And go ahead, cast your lot with old elkslayer there, a self-professed expert who got dogpiled for giving stupid advice and he's still feeling the sting.
Thank you for coming back. My "stupid advice' proved you are too stupid to be able to understand how to aim a gun at different distances when the directions were placed at your feet. That makes you a complete idiot.
I got "dogpiled" by your friends here, who clearly couldn't understand the same, a badge of honor I shall cherish for life.
Its called being a man, secondly who throws a handgun, since you obviously have the presents of mind to have, said gun, in your hand , hence "handgun", your own wellbeing should never be your fist though, it should be what can I do to help ! The hunter is not a teenager, I won't call him a man either, I'll stick with coward and would never share a camp with such a self centered clown.
I'm sure the first thing I would do is throw the gun whilst said bear is chewing on my leg.
Didn't seem like he was telling the truth about that part, maybe he inadvertently dropped it somewhere while making his escape. Still, until I myself pass the "buddy getting chewed on by a mad grizzly" test, ain't qualified to condemn.
I'm sure the first thing I would do is throw the gun whilst said bear is chewing on my leg.
Didn't seem like he was telling the truth about that part, maybe he inadvertently dropped it somewhere while making his escape. Still, until I myself pass the "buddy getting chewed on by a mad grizzly" test, ain't qualified to condemn.
If I hire a guide to take me elk hunting I expect my guide to get me on elk, not to protect me in every possible scenario......
Originally Posted by smokepole
Who said anything about the guide protecting the client in any possible scenario there ace? Sure as hell wasn't me.
Originally Posted by smokepole
Personally, I wouldn't be too hard on the client. It's not his responsibility to keep the guide safe, it's the other way around.
Yes, it sure the hell was you.
No fakepole. The guide is not hired to be a bodyguard during a bear attack. The client is responsible for his own defense in a bear attack, just like a customer is responsible for their own defense / protection during a robbery in a store.
Originally Posted by smokepole
If a guide accepts paying clients and hunts in an area with lots of grizzlies, he has a responsibility to understand how to operate in that environment and do what he can to keep his clients safe.
Typical liberal thought pattern here, it’s the guide’s responsibility to “help/protect” me, even when fakepole is knowingly inserting himself into a dangerous situation, grizzly country. 100% from the book of how a liberal thinks.
If that right there doesn’t show you people fakepole has no clue what he is talking about when hunting in the back country, you’re helpless.
Originally Posted by smokepole
And if they drop an elk and leave it overnight, the likelihood of having to deal with bears goes way up. So that situation is hardly "every possible scenario," it's something a guide should reasonably expect.
Again, let’s cop the liberal blame the guide. No fakepole, true back country hunters know in “any” country, not just grizzly country, you are putting your life in jeopardy once you hike in. The guide is not responsible for ”every possible scenario”, including and up to your life.
Originally Posted by smokepole
So a guide in that situation has some responsibility to manage what happens, unlike a guy from Florida who may not have ever seen a grizzly much less been drug off a horse by one.
More fakepole liberal thought here. The guide is hired to put you on the Elk and help extract the Elk, not protect you, the liberal, who wants others responsible for your safety, even in the back country.
Originally Posted by smokepole
I'm not blaming the guide either, as already noted by everyone with half a functioning brain cell, none of us knows what happened. Just making the observation that a client's responsibilities are much different than a guide's, in response to the previous poster who blamed the client for what happened.
When you, the liberal, state the guide is responsible for the client’s safety, as you just did more than once above, you “are” blaming the guide, Fakepole.
You are such an ignorant [bleep]. Nowhere did I blame the guide.
I see you're falling back to your standard liberal mode, keep telling the lie until it sticks. I even used your own words to prove it.
I love rubbing liberal's, such as you, noses in their own fecal matter online. It is so easy, and I'm damn good at it too.
Pretty sure thread rules for this topic don't allow such a short and factual summary of a 14 page tantrum. You could have at least made some reference to stupid, flat-lander, cork socking back east fools.
No blame game here. And I have not read all the pages. But an observation.......
There is a definite downside to sticking an arrow in an Elk in the afternoon. Bone soured in the morning......plus a grizzly buffet!
Afternoon thermals can also be wish washy.
if the elk was shot in the afternoon, and gotten to the next day.....it was more than likely spoiled.......at that point you need to assume, a bear will be on it.......lets wait and see what smokepole has to say....he should be able to google...spoiled elk, and grizzly bear....and get back to us.....bob
The guide had to have known it was a 99.9% chance they would just find green meat.
My only thought here is the guide, knowing it was a wound shot and not a kill shot, was hoping they could find a weak, and alive, wounded bull, and finish him, and still have good meat to pack-out.
Originally Posted by lvmiker
Your "only thought" is a guess. Good work.
It was a well thought out theory, based on many years of hunting experience. A troll such as yourself would not recognize that.
Originally Posted by lvmiker
I guess your friends are more correct than your mom and dad.
I am so happy you enjoyed reading my signature. You obviously barely survive on the left-side of the Bell Curve or you would have recognized the sarcasm.
Originally Posted by lvmiker
Do you encounter a lot of bears in Texas?
Actually, I have encountered a bear, many years ago. He was 2-3 feet from my face. It happened at Philmont Scout Ranch in New Mexico, which happens to reside in the Republic of TEXAS.
Go smoke some weed with your fakepole boyfriend. You obviously are upset we outed him.
You are getting more amusing w/ every post.
Your "well thought out theory " in the absence of fact= a guess
Sarcasm was not recognized because the quality of your thinking substantiates the opinion of your friends.
If it was called Philmont when you supposedly went face to face w/ a bear tell us again which state it was in. The republic of texas no longer exists.
Smoking weed is not on my agenda but you seem to have an unseemly fascination w/ homoerotica that causes you to guess about many things, or is that another of your "well thought out theories based on many years of.........?
Take a look at what the stupid phugk who calls himself Quynhu is doing on the Go Fund Me page. And it's only been days the family's been grieving. Low life liberal scum.
Wish I could reach out and touch that sonofabitch.
It is only one on a very long list that needs to be dealt with. It's day will come.
His comments appear to have been removed.
Stupid liberal chkount will be right back in there again. His comments had been removed prior.
No blame game here. And I have not read all the pages. But an observation.......
There is a definite downside to sticking an arrow in an Elk in the afternoon. Bone soured in the morning......plus a grizzly buffet!
Afternoon thermals can also be wish washy.
if the elk was shot in the afternoon, and gotten to the next day.....it was more than likely spoiled.......at that point you need to assume, a bear will be on it.......lets wait and see what smokepole has to say....he should be able to google...spoiled elk, and grizzly bear....and get back to us.....bob
People usually say the same when they are incapable of refuting the facts I post when debating liberals online. You are no different.
Originally Posted by lvmiker
Your "well thought out theory " in the absence of fact= a guess
Your public education failed you.
“Well thought out Theory” based on “present known facts” = “How intelligent people operate”. You obviously fail in the intelligent department, like your failed public education you received.
Originally Posted by lvmiker
Sarcasm was not recognized because the quality of your thinking substantiates the opinion of your friends.
Now see, here is a perfect example of what you spoke of above, “absence of fact”. You are completely incapable of “substantiating the opinion of my friends”, because you have not personally interviewed them and acquired facts through discovery.
Nice try. You fail, again, liberal.
Originally Posted by lvmiker
If it was called Philmont when you supposedly went face to face w/ a bear tell us again which state it was in. The republic of texas no longer exists.
Again, your public education fails you.
Here, let me explain. It is very simple, even for an idiot liberal.
Republic of TEXAS is a sovereign nation. You “can not” annex a sovereign nation by a joint resolution. Republic of TEXAS was annexed by a joint resolution, which renders that null and void legally. Sovereign nations must be annexed by treaty. Therefore the Republic of TEXAS is still a sovereign nation based on solid law, dating back to black letter written English law.
Now, roll that and smoke it with fakepole pal.
Originally Posted by lvmiker
Smoking weed is not on my agenda but you seem to have an unseemly fascination w/ homoerotica that causes you to guess about many things, or is that another of your "well thought out theories based on many years of.........?
It’s based on you and fakepole showing back up here “together”. Males who show up together and troll on a site generally are…you know.
Originally Posted by lvmiker
mike r
Does signing your name at the end of your posts satisfy your narcissism?
No blame game here. And I have not read all the pages. But an observation.......
There is a definite downside to sticking an arrow in an Elk in the afternoon. Bone soured in the morning......plus a grizzly buffet!
Afternoon thermals can also be wish washy.
if the elk was shot in the afternoon, and gotten to the next day.....it was more than likely spoiled.......at that point you need to assume, a bear will be on it.......lets wait and see what smokepole has to say....he should be able to google...spoiled elk, and grizzly bear....and get back to us.....bob
The guide had to have known it was a 99.9% chance they would just find green meat.
No experience there, but I once let a cackler hang for a day and a half....best tasting goose I ever ate...I doubt a elk would spoil that quick.
it will spoil quick.....at a minimum, this time of year it needs to be gutted and propped up under the back, so air can circulate under it.....better yet quarter and hang......you have to be careful even in 2 feet of snow......bob
No blame game here. And I have not read all the pages. But an observation.......
There is a definite downside to sticking an arrow in an Elk in the afternoon. Bone soured in the morning......plus a grizzly buffet!
Afternoon thermals can also be wish washy.
if the elk was shot in the afternoon, and gotten to the next day.....it was more than likely spoiled.......at that point you need to assume, a bear will be on it.......lets wait and see what smokepole has to say....he should be able to google...spoiled elk, and grizzly bear....and get back to us.....bob
Could have died overnight and the meat be fine...
They gotta go see regardless...
Greg, Elk are very bad about spoiling since they are so thick, and in mild temps, you have to get them open ASAP. The neck is the first to go with it being under the cape, and no avenue for the heat to escape.
You can leave one on the mountain overnight to retrieve the next day, but only after you field dress, wash blood out of the cavity and off the meat, situate the rear legs open to get air into the cavity, "and" the evening temps and into the next morning "have to be" cold enough to protect the meat from spoilage.
Elkslayer, Old man Polesmoker has nothing else in his sad and argumentative existence except picking fights over parsed words. I generally ignore his stupidity because anything he gets involved with devolves into his little piss ant mini rants. He is known to be a pain in the ass by many that’s why he has to lash out in his interactions here otherwise he’d be ignored completely. Like the old saying about little kids goes it’s also pertinent to grumpy elderly men....negative attention is better than no attention at all.
Old man smokepole needs to tighten the Velcro on his tenny runners with orthopedic insoles and get ready to flee from danger, it’s lurking around every corner of his 1 bedroom 1/2 bath apartment. 😁
And Im the grumpy one. As far as being old, I'm 60 and i guarantee i could run your punk ass into the ground.
The hunter is not a teenager, I won't call him a man either, I'll stick with coward and would never share a camp with such a self centered clown
After this event, if the guy IS any sort of a man, he'd be high on my list for guys I'd want around me with a gun if I got jumped by a grizzly.
Watch the video, in his own words, "I ran away"
One minute it was a beautiful day on horseback in the mountains, next moment out of the blue sheer hell breaks out, thrown off his horse, friggin nightmare right in front of him. No weapon, two bears, I have never been in combat, but I have heard that more’n a few guys panic the first time under fire even when they were forewarned and expecting it , much fewer cut and run a second time.
The hunter is not a teenager, I won't call him a man either, I'll stick with coward and would never share a camp with such a self centered clown
After this event, if the guy IS any sort of a man, he'd be high on my list for guys I'd want around me with a gun if I got jumped by a grizzly.
Watch the video, in his own words, "I ran away"
One minute it was a beautiful day on horseback in the mountains, next moment out of the blue sheer hell breaks out, thrown off his horse, friggin nightmare right in front of him. No weapon, two bears, I have never been in combat, but I have heard that more’n a few guys panic the first time under fire even when they were forewarned and expecting it , much fewer cut and run a second time.
People usually say the same when they are incapable of refuting the facts I post when debating liberals online. You are no different.
Originally Posted by lvmiker
Your "well thought out theory " in the absence of fact= a guess
Your public education failed you.
“Well thought out Theory” based on “present known facts” = “How intelligent people operate”. You obviously fail in the intelligent department, like your failed public education you received.
Originally Posted by lvmiker
Sarcasm was not recognized because the quality of your thinking substantiates the opinion of your friends.
Now see, here is a perfect example of what you spoke of above, “absence of fact”. You are completely incapable of “substantiating the opinion of my friends”, because you have not personally interviewed them and acquired facts through discovery.
Nice try. You fail, again, liberal.
Originally Posted by lvmiker
If it was called Philmont when you supposedly went face to face w/ a bear tell us again which state it was in. The republic of texas no longer exists.
Again, your public education fails you.
Here, let me explain. It is very simple, even for an idiot liberal.
Republic of TEXAS is a sovereign nation. You “can not” annex a sovereign nation by a joint resolution. Republic of TEXAS was annexed by a joint resolution, which renders that null and void legally. Sovereign nations must be annexed by treaty. Therefore the Republic of TEXAS is still a sovereign nation based on solid law, dating back to black letter written English law.
Now, roll that and smoke it with fakepole pal.
Originally Posted by lvmiker
Smoking weed is not on my agenda but you seem to have an unseemly fascination w/ homoerotica that causes you to guess about many things, or is that another of your "well thought out theories based on many years of.........?
It’s based on you and fakepole showing back up here “together”. Males who show up together and troll on a site generally are…you know.
Originally Posted by lvmiker
mike r
Does signing your name at the end of your posts satisfy your narcissism?
You make your educators proud, when unable to compete immediately resort to countering w/ homo and liberal, your debate skills are representative of those who think they live in a state that is a sovereign nation. I imagine you are their rep in the UN.
Tell us some more about....that one summer in scout camp.
No blame game here. And I have not read all the pages. But an observation.......
There is a definite downside to sticking an arrow in an Elk in the afternoon. Bone soured in the morning......plus a grizzly buffet!
Afternoon thermals can also be wish washy.
if the elk was shot in the afternoon, and gotten to the next day.....it was more than likely spoiled.......at that point you need to assume, a bear will be on it.......lets wait and see what smokepole has to say....he should be able to google...spoiled elk, and grizzly bear....and get back to us.....bob
The guide had to have known it was a 99.9% chance they would just find green meat.
So bob, you want to know what I have to say about spoiled elk meat from an elk shot the evening before? Thanks for asking, that was mighty kind.
The first thing I'd say is that anyone who sticks a bull in the evening and doesn't find it before dark needs to either keep looking or pick up the trail and look for it first thing the next morning. I've done both. It's a legal requirement, and a felony in some states to fail to make a reasonable attempt to salvage the meat, even if you "think" it's spoiled or there "may be" a bear on it. Guides are typically familiar with regulations like that. And there's only one way to find out if the meat's spoiled.
The second thing I'd say is, you guys are a little off on your math to say there's 99.9% chance the meat is spoiled. Depends on the situation. I've only shot two elk in the evening and needed to come back in the morning to find them, how about you guys? Both of them were in archery season in Colorado, and the meat was good on both so I must be part of that mythical 0.01% group.
And to top it off, when we got to one of 'em at first light, a big old black bear had just gotten there before us, ain't that something?
The only thing I got from the news cast is the client threw the gun and ran. The guide used spray and it didn’t work. Sounds like a cluster, and why I carry my own lead based spray. Don’t fugg around with grizz.
As for a personal weapon in bear country, a long barrel like a 7.5" one on a Super Blackhawk is not your best friend when things go bad. A much shorter barrel such as a 4 3/4" Super Blackhawk in 44 Mag or a 4" barreled Redhawk in 45 Colt will be a lot handier when things are quickly going sideways. You won't need a longer site radius at that point as it will probably be point and shoot range at best, and clearing a long barrel from a holster might not happen as quickly. Those words paraphrase what my guide told me in prepartation for the hunt.
That was your guide's standard speech for all clients, especially geared towards city slickers, who think they are gun savvy.
It does not apply to someone who has handled wheel guns their whole life, and is very proficient with them.
You yourself went on to state you pulled out your gun when the bear was still at a distance. What makes you think a 3.5 inch longer barrel would matter when you have pulled out the gun, when the bear is 30-50 yards away?
Apparently a couple of things that I said didn't deter you from jumping to your own conclusions. As for me being a city slicker at the time, I had never lived anywhere that had more than one Walmart at that point in my life. In addition, apparently the guide I used was a city slicker also as he carried a Smith 4" 629.
Unlike this scenario, we were in open country and we actually had several minutes to get our act together at the kill site as we saw the bear coming at a fast lope from maybe a half mile away. I did as the guide asked me to do while watching the bear approach while he scoured the area behind us. At about 100 yards he began shouting and waving his arms, one of which had a pump shotgun attached to it in his hand. He had ordered me to stand to his left at that time looking in the opposite direction of the bear in case there were bears on both sides of us. He told me in case he fired to turn to my left around him and to start opening up with my handgun.
Fortunately that was never needed as the bear turned tail at what the guide said was about 30 yards. Whether it was all handled according to the book, I'll never know. But at the time it worked. After the bear turned a 180, he handed me his shotgun and quickly began gutting the caribou. From that point on no more bears were seen and all went well from there.
Btw - I apologise.....I didn't realize that I was talking with Matt Dillon when I made the comments about short barreled handguns... my bad. It never came up in conversations, but I'm betting that my guide would have suggested that even Matt should leave his cavalry model 45 at home and to bring something with a shorter barrel. Maybe not....
Elkslayer, Old man Polesmoker has nothing else in his sad and argumentative existence except picking fights over parsed words. I generally ignore his stupidity because anything he gets involved with devolves into his little piss ant mini rants. He is known to be a pain in the ass by many that’s why he has to lash out in his interactions here otherwise he’d be ignored completely. Like the old saying about little kids goes it’s also pertinent to grumpy elderly men....negative attention is better than no attention at all.
Old man smokepole needs to tighten the Velcro on his tenny runners with orthopedic insoles and get ready to flee from danger, it’s lurking around every corner of his 1 bedroom 1/2 bath apartment. 😁
LOL, you're the one calling a guy you've never met a coward, over a situation you have no first hand knowledge of. Ok And Im the grumpy one. As far as being old, I'm 60 and i guarantee i could run your punk ass into the ground.
And go ahead, cast your lot with old elkslayer there, a self-professed expert who got dogpiled for giving stupid advice and he's still feeling the sting.
Thank you for coming back. My "stupid advice' proved you are too stupid to be able to understand how to aim a gun at different distances when the directions were placed at your feet. That makes you a complete idiot.
I got "dogpiled" by your friends here, who clearly couldn't understand the same, a badge of honor I shall cherish for life.
No blame game here. And I have not read all the pages. But an observation.......
There is a definite downside to sticking an arrow in an Elk in the afternoon. Bone soured in the morning......plus a grizzly buffet!
Afternoon thermals can also be wish washy.
if the elk was shot in the afternoon, and gotten to the next day.....it was more than likely spoiled.......at that point you need to assume, a bear will be on it.......lets wait and see what smokepole has to say....he should be able to google...spoiled elk, and grizzly bear....and get back to us.....bob
The guide had to have known it was a 99.9% chance they would just find green meat.
No experience there, but I once let a cackler hang for a day and a half....best tasting goose I ever ate...I doubt a elk would spoil that quick.
This time of year in warm weather, you have to get them opened ASAP after a kill. You can't leave them overnight, especially one not field dressed.
More nonsense from an inexperienced elk hunter.ES 91 you have no clue when that bull died. Could have been within a few hours of the hunter and guide showing up.
If I hire a guide to take me elk hunting I expect my guide to get me on elk, not to protect me in every possible scenario......
Originally Posted by smokepole
Who said anything about the guide protecting the client in any possible scenario there ace? Sure as hell wasn't me.
Originally Posted by smokepole
Personally, I wouldn't be too hard on the client. It's not his responsibility to keep the guide safe, it's the other way around.
Yes, it sure the hell was you.
No fakepole. The guide is not hired to be a bodyguard during a bear attack. The client is responsible for his own defense in a bear attack, just like a customer is responsible for their own defense / protection during a robbery in a store.
Originally Posted by smokepole
If a guide accepts paying clients and hunts in an area with lots of grizzlies, he has a responsibility to understand how to operate in that environment and do what he can to keep his clients safe.
Typical liberal thought pattern here, it’s the guide’s responsibility to “help/protect” me, even when fakepole is knowingly inserting himself into a dangerous situation, grizzly country. 100% from the book of how a liberal thinks.
If that right there doesn’t show you people fakepole has no clue what he is talking about when hunting in the back country, you’re helpless.
Originally Posted by smokepole
And if they drop an elk and leave it overnight, the likelihood of having to deal with bears goes way up. So that situation is hardly "every possible scenario," it's something a guide should reasonably expect.
Again, let’s cop the liberal blame the guide. No fakepole, true back country hunters know in “any” country, not just grizzly country, you are putting your life in jeopardy once you hike in. The guide is not responsible for ”every possible scenario”, including and up to your life.
Originally Posted by smokepole
So a guide in that situation has some responsibility to manage what happens, unlike a guy from Florida who may not have ever seen a grizzly much less been drug off a horse by one.
More fakepole liberal thought here. The guide is hired to put you on the Elk and help extract the Elk, not protect you, the liberal, who wants others responsible for your safety, even in the back country.
Originally Posted by smokepole
I'm not blaming the guide either, as already noted by everyone with half a functioning brain cell, none of us knows what happened. Just making the observation that a client's responsibilities are much different than a guide's, in response to the previous poster who blamed the client for what happened.
When you, the liberal, state the guide is responsible for the client’s safety, as you just did more than once above, you “are” blaming the guide, Fakepole.
You are such an ignorant [bleep]. Nowhere did I blame the guide.
I see you're falling back to your standard liberal mode, keep telling the lie until it sticks. I even used your own words to prove it.
I love rubbing liberal's, such as you, noses in their own fecal matter online. It is so easy, and I'm damn good at it too.
Is that all you've got, calling me a "liberal?" That's damn funny. And no, you're not very good at it. If I could buy you for what you're worth, and sell you for what you think you're worth, I'd retire tomorrow and buy a place in the Bahamas.
Why don't you complain about how much I post again, that seemed to be one of your best points. And it looks like you put some effort into tracking down my posting habits, I'm flattered.
No blame game here. And I have not read all the pages. But an observation.......
There is a definite downside to sticking an arrow in an Elk in the afternoon. Bone soured in the morning......plus a grizzly buffet!
Afternoon thermals can also be wish washy.
if the elk was shot in the afternoon, and gotten to the next day.....it was more than likely spoiled.......at that point you need to assume, a bear will be on it.......lets wait and see what smokepole has to say....he should be able to google...spoiled elk, and grizzly bear....and get back to us.....bob
Could have died overnight and the meat be fine...
They gotta go see regardless...
Greg, Elk are very bad about spoiling since they are so thick, and in mild temps, you have to get them open ASAP. The neck is the first to go with it being under the cape, and no avenue for the heat to escape.
You can leave one on the mountain overnight to retrieve the next day, but only after you field dress, wash blood out of the cavity and off the meat, situate the rear legs open to get air into the cavity, "and" the evening temps and into the next morning "have to be" cold enough to protect the meat from spoilage.
Lecturing a guide on care of big game meat, it don't get no better than this!!!!
Curiosity, from those who have faced bears, why is a pump shotgun with solid slugs or 00buck, not the preferred close in bear weapon? Fast handling, close in devastation, and a bead sight for fast sighting. Why choose a long range rifle for a close in job?
The matter of whether the meat was good, or wasted is not a point and never is, a clean kill is the responsibility of both the guide and the hunter, God knows if next weeks hunter would blunder into this wounded or dead elk, complete with a bear or more. You shoot it you find it !
Curiosity, from those who have faced bears, why is a pump shotgun with solid slugs or 00buck, not the preferred close in bear weapon? Fast handling, close in devastation, and a bead sight for fast sighting. Why choose a long range rifle for a close in job?
Because a rifle is what we use to hunt elk.....bears are secondary.
Curiosity, from those who have faced bears, why is a pump shotgun with solid slugs or 00buck, not the preferred close in bear weapon? Fast handling, close in devastation, and a bead sight for fast sighting. Why choose a long range rifle for a close in job?
Because a rifle is what we use to hunt elk.....bears are secondary.
But you are NOT hunting, you are recovering a dead animal, and watching out for carnivores.
No blame game here. And I have not read all the pages. But an observation.......
There is a definite downside to sticking an arrow in an Elk in the afternoon. Bone soured in the morning......plus a grizzly buffet!
Afternoon thermals can also be wish washy.
if the elk was shot in the afternoon, and gotten to the next day.....it was more than likely spoiled.......at that point you need to assume, a bear will be on it.......lets wait and see what smokepole has to say....he should be able to google...spoiled elk, and grizzly bear....and get back to us.....bob
Could have died overnight and the meat be fine...
They gotta go see regardless...
Greg, Elk are very bad about spoiling since they are so thick, and in mild temps, you have to get them open ASAP. The neck is the first to go with it being under the cape, and no avenue for the heat to escape.
You can leave one on the mountain overnight to retrieve the next day, but only after you field dress, wash blood out of the cavity and off the meat, situate the rear legs open to get air into the cavity, "and" the evening temps and into the next morning "have to be" cold enough to protect the meat from spoilage.
Laughing....
Not near my first rodeo my man but thanks for the pointers....laughing...
The neck is the first to go as it's under the cape? What about the rest of it under the cape that's a bit thicker than the neck? Laughing...
If you leave a track job of an alive critter overnight not to bump, which often times is the only chance of recovery, time of death may occur at any point meaning that when you find critter the next morning, time of death might have been not too long previously and with a beating heart, meat is bueno....
PS- I'm in AZ and we take potential meat spoilage to about as high as they go, even in elk season. I'm pretty well versed in it....
Curiosity, from those who have faced bears, why is a pump shotgun with solid slugs or 00buck, not the preferred close in bear weapon? Fast handling, close in devastation, and a bead sight for fast sighting. Why choose a long range rifle for a close in job?
Because a rifle is what we use to hunt elk.....bears are secondary.
But you are NOT hunting, you are recovering a dead animal, and watching out for carnivores.
Because we can pack 50 lbs of gear in when packing , that being a 30-378 that kills at close range or closer yet......
Curiosity, from those who have faced bears, why is a pump shotgun with solid slugs or 00buck, not the preferred close in bear weapon? Fast handling, close in devastation, and a bead sight for fast sighting. Why choose a long range rifle for a close in job?
Because a rifle is what we use to hunt elk.....bears are secondary.
But you are NOT hunting, you are recovering a dead animal, and watching out for carnivores.
Because we can pack 50 lbs of gear in when packing , that being a 30-378 that kills at close range or closer yet......
So does the guide also hunt? Or is his purpose only for the client? Never did a guided hunt, myself. Is his rifle more as a backup for his client, or a defensive weapon, in which case would it not make sense to be designed for closer range?
Curiosity, from those who have faced bears, why is a pump shotgun with solid slugs or 00buck, not the preferred close in bear weapon? Fast handling, close in devastation, and a bead sight for fast sighting. Why choose a long range rifle for a close in job?
Because a rifle is what we use to hunt elk.....bears are secondary.
But you are NOT hunting, you are recovering a dead animal, and watching out for carnivores.
Because we can pack 50 lbs of gear in when packing , that being a 30-378 that kills at close range or closer yet......
So does the guide also hunt? Or is his purpose only for the client? Never did a guided hunt, myself. Is his rifle more as a backup for his client, or a defensive weapon, in which case would it not make sense to be designed for closer range?
I have never seen a guide carry anything but a handgun or a shotgun, but that's just my experience.
Wow, this is still raging. It is like the movie “Sully” after he ditched the jet in the Hudson River. A whole panel of pilots were given the same opportunity to safely land the plane at an airport, given the information on the condition of the aircraft. It is amazing how a bunch of people were able to get it right and the real pilot didn’t...
smokepole…….no one said to not try to salvage the meat.....if it is maybe bad......no one has said to not go look …...the point is this...if the elk is not recovered that day....but the next morning.....
it might be wise to think, that just maybe...a bear has found it, and just maybe a person would be wise, to approach the carcass as if there was a bear on it.
maybe they did.....but going off what info is out there.....it sounds kind of like a cluster......its just a discussion...…..bob
smokepole…….no one said to not try to salvage the meat.....if it is maybe bad......no one has said to not go look …...the point is this...if the elk is not recovered that day....but the next morning.....
it might be wise to think, that just maybe...a bear has found it, and just maybe a person would be wise, to approach the carcass as if there was a bear on it.
maybe they did.....but going off what info is out there.....it sounds kind of like a cluster......its just a discussion...…..bob
Bob, I agree 100% and I said as much a few pages back. The information I've heard, scant as it is, seemed to indicate that the bears weren't on the carcass when the hunters arrived, but charged them as they were dragging it out of cover with the horses. Which would definitely make it a cluster.
With all due respect, a man with a gun is at the top of the apex. Most grizzlies comport themselves accordingly; those that don't need to be eliminated from the population. If not they will continue and in this case teach their offspring.
None of them will comport themselves by your standard, given similar circumstances to the present case.
You may as well launch cruise missiles into the lake every time someone drowns in it. Makes just as much sense.
Now, the case of a bear who has been habituated to eating human offerings, or from garbage cans, is a different case, and the only solution in those cases may well be destruction. But there is no evidence that this was the situation in the present case. These bears were in their own habitat, just doing what grizzlies do, tragedy though it may be for the human victims.
Bullsh**. Avoiding humans is 100% a learned behavior, and it can be unlearned. Both by individual animals and generationally.
Brings to recall the bears of the Pelley River area. Some here may have read about them.
smokepole…….no one said to not try to salvage the meat.....if it is maybe bad......no one has said to not go look …...the point is this...if the elk is not recovered that day....but the next morning.....
it might be wise to think, that just maybe...a bear has found it, and just maybe a person would be wise, to approach the carcass as if there was a bear on it.
maybe they did.....but going off what info is out there.....it sounds kind of like a cluster......its just a discussion...…..bob
Bob, I agree 100% and I said as much a few pages back. The information I've heard, scant as it is, seemed to indicate that the bears weren't on the carcass when the hunters arrived, but charged them as they were dragging it out of cover with the horses. Which would definitely make it a cluster.
It might also explain why the horse was still there at all.
[quote=Angus1895]No blame game here. And I have not read all the pages. But an observation.......
There is a definite downside to sticking an arrow in an Elk in the afternoon. Bone soured in the morning......plus a grizzly buffet!
Afternoon thermals can also be wish washy.
if the elk was shot in the afternoon, and gotten to the next day.....it was more than likely spoiled.......at that point you need to assume, a bear will be on it.......lets wait and see what smokepole has to say....he should be able to google...spoiled elk, and grizzly bear....and get back to us.....bob
Could have died overnight and the meat be fine...
They gotta go see regardless...
Greg, Elk are very bad about spoiling since they are so thick, and in mild temps, you have to get them open ASAP. The neck is the first to go with it being under the cape, and no avenue for the heat to escape.
You can leave one on the mountain overnight to retrieve the next day, but only after you field dress, wash blood out of the cavity and off the meat, situate the rear legs open to get air into the cavity, "and" the evening temps and into the next morning "have to be" cold enough to protect the meat from spoilage.
Originally Posted by GregW
Laughing....
Not near my first rodeo my man but thanks for the pointers....laughing...
And I'm supposed to know that when you make your very vague statement, "Could have died overnight and the meat be fine..." with zero clarification? Yeah, I'm laughing at how you think somebody is supposed to just fill in the blanks you left...laughing here bud.
Originally Posted by GregW
The neck is the first to go as it's under the cape? What about the rest of it under the cape that's a bit thicker than the neck? Laughing...
The laugh is on you making a fool out of yourself here while you fail to mention the rest of what I said. I went on to discuss the rest of it under the cape that's a bit thicker than the neck while telling how you need to field dress it. Are you really that mentally bankrupt to lower yourself to the level of these other mentally bankrupt degenerates here?
Originally Posted by GregW
If you leave a track job of an alive critter overnight not to bump, which often times is the only chance of recovery, time of death may occur at any point meaning that when you find critter the next morning, time of death might have been not too long previously and with a beating heart, meat is bueno....
Really? I believe I covered that already:
Originally Posted by ElkSlayer91
The guide had to have known it was a 99.9% chance they would just find green meat.
My only thought here is the guide, knowing it was a wound shot and not a kill shot, was hoping they could find a weak and alive, wounded bull, and finish him and still have good meat to pack-out.
But...you're not here to discuss what I said, are you? You're a fanboy of fakepole, here to show the world how mentally bankrupt you are, while attempting to bust my balls...Thanks for the laughs. BWAHAHAHAHA.
Originally Posted by GregW
PS- I'm in AZ and we take potential meat spoilage to about as high as they go, even in elk season. I'm pretty well versed in it....
Yeah, who would've thunk in AZ you need to know a little about spoilage....laughing.
[quote=Angus1895]No blame game here. And I have not read all the pages. But an observation.......
There is a definite downside to sticking an arrow in an Elk in the afternoon. Bone soured in the morning......plus a grizzly buffet!
Afternoon thermals can also be wish washy.
if the elk was shot in the afternoon, and gotten to the next day.....it was more than likely spoiled.......at that point you need to assume, a bear will be on it.......lets wait and see what smokepole has to say....he should be able to google...spoiled elk, and grizzly bear....and get back to us.....bob
Could have died overnight and the meat be fine...
They gotta go see regardless...
Greg, Elk are very bad about spoiling since they are so thick, and in mild temps, you have to get them open ASAP. The neck is the first to go with it being under the cape, and no avenue for the heat to escape.
You can leave one on the mountain overnight to retrieve the next day, but only after you field dress, wash blood out of the cavity and off the meat, situate the rear legs open to get air into the cavity, "and" the evening temps and into the next morning "have to be" cold enough to protect the meat from spoilage.
Originally Posted by GregW
Laughing....
Not near my first rodeo my man but thanks for the pointers....laughing...
And I'm supposed to know that when you make your very vague statement, "Could have died overnight and the meat be fine..." with zero clarification? Yeah, I'm laughing at how you think somebody is supposed to just fill in the blanks you left...laughing here bud.
Originally Posted by GregW
The neck is the first to go as it's under the cape? What about the rest of it under the cape that's a bit thicker than the neck? Laughing...
The laugh is on you making a fool out of yourself here while you fail to mention the rest of what I said. I went on to discuss the rest of it under the cape that's a bit thicker than the neck while telling how you need to field dress it. Are you really that mentally bankrupt to lower yourself to the level of these other mentally bankrupt degenerates here?
Originally Posted by GregW
If you leave a track job of an alive critter overnight not to bump, which often times is the only chance of recovery, time of death may occur at any point meaning that when you find critter the next morning, time of death might have been not too long previously and with a beating heart, meat is bueno....
Really? I believe I covered that already:
Originally Posted by ElkSlayer91
The guide had to have known it was a 99.9% chance they would just find green meat.
My only thought here is the guide, knowing it was a wound shot and not a kill shot, was hoping they could find a weak and alive, wounded bull, and finish him and still have good meat to pack-out.
But...you're not here to discuss what I said, are you? You're a fanboy of fakepole, here to show the world how mentally bankrupt you are, while attempting to bust my balls...Thanks for the laughs. BWAHAHAHAHA.
Originally Posted by GregW
PS- I'm in AZ and we take potential meat spoilage to about as high as they go, even in elk season. I'm pretty well versed in it....
Yeah, who would've thunk in AZ you need to know a little about spoilage....laughing.
Whew....
Who has a handle named elkslayer? Bet you've slayed a "ton" of elk....
No one gives a damnn. I'm half convinced you are a woman with the drama you start.
You've been spreading your vast knowledge all over this board. Folks like you come and go all the time. Just like JeffO, trying waaay to hard to act like you've done something....
[quote=lvmiker] You are getting more amusing w/ every post.
People usually say the same when they are incapable of refuting the facts I post when debating liberals online. You are no different.
Originally Posted by lvmiker
Your "well thought out theory " in the absence of fact= a guess
Your public education failed you.
“Well thought out Theory” based on “present known facts” = “How intelligent people operate”. You obviously fail in the intelligent department, like your failed public education you received.
Originally Posted by lvmiker
Sarcasm was not recognized because the quality of your thinking substantiates the opinion of your friends.
Now see, here is a perfect example of what you spoke of above, “absence of fact”. You are completely incapable of “substantiating the opinion of my friends”, because you have not personally interviewed them and acquired facts through discovery.
Nice try. You fail, again, liberal.
Originally Posted by lvmiker
If it was called Philmont when you supposedly went face to face w/ a bear tell us again which state it was in. The republic of texas no longer exists.
Again, your public education fails you.
Here, let me explain. It is very simple, even for an idiot liberal.
Republic of TEXAS is a sovereign nation. You “can not” annex a sovereign nation by a joint resolution. Republic of TEXAS was annexed by a joint resolution, which renders that null and void legally. Sovereign nations must be annexed by treaty. Therefore the Republic of TEXAS is still a sovereign nation based on solid law, dating back to black letter written English law.
Now, roll that and smoke it with fakepole pal.
Originally Posted by lvmiker
Smoking weed is not on my agenda but you seem to have an unseemly fascination w/ homoerotica that causes you to guess about many things, or is that another of your "well thought out theories based on many years of.........?
It’s based on you and fakepole showing back up here “together”. Males who show up together and troll on a site generally are…you know.
Originally Posted by lvmiker
mike r
Does signing your name at the end of your posts satisfy your narcissism?
Originally Posted by lvmiker
You make your educators proud, when unable to compete immediately resort to countering w/ homo and liberal,
Never said homo. All you liberals know is to lie..lie...lie, like your "Rules for Radicals" book teaches you, written by the Communist Saul Alinsky.
Originally Posted by lvmiker
your debate skills are representative of those who think they live in a state that is a sovereign nation. I imagine you are their rep in the UN.
And again, we all know liberals completely ignore the written law, just like you just demonstrated right here. I gave you concrete evidence supported by written law, not my opinion, written law. You ignore written law, and we all know who ignore written law.
Fact: My debate skills, along with facts, written law, is exposing your ignorance.
Originally Posted by lvmiker
Tell us some more about....that one summer in scout camp.
It was a great time, long before the scouts were infiltrated with the snowflakes.
i have had some close encounters with black bear, but have not with a grizz. what captivates me is the choice of ammunition and the glock. few years ago i was hunting in an area of colorado where the state said no grizz. this contradicted with my brothers in law, both cattlemen, that knew the area. They said not many, but they were there.
Although there are (unfortunately) no grizzlies in Colorado, I want you to keep saying that as loudly as possible--maybe it will dissuade a few Lifestyle Immigrants from moving to my state............
Curiosity, from those who have faced bears, why is a pump shotgun with solid slugs or 00buck, not the preferred close in bear weapon? Fast handling, close in devastation, and a bead sight for fast sighting. Why choose a long range rifle for a close in job?
In my two posts here, I mentioned a shotgun that belonged to the guide that was in a scabbard on one side of his saddle while hunting caribou. It was indeed a short barreled Rem 870 12 Gauge shotgun - 20" iirc - and he had it loaded with slugs especially for close range bear encounters. He also had a 30-06 rifle in a scabbard on the other side of his saddle and I had a 7MM Rem Mag rifle for caribou. He never suggested the use of a rifle for either of us as the bear visibly approached the caribou kill from a distance.
[quote=Angus1895]No blame game here. And I have not read all the pages. But an observation.......
There is a definite downside to sticking an arrow in an Elk in the afternoon. Bone soured in the morning......plus a grizzly buffet!
Afternoon thermals can also be wish washy.
if the elk was shot in the afternoon, and gotten to the next day.....it was more than likely spoiled.......at that point you need to assume, a bear will be on it.......lets wait and see what smokepole has to say....he should be able to google...spoiled elk, and grizzly bear....and get back to us.....bob
The guide had to have known it was a 99.9% chance they would just find green meat.
Originally Posted by smokepole
The second thing I'd say is, you guys are a little off on your math to say there's 99.9% chance the meat is spoiled. Depends on the situation. I've only shot two elk in the evening and needed to come back in the morning to find them, how about you guys? Both of them were in archery season in Colorado, and the meat was good on both so I must be part of that mythical 0.01% group.
So you are 2 for 2 in wounding Elk where they both suffered through the night long enough to die just before you found them, is what "your own words" just proved.
You go William Tell. You're our Huckleberry.
Originally Posted by smokepole
And to top it off, when we got to one of 'em at first light, a big old black bear had just gotten there before us, ain't that something?
You're a great "story teller". You should write fiction. You've missed your calling, William.
So you are 2 for 2 in wounding Elk where they both suffered through the night long enough to die just before you found them, is what "your own words" just proved.
Wrong slick, on both counts. What you don't know could fill volumes, and it looks like you're doing your best to fill 'em, right here.
Btw - I appologize.....I didn't realize that I was talking with Matt Dillon when I made the comments about short barreled handguns... my bad. It never came up in conversations, but I'm betting that my guide would have suggested that even Matt should leave his cavalry model 45 at home and to bring something with a shorter barrel. Maybe not....
I’m not Matt Dillon, but I can clear leather faster than Matt Dillon. I’m not Wyatt Earp, but I can clear leather faster than Wyatt Earp. I’m not Billy the Kid, but I can clear leather faster than Billy the Kid.
I’m the fastest gun alive.
BTW: Anyone who'd tell someone to look left and start filling the sky with lead, while a bear is around in the hope to scare off any "potential unseen bears", while hoping a real bear doesn't step out to maul their client to death while they reload from filling the sky with lead, is in fact a complete idiot.......even Matt Dillon would tell you that pard.
P.S. I didn't say "you", or your guide were a city slicker.....read.....read....read.
I'm in AZ and we take potential meat spoilage to about as high as they go,.
Prob’ly not. Ever lived in a remote African village? Rancid is an aquired taste.
Have at it...grin...
A "well aged" steak, is one that has started to decompose. And for that matter, Europeans used to leave it exposed until it was "well hung" . Different folks like different tastes.
Curiosity, from those who have faced bears, why is a pump shotgun with solid slugs or 00buck, not the preferred close in bear weapon? Fast handling, close in devastation, and a bead sight for fast sighting. Why choose a long range rifle for a close in job?
Because a rifle is what we use to hunt elk.....bears are secondary.
But you are NOT hunting, you are recovering a dead animal, and watching out for carnivores.
And it is righteous to keep that firearm tucked deep in your pack when doing so...
So you are 2 for 2 in wounding Elk where they both suffered through the night long enough to die just before you found them, is what "your own words" just proved.
Wrong slick, on both counts. What you don't know could fill volumes, and it looks like you're doing your best to fill 'em, right here.
Keep going, you're doing great.
I know how to fill in the blanks, fakes like you leave wide open, and if you think you can escape knowledgeable Elk hunters with your line of tripe I have seen just in the past few weeks, you must have some good Kolorodee smoke.
I'm in AZ and we take potential meat spoilage to about as high as they go,.
Prob’ly not. Ever lived in a remote African village? Rancid is an aquired taste.
Have at it...grin...
A "well aged" steak, is one that has started to decompose. And for that matter, Europeans used to leave it exposed until it was "well hung" . Different folks like different tastes.
This meat discussion has turned into this? We are talking about bone rotted meat on a mountain that does or doesn't smell like skunk or look like pudding, not controlled aged beef steaks. How many elk have you found the morning after Kellory?
Some of you guys love to tell everyone else how smart you are for no apparent reason. It's no wonder most of the good guys on this forum left. It's threads just like this ...
Btw - I appologize.....I didn't realize that I was talking with Matt Dillon when I made the comments about short barreled handguns... my bad. It never came up in conversations, but I'm betting that my guide would have suggested that even Matt should leave his cavalry model 45 at home and to bring something with a shorter barrel. Maybe not....
I’m not Matt Dillon, but I can clear leather faster than Matt Dillon. I’m not Wyatt Earp, but I can clear leather faster than Wyatt Earp. I’m not Billy the Kid, but I can clear leather faster than Billy the Kid.
I’m the fastest gun alive.
BTW: Anyone who'd tell someone to look left and start filling the sky with lead, while a bear is around in the hope to scare off any "potential unseen bears", while hoping a real bear doesn't step out to maul their client to death while they reload from filling the sky with lead, is in fact a complete idiot.......even Matt Dillon would tell you that pard.
P.S. I didn't say "you", or your guide were a city slicker.....read.....read....read.
You're not even close to understanding what I said. And no one was going to "fill the sky with lead" "in the hope to scare off any "potential unseen bears"", Matt. But please do carry on. You're doing great making it up as you go.
I hope you sleep well tonight. I know that I will, but I'm not worked up because I'm clinging to a life boat over any of this...........
Elkslayer, Old man Polesmoker has nothing else in his sad and argumentative existence except picking fights over parsed words. I generally ignore his stupidity because anything he gets involved with devolves into his little piss ant mini rants. He is known to be a pain in the ass by many that’s why he has to lash out in his interactions here otherwise he’d be ignored completely. Like the old saying about little kids goes it’s also pertinent to grumpy elderly men....negative attention is better than no attention at all.
Old man smokepole needs to tighten the Velcro on his tenny runners with orthopedic insoles and get ready to flee from danger, it’s lurking around every corner of his 1 bedroom 1/2 bath apartment. 😁
LOL, you're the one calling a guy you've never met a coward, over a situation you have no first hand knowledge of. Ok And Im the grumpy one. As far as being old, I'm 60 and i guarantee i could run your punk ass into the ground.
And go ahead, cast your lot with old elkslayer there, a self-professed expert who got dogpiled for giving stupid advice and he's still feeling the sting.
Thank you for coming back. My "stupid advice' proved you are too stupid to be able to understand how to aim a gun at different distances when the directions were placed at your feet. That makes you a complete idiot.
I got "dogpiled" by your friends here, who clearly couldn't understand the same, a badge of honor I shall cherish for life.
"Everybody but me is stupid," LOL.
Perfect and standard typical liberal obfuscation here. Can't refute the facts, so they just make crazy azz statements and laugh....not knowing they are the laughing stock to the informed and intelligent.
You see guys, fakepole can't even figure out how to hold-under while aiming on an animal when given the ballistics of a particular gun, something bow hunters have done for ages to compensate for deer squatting at the sound of a release....and ace here, fakepole, claims to be a bowhunter, which even makes this fact more laughable, being he is, through his own words, unfamiliar with hold-under.
Never said I was. But a weapon in a pack is a near useless thing. Everyone who talks of bear attacks, remarks upon the speed and power of the animal. Carrying a gun in your pack, and not with you, is like leaving your CCW on the bedside table when you leave home. Nothing bad azz about it.
You're not even close to understanding what I said. And no one was going to "fill the sky with lead" "in the hope to scare off any "potential unseen bears"", Matt. But please do carry on. You're doing great making it up as you go.
Your words....Your words prove you to be untruthful. Be sure and add sauce to make it more bearable while you eat your own words.
He had ordered me to stand to his left at that time looking in the opposite direction of the bear in case there were bears on both sides of us. He told me in case he fired to turn to my left around him and to start opening up with my handgun.
Originally Posted by BayouRover
I hope you sleep well tonight. I know that I will, but I'm not worked up because I'm clinging to a life boat over any of this...........
This time of year in warm weather, you have to get them opened ASAP after a kill. You can't leave them overnight, especially one not field dressed.
More nonsense from an inexperienced elk hunter.ES 91 you have no clue when that bull died. Could have been within a few hours of the hunter and guide showing up.
Please continue to embarrass yourself here. It is quite entertaining. The prior poster did not discuss "when the bull died". he simply made a statement, "I doubt an elk would spoil that quick".
Where's the mention of time the elk dies troll?
Now who is the inexperienced?
Try taking some tutoring in reading comprehension, or just keep stalking me and embarrassing yourself here, and on other threads you've visited tonight in your trolling attempts to get an acknowledgement.
Not possible, three years was the maximum allowable period for taking malaria meds, after that 500mg of chloroquine phosphate every week started seriously screwing with your liver, optic nerves and hearing. I have some significant hearing loss now, dunno if it’s guns, chloroquine, motorcycles or the ear infections I got that pierced both eardrums when I was over there.
You're not even close to understanding what I said. And no one was going to "fill the sky with lead" "in the hope to scare off any "potential unseen bears"", Matt. But please do carry on. You're doing great making it up as you go.
Your words....Your words prove you to be untruthful. Be sure and add sauce to make it more bearable while you eat your own words.
He had ordered me to stand to his left at that time looking in the opposite direction of the bear in case there were bears on both sides of us. He told me in case he fired to turn to my left around him and to start opening up with my handgun.
Try to picture the guide with a shotgun facing south toward the bear that we knew was coming. I was on his left side and slightly behind him looking north just in case something came in from that direction. He distinctly told me to turn to my left around him if necessary if/when he fired the shotgun. At that time we would both be facing the bear that we already knew was still coming in, and hopefully both of us would be putting lead on that target. At that time the 'back door" that I was watching would be unattended since we both would know by then that someone was pounding hard at the front door. I never asked, but I've always assumed that by him telling me to turn left around him was so that I would not potentially shoot him as I turned toward the bear that he had already fired his shotgun at at least one time at that point.
Fortunately none of that was necessary or happened, and the first thing I heard from the guide over my right shoulder was, "Holy phouc, he finally turned".
Originally Posted by BayouRover
I hope you sleep well tonight. I know that I will, but I'm not worked up because I'm clinging to a life boat over any of this...........
You're not even close to understanding what I said. And no one was going to "fill the sky with lead" "in the hope to scare off any "potential unseen bears"", Matt. But please do carry on. You're doing great making it up as you go.
Your words....Your words prove you to be untruthful. Be sure and add sauce to make it more bearable while you eat your own words.
He had ordered me to stand to his left at that time looking in the opposite direction of the bear in case there were bears on both sides of us. He told me in case he fired to turn to my left around him and to start opening up with my handgun.
Try to picture the guide with a shotgun facing south toward the bear that we knew was coming. I was on his left side and slightly behind him looking north just in case something came in from that direction. He distinctly told me to turn to my left around him if necessary if/when he fired the shotgun. At that time we would both be facing the bear that we already knew was still coming in, and hopefully both of us would be putting lead on that target. At that time the 'back door" that I was watching would be unattended since we both would know by then that someone was pounding hard at the front door. I never asked, but I've always assumed that by him telling me to turn left around him was so that I would not potentially shoot him as I turned toward the bear that he had already fired his shotgun at at least one time at that point.
Originally Posted by BayouRover
I hope you sleep well tonight. I know that I will, but I'm not worked up because I'm clinging to a life boat over any of this...........
You're drowning, and don't even know it.
My head is well above the water line. I'm fine
That's not what you said the first time, and all people can go by on the internet is what you type. I'm glad you both made it out unharmed, so you can be here tonight to witness my fast draws on the internet, while enjoying a beverage.
It's past time to eat, though this has been fun busting liberal's chops. I'm hungry.
Never said I was. But a weapon in a pack is a near useless thing. Everyone who talks of bear attacks, remarks upon the speed and power of the animal. Carrying a gun in your pack, and not with you, is like leaving your CCW on the bedside table when you leave home. Nothing bad azz about it.
You're not even close to understanding what I said. And no one was going to "fill the sky with lead" "in the hope to scare off any "potential unseen bears"", Matt. But please do carry on. You're doing great making it up as you go.
Your words....Your words prove you to be untruthful. Be sure and add sauce to make it more bearable while you eat your own words.
He had ordered me to stand to his left at that time looking in the opposite direction of the bear in case there were bears on both sides of us. He told me in case he fired to turn to my left around him and to start opening up with my handgun.
Try to picture the guide with a shotgun facing south toward the bear that we knew was coming. I was on his left side and slightly behind him looking north just in case something came in from that direction. He distinctly told me to turn to my left around him if necessary if/when he fired the shotgun. At that time we would both be facing the bear that we already knew was still coming in, and hopefully both of us would be putting lead on that target. At that time the 'back door" that I was watching would be unattended since we both would know by then that someone was pounding hard at the front door. I never asked, but I've always assumed that by him telling me to turn left around him was so that I would not potentially shoot him as I turned toward the bear that he had already fired his shotgun at at least one time at that point.
Originally Posted by BayouRover
I hope you sleep well tonight. I know that I will, but I'm not worked up because I'm clinging to a life boat over any of this...........
You're drowning, and don't even know it.
My head is well above the water line. I'm fine
That's not what you said the first time, and all people can go by on the internet is what you type. I'm glad you both made it out unharmed, so you can be here tonight to witness my fast draws on the internet, while enjoying a beverage.
Maybe try reading the first post with what you now understand from what I posted just above here in red and I think you'll see that I was saying the same things without the detail the first time.
It's past time to eat, though this has been fun busting liberal's chops. I'm hungry.
Gents, There is one man dead leaving a widow and orphans, there is another man that has to live the rest of his life with the consequences of what occurred. None of us were there and none of us can say what we may have done in that situation.
Out of respect for the family with the lost father and the person who survived just let this go. There is no point in going on and on when none of know what really occurred and never will.
Others have identified you as a liberal, not just me....fact. You obviously are incapable of hiding that liberal stench.
Originally Posted by smokepole
That's damn funny.
Your posting is even more funny.
Originally Posted by smokepole
And no, you're not very good at it. If I could buy you for what you're worth, and sell you for what you think you're worth, I'd retire tomorrow and buy a place in the Bahamas.
My rising AMD stock makes me worth a lot. Should I continue to ride it or cash out Mr. Financial genius? Are you worth much, or are you just another broke dic troll on the internet? (defendants council rises with objection).....I retract my question your honor....
Originally Posted by smokepole
Why don't you complain about how much I post again, that seemed to be one of your best points.
Yes, that was quite fun exposing someone who posts from sunrise to midnight, being only the mentally challenged would have a habit as such or a retired govt employee mooching off the tax payer with a govt pension or a broke unemployed dic.....and you are which?
Originally Posted by smokepole
And it looks like you put some effort into tracking down my posting habits, I'm flattered.
Not as much tracking effort as you did to find your two wounded elk, who suffered all night before they died, so you could still have fresh meat.
Lecturing a guide on care of big game meat, it don't get no better than this!!!!
Answering a very "vague" comment with helpful pointers for future beginner hunters to educate themselves, is not lecturing.
To someone with a limited intellect, such as yourself, then,yes, it would be considered lecturing for those half-way down the left-side of the Bell Curve, and their fan-club.
Never said I was. But a weapon in a pack is a near useless thing. Everyone who talks of bear attacks, remarks upon the speed and power of the animal. Carrying a gun in your pack, and not with you, is like leaving your CCW on the bedside table when you leave home. Nothing bad azz about it.
Whew... Who has a handle named elkslayer? Bet you've slayed a "ton" of elk....
When your fellow elk hunting buddies give you a nickname, based on your success, and ask you to guide for their high affluent clients too, well.....
Don't be jealous because you don't have repeat clients while wasting your life away trolling on a forum board.
Originally Posted by GregW
No one gives a damnn.
Let's see. A *guide* [cough] trolls another person on the internet, and then states nobody "gives a damn" in their limited intellectual capacity to convince the dark matter in space the *guide* [cough] is a somebody with their clown statement.
I don't give a damn what you think / say / do. That is my "one" opinion.
Originally Posted by GregW
I'm half convinced you are a woman with the drama you start.
Another liberal mental case here....wanting to place blame on the other person for the crap they started. It is called a false negative, and only Communist liberal trolls use this technique.....and the mentally sick.
I embarrassed you by making you eat crow here from your lies you posted. Deal with it mr [cough] *guide* [cough]
Originally Posted by GregW
You've been spreading your vast knowledge all over this board.
You realize people can go look at my posting history, and read my posts, and see you are lying again right here, right? No, liberals are incapable of thinking ahead. They just repeat lie after lie after lie in the hopes it will stick. Another Saul Alinsky student you are.
Originally Posted by GregW
Folks like you come and go all the time. Just like JeffO, trying waaay to hard to act like you've done something....
Who's trying waaaay too hard here mr *guide* [cough] troll?
I've "done something" for over two decades while elk hunting...got the mounted trophies....the friendships acquired along the way with other "true professional guides", who by the way don't call themselves a guide and troll on a forum board, unlike you.
[quote=GregW][quote=BobMt][quote=Angus1895]No blame game here. And I have not read all the pages. But an observation.......
There is a definite downside to sticking an arrow in an Elk in the afternoon. Bone soured in the morning......plus a grizzly buffet!
Afternoon thermals can also be wish washy.
if the elk was shot in the afternoon, and gotten to the next day.....it was more than likely spoiled.......at that point you need to assume, a bear will be on it.......lets wait and see what smokepole has to say....he should be able to google...spoiled elk, and grizzly bear....and get back to us.....bob
Could have died overnight and the meat be fine...
They gotta go see regardless...
Greg, Elk are very bad about spoiling since they are so thick, and in mild temps, you have to get them open ASAP. The neck is the first to go with it being under the cape, and no avenue for the heat to escape.
You can leave one on the mountain overnight to retrieve the next day, but only after you field dress, wash blood out of the cavity and off the meat, situate the rear legs open to get air into the cavity, "and" the evening temps and into the next morning "have to be" cold enough to protect the meat from spoilage.
Originally Posted by GregW
Laughing....
Not near my first rodeo my man but thanks for the pointers....laughing...
And I'm supposed to know that when you make your very vague statement, "Could have died overnight and the meat be fine..." with zero clarification? Yeah, I'm laughing at how you think somebody is supposed to just fill in the blanks you left...laughing here bud.
Originally Posted by GregW
The neck is the first to go as it's under the cape? What about the rest of it under the cape that's a bit thicker than the neck? Laughing...
The laugh is on you making a fool out of yourself here while you fail to mention the rest of what I said. I went on to discuss the rest of it under the cape that's a bit thicker than the neck while telling how you need to field dress it. Are you really that mentally bankrupt to lower yourself to the level of these other mentally bankrupt degenerates here?
Originally Posted by GregW
If you leave a track job of an alive critter overnight not to bump, which often times is the only chance of recovery, time of death may occur at any point meaning that when you find critter the next morning, time of death might have been not too long previously and with a beating heart, meat is bueno....
Really? I believe I covered that already:
Originally Posted by ElkSlayer91
The guide had to have known it was a 99.9% chance they would just find green meat.
My only thought here is the guide, knowing it was a wound shot and not a kill shot, was hoping they could find a weak and alive, wounded bull, and finish him and still have good meat to pack-out.
But...you're not here to discuss what I said, are you? You're a fanboy of fakepole, here to show the world how mentally bankrupt you are, while attempting to bust my balls...Thanks for the laughs. BWAHAHAHAHA.
Originally Posted by GregW
PS- I'm in AZ and we take potential meat spoilage to about as high as they go, even in elk season. I'm pretty well versed in it....
Yeah, who would've thunk in AZ you need to know a little about spoilage....laughing
ELKSLAYER91 LET’S SEE SOME PROOF! Slayme is sounding a lot like “Sharp Things” twin...Possible sock puppet. Slayer, you’re a net savvy Texan. Hang some pictures of all those 350”-380” bulls you have killed. All we’ve seen is you running your mouth without anything to backup your big hat talk. Put some colors up and dazzle us with your amazing hunting skills and big fur you’ve burned...😎
Curiosity, from those who have faced bears, why is a pump shotgun with solid slugs or 00buck, not the preferred close in bear weapon? Fast handling, close in devastation, and a bead sight for fast sighting. Why choose a long range rifle for a close in job?
Guess what, you have to aim a shotgun, just as you do a rifle, or you ain't hitting sheit.
Shotgun ammo is HEAVY. Never seen anything outside of a dove field that a shotgun is a better choice than a rifle.
Curiosity, from those who have faced bears, why is a pump shotgun with solid slugs or 00buck, not the preferred close in bear weapon? Fast handling, close in devastation, and a bead sight for fast sighting. Why choose a long range rifle for a close in job?
Guess what, you have to aim a shotgun, just as you do a rifle, or you ain't hitting sheit.
Shotgun ammo is HEAVY. Never seen anything outside of a dove field that a shotgun is a better choice than a rifle.
I grew up with shotguns. It's a natural extension of my arm. Shotgun ammo ain't much heavier than my .450 bushmaster loads, and I don't count ounces when it's my life on the line. Besides, even a loaded ammo belt is not uncomfortable to carry long term. (Ymmv)
Curiosity, from those who have faced bears, why is a pump shotgun with solid slugs or 00buck, not the preferred close in bear weapon? Fast handling, close in devastation, and a bead sight for fast sighting. Why choose a long range rifle for a close in job?
Because a shotgun lacks penetration, even on the relatively thin skull of the big cats.
Curiosity, from those who have faced bears, why is a pump shotgun with solid slugs or 00buck, not the preferred close in bear weapon? Fast handling, close in devastation, and a bead sight for fast sighting. Why choose a long range rifle for a close in job?
Because a shotgun lacks penetration, even on the relatively thin skull of the big cats.
True. While bowhunting, a large caliber handgun, 357 on up, is best because of its deployability, maneuverability, power and weight. My preference when returning to one of my kills to pack out the remainder, whether rifle or bow season, is to carry my 45/70. I feel my Marlin Guide 45/70 is the ideal weapon for a close-in bear encounter. My 454 Ruger Alaskan is a close second. Luckily, I've never had to test my opinion or preference.
Curiosity, from those who have faced bears, why is a pump shotgun with solid slugs or 00buck, not the preferred close in bear weapon? Fast handling, close in devastation, and a bead sight for fast sighting. Why choose a long range rifle for a close in job?
Because a shotgun lacks penetration, even on the relatively thin skull of the big cats.
True. While bowhunting, a large caliber handgun, 357 on up, is best because of its deployability, maneuverability, power and weight. My preference when returning to one of my kills to pack out the remainder, whether rifle or bow season, is to carry my 45/70. I feel my Marlin Guide 45/70 is the ideal weapon for a close-in bear encounter. My 454 Ruger Alaskan is a close second. Luckily, I've never had to test my opinion or preference.
Thank you for an intelligent response. I hope you never have to test your choices, either. Ohio does not ALLOW a second weapon when hunting deer (bow or gun). Only exception is your CCW if you have one.
Btw - I appologize.....I didn't realize that I was talking with Matt Dillon when I made the comments about short barreled handguns... my bad. It never came up in conversations, but I'm betting that my guide would have suggested that even Matt should leave his cavalry model 45 at home and to bring something with a shorter barrel. Maybe not....
I’m not Matt Dillon, but I can clear leather faster than Matt Dillon. I’m not Wyatt Earp, but I can clear leather faster than Wyatt Earp. I’m not Billy the Kid, but I can clear leather faster than Billy the Kid.
I’m the fastest gun alive.
BTW: Anyone who'd tell someone to look left and start filling the sky with lead, while a bear is around in the hope to scare off any "potential unseen bears", while hoping a real bear doesn't step out to maul their client to death while they reload from filling the sky with lead, is in fact a complete idiot.......even Matt Dillon would tell you that pard.
P.S. I didn't say "you", or your guide were a city slicker.....read.....read....read.
Curiosity, from those who have faced bears, why is a pump shotgun with solid slugs or 00buck, not the preferred close in bear weapon? Fast handling, close in devastation, and a bead sight for fast sighting. Why choose a long range rifle for a close in job?
Guess what, you have to aim a shotgun, just as you do a rifle, or you ain't hitting sheit.
Shotgun ammo is HEAVY. Never seen anything outside of a dove field that a shotgun is a better choice than a rifle.
I grew up with shotguns. It's a natural extension of my arm. Shotgun ammo ain't much heavier than my .450 bushmaster loads, and I don't count ounces when it's my life on the line. Besides, even a loaded ammo belt is not uncomfortable to carry long term. (Ymmv)
Compelling, but you still have to AIM with said extension.
Try wearing blue if you go where bears are, it might have the same effect as at do with deer.
Originally Posted by kellory
Deer see blue very well. They see more into the ultraviolet than we do. Camo works better on us than them anyways. Deer can not see red, but we use hunter orange because we see it better than red. The deer would see the yellow portion of orange.
Curiosity, from those who have faced bears, why is a pump shotgun with solid slugs or 00buck, not the preferred close in bear weapon? Fast handling, close in devastation, and a bead sight for fast sighting. Why choose a long range rifle for a close in job?
Because a shotgun lacks penetration, even on the relatively thin skull of the big cats.
True. While bowhunting, a large caliber handgun, 357 on up, is best because of its deployability, maneuverability, power and weight. My preference when returning to one of my kills to pack out the remainder, whether rifle or bow season, is to carry my 45/70. I feel my Marlin Guide 45/70 is the ideal weapon for a close-in bear encounter. My 454 Ruger Alaskan is a close second. Luckily, I've never had to test my opinion or preference.
We are going to start carrying the 50 beowulf AR we have. Pretty good thumper really. Quick repeat shots.
That said I"m generally still comfortable with the G20 and if not either of the above its whatever is decent and handy.
Mostly if you pay attention and keep your head in the game you'll have much less risk. Regardless the risk is there, we are not top of the food chain and wife and I are ok with that.
Curiosity, from those who have faced bears, why is a pump shotgun with solid slugs or 00buck, not the preferred close in bear weapon? Fast handling, close in devastation, and a bead sight for fast sighting. Why choose a long range rifle for a close in job?
Because a shotgun lacks penetration, even on the relatively thin skull of the big cats.
More on the penetration from Professional Hunter Robin Hurt: "In a split second, the leopard sprang up at me from close quarters but I somehow managed to fire the second barrel with the muzzles less than a foot from its head. But as he was moving so quickly, the shot missed his head, hitting him on the side of the neck. At such close quarters, the ’00’ buckshot had acted like a solid and had absolutely no immediate effect."
Whew... Who has a handle named elkslayer? Bet you've slayed a "ton" of elk....
When your fellow elk hunting buddies give you a nickname, based on your success, and ask you to guide for their high affluent clients too, well.....
Don't be jealous because you don't have repeat clients while wasting your life away trolling on a forum board.
Originally Posted by GregW
No one gives a damnn.
Let's see. A *guide* [cough] trolls another person on the internet, and then states nobody "gives a damn" in their limited intellectual capacity to convince the dark matter in space the *guide* [cough] is a somebody with their clown statement.
I don't give a damn what you think / say / do. That is my "one" opinion.
Originally Posted by GregW
I'm half convinced you are a woman with the drama you start.
Another liberal mental case here....wanting to place blame on the other person for the crap they started. It is called a false negative, and only Communist liberal trolls use this technique.....and the mentally sick.
I embarrassed you by making you eat crow here from your lies you posted. Deal with it mr [cough] *guide* [cough]
Originally Posted by GregW
You've been spreading your vast knowledge all over this board.
You realize people can go look at my posting history, and read my posts, and see you are lying again right here, right? No, liberals are incapable of thinking ahead. They just repeat lie after lie after lie in the hopes it will stick. Another Saul Alinsky student you are.
Originally Posted by GregW
Folks like you come and go all the time. Just like JeffO, trying waaay to hard to act like you've done something....
Who's trying waaaay too hard here mr *guide* [cough] troll?
I've "done something" for over two decades while elk hunting...got the mounted trophies....the friendships acquired along the way with other "true professional guides", who by the way don't call themselves a guide and troll on a forum board, unlike you.
Elkslayer, just how many elk have you taken to get that name from your Texas buddies? No way to know when that bull died and if you say you've never wounded an animal I call BS or you haven't been hunting long. It happens to the best of hunters. Come on up, I'll set you up in a grizz area for a hunt, we'll all see how you fare. Better bring your depends.
Curiosity, from those who have faced bears, why is a pump shotgun with solid slugs or 00buck, not the preferred close in bear weapon? Fast handling, close in devastation, and a bead sight for fast sighting. Why choose a long range rifle for a close in job?
Because a shotgun lacks penetration, even on the relatively thin skull of the big cats.
More on the penetration from Professional Hunter Robin Hurt: "In a split second, the leopard sprang up at me from close quarters but I somehow managed to fire the second barrel with the muzzles less than a foot from its head. But as he was moving so quickly, the shot missed his head, hitting him on the side of the neck. At such close quarters, the ’00’ buckshot had acted like a solid and had absolutely no immediate effect."
An interesting read, thank you. "If there was any fault at all, it was mine in that I changed from my rifle to the shotgun. It was a calculated risk, one I was well aware of, but life is often a gamble and, after all, hunting itself is the chance of the chase. My shot through the neck and into his back would have killed him instantly had it only been from the .500. It was a costly mistake, but one that I would never make again."
Whew... Who has a handle named elkslayer? Bet you've slayed a "ton" of elk....
When your fellow elk hunting buddies give you a nickname, based on your success, and ask you to guide for their high affluent clients too, well.....
Don't be jealous because you don't have repeat clients while wasting your life away trolling on a forum board.
Originally Posted by GregW
No one gives a damnn.
Let's see. A *guide* [cough] trolls another person on the internet, and then states nobody "gives a damn" in their limited intellectual capacity to convince the dark matter in space the *guide* [cough] is a somebody with their clown statement.
I don't give a damn what you think / say / do. That is my "one" opinion.
Originally Posted by GregW
I'm half convinced you are a woman with the drama you start.
Another liberal mental case here....wanting to place blame on the other person for the crap they started. It is called a false negative, and only Communist liberal trolls use this technique.....and the mentally sick.
I embarrassed you by making you eat crow here from your lies you posted. Deal with it mr [cough] *guide* [cough]
Originally Posted by GregW
You've been spreading your vast knowledge all over this board.
You realize people can go look at my posting history, and read my posts, and see you are lying again right here, right? No, liberals are incapable of thinking ahead. They just repeat lie after lie after lie in the hopes it will stick. Another Saul Alinsky student you are.
Originally Posted by GregW
Folks like you come and go all the time. Just like JeffO, trying waaay to hard to act like you've done something....
Who's trying waaaay too hard here mr *guide* [cough] troll?
I've "done something" for over two decades while elk hunting...got the mounted trophies....the friendships acquired along the way with other "true professional guides", who by the way don't call themselves a guide and troll on a forum board, unlike you.
Elkslayer, just how many elk have you taken to get that name from your Texas buddies? No way to know when that bull died and if you say you've never wounded an animal I call BS or you haven't been hunting long. It happens to the best of hunters. Come on up, I'll set you up in a grizz area for a hunt, we'll all see how you fare. Better bring your depends.
FWIW, Bayou Rover is "MASER" ... The pissing his pants, diaper wearing, binky sucking, hiding in the closet from gramps maser.....I suspect ElkSlayer91 is also one of his reincarnations...probably from a different computer...
Curiosity, from those who have faced bears, why is a pump shotgun with solid slugs or 00buck, not the preferred close in bear weapon? Fast handling, close in devastation, and a bead sight for fast sighting. Why choose a long range rifle for a close in job?
Because a shotgun lacks penetration, even on the relatively thin skull of the big cats.
.. .When your fellow elk hunting buddies give you a nickname, based on your success, and ask you to guide for their high affluent clients too, well.....
Lets see, from Texas, calls a bull-- Imperial, shows no dead elk pics, can't score a bull, suggests one of the most bizarre theories I have seen on sighting in an elk rifle.
Ya for sure an elk slayer. Your buddies call you elk slayer? You can't get them to stop?
Killer griz never slowed charge Bear spray likely not deployed until after initial attack, officials say. By Mike Koshmrl Sep 19, 2018 Updated 6 hrs ago 2 Uptain Fatality Map Buy Now
Uptain grizzly death Wyoming Game and Fish Department large carnivore biologists Mike Boyce, Brian Baker and Dan Thompson keep their heads low as a helicopter descends at a staging area near the Buffalo Fork River. Minutes later, the trio of biologists were inserted onto the slopes of the Teton Wilderness’ Terrace Mountain, tasked with checking foothold shares that were set to trap the pair of grizzly bears suspected of killing hunting outfitter Mark Uptain. MIKE KOSHMRL / NEWS&GUIDE Facebook Twitter Email Print Save The grizzly bear that caused tragedy high in the Teton Wilderness never let up from a full-bore charge before hitting the Jackson Hole outfitter she fatally mauled.
When the approximately 250-pound sow bruin first came into view, pounding downhill out of a clearing, Mark Uptain was removing the head of a four-by-four bull elk for his client, Corey Chubon.
It was Friday afternoon, and the elk’s four quarters had been removed without any sign of bears. Chubon had killed the elk with an arrow the day before, but the hunters didn’t find the carcass until Friday. Even so, the hunters saw no sign grizzlies had touched it.
The sow grizzly, in other words, was not coming back to claim her meal. Her 1 1/2-year-old male cub was nearby, but ultimately he was watching from the outskirts and wasn’t being threatened. Nevertheless, she was not bluffing.
“It just came on a full run,” said Brad Hovinga, who supervises the Wyoming Game and Fish Department’s Jackson Region. “There was no hesitation.”
Even for grizzlies, which are inherently protective and aggressive animals, this is unusual behavior.
“A female with a yearling attacking in this manner, I’ve never dealt with that,” said Dan Thompson, Game and Fish’s large carnivore chief.
The now-dead grizzly, around 10 years old, was in good shape, with plenty of fat and nothing outwardly wrong.
Chubon, who did not respond to repeated requests for interviews, provided the above account to Wyoming Game and Fish investigators. The Florida man, who was on a guided Martin Outfitters bow hunt with his father, relayed his recollection to Game and Fish at length on several occasions.
As the bear first hit Uptain, who carried bear spray in a hip-slung holster, Chubon went for a Glock that his guide had left with their gear a few yards uphill. For some reason, he could not get the handgun to fire. When the female grizzly diverted her attention away from Uptain and toward the Floridian, he tossed the pistol to his guide. Evidently, it didn’t make it to Uptain, who was a lifelong elk hunter, small-business owner and family man.
Within moments, the bear turned back toward Uptain. Chubon, whose leg, chest and arms were lacerated by the bruin, ran for his life. His last view of Uptain, which he relayed to investigators, was of the guide on his feet trying to fight off the sow.
In an interview with the Orlando, Florida TV station WKMG, he described Uptain as his hero.
“I’m just extremely blessed and fortunate to have made it out of this situation alive,” Chubon told WKMG.
Bolting from the chaos, Chubon huffed it uphill to the duo’s horses, mounted one and rode uphill to a ridgeline near the crest of 10,258-foot-high Terrace Mountain in the Bridger-Teton National Forest. Amazingly, he caught a signal to phone authorities, who flew in to rescue him. Teton County Undersheriff Matt Carr, who was among the first responders, said the call out was a feat in itself.
“I’m not quite sure how he did that, because there’s no cell service out there at all,” Carr said. “That’s something we could not duplicate when we were there on the scene.”
Using the description from Chubon, searchers in a helicopter were able to locate the elk carcass that caused conflict around 7 p.m. Friday. There was less than an hour of daylight left, and the call was made to suspend the search until sunup Saturday.
“We ran out of flight time,” Carr said. “Helicopter restrictions don’t allow us to fly past a hard-and-fast time. And by that point, we couldn’t get ground teams in. The risk to the rescuers was far too great at that moment.”
It will never be known exactly what unfolded between the grizzlies and Uptain after Chubon left the scene.
When Carr and Game and Fish wardens Jon Stephens and Kyle Lash arrived at the quartered elk early Saturday morning to continue the search, they initially assumed that a drag mark heading downhill was from Uptain. Later, investigators discovered this was the slick left from the elk’s gut pile.
“It was confusing, because there was blood and struggle and debris from the elk dying,” Hovinga said. “There was a blood trail from the wounded elk coming in. On the scene, it was difficult to determine whose blood was whose.”
The gut pile drag mark heading downhill drew searchers attention away from where Uptain had died 50 yards uphill from the elk carcass, in a grove of timber. The nature of the 37-year-old’s fatal injuries and lack of a drag trail uphill suggest that he was able to walk after the initial attack, about 50 yards, but ultimately was killed by the grizzlies near where he was found.
“From the nature of his injuries, his death was pretty instantaneous,” Teton County Coroner Brent Blue said. “His fatal injuries were fatal instantly. He wasn’t going to be walking after the fatal injury.”
Bites to Uptain’s head likely ended his life, Blue said. Although there was massive trauma, his body was intact and showed no signs of having been fed upon.
At some point during the struggle, Uptain was able to douse the adult sow with bear spray, which has a high probability of thwarting an attack.
“When we were looking at the [adult female bear’s] head,” Hovinga said, “we could smell it, and we could feel it.”
Hovinga was quick to point out that bear spray was not put to use at the time of the initial attack — perhaps because there wasn’t time.
“We feel that he deployed that bear spray sometime after the initial attack, but before he succumbed to his injuries,” he said. “A lot of people have said, ‘Well, he sprayed the bear, and it didn’t do any good.’ We can’t say that. We can’t say that bear spray wasn’t completely effective.”
The discharged canister was near where he died, not at the elk carcass downhill. The thrown firearm was found uphill of the bull elk’s scattered remains, but downhill and distanced from Uptain’s body.
After locating Uptain around 1:15 p.m. Saturday, Teton County Search and Rescue, Game and Fish and citizen search teams that grew to about 30 people flew out and rode out on horseback.
Game and Fish large carnivore biologists set out three leghold snares concealed in cubbies in an attempt to livetrap one or both of the grizzlies in the overnight hours. Aboard an airship that clattered overhead Sunday morning, they could not see if it worked. But after unloading from the chopper late Sunday morning, Thompson, Lash, Stephens and Game and Fish colleagues Brian Baker and Mike Boyce could make out bawls that told them they had captured the cub.
“Based on the vocalizations and the different tones, we knew we had a younger bear,” Thompson said.
The worst-case scenario was trapping the cub, with mom running free. That’s what happened. The quintet of biologists and wardens, four of whom were armed, chose a path in the relative open in the effort to gain a vantage point of the trap. The sow heard them coming.
“She appeared on a full charge,” Thompson said. “When she visualized five of us standing there, she paused for a second. We had guns up. There was a question, ‘Do we take her?’ I said take her.”
A barrage of gunfire ended the life of the grizzly that killed Mark Uptain. Her stomach was “full of elk meat,” one indication that told the Game and Fish folks that they had killed the right bear. Paws with pads and claws that matched tracks left at the scene the day before further corroborated the connection, and DNA evidence has been sent to a Laramie lab to cement that the right bears were killed.
The cub, about a 150-pound animal, was sedated before Thompson made the call to kill the sow’s dependent as well. His primary reasoning was that Uptain’s injuries suggested the cub was not a passive bystander.
“That yearling was involved in the attack,” Thompson said, “and was a contributing factor to his fatality.”
Asked if there were lessons to be learned from the fatal attack, Thompson said there was no “overt” wrongdoing or decisions made that belie best practices for hunting in grizzly country. Game and Fish’s large carnivore chief also stood behind his decision-making.
“I’m 100 percent confident that we removed the target individuals, and I’m also 100 percent confident that was the right thing to do,” Thompson said. “She was teaching an offspring that killing humans is a potential way to get food. We’ve had 10 other human injuries [from grizzlies] in the past couple years, and we haven’t attempted captures in those situations because of our investigations and the behavior of the bear.
“This was completely different, dangerous behavior,” he said. “It’s not something we want out there on the landscape
After reading this you have to know that Uptain was one tough Hombre.
You also have to know the several absolute idiots that posted here on this thread and they don’t need naming.
Sounds pretty brutal.
."....As the bear first hit Uptain, who carried bear spray in a hip-slung holster, Chubon went for a Glock that his guide had left with their gear a few yards uphill. For some reason, he could not get the handgun to fire. When the female grizzly diverted her attention away from Uptain and toward the Floridian, he tossed the pistol to his guide.".... Any word on why the gun would not fire? First I've heard of this.
After reading this you have to know that Uptain was one tough Hombre.
You also have to know the several absolute idiots that posted here on this thread and they don’t need naming.
Sounds pretty brutal.
."....As the bear first hit Uptain, who carried bear spray in a hip-slung holster, Chubon went for a Glock that his guide had left with their gear a few yards uphill. For some reason, he could not get the handgun to fire. When the female grizzly diverted her attention away from Uptain and toward the Floridian, he tossed the pistol to his guide.".... Any word on why the gun would not fire? First I've heard of this.
Your question? Let’s just sit back and watch all of the all knowing “pros” pontificate for us.
Curiosity, from those who have faced bears, why is a pump shotgun with solid slugs or 00buck, not the preferred close in bear weapon? Fast handling, close in devastation, and a bead sight for fast sighting. Why choose a long range rifle for a close in job?
Because a shotgun lacks penetration, even on the relatively thin skull of the big cats.
This.
Gross oversimplification and generalization.
Standard issue for ADF&G bear control is a 12 gauge with Brennekes. They penetrate.
Curiosity, from those who have faced bears, why is a pump shotgun with solid slugs or 00buck, not the preferred close in bear weapon? Fast handling, close in devastation, and a bead sight for fast sighting. Why choose a long range rifle for a close in job?
Because a shotgun lacks penetration, even on the relatively thin skull of the big cats.
This.
Gross oversimplification and generalization.
Standard issue for ADF&G bear control is a 12 gauge with Brennekes. They penetrate.
Do you have any idea of what you’ve started with this post? Grins.
I'm guessing the Floridian was flustered during the bear attack and couldn't figure out how to shoot the gun in all the excitement.
How can ANYBODY not know how to shoot a Glock?
Maybe he had never shot one before and in the excitement, he didn't think to work the slide to make sure there was a round in the pipe? Either he thought tossing the gun to Uptain was the best thing or Uptain told him to throw it to him or he simply wasn't thinking right with all the excitement.
I still don't understand how the guy could ride away while the guide was fighting off the bear?
My question for you, will you now include yourself as one of the ”several absolute idiots that posted here on this thread and they don’t need naming”, you just stated above, for making fun of a bear attack victim while safely behind your computer in the safety of your home?
Curiosity, from those who have faced bears, why is a pump shotgun with solid slugs or 00buck, not the preferred close in bear weapon? Fast handling, close in devastation, and a bead sight for fast sighting. Why choose a long range rifle for a close in job?
Because a shotgun lacks penetration, even on the relatively thin skull of the big cats.
This.
Gross oversimplification and generalization.
Standard issue for ADF&G bear control is a 12 gauge with Brennekes. They penetrate.
Do you have any idea of what you’ve started with this post? Grins.
Curiosity, from those who have faced bears, why is a pump shotgun with solid slugs or 00buck, not the preferred close in bear weapon? Fast handling, close in devastation, and a bead sight for fast sighting. Why choose a long range rifle for a close in job?
Because a shotgun lacks penetration, even on the relatively thin skull of the big cats.
This.
Gross oversimplification and generalization.
Standard issue for ADF&G bear control is a 12 gauge with Brennekes. They penetrate.
Do you have any idea of what you’ve started with this post? Grins.
I don't. So, let's get the ball rolling so I can find out.
[quote=GregW][quote=BobMt][quote=Angus1895]No blame game here. And I have not read all the pages. But an observation.......
There is a definite downside to sticking an arrow in an Elk in the afternoon. Bone soured in the morning......plus a grizzly buffet!
Afternoon thermals can also be wish washy.
if the elk was shot in the afternoon, and gotten to the next day.....it was more than likely spoiled.......at that point you need to assume, a bear will be on it.......lets wait and see what smokepole has to say....he should be able to google...spoiled elk, and grizzly bear....and get back to us.....bob
Could have died overnight and the meat be fine...
They gotta go see regardless...
Greg, Elk are very bad about spoiling since they are so thick, and in mild temps, you have to get them open ASAP. The neck is the first to go with it being under the cape, and no avenue for the heat to escape.
You can leave one on the mountain overnight to retrieve the next day, but only after you field dress, wash blood out of the cavity and off the meat, situate the rear legs open to get air into the cavity, "and" the evening temps and into the next morning "have to be" cold enough to protect the meat from spoilage.
Originally Posted by GregW
Laughing....
Not near my first rodeo my man but thanks for the pointers....laughing...
And I'm supposed to know that when you make your very vague statement, "Could have died overnight and the meat be fine..." with zero clarification? Yeah, I'm laughing at how you think somebody is supposed to just fill in the blanks you left...laughing here bud.
Originally Posted by GregW
The neck is the first to go as it's under the cape? What about the rest of it under the cape that's a bit thicker than the neck? Laughing...
The laugh is on you making a fool out of yourself here while you fail to mention the rest of what I said. I went on to discuss the rest of it under the cape that's a bit thicker than the neck while telling how you need to field dress it. Are you really that mentally bankrupt to lower yourself to the level of these other mentally bankrupt degenerates here?
Originally Posted by GregW
If you leave a track job of an alive critter overnight not to bump, which often times is the only chance of recovery, time of death may occur at any point meaning that when you find critter the next morning, time of death might have been not too long previously and with a beating heart, meat is bueno....
Really? I believe I covered that already:
Originally Posted by ElkSlayer91
The guide had to have known it was a 99.9% chance they would just find green meat.
My only thought here is the guide, knowing it was a wound shot and not a kill shot, was hoping they could find a weak and alive, wounded bull, and finish him and still have good meat to pack-out.
But...you're not here to discuss what I said, are you? You're a fanboy of fakepole, here to show the world how mentally bankrupt you are, while attempting to bust my balls...Thanks for the laughs. BWAHAHAHAHA.
Originally Posted by GregW
PS- I'm in AZ and we take potential meat spoilage to about as high as they go, even in elk season. I'm pretty well versed in it....
Yeah, who would've thunk in AZ you need to know a little about spoilage....laughing
ELKSLAYER91 LET’S SEE SOME PROOF! Slayme is sounding a lot like “Sharp Things” twin...Possible sock puppet. Slayer, you’re a net savvy Texan. Hang some pictures of all those 350”-380” bulls you have killed. All we’ve seen is you running your mouth without anything to backup your big hat talk. Put some colors up and dazzle us with your amazing hunting skills and big fur you’ve burned...😎
I don’t have to prove / verify anything to anybody anywhere here on the internet, and if you’re so mentally challenged that a rejection like this upsets you to the point you will continue to stalk and harass me here….carry on with humiliating yourself. It’s free popcorn eating entertainment to me, and any other intelligent professional killing time here.
I don’t need to create some persona here on the internet. Sad you feel the need to.
Btw - I appologize.....I didn't realize that I was talking with Matt Dillon when I made the comments about short barreled handguns... my bad. It never came up in conversations, but I'm betting that my guide would have suggested that even Matt should leave his cavalry model 45 at home and to bring something with a shorter barrel. Maybe not....
I’m not Matt Dillon, but I can clear leather faster than Matt Dillon. I’m not Wyatt Earp, but I can clear leather faster than Wyatt Earp. I’m not Billy the Kid, but I can clear leather faster than Billy the Kid.
I’m the fastest gun alive.
BTW: Anyone who'd tell someone to look left and start filling the sky with lead, while a bear is around in the hope to scare off any "potential unseen bears", while hoping a real bear doesn't step out to maul their client to death while they reload from filling the sky with lead, is in fact a complete idiot.......even Matt Dillon would tell you that pard.
P.S. I didn't say "you", or your guide were a city slicker.....read.....read....read.
Elk Slayer....do you know who "Maser" is????
That's who you're arguing with.....
Don't know. Don't care. I'm not into the soap opera games played in these forums by the mentally deranged.
My question for you, will you now include yourself as one of the ”several absolute idiots that posted here on this thread and they don’t need naming”, you just stated above, for making fun of a bear attack victim while safely behind your computer in the safety of your home?
P.S. You're not a tough Hombre. Uptain was.
Kind of touchy ain’t you, you big mouthed, blow hard [bleep]? Keep on posting your inane crap. You’re like a naked man going up a flagpole in that the higher you go, the more you show your asss to.
As far as tough Hombres go, I’ve got more left than your punk assss started with.
“Elkslayer”,,,,,,, a name given to him by his hunting amigos. You ain’t even a decent joke.
On my last hunt in AK., one of my bush pilots also worked as a "bear guard" during the off season. His weapon of choice was a 12 gauge shotgun. He also was a member of the "bear bait club". Now, I wonder why a guy that was a member of the bear bait club would choose to carry a 12 gauge for his defense while working as a bear gaurd? Seems like he would have good reason for his choice.
On my last hunt in AK., one of my bush pilots also worked as a "bear guard" during the off season. His weapon of choice was a 12 gauge shotgun. He also was a member of the "bear bait club". Now, I wonder why a guy that was a member of the bear bait club would choose to carry a 12 gauge for his defense while working as a bear gaurd? Seems like he would have good reason for his choice.
One that I flew with had a SS, Taurus, 8 shot, .357 revolver with max handloads in it. 5” barrel. Had it in a quick release type shoulder holster. Very nice rig.
I would be interested in your impressions of an AR Thumper. I went with the .450 bushmaster.
Why not carry a shotgun?
I know you are being stupid, but I'll answer it anyways. I built the AR .450bushmaster to comply with the Ohio rifle season, which is fairly new. It is designed on a 300yard ammo. Though, a gentleman shooting bowling pins at 300, missed and hit an Aspen tree at 400 yards. He measured 9" of penetration in that tree at 400 yards. I've used a shotgun since I was 8-9 years old. (Roughly 45 years) Rifle is relatively new to me in a center fire cartridge. It gives me an longer range option. Since I can not afford several rifles, I went with the AR platform, and will add A few other uppers when I can for other uses. .450 Bushmaster should kill anything attacking in two legged or 4 legged, anywhere in N/A.
Elkslayer, just how many elk have you taken to get that name from your Texas buddies?
I’m 5 for 5 just in my last 5 hunts, all 300+ respectable mounts. That’s a 1,000 batting average pards. That’s why I’m called elkslayer by my friends.
Originally Posted by wytex
No way to know when that bull died
I never claimed to know nor did I post I did. Learn reading comprehension.
Originally Posted by wytex
and if you say you've never wounded an animal I call BS or you haven't been hunting long.
A “successful and responsible” hunter puts himself in position for a 99.999% chance of a kill shot. Desperate hunters take desperate measures with no care whatsoever for the animal, and chance wounding game. I’ve never wounded and lost game, nor have any of my many decades successful hunter friends. Sad you feel the need to chance and wound game thereby ultimately losing them.
Call BS all you want. There are many ethical and responsible big game hunters, who are excellent marksman, who don’t endanger game to being lost and wounded to die a slow death from Hail Mary, unethical, and irresponsible shots.
Originally Posted by wytex
It happens to the best of hunters.
Wrong. It happens to hunters who don’t have the patience or ability to position for a 99.999% kill shot.
What the hell do you think the reason is when a hunter “passes” on a shot? LOL
Ever hear of taking a pass on a shot….obviously not.
Originally Posted by wytex
Come on up, I'll set you up in a grizz area for a hunt, we'll all see how you fare.
Tough guy going to “set me up” in the hopes I’ll be attacked and killed in grizz country is basically what you just said.
You are one mentally sick sumb!tch.
Originally Posted by wytex
Better bring your depends.
Put the depends over your face. It’ll catch all the fecal matter escaping your mouth, tough guy.
Looks to me like you’re pretty desperate since you are mooching your hunts for free.
Originally Posted by wytex
I've found access through a trespass fee that turned into free access once they got to know us, only paid once.
I would be interested in your impressions of an AR Thumper. I went with the .450 bushmaster.
Why not carry a shotgun?
I know you are being stupid, but I'll answer it anyways. I built the AR .450bushmaster to comply with the Ohio rifle season, which is fairly new. It is designed on a 300yard ammo. Though, a gentleman shooting bowling pins at 300, missed and hit an Aspen tree at 400 yards. He measured 9" of penetration in that tree at 400 yards. I've used a shotgun since I was 8-9 years old. (Roughly 45 years) Rifle is relatively new to me in a center fire cartridge. It gives me an longer range option. Since I can not afford several rifles, I went with the AR platform, and will add A few other uppers when I can for other uses. .450 Bushmaster should kill anything attacking in two legged or 4 legged, anywhere in N/A.
I would be interested in your impressions of an AR Thumper. I went with the .450 bushmaster.
Why not carry a shotgun?
I know you are being stupid, but I'll answer it anyways. I built the AR .450bushmaster to comply with the Ohio rifle season, which is fairly new. It is designed on a 300yard ammo. Though, a gentleman shooting bowling pins at 300, missed and hit an Aspen tree at 400 yards. He measured 9" of penetration in that tree at 400 yards. I've used a shotgun since I was 8-9 years old. (Roughly 45 years) Rifle is relatively new to me in a center fire cartridge. It gives me an longer range option. Since I can not afford several rifles, I went with the AR platform, and will add A few other uppers when I can for other uses. .450 Bushmaster should kill anything attacking in two legged or 4 legged, anywhere in N/A.
I’ve seen much available on the shelf ammo for that round in Cabelas and Academy. What’s the highest capacity clip you can get for it?
That with a 16” barrel, collapsible stock, high round clip, sling would be a nasty little bish for sure.
Elkslayer, just how many elk have you taken to get that name from your Texas buddies?
I’m 5 for 5 just in my last 5 hunts, all 300+ respectable mounts. That’s a 1,000 batting average pards. That’s why I’m called elkslayer by my friends.
Originally Posted by wytex
No way to know when that bull died
I never claimed to know nor did I post I did. Learn reading comprehension.
Originally Posted by wytex
and if you say you've never wounded an animal I call BS or you haven't been hunting long.
A “successful and responsible” hunter puts himself in position for a 99.999% chance of a kill shot. Desperate hunters take desperate measures with no care whatsoever for the animal, and chance wounding game. I’ve never wounded and lost game, nor have any of my many decades successful hunter friends. Sad you feel the need to chance and wound game thereby ultimately losing them.
Call BS all you want. There are many ethical and responsible big game hunters, who are excellent marksman, who don’t endanger game to being lost and wounded to die a slow death from Hail Mary, unethical, and irresponsible shots.
Originally Posted by wytex
It happens to the best of hunters.
Wrong. It happens to hunters who don’t have the patience or ability to position for a 99.999% kill shot.
What the hell do you think the reason is when a hunter “passes” on a shot? LOL
Ever hear of taking a pass on a shot….obviously not.
Originally Posted by wytex
Come on up, I'll set you up in a grizz area for a hunt, we'll all see how you fare.
Tough guy going to “set me up” in the hopes I’ll be attacked and killed in grizz country is basically what you just said.
You are one mentally sick sumb!tch.
Originally Posted by wytex
Better bring your depends.
Put the depends over your face. It’ll catch all the fecal matter escaping your mouth, tough guy.
Looks to me like you’re pretty desperate since you are mooching your hunts for free.
Originally Posted by wytex
I've found access through a trespass fee that turned into free access once they got to know us, only paid once.
]I’m 5 for 5 just in my last 5 hunts, all 300+ respectable mounts. That’s a 1,000 batting average pards. That’s why I’m called elkslayer by my friends.
My 16 yearold grandson has you beat, we don't call it elkslaying, we consider it just getting started.
Really ask them to quit calling you that, its embarrassing.
If you claim the are 300" they are probably not, I saw the one in the elk forum you guessed on. You are 50" off.
Not trying to stir the pot any further, genuinely curious...
How many of you have actually been in a grizzly/brown bear charging situation? I'm not talking about a bluff charge, I'm not talking about being within 50 yards of one, I'm talking about having the bear coming at you to a point that you discharged bear spray or shot at the bear to either kill it or scare it away. I mean pants full of [bleep] it's coming and either deterred or died within a matter of feet. Full blown charge with intent to kill. Spending time in bear country is one thing, how many of you have actually danced this dance and walked away. Genuine curiosity, not trying to troll.
.. .When your fellow elk hunting buddies give you a nickname, based on your success, and ask you to guide for their high affluent clients too, well.....
Originally Posted by callnum
Lets see, from Texas,
Get it right, Republic of TEXAS. Gonna be a test you’ll need to pass.
Originally Posted by callnum
calls a bull-- Imperial,
This supposedly experienced elk hunter here, who claims to have killed 55+ elk over the course of his life, does even know there is a name for different classes of elk horns: Royal, Imperial, Monarch. You can’t fix stupid.
Originally Posted by callnum
shows no dead elk pics,
The mentally challenged require proof on the internet. The intelligent people don’t.
Originally Posted by callnum
can't score a bull,
Estimating a score from a picture is not scoring a bull. Try to become educated. Life won’t be so difficult for you.
Originally Posted by callnum
suggests one of the most bizarre theorie I have seen on sighting in an elk rifle.
Another fakepole fan-boy here who can’t even understand how to aim a rifle when the ballistics of the rifle are placed at his feet. Can’t fix stupid.
Hey clown, you never answered in that other thread, “What’s the difference between 100, 200, 300, 350 yard zero on a gun?” You do realize there is an article on this very site which discusses long range shooting with tables having a 300 yard zero. I guess you are incapable of understanding / comprehending that article too. Can’t fix stupid.
So you see, it’s not a ”most bizarre theory” when others use zeros greater than 200, which obviously escapes your intellect.
Originally Posted by callnum
Ya for sure an elk slayer. Your buddies call you elk slayer? You can't get them to stop?
I’ze beez a foe sure big game elk hunter pards. Have the elk ivories to prove it.
Shotguns are for birds,if the bear has wings,I am bringing my shotgun..
But we are elk hunting with a bow so most likely,I will have a good bow and if legal, a good revolver for that special moment of hungry bears over a kill...Been there once and an arrow did the trick,luckily for my neighbor, trying to skin a fresh killed elk...Literally nailed the bear to a log,but it did rip his jacket and for a preacher,you should have heard him cuss..
My question for you, will you now include yourself as one of the ”several absolute idiots that posted here on this thread and they don’t need naming”, you just stated above, for making fun of a bear attack victim while safely behind your computer in the safety of your home?
P.S. You're not a tough Hombre. Uptain was.
Kind of touchy ain’t you, you big mouthed, blow hard [bleep]? Keep on posting your inane crap. You’re like a naked man going up a flagpole in that the higher you go, the more you show your asss to.
As far as tough Hombres go, I’ve got more left than your punk assss started with.
“Elkslayer”,,,,,,, a name given to him by his hunting amigos. You ain’t even a decent joke.
Turn the valve off. Liquid fecal matter is pouring out of your pie hole.
The tough guy that you are on the internet got called to the floor for making fun of a bear attack victim. That makes you the Darwin Award candidate.
Elkslayer, just how many elk have you taken to get that name from your Texas buddies?
I’m 5 for 5 just in my last 5 hunts, all 300+ respectable mounts. That’s a 1,000 batting average pards. That’s why I’m called elkslayer by my friends.
Originally Posted by wytex
No way to know when that bull died
I never claimed to know nor did I post I did. Learn reading comprehension.
Originally Posted by wytex
and if you say you've never wounded an animal I call BS or you haven't been hunting long.
A “successful and responsible” hunter puts himself in position for a 99.999% chance of a kill shot. Desperate hunters take desperate measures with no care whatsoever for the animal, and chance wounding game. I’ve never wounded and lost game, nor have any of my many decades successful hunter friends. Sad you feel the need to chance and wound game thereby ultimately losing them.
Call BS all you want. There are many ethical and responsible big game hunters, who are excellent marksman, who don’t endanger game to being lost and wounded to die a slow death from Hail Mary, unethical, and irresponsible shots.
Originally Posted by wytex
It happens to the best of hunters.
Wrong. It happens to hunters who don’t have the patience or ability to position for a 99.999% kill shot.
What the hell do you think the reason is when a hunter “passes” on a shot? LOL
Ever hear of taking a pass on a shot….obviously not.
Originally Posted by wytex
Come on up, I'll set you up in a grizz area for a hunt, we'll all see how you fare.
Tough guy going to “set me up” in the hopes I’ll be attacked and killed in grizz country is basically what you just said.
You are one mentally sick sumb!tch.
Originally Posted by wytex
Better bring your depends.
Put the depends over your face. It’ll catch all the fecal matter escaping your mouth, tough guy.
Looks to me like you’re pretty desperate since you are mooching your hunts for free.
Originally Posted by wytex
I've found access through a trespass fee that turned into free access once they got to know us, only paid once.
I’ll pass. I don’t hunt with your type. I have money.
I’m sure you do have money and lots of it cause high fence hunts ain’t cheap.
Never said I hunt a high fence, and never would either. All low fence back country pal. Maybe if you hadn't wasted your life away on the internet harrassing people, you could afford to hunt a quality area.
From today's Jackson Hole News and Guide--probably not going to change anyone's mind, but it is a comprehensive account that will clear up some of the questions:
The grizzly bear that caused tragedy high in the Teton Wilderness never let up from a full-bore charge before hitting the Jackson Hole outfitter she fatally mauled.
When the approximately 250-pound sow bruin first came into view, pounding downhill out of a clearing, Mark Uptain was removing the head of a four-by-four bull elk for his client, Corey Chubon.
It was Friday afternoon, and the elk’s four quarters had been removed without any sign of bears. Chubon had killed the elk with an arrow the day before, but the hunters didn’t find the carcass until Friday. Even so, the hunters saw no sign grizzlies had touched it.
The sow grizzly, in other words, was not coming back to claim her meal. Her 1 1/2-year-old male cub was nearby, but ultimately he was watching from the outskirts and wasn’t being threatened. Nevertheless, she was not bluffing.
“It just came on a full run,” said Brad Hovinga, who supervises the Wyoming Game and Fish Department’s Jackson Region. “There was no hesitation.”
Even for grizzlies, which are inherently protective and aggressive animals, this is unusual behavior.
“A female with a yearling attacking in this manner, I’ve never dealt with that,” said Dan Thompson, Game and Fish’s large carnivore chief.
The now-dead grizzly, around 10 years old, was in good shape, with plenty of fat and nothing outwardly wrong.
Chubon, who did not respond to repeated requests for interviews, provided the above account to Wyoming Game and Fish investigators. The Florida man, who was on a guided Martin Outfitters bow hunt with his father, relayed his recollection to Game and Fish at length on several occasions.
As the bear first hit Uptain, who carried bear spray in a hip-slung holster, Chubon went for a Glock that his guide had left with their gear a few yards uphill. For some reason, he could not get the handgun to fire. When the female grizzly diverted her attention away from Uptain and toward the Floridian, he tossed the pistol to his guide. Evidently, it didn’t make it to Uptain, who was a lifelong elk hunter, small-business owner and family man.
Within moments, the bear turned back toward Uptain. Chubon, whose leg, chest and arms were lacerated by the bruin, ran for his life. His last view of Uptain, which he relayed to investigators, was of the guide on his feet trying to fight off the sow.
In an interview with the Orlando, Florida TV station WKMG, he described Uptain as his hero.
“I’m just extremely blessed and fortunate to have made it out of this situation alive,” Chubon told WKMG.
Bolting from the chaos, Chubon huffed it uphill to the duo’s horses, mounted one and rode uphill to a ridgeline near the crest of 10,258-foot-high Terrace Mountain in the Bridger-Teton National Forest. Amazingly, he caught a signal to phone authorities, who flew in to rescue him. Teton County Undersheriff Matt Carr, who was among the first responders, said the call out was a feat in itself.
“I’m not quite sure how he did that, because there’s no cell service out there at all,” Carr said. “That’s something we could not duplicate when we were there on the scene.”
Using the description from Chubon, searchers in a helicopter were able to locate the elk carcass that caused conflict around 7 p.m. Friday. There was less than an hour of daylight left, and the call was made to suspend the search until sunup Saturday.
“We ran out of flight time,” Carr said. “Helicopter restrictions don’t allow us to fly past a hard-and-fast time. And by that point, we couldn’t get ground teams in. The risk to the rescuers was far too great at that moment.”
It will never be known exactly what unfolded between the grizzlies and Uptain after Chubon left the scene.
When Carr and Game and Fish wardens Jon Stephens and Kyle Lash arrived at the quartered elk early Saturday morning to continue the search, they initially assumed that a drag mark heading downhill was from Uptain. Later, investigators discovered this was the slick left from the elk’s gut pile.
“It was confusing, because there was blood and struggle and debris from the elk dying,” Hovinga said. “There was a blood trail from the wounded elk coming in. On the scene, it was difficult to determine whose blood was whose.”
The gut pile drag mark heading downhill drew searchers attention away from where Uptain had died 50 yards uphill from the elk carcass, in a grove of timber. The nature of the 37-year-old’s fatal injuries and lack of a drag trail uphill suggest that he was able to walk after the initial attack, about 50 yards, but ultimately was killed by the grizzlies near where he was found.
“From the nature of his injuries, his death was pretty instantaneous,” Teton County Coroner Brent Blue said. “His fatal injuries were fatal instantly. He wasn’t going to be walking after the fatal injury.”
Bites to Uptain’s head likely ended his life, Blue said. Although there was massive trauma, his body was intact and showed no signs of having been fed upon.
At some point during the struggle, Uptain was able to douse the adult sow with bear spray, which has a high probability of thwarting an attack.
“When we were looking at the [adult female bear’s] head,” Hovinga said, “we could smell it, and we could feel it.”
Hovinga was quick to point out that bear spray was not put to use at the time of the initial attack — perhaps because there wasn’t time.
“We feel that he deployed that bear spray sometime after the initial attack, but before he succumbed to his injuries,” he said. “A lot of people have said, ‘Well, he sprayed the bear, and it didn’t do any good.’ We can’t say that. We can’t say that bear spray wasn’t completely effective.”
The discharged canister was near where he died, not at the elk carcass downhill. The thrown firearm was found uphill of the bull elk’s scattered remains, but downhill and distanced from Uptain’s body.
After locating Uptain around 1:15 p.m. Saturday, Teton County Search and Rescue, Game and Fish and citizen search teams that grew to about 30 people flew out and rode out on horseback.
Game and Fish large carnivore biologists set out three leghold snares concealed in cubbies in an attempt to livetrap one or both of the grizzlies in the overnight hours. Aboard an airship that clattered overhead Sunday morning, they could not see if it worked. But after unloading from the chopper late Sunday morning, Thompson, Lash, Stephens and Game and Fish colleagues Brian Baker and Mike Boyce could make out bawls that told them they had captured the cub.
“Based on the vocalizations and the different tones, we knew we had a younger bear,” Thompson said.
The worst-case scenario was trapping the cub, with mom running free. That’s what happened. The quintet of biologists and wardens, four of whom were armed, chose a path in the relative open in the effort to gain a vantage point of the trap. The sow heard them coming.
“She appeared on a full charge,” Thompson said. “When she visualized five of us standing there, she paused for a second. We had guns up. There was a question, ‘Do we take her?’ I said take her.”
A barrage of gunfire ended the life of the grizzly that killed Mark Uptain. Her stomach was “full of elk meat,” one indication that told the Game and Fish folks that they had killed the right bear. Paws with pads and claws that matched tracks left at the scene the day before further corroborated the connection, and DNA evidence has been sent to a Laramie lab to cement that the right bears were killed.
The cub, about a 150-pound animal, was sedated before Thompson made the call to kill the sow’s dependent as well. His primary reasoning was that Uptain’s injuries suggested the cub was not a passive bystander.
“That yearling was involved in the attack,” Thompson said, “and was a contributing factor to his fatality.”
Asked if there were lessons to be learned from the fatal attack, Thompson said there was no “overt” wrongdoing or decisions made that belie best practices for hunting in grizzly country. Game and Fish’s large carnivore chief also stood behind his decision-making.
“I’m 100 percent confident that we removed the target individuals, and I’m also 100 percent confident that was the right thing to do,” Thompson said. “She was teaching an offspring that killing humans is a potential way to get food. We’ve had 10 other human injuries [from grizzlies] in the past couple years, and we haven’t attempted captures in those situations because of our investigations and the behavior of the bear.
“This was completely different, dangerous behavior,” he said. “It’s not something we want out there on the landscape.”
Chit happens in Grizz country..How can one not take that into consideration when one is down or hit?
Beats the hell out of me..I am sceered chitless once I hit something,especially with my bow and have to take care of business..I want a lookout ready and steady for the unsceen...
My question for you, will you now include yourself as one of the ”several absolute idiots that posted here on this thread and they don’t need naming”, you just stated above, for making fun of a bear attack victim while safely behind your computer in the safety of your home?
P.S. You're not a tough Hombre. Uptain was.
Kind of touchy ain’t you, you big mouthed, blow hard [bleep]? Keep on posting your inane crap. You’re like a naked man going up a flagpole in that the higher you go, the more you show your asss to.
As far as tough Hombres go, I’ve got more left than your punk assss started with.
“Elkslayer”,,,,,,, a name given to him by his hunting amigos. You ain’t even a decent joke.
Turn the valve off. Liquid fecal matter is pouring out of your pie hole.
The tough guy that you are on the internet got called to the floor for making fun of a bear attack victim. That makes you the Darwin Award candidate. [/quote
Originally Posted by ElkSlayer91
Originally Posted by Old_Toot
Originally Posted by ElkSlayer91
[quote=Old_Toot]After reading this you have to know that Uptain was one tough Hombre.
You also have to know the several absolute idiots that posted here on this thread and they don’t need naming.
You just posted the below posting on the other bear attack thread:
Originally Posted by Old_Toot
Treadwellitus. You hate to say Darwin Award candidates but,,,,,,
My question for you, will you now include yourself as one of the ”several absolute idiots that posted here on this thread and they don’t need naming”, you just stated above, for making fun of a bear attack victim while safely behind your computer in the safety of your home?
P.S. You're not a tough Hombre. Uptain was.
Kind of touchy ain’t you, you big mouthed, blow hard [bleep]? Keep on posting your inane crap. You’re like a naked man going up a flagpole in that the higher you go, the more you show your asss to.
As far as tough Hombres go, I’ve got more left than your punk assss started with.
“Elkslayer”,,,,,,, a name given to him by his hunting amigos. You ain’t even a decent joke.
Turn the valve off. Liquid fecal matter is pouring out of your pie hole.
The tough guy that you are on the internet got called to the floor for making fun of a bear attack victim. That makes you the Darwin Award candidate.
The liquid fecal matter you speak of is well aimed and dead center.
What we have with elkslayer is a living legend amongst us in the mold of Paddler . Pitiful bastard but you ain’t done all that bad for being a white child raised by black folks in inner city Houston, thus your values.
I’m 5 for 5 just in my last 5 hunts, all 300+ respectable mounts. That’s a 1,000 batting average pards. That’s why I’m called elkslayer by my friends.
Originally Posted by callnum
My 16 yearold grandson has you beat, we don't call it elkslaying, we consider it just getting started.
Hey pops, feel free to continue to humiliate yourself on here, please, and learn how to comprehend what you read, please. You’re embarrassing your prodigy, which I’m sure is on this forum.
See where I bolded for your cataract eyes. It says, “just in my last 5 hunts”. Do you see that? In the English language, that means “just last 5”. That does not include "total kills” in my lifetime. Before we go to the next lesson to show your stupidity, I want to make sure you’re awake. Just 5 pops. Not total. Got it?
Originally Posted by callnum
Really ask them to quit calling you that, its embarrassing.
What’s embarrassing is you, a Grandpa, trolling on the internet, something mentally challenged people participate in. Again, save your prodigy from the embarrassment you are causing him.
Originally Posted by callnum
If you claim the are 300" they are probably not,
You’re great at completely humiliating yourself, being all of the horns have been scored by people, who have scored horns for decades.
Originally Posted by callnum
I saw the one in the elk forum you guessed on. You are 50" off.
You didn’t even know there are different classifications for horns 6x6 and greater: Royal, Imperial, and Monarch. Your “opinion” as to “any” score of a rack is worthless, and the fact you think that rack is only a 250 proves it.
I would be interested in your impressions of an AR Thumper. I went with the .450 bushmaster.
Why not carry a shotgun?
I know you are being stupid, but I'll answer it anyways. I built the AR .450bushmaster to comply with the Ohio rifle season, which is fairly new. It is designed on a 300yard ammo. Though, a gentleman shooting bowling pins at 300, missed and hit an Aspen tree at 400 yards. He measured 9" of penetration in that tree at 400 yards. I've used a shotgun since I was 8-9 years old. (Roughly 45 years) Rifle is relatively new to me in a center fire cartridge. It gives me an longer range option. Since I can not afford several rifles, I went with the AR platform, and will add A few other uppers when I can for other uses. .450 Bushmaster should kill anything attacking in two legged or 4 legged, anywhere in N/A.
I’ve seen much available on the shelf ammo for that round in Cabelas and Academy. What’s the highest capacity clip you can get for it?
That with a 16” barrel, collapsible stock, high round clip, sling would be a nasty little bish for sure.
A standard 30rd mag for a .223, with a different follower is a 10rd for .450 Bushmaster. Single stack. Currently I have a 10rd and a 5rd mag just hunting. Law is 3rds only in the weapon, shotgun or rifle. No kills yet. Several with shotgun.
I would be interested in your impressions of an AR Thumper. I went with the .450 bushmaster.
Why not carry a shotgun?
I know you are being stupid, but I'll answer it anyways. I built the AR .450bushmaster to comply with the Ohio rifle season, which is fairly new. It is designed on a 300yard ammo. Though, a gentleman shooting bowling pins at 300, missed and hit an Aspen tree at 400 yards. He measured 9" of penetration in that tree at 400 yards. I've used a shotgun since I was 8-9 years old. (Roughly 45 years) Rifle is relatively new to me in a center fire cartridge. It gives me an longer range option. Since I can not afford several rifles, I went with the AR platform, and will add A few other uppers when I can for other uses. .450 Bushmaster should kill anything attacking in two legged or 4 legged, anywhere in N/A.
I’ve seen much available on the shelf ammo for that round in Cabelas and Academy. What’s the highest capacity clip you can get for it?
That with a 16” barrel, collapsible stock, high round clip, sling would be a nasty little bish for sure.
A standard 30rd mag for a .223, with a different follower is a 10rd for .450 Bushmaster. Single stack. Currently I have a 10rd and a 5rd mag just hunting. Law is 3rds only in the weapon, shotgun or rifle. No kills yet. Several with shotgun.
Give him a break--the man is a legend in his own mind. Anyone who adopts a screen name like "ElkSlayer" on a forum like this (and takes it seriously) is a hopeless egoist.
Buzz schooled you son, and with pics. I think you could post up a measly 5 pics of the 300" bulls.
Buzz refused to debate the facts and ran while attempting to steer the conversation away from him getting humiliated by posting pictures. That is the fact. The fact you choose to ignore the fact shows you, too, are incapable of debating facts.
You are trolling, and you are blind to the truth, just like all liberals.
Originally Posted by callnum
Really tell your buddies to stop. No one and I mean no one except you use those terms to describe points on a bull. Silly Texan.
It was late when I called them horns, instead of points. People make typing mistakes when they are tired.
Mentally challenged people, like you, are grammar Nazis on the internet.
Would you like me to go back in just your last two postings, and show you where you made grammatical errors, you hypocrite?
A grandpa trolling on the internet, and stalking me on other threads here in your attempts to get a response . How pitifully sad you are.
This whole thing has become quite the pissing and dick-measuring contest.
I won't lay judgment on the 2 guys involved. Like many have said, the facts aren't known.
But 1 fact that is known definitely tells me all I need to know about the florida dickhead who was involved in this incident.
When he flew out and got treated for his scrapes and then he left to go home before they even found his guide or knew for certain what happened to him tells me this guy is a Class A POS.
This whole thing has become quite the pissing and dick-measuring contest.
I won't lay judgment on the 2 guys involved. Like many have said, the facts aren't known.
But 1 fact that is known definitely tells me all I need to know about the florida dickhead who was involved in this incident.
When he flew out and got treated for his scrapes and then he left to go home before they even found his guide or knew for certain what happened to him tells me this guy is a Class A POS.
Here, he goes by the name of elkslayer, it’s rumored.
There is no blame to give to anyone...Nobody knows how they will act after getting punched in the nose with a good one,all the plans/training goes out the window until the cobwebs clear,if they do...This happened and nobody is to blame period..It just happened and no one expected it and acted accordingly.
The liquid fecal matter you speak of is well aimed and dead center.
What we have with elkslayer is a living legend amongst us in the mold of Paddler . Pitiful bastard but you ain’t done all that bad for being a white child raised by black folks in inner city Houston, thus your values.
You're reaching pal.
You are today's Darwin Award winner for making fun of a bear attack victim, and you don't have the balls to be a man, and take the medicine you deserve.
Please continue to show your left-side Bell Curve I.Q., pal.
The liquid fecal matter you speak of is well aimed and dead center.
What we have with elkslayer is a living legend amongst us in the mold of Paddler . Pitiful bastard but you ain’t done all that bad for being a white child raised by black folks in inner city Houston, thus your values.
You're reaching pal.
You are today's Darwin Award winner for making fun of a bear attack victim, and you don't have the balls to be a man, and take the medicine you deserve.
Please continue to show your left-side Bell Curve I.Q., pal.
You can’t possibly know anything. You dont even have 1,000 posts here. Try 5,000 minimum before the possibility of any street cred....
Really. You’re not impressing anyone by proving everyone wrong on the internet. Wait til Fireball or some other Oregon dude comes along ....
Hey,that's below the belt..Back off on the grandpa's here..(laughing)
PS..Seems you have gotten yourself in a predicament here,for a young pup...
No young pup here, and am fully capable of handling these low I.Q. midgets.
You will notice they have zero command of the English language past third grade playground blather....Low I.Q. on full display for all to see from these heathens.
Getting past the nonsense, but in other news a doc from MN was mauled a day or two ago on and is now recovering in Billings. It sounds like a similar situation. 2 bears again so maybe a sow with cub.
[quote=wytex]Elkslayer, just how many elk have you taken to get that name from your Texas buddies?
I’m 5 for 5 just in my last 5 hunts, all 300+ respectable mounts. That’s a 1,000 batting average pards. That’s why I’m called elkslayer by my friends.
Originally Posted by wytex
No way to know when that bull died
I never claimed to know nor did I post I did. Learn reading comprehension.
Originally Posted by wytex
and if you say you've never wounded an animal I call BS or you haven't been hunting long.
A “successful and responsible” hunter puts himself in position for a 99.999% chance of a kill shot. Desperate hunters take desperate measures with no care whatsoever for the animal, and chance wounding game. I’ve never wounded and lost game, nor have any of my many decades successful hunter friends. Sad you feel the need to chance and wound game thereby ultimately losing them.
Call BS all you want. There are many ethical and responsible big game hunters, who are excellent marksman, who don’t endanger game to being lost and wounded to die a slow death from Hail Mary, unethical, and irresponsible shots.
Originally Posted by wytex
It happens to the best of hunters.
Wrong. It happens to hunters who don’t have the patience or ability to position for a 99.999% kill shot.
What the hell do you think the reason is when a hunter “passes” on a shot? LOL
Ever hear of taking a pass on a shot….obviously not.
Originally Posted by wytex
Come on up, I'll set you up in a grizz area for a hunt, we'll all see how you fare.
Tough guy going to “set me up” in the hopes I’ll be attacked and killed in grizz country is basically what you just said.
You are one mentally sick sumb!tch.
Originally Posted by wytex
Better bring your depends.
Put the depends over your face. It’ll catch all the fecal matter escaping your mouth, tough guy.
Looks to me like you’re pretty desperate since you are mooching your hunts for free.
Originally Posted by wytex
I've found access through a trespass fee that turned into free access once they got to know us, only paid once.
I’ll pass. I don’t hunt with your type. I have money.
Wrong on all counts. First of all I am no sumbitch, but undoubtedly you would call me a b#tch. Wounded animals can happen to any experienced hunter, nature happens and things happen, even to the 99.999% that think they have everything covered.I have never taken an unethical shot at an animal, and will not ever. So name call all you want sicko. I in no way inferred I wanted to see you dead, just see your experienced reaction to a charging bear. Set you up meant getting you into grizz and elk country. Reading comprehension eh. We now manage an 8,500 acre ranch we once paid a trespass fee to hunt, no mooching here. How many of those elk were unguided, public land? Money makes you a better hunter, LOL. We hunt DIY and are very successful. I cannot give you an accurate count of my elk harvests, too many over the past 31 years. How large is your deer lease, we have family land to hunt in Texas, don't have to pay.
Funny I didn't even look up your past posts. Who is the fecal spewing troll now.
Give him a break--the man is a legend in his own mind. Anyone who adopts a screen name like "ElkSlayer" on a forum like this (and takes it seriously) is a hopeless egoist.
Let me guess, you're a retired university professor, and you wanted to show us your WizzDumb ™
Hey,that's below the belt..Back off on the grandpa's here..(laughing)
PS..Seems you have gotten yourself in a predicament here,for a young pup...
Nah, Logcutter, he’s just smelling assses and licking his balls like pups do.
Curdog would say he’s a “face barker “ and he’d be right.
They're calling you in the other bear-attack thread. They want to know if you plan to attack the victim anymore tonight, so you can cement that advantage you have for the Darwin Award today.
I suspect ElkSlayer91 is also one of his reincarnations...probably from a different computer...
You must be this site's nominated soap opera writer, correct? You have imagination.
Not good enough to dream up 300 imaginary mounts....
300+ would be referencing the scored rack.
When people are talking shop about a particular topic, most "mature adults" would have understood what "300+" refers to(rack score), when everyone very well knows a person will not kill anywhere close to 300+(quantity) mountable quality bulls in a lifetime.
If you are that mentally challenged, you should go sit down,and let the men talk.
Let's say your going into a bar with a big bad bully( let,say Mike Tyson for this thread) that is know for attacking people without cause..Would you go into that bar without backup?
These hunters new there were the big bad bears in the area and they chose to go without backup...No ones fault,there choice and I am sure they regret it...
This,it can't happen to me syndrome, kills way to many people anymore..Plan for the worst and go from there...
Here is a hint for you..... when trying to pass yourself off as a Texan, don’t use “pal” in addressing someone.
I've been using pards also.
If I didn't change it up, you people would fall asleep........and you wouldn't be able to crap on someone from your own state, would you, or show us your WizzDumb™..........pards.
It's funny how things go,this year around my area,the elk are fat and the bears are fatter,based on local kills so far...So I guess, were in for a really bad winter if you watch the critters....
Here is a hint for you..... when trying to pass yourself off as a Texan, don’t use “pal” in addressing someone.
TEXAN, you say?
This high fence hunting excuse couldn’t stand on his mammy and pappy’s shoulders and kiss a real Texan’s asss.
Broward County Florida Democrat talking through his sphincter muscle about a Texan.
It just doesn't get any better.
You can stop any time. The results are in. You have won the Darwin Award today for making fun of the other bear victim.
It is impossible to win a Darwin Award for anything less than losing the ability to reproduce, usually because of a spectacular death. Please find a more suitable award. This one already has a specific requirement.
Wytex is arguing with himself. I’m gonna say that is elk heavy metal slayer...
"himself", not a chance. I moved from Texas to get away from his kind of drivel. I live and hunt in Wyoming, and Texas on occasion. Don't have to pay when you're respected by landowners. They invite you on to their property to hunt or manage it. Been in grizz country and hunted it. Don't like it and freely admit I am scared of grizzly bears. A healthy respect keeps me safe and out of their prime habitat unless absolutely necessary. Guess you all can't get gender hints.
And oh by the way I know Wyoming was once part of Texas. I'm sure someone will bring that up.
Tell about how you got charged by a Griz and be done with it, for Pete's sake.
Huh? I’m asking because there seems to be a ton of knowledge passed around in this thread and before I read 10 pages of [bleep] and bickering, I want to know whose posts to pay attention to...
Tell about how you got charged by a Griz and be done with it, for Pete's sake.
Huh? I’m asking because there seems to be a ton of knowledge passed around in this thread and before I read 10 pages of [bleep] and bickering, I want to know whose posts to pay attention to...
there is more than one that has but they haven't posted on this thread..
So you’ve had a run-in? I’m just curious who can speak on this topic with authority...
I don't know about authority, but I have one exciting experience with a cougar,hunting Elk that left me horseless on the ground..The horse went sideways before I could adjust and I went kaboom on the ground and the other horses were like a rodeo..Cats and horses have a funny thing going.....Once again with a black bear the cook at the local lodge(Grandjean) shot out of the tree and went on a rampage..Went after the horses twice,once when I was on one and once tied up...Again,the horse went sideways and I went the other but held on this time..
And once again with a black bear attacking my neighbor(A minister) over an elk kill in bow season...I got there when it was all over and a really pizzed off minister that had a brand new jacket the bear ripped apart..The bear was literally nailed to a log with an arrow..F&G even did a mild investigation because no bear tag was involved.
I think about bears on every trip,including just getting firewood..Never know......
Here is a hint for you..... when trying to pass yourself off as a Texan, don’t use “pal” in addressing someone.
TEXAN, you say?
This high fence hunting excuse couldn’t stand on his mammy and pappy’s shoulders and kiss a real Texan’s asss.
Broward County Florida Democrat talking through his sphincter muscle about a Texan.
It just doesn't get any better.
You can stop any time. The results are in. You have won the Darwin Award today for making fun of the other bear victim.
It is impossible to win a Darwin Award for anything less than losing the ability to reproduce, usually because of a spectacular death. Please find a more suitable award. This one already has a specific requirement.
I fully understand what you are referencing with your statement. I was simply throwing "Darwin Award" back into Old_Toot's face throughout all of this, being he specifically stated the other bear attack victim, in the other thread, was a "Darwin Award Candidate"
In essence, making him eat his own words if you will.
Here is a hint for you..... when trying to pass yourself off as a Texan, don’t use “pal” in addressing someone.
TEXAN, you say?
This high fence hunting excuse couldn’t stand on his mammy and pappy’s shoulders and kiss a real Texan’s asss.
Broward County Florida Democrat talking through his sphincter muscle about a Texan.
It just doesn't get any better.
You can stop any time. The results are in. You have won the Darwin Award today for making fun of the other bear victim.
It is impossible to win a Darwin Award for anything less than losing the ability to reproduce, usually because of a spectacular death. Please find a more suitable award. This one already has a specific requirement.
I fully understand what you are referencing with your statement. I was simply throwing "Darwin Award" back into Old_Toot's face throughout all of this, being he specifically stated the other bear attack victim, in the other thread, was a "Darwin Award Candidate"
In essence, making him eat his own words if you will.
Tell about how you got charged by a Griz and be done with it, for Pete's sake.
Huh? I’m asking because there seems to be a ton of knowledge passed around in this thread and before I read 10 pages of [bleep] and bickering, I want to know whose posts to pay attention to...
the discussion …..I think, has been more about how to act....for lack of a better word.....in grizzly country, by those that live around them.
brooks range, sheep, moose, bear hunt....mainly wanted bear....went in the brush to find bear....boar...that I shot, he wasn't dead , got charged short range...….a feeling like no other....he's a mount now.
2cd hunt.....another sheep, moose, bear hunt...brooks range.....sow, ( we figured it was a sow, size wise etc, but the color was classic ) long shot...got closer, put finisher in her......still exciting....she's a rug now.
3rd hunt....out of cold bay.....brown bear.....he knew something was up, didn't give him time to figure it out.....well inside of 100 yards...cool as hell, he's a mount now....
no expert by any means....I do ride, hunt, fish and live in grizz country...….bob
So name call all you want sicko. I in no way inferred I wanted to see you dead, just see your experienced reaction to a charging bear. Set you up meant getting you into grizz and elk country. Reading comprehension eh. Who is the fecal spewing troll now.
You are not only mentally challenged and intellectually bankrupt, you’re Two Stoopud™ to know you’re too stupid to understand you are threatening me with pre-meditated first degree murder, on an open public forum utilizing phone lines, across state-lines, which brings into play enough multiple federal felony offenses to jail you for the rest of your natural life, before you would even be eligible for parole.
You are a mentally sick, super low I.Q., idiot of biblical proportions.
I hunt low-fence private ranches for the very reason to be as far away as possible from the likes of you while in the field, while I self-guide or am guiding others. Multiple hard barricaded private gates protect me from people like you…..thank God.
From today's Jackson Hole News and Guide--probably not going to change anyone's mind, but it is a comprehensive account that will clear up some of the questions:
The grizzly bear that caused tragedy high in the Teton Wilderness never let up from a full-bore charge before hitting the Jackson Hole outfitter she fatally mauled.
When the approximately 250-pound sow bruin first came into view, pounding downhill out of a clearing, Mark Uptain was removing the head of a four-by-four bull elk for his client, Corey Chubon.
It was Friday afternoon, and the elk’s four quarters had been removed without any sign of bears. Chubon had killed the elk with an arrow the day before, but the hunters didn’t find the carcass until Friday. Even so, the hunters saw no sign grizzlies had touched it.
The sow grizzly, in other words, was not coming back to claim her meal. Her 1 1/2-year-old male cub was nearby, but ultimately he was watching from the outskirts and wasn’t being threatened. Nevertheless, she was not bluffing.
“It just came on a full run,” said Brad Hovinga, who supervises the Wyoming Game and Fish Department’s Jackson Region. “There was no hesitation.”
Even for grizzlies, which are inherently protective and aggressive animals, this is unusual behavior.
“A female with a yearling attacking in this manner, I’ve never dealt with that,” said Dan Thompson, Game and Fish’s large carnivore chief.
The now-dead grizzly, around 10 years old, was in good shape, with plenty of fat and nothing outwardly wrong.
Chubon, who did not respond to repeated requests for interviews, provided the above account to Wyoming Game and Fish investigators. The Florida man, who was on a guided Martin Outfitters bow hunt with his father, relayed his recollection to Game and Fish at length on several occasions.
As the bear first hit Uptain, who carried bear spray in a hip-slung holster, Chubon went for a Glock that his guide had left with their gear a few yards uphill. For some reason, he could not get the handgun to fire. When the female grizzly diverted her attention away from Uptain and toward the Floridian, he tossed the pistol to his guide. Evidently, it didn’t make it to Uptain, who was a lifelong elk hunter, small-business owner and family man.
Within moments, the bear turned back toward Uptain. Chubon, whose leg, chest and arms were lacerated by the bruin, ran for his life. His last view of Uptain, which he relayed to investigators, was of the guide on his feet trying to fight off the sow.
In an interview with the Orlando, Florida TV station WKMG, he described Uptain as his hero.
“I’m just extremely blessed and fortunate to have made it out of this situation alive,” Chubon told WKMG.
Bolting from the chaos, Chubon huffed it uphill to the duo’s horses, mounted one and rode uphill to a ridgeline near the crest of 10,258-foot-high Terrace Mountain in the Bridger-Teton National Forest. Amazingly, he caught a signal to phone authorities, who flew in to rescue him. Teton County Undersheriff Matt Carr, who was among the first responders, said the call out was a feat in itself.
“I’m not quite sure how he did that, because there’s no cell service out there at all,” Carr said. “That’s something we could not duplicate when we were there on the scene.”
Using the description from Chubon, searchers in a helicopter were able to locate the elk carcass that caused conflict around 7 p.m. Friday. There was less than an hour of daylight left, and the call was made to suspend the search until sunup Saturday.
“We ran out of flight time,” Carr said. “Helicopter restrictions don’t allow us to fly past a hard-and-fast time. And by that point, we couldn’t get ground teams in. The risk to the rescuers was far too great at that moment.”
It will never be known exactly what unfolded between the grizzlies and Uptain after Chubon left the scene.
When Carr and Game and Fish wardens Jon Stephens and Kyle Lash arrived at the quartered elk early Saturday morning to continue the search, they initially assumed that a drag mark heading downhill was from Uptain. Later, investigators discovered this was the slick left from the elk’s gut pile.
“It was confusing, because there was blood and struggle and debris from the elk dying,” Hovinga said. “There was a blood trail from the wounded elk coming in. On the scene, it was difficult to determine whose blood was whose.”
The gut pile drag mark heading downhill drew searchers attention away from where Uptain had died 50 yards uphill from the elk carcass, in a grove of timber. The nature of the 37-year-old’s fatal injuries and lack of a drag trail uphill suggest that he was able to walk after the initial attack, about 50 yards, but ultimately was killed by the grizzlies near where he was found.
“From the nature of his injuries, his death was pretty instantaneous,” Teton County Coroner Brent Blue said. “His fatal injuries were fatal instantly. He wasn’t going to be walking after the fatal injury.”
Bites to Uptain’s head likely ended his life, Blue said. Although there was massive trauma, his body was intact and showed no signs of having been fed upon.
At some point during the struggle, Uptain was able to douse the adult sow with bear spray, which has a high probability of thwarting an attack.
“When we were looking at the [adult female bear’s] head,” Hovinga said, “we could smell it, and we could feel it.”
Hovinga was quick to point out that bear spray was not put to use at the time of the initial attack — perhaps because there wasn’t time.
“We feel that he deployed that bear spray sometime after the initial attack, but before he succumbed to his injuries,” he said. “A lot of people have said, ‘Well, he sprayed the bear, and it didn’t do any good.’ We can’t say that. We can’t say that bear spray wasn’t completely effective.”
The discharged canister was near where he died, not at the elk carcass downhill. The thrown firearm was found uphill of the bull elk’s scattered remains, but downhill and distanced from Uptain’s body.
After locating Uptain around 1:15 p.m. Saturday, Teton County Search and Rescue, Game and Fish and citizen search teams that grew to about 30 people flew out and rode out on horseback.
Game and Fish large carnivore biologists set out three leghold snares concealed in cubbies in an attempt to livetrap one or both of the grizzlies in the overnight hours. Aboard an airship that clattered overhead Sunday morning, they could not see if it worked. But after unloading from the chopper late Sunday morning, Thompson, Lash, Stephens and Game and Fish colleagues Brian Baker and Mike Boyce could make out bawls that told them they had captured the cub.
“Based on the vocalizations and the different tones, we knew we had a younger bear,” Thompson said.
The worst-case scenario was trapping the cub, with mom running free. That’s what happened. The quintet of biologists and wardens, four of whom were armed, chose a path in the relative open in the effort to gain a vantage point of the trap. The sow heard them coming.
“She appeared on a full charge,” Thompson said. “When she visualized five of us standing there, she paused for a second. We had guns up. There was a question, ‘Do we take her?’ I said take her.”
A barrage of gunfire ended the life of the grizzly that killed Mark Uptain. Her stomach was “full of elk meat,” one indication that told the Game and Fish folks that they had killed the right bear. Paws with pads and claws that matched tracks left at the scene the day before further corroborated the connection, and DNA evidence has been sent to a Laramie lab to cement that the right bears were killed.
The cub, about a 150-pound animal, was sedated before Thompson made the call to kill the sow’s dependent as well. His primary reasoning was that Uptain’s injuries suggested the cub was not a passive bystander.
“That yearling was involved in the attack,” Thompson said, “and was a contributing factor to his fatality.”
Asked if there were lessons to be learned from the fatal attack, Thompson said there was no “overt” wrongdoing or decisions made that belie best practices for hunting in grizzly country. Game and Fish’s large carnivore chief also stood behind his decision-making.
“I’m 100 percent confident that we removed the target individuals, and I’m also 100 percent confident that was the right thing to do,” Thompson said. “She was teaching an offspring that killing humans is a potential way to get food. We’ve had 10 other human injuries [from grizzlies] in the past couple years, and we haven’t attempted captures in those situations because of our investigations and the behavior of the bear.
“This was completely different, dangerous behavior,” he said. “It’s not something we want out there on the landscape.”
Good to hear they caught and killed the bear. I've never seen a grizzly bear, but was surprised at the weight - "250-pound sow bruin." I thought they were bigger, but just googled it and and adult sows average 290 – 440 lbs.
I hunt low-fence private ranches for the very reason to be as far away as possible from the likes of you while in the field, while I self-guide or am guiding others.
Put up a pic of your guide license, blowhard......
So name call all you want sicko. I in no way inferred I wanted to see you dead, just see your experienced reaction to a charging bear. Set you up meant getting you into grizz and elk country. Reading comprehension eh. Who is the fecal spewing troll now.
You are not only mentally challenged and intellectually bankrupt, you’re Two Stoopud™ to know you’re too stupid to understand you are threatening me with pre-meditated first degree murder, on an open public forum utilizing phone lines, across state-lines, which brings into play enough multiple federal felony offenses to jail you for the rest of your natural life, before you would even be eligible for parole.
You are a mentally sick, super low I.Q., idiot of biblical proportions.
I hunt low-fence private ranches for the very reason to be as far away as possible from the likes of you while in the field, while I self-guide or am guiding others. Multiple hard barricaded private gates protect me from people like you…..thank God.
I do believe that you belong behind locked gates and that you, indeed, need protection from other people. It does ring true,,,that.
From today's Jackson Hole News and Guide--probably not going to change anyone's mind, but it is a comprehensive account that will clear up some of the questions:
The grizzly bear that caused tragedy high in the Teton Wilderness never let up from a full-bore charge before hitting the Jackson Hole outfitter she fatally mauled.
When the approximately 250-pound sow bruin first came into view, pounding downhill out of a clearing, Mark Uptain was removing the head of a four-by-four bull elk for his client, Corey Chubon.
It was Friday afternoon, and the elk’s four quarters had been removed without any sign of bears. Chubon had killed the elk with an arrow the day before, but the hunters didn’t find the carcass until Friday. Even so, the hunters saw no sign grizzlies had touched it.
The sow grizzly, in other words, was not coming back to claim her meal. Her 1 1/2-year-old male cub was nearby, but ultimately he was watching from the outskirts and wasn’t being threatened. Nevertheless, she was not bluffing.
“It just came on a full run,” said Brad Hovinga, who supervises the Wyoming Game and Fish Department’s Jackson Region. “There was no hesitation.”
Even for grizzlies, which are inherently protective and aggressive animals, this is unusual behavior.
“A female with a yearling attacking in this manner, I’ve never dealt with that,” said Dan Thompson, Game and Fish’s large carnivore chief.
The now-dead grizzly, around 10 years old, was in good shape, with plenty of fat and nothing outwardly wrong.
Chubon, who did not respond to repeated requests for interviews, provided the above account to Wyoming Game and Fish investigators. The Florida man, who was on a guided Martin Outfitters bow hunt with his father, relayed his recollection to Game and Fish at length on several occasions.
As the bear first hit Uptain, who carried bear spray in a hip-slung holster, Chubon went for a Glock that his guide had left with their gear a few yards uphill. For some reason, he could not get the handgun to fire. When the female grizzly diverted her attention away from Uptain and toward the Floridian, he tossed the pistol to his guide. Evidently, it didn’t make it to Uptain, who was a lifelong elk hunter, small-business owner and family man.
Within moments, the bear turned back toward Uptain. Chubon, whose leg, chest and arms were lacerated by the bruin, ran for his life. His last view of Uptain, which he relayed to investigators, was of the guide on his feet trying to fight off the sow.
In an interview with the Orlando, Florida TV station WKMG, he described Uptain as his hero.
“I’m just extremely blessed and fortunate to have made it out of this situation alive,” Chubon told WKMG.
Bolting from the chaos, Chubon huffed it uphill to the duo’s horses, mounted one and rode uphill to a ridgeline near the crest of 10,258-foot-high Terrace Mountain in the Bridger-Teton National Forest. Amazingly, he caught a signal to phone authorities, who flew in to rescue him. Teton County Undersheriff Matt Carr, who was among the first responders, said the call out was a feat in itself.
“I’m not quite sure how he did that, because there’s no cell service out there at all,” Carr said. “That’s something we could not duplicate when we were there on the scene.”
Using the description from Chubon, searchers in a helicopter were able to locate the elk carcass that caused conflict around 7 p.m. Friday. There was less than an hour of daylight left, and the call was made to suspend the search until sunup Saturday.
“We ran out of flight time,” Carr said. “Helicopter restrictions don’t allow us to fly past a hard-and-fast time. And by that point, we couldn’t get ground teams in. The risk to the rescuers was far too great at that moment.”
It will never be known exactly what unfolded between the grizzlies and Uptain after Chubon left the scene.
When Carr and Game and Fish wardens Jon Stephens and Kyle Lash arrived at the quartered elk early Saturday morning to continue the search, they initially assumed that a drag mark heading downhill was from Uptain. Later, investigators discovered this was the slick left from the elk’s gut pile.
“It was confusing, because there was blood and struggle and debris from the elk dying,” Hovinga said. “There was a blood trail from the wounded elk coming in. On the scene, it was difficult to determine whose blood was whose.”
The gut pile drag mark heading downhill drew searchers attention away from where Uptain had died 50 yards uphill from the elk carcass, in a grove of timber. The nature of the 37-year-old’s fatal injuries and lack of a drag trail uphill suggest that he was able to walk after the initial attack, about 50 yards, but ultimately was killed by the grizzlies near where he was found.
“From the nature of his injuries, his death was pretty instantaneous,” Teton County Coroner Brent Blue said. “His fatal injuries were fatal instantly. He wasn’t going to be walking after the fatal injury.”
Bites to Uptain’s head likely ended his life, Blue said. Although there was massive trauma, his body was intact and showed no signs of having been fed upon.
At some point during the struggle, Uptain was able to douse the adult sow with bear spray, which has a high probability of thwarting an attack.
“When we were looking at the [adult female bear’s] head,” Hovinga said, “we could smell it, and we could feel it.”
Hovinga was quick to point out that bear spray was not put to use at the time of the initial attack — perhaps because there wasn’t time.
“We feel that he deployed that bear spray sometime after the initial attack, but before he succumbed to his injuries,” he said. “A lot of people have said, ‘Well, he sprayed the bear, and it didn’t do any good.’ We can’t say that. We can’t say that bear spray wasn’t completely effective.”
The discharged canister was near where he died, not at the elk carcass downhill. The thrown firearm was found uphill of the bull elk’s scattered remains, but downhill and distanced from Uptain’s body.
After locating Uptain around 1:15 p.m. Saturday, Teton County Search and Rescue, Game and Fish and citizen search teams that grew to about 30 people flew out and rode out on horseback.
Game and Fish large carnivore biologists set out three leghold snares concealed in cubbies in an attempt to livetrap one or both of the grizzlies in the overnight hours. Aboard an airship that clattered overhead Sunday morning, they could not see if it worked. But after unloading from the chopper late Sunday morning, Thompson, Lash, Stephens and Game and Fish colleagues Brian Baker and Mike Boyce could make out bawls that told them they had captured the cub.
“Based on the vocalizations and the different tones, we knew we had a younger bear,” Thompson said.
The worst-case scenario was trapping the cub, with mom running free. That’s what happened. The quintet of biologists and wardens, four of whom were armed, chose a path in the relative open in the effort to gain a vantage point of the trap. The sow heard them coming.
“She appeared on a full charge,” Thompson said. “When she visualized five of us standing there, she paused for a second. We had guns up. There was a question, ‘Do we take her?’ I said take her.”
A barrage of gunfire ended the life of the grizzly that killed Mark Uptain. Her stomach was “full of elk meat,” one indication that told the Game and Fish folks that they had killed the right bear. Paws with pads and claws that matched tracks left at the scene the day before further corroborated the connection, and DNA evidence has been sent to a Laramie lab to cement that the right bears were killed.
The cub, about a 150-pound animal, was sedated before Thompson made the call to kill the sow’s dependent as well. His primary reasoning was that Uptain’s injuries suggested the cub was not a passive bystander.
“That yearling was involved in the attack,” Thompson said, “and was a contributing factor to his fatality.”
Asked if there were lessons to be learned from the fatal attack, Thompson said there was no “overt” wrongdoing or decisions made that belie best practices for hunting in grizzly country. Game and Fish’s large carnivore chief also stood behind his decision-making.
“I’m 100 percent confident that we removed the target individuals, and I’m also 100 percent confident that was the right thing to do,” Thompson said. “She was teaching an offspring that killing humans is a potential way to get food. We’ve had 10 other human injuries [from grizzlies] in the past couple years, and we haven’t attempted captures in those situations because of our investigations and the behavior of the bear.
“This was completely different, dangerous behavior,” he said. “It’s not something we want out there on the landscape.”
I do recall reading that this female grizzly was not known prior to this by the Fish and Game people. Anyone know the odds that the bear had never encountered humans before?
And I'd bet good money he couldn't kill a 300" bull elk on public land if he had too...
Uh oh. Yo ass is on thin ice, brother! Grins
The Tin Horn has already confessed to hunting behind fences and locked, barred gates. See his above post on the matter. Takes money to do that and he claims to have beau coup of it, yes he does.
I hunt low-fence private ranches for the very reason to be as far away as possible from the likes of you while in the field, while I self-guide or am guiding others.
Put up a pic of your guide license, blowhard......
I love watching people like you make an absolute and complete fool of them self, on a public forum, from their mother’s basement.
You are so mind numbing stupid, with your lame attempt to bust my balls, that you, with what few cells are alive between your ears, are still incapable of even using google before you make a complete fool out of yourself on the internet.
You are a dumbass pard. You are a low I.Q. dumbass of biblical proportions, and are Two Stoopud™ to realize it.
I don’t need a license to guide you idiotic, Democrat, low I.Q., far left-side Bell Curve, blowhard, troll.
And I'd bet good money he couldn't kill a 300" bull elk on public land if he had too...
Uh oh. Yo ass is on thin ice, brother! Grins
The Tin Horn has already confessed to hunting behind fences and locked, barred gates. See his above post on the matter. Takes money to do that and he claims to have beau coup of it, yes he does.
Foul. I hunt behind locked gates and fences, and I have never spent money on a lease, or high fence operation. It's called a family farm. No reason to allow access to other hunters when we are actively hunting, and lock those gates. It does not take money. It takes access. Do not infer cause and effect where there is nothing to prove the case. (False assumption). Clearly, I have no money to waste.
I'm guessing the Floridian was flustered during the bear attack and couldn't figure out how to shoot the gun in all the excitement.
How can ANYBODY not know how to shoot a Glock?
Maybe he had never shot one before and in the excitement, he didn't think to work the slide to make sure there was a round in the pipe? Either he thought tossing the gun to Uptain was the best thing or Uptain told him to throw it to him or he simply wasn't thinking right with all the excitement.
Empty chamber, magazine not properly seated so he couldn’t chamber a round?
For a while I was carrying a 10mm Glock 29 in the woods, the magazine release projected some distance from the side of the grip. However it happened several times when carried the mag release had been popped resulting in the 10rd magazine dropping out of battery but not falling out of the pistol. I had a Glock guy replace the release with one for a Glock 19. Dropped right in, worked perfectly, laying nearly flush with the grip. Problem solved. [/quote]
And I'd bet good money he couldn't kill a 300" bull elk on public land if he had too...
Uh oh. Yo ass is on thin ice, brother! Grins
The Tin Horn has already confessed to hunting behind fences and locked, barred gates. See his above post on the matter. Takes money to do that and he claims to have beau coup of it, yes he does.
Foul. I hunt behind locked gates and fences, and I have never spent money on a lease, or high fence operation. It's called a family farm. No reason to allow access to other hunters when we are actively hunting, and lock those gates. It does not take money. It takes access. Do not infer cause and effect where there is nothing to prove the case. (False assumption). Clearly, I have no money to waste.
Et tu, Brute’? Grins.
I know where you can find a great unliscened guide should you need one. He’s posting here currently. Let me know should the need arise. Specializing in elk, mostly.
And I'd bet good money he couldn't kill a 300" bull elk on public land if he had too...
Greg, it’s OK. I realize how frustrating you must feel, to have lived life, after your I.Q. testing session in first grade was stopped, once they determined you were incapable of completing it.
Really, I do.
Your immature and uninformed responses here prove it.
Please carry own. I don’t have to pay here to watch people completely humiliate themselves with such mind numbing stupidity.
You boys fill your glasses with some good scotch tonight and continue to make complete idiots out of yourselves, because I have zero problems with quoting your stupidity, so it can be read on the internet for eternity on this forum.
And I'd bet good money he couldn't kill a 300" bull elk on public land if he had too...
Uh oh. Yo ass is on thin ice, brother! Grins
The Tin Horn has already confessed to hunting behind fences and locked, barred gates. See his above post on the matter. Takes money to do that and he claims to have beau coup of it, yes he does.
Foul. I hunt behind locked gates and fences, and I have never spent money on a lease, or high fence operation. It's called a family farm. No reason to allow access to other hunters when we are actively hunting, and lock those gates. It does not take money. It takes access. Do not infer cause and effect where there is nothing to prove the case. (False assumption). Clearly, I have no money to waste.
Et tu, Brute’? Grins.
I know where you can find a great unliscened guide should you need one. He’s posting here currently. Let me know should the need arise. Specializing in elk, mostly.
Not looking for a guide. And just keeping it honest. Carry on.
You boys fill your glasses with some good scotch tonight and continue to make complete idiots out of yourselves, because I have zero problems with quoting your stupidity, so it can be read on the internet for eternity on this forum.
Good idea and while we’re at it, a toast.
Here’s to you and here’s to me The best of friends we should always be But should we ever disagree Well,,fflluucck ole you And here’s to me.
Sleep tight, it’s been a long day for you, little feller.
And I'd bet good money he couldn't kill a 300" bull elk on public land if he had too...
Greg, it’s OK. I realize how frustrating you must feel, to have lived life, after your I.Q. testing session in first grade was stopped, once they determined you were incapable of completing it.
Really, I do.
Your immature and uninformed responses here prove it.
Please carry own. I don’t have to pay here to watch people completely humiliate themselves with such mind numbing stupidity.
Well, you just proved youre a liar and full of bull schiet all by your own self. Sheesh. You are impressing who, your daughter?
So name call all you want sicko. I in no way inferred I wanted to see you dead, just see your experienced reaction to a charging bear. Set you up meant getting you into grizz and elk country. Reading comprehension eh. Who is the fecal spewing troll now.
You are not only mentally challenged and intellectually bankrupt, you’re Two Stoopud™ to know you’re too stupid to understand you are threatening me with pre-meditated first degree murder, on an open public forum utilizing phone lines, across state-lines, which brings into play enough multiple federal felony offenses to jail you for the rest of your natural life, before you would even be eligible for parole.
You are a mentally sick, super low I.Q., idiot of biblical proportions.
I hunt low-fence private ranches for the very reason to be as far away as possible from the likes of you while in the field, while I self-guide or am guiding others. Multiple hard barricaded private gates protect me from people like you…..thank God.
Forgot to add, if I'm not " intellectually bankrupt" (a bit overused, don't you think?), I'm certainly overdrawn, your cognitive resources are boundless and that as only seen every couple of millennia. I'm sure your humbleness has endeared you to the masses everywhere.
Originally Posted by ElkSlayer91but didn't find right away [/quote
Never said I hunt a high fence, and never would either. All low fence back country pal. Maybe if you hadn't wasted your life away on the internet harrassing people, you could afford to hunt a quality area.
"Low fence backcountry" that's hilarious, keep 'em coming!! "Backcountry" is not fenced. At least where I hunt. It ain't private land either. And as far as all your sanctimonious bullsh** about never making a bad shot, you just haven't hunted enough, it'll happen.
And just to put some facts in front of you so you can stop with your sanctimonious bullsh**, neither one of the two elk I killed suffered inordinately, I just couldn't find them in the dark and had to come back in the morning. One was a cow I shot with a muzzleloader, perfect placement on a 60 yard standing broadside shot. The bullet double-lunged her and was expanded to the size of a quarter, just under the off-side hide. She made it lesss than 200 yards and died out in the open on a night that got down near 20 degrees. The reason I couldn't find her was, she took off running the way she was facing, got into a grove of spruce where I couldn't see her, and turned 180 degrees and ran the other direction before she piled up. She left one drop of blood the size of a quarter, right where she was standing when I shot. I spent a few hours looking in the wrong direction, searching by headlamp.
We found her at first light and I was pissed, I thought I'd lost the meat because like you, I'd never done what we're talking about here, that is, recovered an animal after it layed overnight. Like you, I believed the stuff I'd always heard and read in Field and Stream.
Now I know better. One day you will. Possibly.
The other was a bull. Fatal shot, 30 yards broadside. He trotted 60 yards and layed down under a tree. I stood there watching him for 15 minutes, and he watched me, too sick to run off. Finally his head flopped over and layed on the ground. It was my first bow kill and I was excited and wanted to put my hands on him. So I didn't wait long enough before I walked up to him. If I had, I'd have recovered him right there, 60 yards from the shot. But he got up and trotted into the thick oak brush. By that time it was dark and my only move was to back out and come back in the morning.
We found him at first light, he'd made it another hundred yards.
And the meat was still good.
Other than that, it's beyond me how a person with as little experience and knowledge as you becomes such a sanctimonious prick in such a short time on this earth.
I have killed elk from Idaho to southern New Mexico, and in most of the states in between. I had to leave a couple of them in the field overnight, but I was able to field dress both and leave a jacket covering most of the exposed heart/lung area. Both were perfectly fine the next morning and there was no meat lost.
Conditions vary from time to time and place to place, so hard and fast rules don't always apply. What happened with that elk that you harvested in the Gros Ventres may not be what will happen with the one that you shoot in the Gila a month or six weeks later.
I have killed elk from Idaho to southern New Mexico, and in most of the states in between. I had to leave a couple of them in the field overnight, but I was able to field dress both and leave a jacket covering most of the exposed heart/lung area. Both were perfectly fine the next morning and there was no meat lost.
Conditions vary from time to time and place to place, so hard and fast rules don't always apply. What happened with that elk that you harvested in the Gros Ventres may not be what will happen with the one that you shoot in the Gila a month or six weeks later.
I think a lot of scavengers and predators could remove a jacket.
So name call all you want sicko. I in no way inferred I wanted to see you dead, just see your experienced reaction to a charging bear. Set you up meant getting you into grizz and elk country. Reading comprehension eh. Who is the fecal spewing troll now.
You are not only mentally challenged and intellectually bankrupt, you’re Two Stoopud™ to know you’re too stupid to understand you are threatening me with pre-meditated first degree murder, on an open public forum utilizing phone lines, across state-lines, which brings into play enough multiple federal felony offenses to jail you for the rest of your natural life, before you would even be eligible for parole.
You are a mentally sick, super low I.Q., idiot of biblical proportions.
I hunt low-fence private ranches for the very reason to be as far away as possible from the likes of you while in the field, while I self-guide or am guiding others. Multiple hard barricaded private gates protect me from people like you…..thank God.
This post reminds me of someone that posted on here some years ago, same smarmy irritating semi-legalese way about him...I just for the world of me cannot remember what the arsehole's moniker was.
So name call all you want sicko. I in no way inferred I wanted to see you dead, just see your experienced reaction to a charging bear. Set you up meant getting you into grizz and elk country. Reading comprehension eh. Who is the fecal spewing troll now.
You are not only mentally challenged and intellectually bankrupt, you’re Two Stoopud™ to know you’re too stupid to understand you are threatening me with pre-meditated first degree murder, on an open public forum utilizing phone lines, across state-lines, which brings into play enough multiple federal felony offenses to jail you for the rest of your natural life, before you would even be eligible for parole.
You are a mentally sick, super low I.Q., idiot of biblical proportions.
I hunt low-fence private ranches for the very reason to be as far away as possible from the likes of you while in the field, while I self-guide or am guiding others. Multiple hard barricaded private gates protect me from people like you…..thank God.
LOL, so every hunting guide that offers an elk hunt in NW Wyoming is threatening premeditated murder, give me a break. At no point did I threaten you, bring that charge, you'll get laughed out of our great state. Elkslayer got threatened by a female hunter. Big tough guy you are! Lock yourself behind closed gates , it keeps us safe. Guess the reference about Depends hit a nerve. Went right over your head the play on a joke that most folks who have been in a life threatening situation share. You are not worth the time or effort. I look forward to your charge of a premeditate murder . Seems you are the one who went ballistic. Take your meds before you post next time. I hunt with stable ethical folks who respect the game and other hunters, as well as the landowner who grant them free access. Mutual respect gets you that, but guess you wouldn't know that, you pay for your hunting. By the way premeditated is not hyphenated.
For the most part guides in NW Wyoming know full well they are responsible for the health and safety of their clients. They take it very seriously. That guide gave his life for a stranger just because he paid to hunt with him. The hunter will have to live with that for the rest of his life. That is a heavy cross to bear.
1 - How many sections he owns. 2 - How many Head he's running. 3 - How many lever guns he owns.
You forgot #4: "What's 2+2?"
I doubt he's a Texan.
He damn sure ain’t a Texan bred and born and I doubt he even lives here. All his talk of IQ’s pegs him as a an idiot that used to post here but I can’t recall a handle for him.
Originally Posted by ElkSlayer91but didn't find right away
Never said I hunt a high fence, and never would either. All low fence back country pal. Maybe if you hadn't wasted your life away on the internet harrassing people, you could afford to hunt a quality area. [/quote
"Low fence backcountry" that's hilarious, keep 'em coming!! "Backcountry" is not fenced. At least where I hunt. It ain't private land either. And as far as all your sanctimonious bullsh** about never making a bad shot, you just haven't hunted enough, it'll happen.
And just to put some facts in front of you so you can stop with your sanctimonious bullsh**, neither one of the two elk I killed suffered inordinately, I just couldn't find them in the dark and had to come back in the morning. One was a cow I shot with a muzzleloader, perfect placement on a 60 yard standing broadside shot. The bullet double-lunged her and was expanded to the size of a quarter, just under the off-side hide. She made it lesss than 200 yards and died out in the open on a night that got down near 20 degrees. The reason I couldn't find her was, she took off running the way she was facing, got into a grove of spruce where I couldn't see her, and turned 180 degrees and ran the other direction before she piled up. She left one drop of blood the size of a quarter, right where she was standing when I shot. I spent a few hours looking in the wrong direction, searching by headlamp.
We found her at first light and I was pissed, I thought I'd lost the meat because like you, I'd never done what we're talking about here, that is, recovered an animal after it layed overnight. Like you, I believed the stuff I'd always heard and read in Field and Stream.
Now I know better. One day you will. Possibly.
The other was a bull. Fatal shot, 30 yards broadside. He trotted 60 yards and layed down under a tree. I stood there watching him for 15 minutes, and he watched me, too sick to run off. Finally his head flopped over and layed on the ground. It was my first bow kill and I was excited and wanted to put my hands on him. So I didn't wait long enough before I walked up to him. If I had, I'd have recovered him right there, 60 yards from the shot. But he got up and trotted into the thick oak brush. By that time it was dark and my only move was to back out and come back in the morning.
We found him at first light, he'd made it another hundred yards.
And the meat was still good.
Other than that, it's beyond me how a person with as little experience and knowledge as you becomes such a sanctimonious prick in such a short time on this earth.
Anyone who would troll on this particular thread needs a good ass whipping.
For those of you with a functioning brain, smokepole starting trolling people on page 4 of this thread. The quote below is where he started. Just click the link to go to the quote, and scroll forward from there, and you’ll see how mentally sick this guy is when he sits here and talks about trolling, when he is the one who started the trolling.
Originally Posted by smokepole
Originally Posted by Middlefork_Miner
.......the fact remains that at one time, the hunter/client had a handgun and ended up throwing it towards somebody that was probably already incapable of using it...
Listen to what you're saying. You start out with "the fact remains" and you end up with "probablyincapable of using it."
You have no idea whether the guide was incapable of using it, hell, he may have even asked the hunter to toss it to him. Shooting a bear while it's on top of a guy would seem to be a dicey proposition, have you ever done it?
The fact remains, you weren't there and you're guessing.
Temps in that part of the state have been pretty consistently down into the 20's at night in the mountains. The meat should have been ok unless gut shot. I wonder if he shot it too close to dark and therefore they had to give up the search due to darkness. That guide wouldn't have taken a hunter looking for an elk in grizz country after dark. He would have gone back early morning to look. We got to know Jon Stephens, GW and one official in on the sow take, 3 years ago on a bison hunt in Jackson. He and the husband have mutual friends and acquaintances in G&F.He's a stand up guy. He made sure we had bear spray for both the husband's hunt and mine the next year. He also recommended a large caliber handgun as backup, if competent with it, for the non hunting companion(spouse).
Hunting the bears may or may not help with the attack situation but at least some aggressive bears would have been targeted to get out of the population. G&F was more than willing to be involved in helping grizzly hunters locate older non breeding boars and problem bears. We have many friends who hunt the outer edge of the grizzly range, they always have more than a couple of folks along for a pack out or field dressing. They hunt close enough together that when a shot is heard they can check in and be available for lookout services. Maybe a little paranoid, but they have been safe while having had minor bear encounters.
I have killed elk from Idaho to southern New Mexico, and in most of the states in between. I had to leave a couple of them in the field overnight, but I was able to field dress both and leave a jacket covering most of the exposed heart/lung area. Both were perfectly fine the next morning and there was no meat lost.
Conditions vary from time to time and place to place, so hard and fast rules don't always apply. What happened with that elk that you harvested in the Gros Ventres may not be what will happen with the one that you shoot in the Gila a month or six weeks later.
I think a lot of scavengers and predators could remove a jacket.
It kept the Ravens, the Steller's Jays and Magpies off--all of which can indeed ruin a significant amount of meat, especially in hindquarters.
Anyone who would troll on this particular thread needs a good ass whipping.
Originally Posted by smokepole
Originally Posted by Middlefork_Miner
Originally Posted by smokepole
Originally Posted by Middlefork_Miner
.......the fact remains that at one time, the hunter/client had a handgun and ended up throwing it towards somebody that was probably already incapable of using it...
Listen to what you're saying. You start out with "the fact remains" and you end up with "probablyincapable of using it."
You have no idea whether the guide was incapable of using it, hell, he may have even asked the hunter to toss it to him. Shooting a bear while it's on top of a guy would seem to be a dicey proposition, have you ever done it?
The fact remains, you weren't there and you're guessing.
Guide is dead.....client ran for help....figure it out.
No, you figure it out, and make sure to give everyone your opinion on what happened and why. I don't play that game, not having been in that situation myself.
How about you, how many times have you been attacked by a grizzly bear? How did you handle it?
Page 11, smokepole gets called to the carpet for his trolling.
Here is where a long time member here, AcesNeights, hands smokepole his backside on a silver platter while pointing out his arguing with everyone and everywhere on this forum.
Originally Posted by AcesNeights
Originally Posted by smokepole
Originally Posted by AcesNeights
IThat client sounds like a coward of the first order. Having been tested more than a few times I know that.....
You don't know squat. Unless you've been dragged off a horse by your ankle.
Is that how you were "tested more than a few times?"
I’ll trust what I know over your guessing.
You can use partial quotes and take statements out of context all you want (typical liberal reaction) but it makes you look stupid. You have become more and more argumentative for no good reason, not just this thread but many of the ones you insert yourself in. I don’t know if loneliness and old age is your excuse but either way you just come across as a washed up old crank that gets off on picking internet arguments because you lack excitement in your elderly life. Keep on keeping on champ....you’re always good for a laugh at your own expense.
That being hunting in griz country and what can happen and what you might do in that situation.
I like how the game and fish personnel when going in to the site to investigate responded to a charge. Not a one of them used bear spray. I think 4 of the 5 were armed and all 4 of those opened fire and killed the sow.
Now, if bear spray is so damn effective. You would think 4 people each with their can of bear spray, could get that bear to stop wouldn't you???
But, what they did in fact was, as their first choice, to use lethal force. This is further convincing me that spray is not the way to go.
That being hunting in griz country and what can happen and what you might do in that situation.
I like how the game and fish personnel when going in to the site to investigate responded to a charge. Not a one of them used bear spray. I think 4 of the 5 were armed and all 4 of those opened fire and killed the sow.
Now, if bear spray is so damn effective. You would think 4 people each with their can of bear spray, could get that bear to stop wouldn't you???
But, what they did in fact was, as their first choice, to use lethal force. This is further convincing me that spray is not the way to go.
Tarkio,
I'm willing to bet they determined that bear was going to die that day before going in there. No need for deterrent spray when the final option is necessary.
Below is the link to my posting thanking AcesNeights for pointing out what I already knew, and also at the bottom of my posting, you’ll see where I stated in my post that I knew by me thanking him, it would bring smokepole’s fan-boys to this thread to troll me.
And as you all can see, those of you with a functioning brain, they came and trashed this thread after AcesNeights called smokepole to the carpet.
All I have done here is point out their lies when they trolled me, which I have every right to do.
We can assume bear spray while under attack will only add flavor and ability for biologists and state shooters to pin the murder on the right bear.
Rifle, shotgun with proper slugs, large caliber pistol or wheel gun with hard cast bullets seems about the best option.
But, like Shrapnel said waaaay back in this thread; it’s still no guarantee when you got a determined, pissed off, massive animal that is covering ground to you in a blink of an eye, cuz you’re on the menu for “Special of the Day” 😎
Anyone who would troll on this particular thread needs a good ass whipping.
Originally Posted by smokepole
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by MOGC
Too many people are conditioned to "go call for help" instead of dealing with the immediate problem on their own. In the backcountry there is no immediate help. Help is many hours away. You are "help." The emergency in this case was immediate and needed to be dealt with inside of several seconds, not hours.
This. Going for help in this context was a cop out for losing nerve, i.e., going with the flight reflex at the sight of dread and imminent danger.
How about you, how many time have you been attacked by a grizzly and how did you handle it?
Anyone who would troll on this particular thread needs a good ass whipping.
Originally Posted by smokepole
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Where did I say I was immune to the flight reflex? It's a thing.
You said it was a "cop out." If it's a reflex and physiological, how is it a "cop out?"
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Best way to prepare is to understand that the flight reflex is a thing and to be prepared to not allow it to rule your action.
That's like saying that the best way to survive a subzero night out without shelter is to build a snow cave, without ever having built one. You have no idea if it'll work unless you've done it.
Anyone who would troll on this particular thread needs a good ass whipping.
Originally Posted by smokepole
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Where did I say I was immune to the flight reflex? It's a thing.
You said it was a "cop out." If it's a reflex and physiological, how is it a "cop out?"
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Best way to prepare is to understand that the flight reflex is a thing and to be prepared to not allow it to rule your action.
That's like saying that the best way to survive a subzero night out without shelter is to build a snow cave, without ever having built one. You have no idea if it'll work unless you've done it.
Originally Posted by smokepole
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by smokepole
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Where did I say I was immune to the flight reflex? It's a thing.
You said it was a "cop out." If it's a reflex and physiological, how is it a "cop out?"
The explanation was a nice way of saying he freaked out and ran away. That's the cop out, not just saying he pissed his pants, threw his gun at the bear, and ran, which is likely closer to what happened.
Once again, when you've been attacked by grizzlies, how did you handle it?
Anyone who would troll on this particular thread needs a good ass whipping.
Originally Posted by smokepole
To the contrary. My question has shown that you're criticizing someone for "copping out" in a situation you've never been in yourself. So you have no idea how you would react, yet you criticize from the comfort of your easy chair.
Anyone who would troll on this particular thread needs a good ass whipping.
Originally Posted by smokepole
You really are that dense aren't you. Bears who attack people with impunity will do it again. What they classify us as is irrelevant.
Haven’t seen you lend your vast ‘expertise’ on the Elk Hunting Forum. Strange for a bonafide dedicated elk slayer such as yourself. Too busy here, maybe?
Originally Posted by ElkSlayer91but didn't find right away
Never said I hunt a high fence, and never would either. All low fence back country pal. Maybe if you hadn't wasted your life away on the internet harrassing people, you could afford to hunt a quality area.
No where in that conversation are the words but didn't find right away, much less said by me.
You’ll also notice at that link / posting, smokepole was not even involved in that conversation at all.
So, what this mentally deranged individual did, was he added but didn't find right away after elkslayer91 to make it look like I was talking about “not finding an animal”, so he could type ”And as far as all your sanctimonious bullsh** about never making a bad shot, you just haven't hunted enough, it'll happen.” below in his first paragraph, and then talk about his “two supposed kills” he didn’t recover until the next day, and all of his garbage you see below directed at me.
Now remember, smokepole was not even involved in the original conversation as you have seen now for yourselves at the link above.
Friends, this is what a mentally sick stalker does, and looks like on the internet.
Only a severe mentally deranged person would add words to make it look like someone said something, so they could inject themselves into a conversation and go on to troll the individual.
Is this the type of mentally deranged people you support and want on this site?
Originally Posted by smokepole
"Low fence backcountry" that's hilarious, keep 'em coming!! "Backcountry" is not fenced. At least where I hunt. It ain't private land either. And as far as all your sanctimonious bullsh** about never making a bad shot, you just haven't hunted enough, it'll happen.
I’ll let you guys read the rest, but I need to correct him here.
Smokepole, again, you’re a complete idiot, and the biggest B.S. artist I have ever seen on the internet. Turner’s ranch is back country low fence. Bacon’s ranch is back country low fence. Hill’s ranch is back country low fence, and many more, all low fence back country. All the ranches in the lower Sangre de Cristo range are all private owned back country low fence ranches owned by billionaires and very wealthy people.
You’re a fool, a complete uneducated fool.
Originally Posted by smokepole
And just to put some facts in front of you so you can stop with your sanctimonious bullsh**, neither one of the two elk I killed suffered inordinately, I just couldn't find them in the dark and had to come back in the morning. One was a cow I shot with a muzzleloader, perfect placement on a 60 yard standing broadside shot. The bullet double-lunged her and was expanded to the size of a quarter, just under the off-side hide. She made it lesss than 200 yards and died out in the open on a night that got down near 20 degrees. The reason I couldn't find her was, she took off running the way she was facing, got into a grove of spruce where I couldn't see her, and turned 180 degrees and ran the other direction before she piled up. She left one drop of blood the size of a quarter, right where she was standing when I shot. I spent a few hours looking in the wrong direction, searching by headlamp.
We found her at first light and I was pissed, I thought I'd lost the meat because like you, I'd never done what we're talking about here, that is, recovered an animal after it layed overnight. Like you, I believed the stuff I'd always heard and read in Field and Stream.
Now I know better. One day you will. Possibly.
The other was a bull. Fatal shot, 30 yards broadside. He trotted 60 yards and layed down under a tree. I stood there watching him for 15 minutes, and he watched me, too sick to run off. Finally his head flopped over and layed on the ground. It was my first bow kill and I was excited and wanted to put my hands on him. So I didn't wait long enough before I walked up to him. If I had, I'd have recovered him right there, 60 yards from the shot. But he got up and trotted into the thick oak brush. By that time it was dark and my only move was to back out and come back in the morning.
We found him at first light, he'd made it another hundred yards.
And the meat was still good.
Other than that, it's beyond me how a person with as little experience and knowledge as you becomes such a sanctimonious prick in such a short time on this earth.
It takes a deranged and mentally sick person you guys to add words to somebody’s post, so they can go on to troll and write all of that above, and especially his last paragraph bolded right above……..when the but didn't find right away was never even said by me or anyone in the original post HE quoted.
Last point. All of his above posting is outright lies. Meat on a thick animal, like an elk, will not keep overnight unless the heat is released by opening the body cavity. You must: field dress, wash the majority of blood off the meat and inside body cavity, body cavity spread and held open with a broken branch, hind legs spread and held apart (rope to a close tree or feet spread and tied to long branch), and lastly the temps have to be low enough (less than 40*) and the meat protected from direct sunlight the next morning.
Leave a hat or shirt you’re wearing, and hang on the horns for the human scent, so it can drift outward in the air, to keep predators off the meat. On a trophy you plan to mount, wrap a cover over the face to protect the cape, so a predator can not chew up the face if the scent does not keep them away.
If you want spoiled green meat, listen to your deranged friend.
If you don’t believe me, you’ll just have to learn the hard way.
EDIT: The "but didn't find right away" added, you people will notice, is right after the "91", and words do not come after the poster's name when you quote them. 100% proof smokepole doctor's people's quotes.
Never said I hunt a high fence, and never would either. All low fence back country pal. Maybe if you hadn't wasted your life away on the internet harrassing people, you could afford to hunt a quality area.
No where in that conversation are the words but didn't find right away, much less said by me.
You’ll also notice at that link / posting, smokepole was not even involved in that conversation at all.
So, what this mentally deranged individual did, was he added but didn't find right away after elkslayer91 to make it look like I was talking about “not finding an animal”, so he could type ”And as far as all your sanctimonious bullsh** about never making a bad shot, you just haven't hunted enough, it'll happen.” below in his first paragraph, and then talk about his “two supposed kills” he didn’t recover until the next day, and all of his garbage you see below directed at me.
Now remember, smokepole was not even involved in the original conversation as you have seen now for yourselves at the link above.
Friends, this is what a mentally sick stalker does, and looks like on the internet.
Only a severe mentally deranged person would add words to make it look like someone said something, so they could inject themselves into a conversation and go on to troll the individual.
Is this the type of mentally deranged people you support and want on this site?
Originally Posted by smokepole
"Low fence backcountry" that's hilarious, keep 'em coming!! "Backcountry" is not fenced. At least where I hunt. It ain't private land either. And as far as all your sanctimonious bullsh** about never making a bad shot, you just haven't hunted enough, it'll happen.
I’ll let you guys read the rest, but I need to correct him here.
Smokepole, again, you’re a complete idiot, and the biggest B.S. artist I have ever seen on the internet. Turner’s ranch is back country low fence. Bacon’s ranch is back country low fence. Hill’s ranch is back country low fence, and many more, all low fence back country. All the ranches in the lower Sangre de Cristo range are all private owned back country low fence ranches owned by billionaires and very wealthy people.
You’re a fool, a complete uneducated fool.
Originally Posted by smokepole
And just to put some facts in front of you so you can stop with your sanctimonious bullsh**, neither one of the two elk I killed suffered inordinately, I just couldn't find them in the dark and had to come back in the morning. One was a cow I shot with a muzzleloader, perfect placement on a 60 yard standing broadside shot. The bullet double-lunged her and was expanded to the size of a quarter, just under the off-side hide. She made it lesss than 200 yards and died out in the open on a night that got down near 20 degrees. The reason I couldn't find her was, she took off running the way she was facing, got into a grove of spruce where I couldn't see her, and turned 180 degrees and ran the other direction before she piled up. She left one drop of blood the size of a quarter, right where she was standing when I shot. I spent a few hours looking in the wrong direction, searching by headlamp.
We found her at first light and I was pissed, I thought I'd lost the meat because like you, I'd never done what we're talking about here, that is, recovered an animal after it layed overnight. Like you, I believed the stuff I'd always heard and read in Field and Stream.
Now I know better. One day you will. Possibly.
The other was a bull. Fatal shot, 30 yards broadside. He trotted 60 yards and layed down under a tree. I stood there watching him for 15 minutes, and he watched me, too sick to run off. Finally his head flopped over and layed on the ground. It was my first bow kill and I was excited and wanted to put my hands on him. So I didn't wait long enough before I walked up to him. If I had, I'd have recovered him right there, 60 yards from the shot. But he got up and trotted into the thick oak brush. By that time it was dark and my only move was to back out and come back in the morning.
We found him at first light, he'd made it another hundred yards.
And the meat was still good.
Other than that, it's beyond me how a person with as little experience and knowledge as you becomes such a sanctimonious prick in such a short time on this earth.
It takes a deranged and mentally sick person you guys to add words to somebody’s post, so they can go on to troll and write all of that above, and especially his last paragraph bolded right above……..when the but didn't find right away was never even said by me or anyone in the original post HE quoted.
Last point. All of his above posting is outright lies. Meat on a thick animal, like an elk, will not keep overnight unless the heat is released by opening the body cavity. You must: field dress, wash the majority of blood off the meat and inside body cavity, body cavity spread and held open with a broken branch, hind legs spread and held apart (rope to a close tree or feet spread and tied to long branch), and lastly the temps have to be low enough (less than 40*) and the meat protected from direct sunlight the next morning.
Leave a hat or shirt you’re wearing, and hang on the horns for the human scent, so it can drift outward in the air, to keep predators off the meat. On a trophy you plan to mount, wrap a cover over the face to protect the cape, so a predator can not chew up the face if the scent does not keep them away.
If you want spoiled green meat, listen to your deranged friend.
If you don’t believe me, you’ll just have to learn the hard way.
Now this is hilarious. "Taking me to task" for misquoting him. And the first thing he quotes above and attributes to me is misqouted, something i never said.
My daughter in the Eagle Cap Wilderness a few years ago. Near the Snake. Bear country but they did not have any problems. Had the quarters on the horses in a matter of a couple of hours. Archery kill.
I was going to post photos of my 5500 ft/lb 50 caliber lever gun but figured the flaming would get to 20 pages explaining to me it would be useless against a charging griz.
Now this is hilarious. "Taking me to task" for misquoting him. And the first thing he quotes above and attributes to me is misqouted, something i never said.
I didn't read any further.
"Elkslayer," GFY you tool.
If you would not have altered the original posting when you added words to it, that would not have happened, but you screwed it all up.
It's repaired now to show just like you altered it.
You're a deranged man
And, yeah, "you read further", because all normal people would. Just shows you're a pathological liar.
Originally Posted by ElkSlayer91but didn't find right away
Never said I hunt a high fence, and never would either. All low fence back country pal. Maybe if you hadn't wasted your life away on the internet harrassing people, you could afford to hunt a quality area.
Here it is again, for everyone to see you added but didn't find right away.
Words don't come after the person's screen name on a quote.
you’re a complete idiot, and the biggest B.S. artist I have ever seen on the internet.
People who speak like you are usually exactly what they rant most loudly about...
You're just as mentally sick for not quoting my whole post with the proof I posted to backup my statement.
I back my speak with facts where the adults in the room can read the verifiable proof.
You're just a troll, lying to cover for a mentally sick man, and that makes you just as mentally sick.
Here's the original full quote you fool:
Originally Posted by elkslayer91
Smokepole, again, you’re a complete idiot, and the biggest B.S. artist I have ever seen on the internet. Turner’s ranch is back country low fence. Bacon’s ranch is back country low fence. Hill’s ranch is back country low fence, and many more, all low fence back country. All the ranches in the lower Sangre de Cristo range are all private owned back country low fence ranches owned by billionaires and very wealthy people.
30 pages of regurgitant spew. Still no hard & fast answers on the subject at hand. The question that really needs to be answered is "Who ate the Strawberries". Fess up.
My daughter in the Eagle Cap Wilderness a few years ago. Near the Snake. Bear country but they did not have any problems. Had the quarters on the horses in a matter of a couple of hours. Archery kill.
I was going to post photos of my 5500 ft/lb 50 caliber lever gun but figured the flaming would get to 20 pages explaining to me it would be useless against a charging griz.
The surreal thing about this thread is very personal in a way.
Years ago I was just a die hard archer that moved west.
Then I started to spike camp with my mules.
One moonlight night in wolves country I tried to figure out my 45 ACP high point. What a joke! I couldn't tell in the dark wtf was going on!
My good friend told me all the Vietnam cave rats liked single action colts for the nitty gritty. I have to agree a wheel gun will go "bang" pretty much when you want!
Perhaps a good compromise would be a Ruger 100 in 44 spl, or 45 spl?
Go piss on another thread elkschlayer. No one gives a [bleep] about you or your issues.
This was a somewhat informative discussion about something very topical to many of us before you decided to inculcate the thread with your profound insecurity and ignorance. GFY.
Go piss on another thread elkschlayer. No one gives a [bleep] about you or your issues.
This was a somewhat informative discussion about something very topical to many of us before you decided to inculcate the tread with your profound insecurity and ignorance. GFY.
Prayers for the guides family.
Ummm....your boyfriend, smokepole, starting trolling this thread starting on page 4, attacking several members here, and STALKING me by quoting my posts and altering my words.......so you can go straight to hell.
I have posted the evidence tonight for everyone who has a functioning brain to see.
Obviously, your brain does not function....at all.
The fact you are jumping me, instead of smokepole for trashing this thread to begin with, just shows you are a troll too.
Should we give this thread a close with an silent prayer for Mark Uptain and his family...And a Thanks to Field Grade for his “Troll Sniffer Nose” early on and excellent choice in all things female. Amen 😎
this is still going on? I left it a few pages back last night and was amazed at the poopshow it had become.
FG, someone else a few post backs called it,
we need some T&A
Geno.
I'll get right on it.
Now THAT"S what I'm talkin' about!
I'd like to get right on it also.
Geno
PS 28 pages by my count, sheesh. I wonder what the dead guy would think of what his demise has wrought? Shame, except for girls with guns that is. No offense to his wife and kiddoes.
Smokepole, again, you’re a complete idiot, and the biggest B.S. artist I have ever seen on the internet. Turner’s ranch is back country low fence. Bacon’s ranch is back country low fence. Hill’s ranch is back country low fence, and many more, all low fence back country. All the ranches in the lower Sangre de Cristo range are all private owned back country low fence ranches owned by billionaires and very wealthy people.
Thanks for the information. Let's see, "Turner's Ranch" in the Sangres would be Vermejo, right? And "Bacon's Ranch" would be Trinchera, correct? And of course, "Hill's ranch" is the Hill Ranch in southern Colorado.
Smokepole, again, you’re a complete idiot, and the biggest B.S. artist I have ever seen on the internet. Turner’s ranch is back country low fence. Bacon’s ranch is back country low fence. Hill’s ranch is back country low fence, and many more, all low fence back country. All the ranches in the lower Sangre de Cristo range are all private owned back country low fence ranches owned by billionaires and very wealthy people.
Thanks for the information. Let's see, "Turner's Ranch" in the Sangres would be Vermejo, right? And "Bacon's Ranch" would be Trinchera, correct? And of course, "Hill's ranch" is the Hill Ranch in southern Colorado.
Which of those do you hunt?
Would you two f~cking idiots get a room, shut the ph~ck up and go milk a cat, everyone has had enough ! PM your handjobs to each other because this is getting sicking now!
No sh** Sherlock. So when you said "everyone to the rigbt of the bell curve" you were talking about the book.
Which makes no sense. Which makes sense coming from you.
No pardner. Wrong again. The link, and sentence, just proved you were wrong about the "C". It does need to be capitalized.
Everyone knows what "everyone to the right of the bell curve" means......except you obviously. Get one of your fan-boys to explain it to you in a PM.
Sorry ace, you're wrong again. The book is capitalized, the term (as you used it) is not. It's just a bell-shaped curve. From Wikipedia:
"The normal distribution is sometimes informally called the bell curve. However, many other distributions are bell-shaped (such as the Cauchy, Student's t, and logistic distributions)."
I took the strawberries, had them with heavy whipping cream last night.
My statement makes about as much sense as most of the posts in this thread, I will not open it anymore. Getting too off track. Take your egos to the gym.
With all due respect, a man with a gun is at the top of the apex. Most grizzlies comport themselves accordingly; those that don't need to be eliminated from the population. If not they will continue and in this case teach their offspring.
None of them will comport themselves by your standard, given similar circumstances to the present case.
You may as well launch cruise missiles into the lake every time someone drowns in it. Makes just as much sense.
Now, the case of a bear who has been habituated to eating human offerings, or from garbage cans, is a different case, and the only solution in those cases may well be destruction. But there is no evidence that this was the situation in the present case. These bears were in their own habitat, just doing what grizzlies do, tragedy though it may be for the human victims.
I skipped pages 10 though 32. Alaska v. Florida is decided in favor of Alaska.
Smokepole, again, you’re a complete idiot, and the biggest B.S. artist I have ever seen on the internet. Turner’s ranch is back country low fence. Bacon’s ranch is back country low fence. Hill’s ranch is back country low fence, and many more, all low fence back country. All the ranches in the lower Sangre de Cristo range are all private owned back country low fence ranches owned by billionaires and very wealthy people.
Thanks for the information. Let's see, "Turner's Ranch" in the Sangres would be Vermejo, right? And "Bacon's Ranch" would be Trinchera, correct? And of course, "Hill's ranch" is the Hill Ranch in southern Colorado.
Which of those do you hunt?
This seemed like a pretty straightforward question, but ol' "elkslayer" sure disappeared in a hurry. Not sure why he wouldn't want to answer, he seems pretty self-assured about this stuff. I'm still curious about these "backcountry low-fence ranches" elkslayer says he hunts, I think I'll start another thread on that.
The GoFundMe page for Mark Uptain's family is up to $177K agsainst a goal of $200K, in case anyone is interested:
No thang to bark,sidestep,draw your 22LR(S&W 317 Airlite on this jaunt)and place CT laser where one wishes. She stopped atta 'bout the 5-foot line and headed for her Cubs...no drama requisite. Had a few cameras to contend,but hardly a big fhuqking deal and it pays to be proficient.
Though I'm usually toting a 22/45 LITE wearing FF3 and CT grip. It seems a rifle is often slung on a shoulder to boot,but was gunning pics yesterday,because it was too hot to skin a fhuqking Bear out and a rifle never made the cut.
Spent primers remain THE Supreme Tutorial. Hint.
Vegetation tends to be a touch "thick",shadows loom and the screaming harsh sunlight,does no favors for seeing WTF lurks ahead. Have seen it get sporty.(grin) NOBODY draws a CT grip in such conditions and do not buy same,immediately. Hint.
Been purty good digs for 'em,due the huge rains and highwater storms.
Smokepole, again, you’re a complete idiot, and the biggest B.S. artist I have ever seen on the internet. Turner’s ranch, Bacon’s ranch, and Hill’s ranch are all backcountry low fence, and many more, all low fence backcountry. All the ranches in the lower Sangre de Cristo range are all private owned backcountry low fence ranches owned by billionaires and very wealthy people.
Thanks for the information. Let's see, "Turner's Ranch" in the Sangres would be Vermejo, right? And "Bacon's Ranch" would be Trinchera, correct? And of course, "Hill's ranch" is the Hill Ranch in southern Colorado. Which of those do you hunt?
Not sure why he wouldn't want to answer
1 - There's more than 1 Hill ranch. 2 - I hunt "and many more" 3 - It isn't any of your business: who I am; how many sections I own, head I run, lever guns I own; where exactly I live; or where exactly I hunt....because you're a mentally disturbed individual stalking me on this site. 4 - Go apply for that Walmart Greeter job, so you can obtain health benefits, and receive the medication and psychological help you so desparatly need.
Smokepole, again, you’re a complete idiot, and the biggest B.S. artist I have ever seen on the internet. Turner’s ranch, Bacon’s ranch, and Hill’s ranch are all backcountry low fence, and many more, all low fence backcountry. All the ranches in the lower Sangre de Cristo range are all private owned backcountry low fence ranches owned by billionaires and very wealthy people.
Thanks for the information. Let's see, "Turner's Ranch" in the Sangres would be Vermejo, right? And "Bacon's Ranch" would be Trinchera, correct? And of course, "Hill's ranch" is the Hill Ranch in southern Colorado. Which of those do you hunt?
Not sure why he wouldn't want to answer
1 - There's more than 1 Hill ranch. 2 - I hunt "and many more" 3 - It isn't any of your business: who I am; how many sections I own, head I run, lever guns I own; where exactly I live; or where exactly I hunt....because you're a mentally disturbed individual stalking me on this site. 4 - Go apply for that Walmart Greeter job, so you can obtain health benefits, and receive the medication and psychological help you so desparatly need.
Sport, I don't want to know "who you are" what you own, or any of your information, and I didn't ask for anything like that so stop your bitching and whining. Nice try at misdirection though.
You've been bragging about your elk hunting prowess, and I'm calling bullsh**, just so everyone here can see that you're as FOS as a Christmas turkey. You said you hunt on "low fence back country ranches" (there's an oxymoron) and you named three, Trinchera, Vermejo, and Hill. All three offer only guided hunts.
You don't hunt Trinchera because they're bowhunting only and you've been bragging about your rifle skills. Plus they have a long waiting list.
Hill Ranch advertises 95% success, and Vermejo advertises 90% success with 100% of hunters getting an opportunoty for a shot on a bull.
So congratulations "elkslayer," for killing elk on "low-fence back country" ranches with 90+% success rates.
Smokepole, again, you’re a complete idiot, and the biggest B.S. artist I have ever seen on the internet. Turner’s ranch, Bacon’s ranch, and Hill’s ranch are all backcountry low fence, and many more, all low fence backcountry. All the ranches in the lower Sangre de Cristo range are all private owned backcountry low fence ranches owned by billionaires and very wealthy people.
Thanks for the information. Let's see, "Turner's Ranch" in the Sangres would be Vermejo, right? And "Bacon's Ranch" would be Trinchera, correct? And of course, "Hill's ranch" is the Hill Ranch in southern Colorado. Which of those do you hunt?
Not sure why he wouldn't want to answer
1 - There's more than 1 Hill ranch. 2 - I hunt "and many more" 3 - It isn't any of your business: who I am; how many sections I own, head I run, lever guns I own; where exactly I live; or where exactly I hunt....because you're a mentally disturbed individual stalking me on this site. 4 - Go apply for that Walmart Greeter job, so you can obtain health benefits, and receive the medication and psychological help you so desparatly need.
Sport, I don't want to know "who you are" what you own, or any of your information, and I didn't ask for anything like that so stop your bitching and whining. Nice try at misdirection though.
You've been bragging about your elk hunting prowess, and I'm calling bullsh**, just so everyone here can see that you're as FOS as a Christmas turkey. You said you hunt on "low fence back country ranches" (there's an oxymoron) and you named three, Trinchera, Vermejo, and Hill. All three offer only guided hunts.
You don't hunt Trinchera because they're bowhunting only and you've been bragging about your rifle skills. Plus they have a long waiting list.
Hill Ranch advertises 95% success, and Vermejo advertises 90% success with 100% of hunters getting an opportunoty for a shot on a bull.
So congratulations "elkslayer," for killing elk on "low-fence back country" ranches with 90+% success rates.
You forgot to put the gofundme link in your post here, you have been using, in your attempt to cover up the fact you are nothing but a mentally deranged troll here on this site.
Come edit your post, and then go apply for that Walmart job.
You wouldn't know, because you just showed you're Two Stoopud™ to recognize any facts, being you don’t know the difference between your and you’re, something you’re taught in elementary school.
Your brilliance is showing while you’re wasting your life away as a troll.
You wouldn't know, because you just showed you're Two Stoopud™ to recognize any facts, being you don’t know the difference between your and you’re, something you’re taught in elementary school.
Your brilliance is showing while you’re wasting your life away as a troll.
Here, Buttercup, maybe a couple of these will sooth your irritated vagina.
You wouldn't know, because you just showed you're Two Stoopud™ to recognize any facts, being you don’t know the difference between your and you’re, something you’re taught in elementary school.
Your brilliance is showing while you’re wasting your life away as a troll.
Here, Buttercup, maybe a couple of these will sooth your irritated vagina.
It's not too often you see a guy with an avatar that matches the banjo player from the movie Deliverance......and with the posts to match the character's I.Q. level.
You wouldn't know, because you just showed you're Two Stoopud™ to recognize any facts, being you don’t know the difference between your and you’re, something you’re taught in elementary school.
Your brilliance is showing while you’re wasting your life away as a troll.
You wouldn't know, because you just showed you're Two Stoopud™ to recognize any facts, being you don’t know the difference between your and you’re, something you’re taught in elementary school.
Your brilliance is showing while you’re wasting your life away as a troll.
Here, Buttercup, maybe a couple of these will sooth your irritated vagina.
It's not too often you see a guy with an avatar that matches the banjo player from the movie Deliverance......and with the posts to match the character's I.Q. level.
Aww shucks, I done hurt his little feelings.........
What they don't show is the 2 or 3 dozen wounded and lost critters to get this video.
Idunno, I do know that I couldn't do it even with the right gear. But without knowing more I'm not going to condemn somebody that possibly can. There are plenty of long range deer shot with videos posted online.
The one thing said at the end of the video by the kids dad was that they had a range in their backyard that was set up for long range practice, they even have a "gong" at 1360 yards. If you grew up doing that all the time and had all the right gear maybe it comes as natural as me shooting elk at 300 yards.
I don't think anything of it when I see military sharp shooters smoking a guys head off with a 50 cal at similar range.
I'll give them the benefit of the doubt, even though hundreds of commentors on youtube roasted them pretty hard.
What they don't show is the 2 or 3 dozen wounded and lost critters to get this video.
Idunno, I do know that I couldn't do it even with the right gear. But without knowing more I'm not going to condemn somebody that possibly can. There are plenty of long range deer shot with videos posted online.
The one thing said at the end of the video by the kids dad was that they had a range in their backyard that was set up for long range practice, they even have a "gong" at 1360 yards. If you grew up doing that all the time and had all the right gear maybe it comes as natural as me shooting elk at 300 yards.
I don't think anything of it when I see military sharp shooters smoking a guys head off with a 50 cal at similar range.
I'll give them the benefit of the doubt, even though hundreds of commentors on youtube roasted them pretty hard.
Missed the first shot didn't he? What's that tell ya?
Sport hunting, which is what all of us do, SHOULD be about the quality of the animal taken, at least to some extent.
That is subverted to the shooters ability when game is purposely sought at long ranges just to display shooting skill that could be measured more accurately on paper targets.
Sport hunting, which is what all of us do, SHOULD be about the quality of the animal taken, at least to some extent.
That is subverted to the shooters ability when game is purposely sought at long ranges just to display shooting skill that could be measured more accurately on paper targets.
You wouldn't know, because you just showed you'reTwo Stoopud™ to recognize any facts, being you don’t know the difference between your and you’re, something you’re taught in elementary school.
Your brilliance is showing while you’re wasting your life away as a troll.
That's rich coming from a dumb ass that doesn't know the difference between Two and Too.
You wouldn't know, because you just showed you're Two Stoopud™ to recognize any facts, being you don’t know the difference between your and you’re, something you’re taught in elementary school.
Your brilliance is showing while you’re wasting your life away as a troll.
big f-cking deal fake Texan is that all you got.
Am I the only one having visions of elfslayer turning around and seeing Roger behind him after making these statements out loud?
You wouldn't know, because you just showed you're Two Stoopud™ to recognize any facts, being you don’t know the difference between your and you’re, something you’re taught in elementary school.
Your brilliance is showing while you’re wasting your life away as a troll.
big f-cking deal fake Texan is that all you got.
Am I the only one having visions of elfslayer turning around and seeing Roger behind him after making these statements out loud?
mike r
Roger (I think) has better things to do....besides, ending up in jail or prison would just plain suck....
I'm to old and beat up for fist fights ... sometimes, but i always carry a 1911.... sometimes. I'd just sic Sue our rat terrier on him, shes mean as hell.
guylayer91 bout ta log in under his other handle, kickstheshitouttaeverbody, which was also given to him due to his incredible skills fighting low fences, whilst correcting their grammar, but never his own, and tell us all how wrong everybody is but him.
[quote=ElkSlayer91] Smokepole, again, you’re a complete idiot, and the biggest B.S. artist I have ever seen on the internet. Turner’s ranch, Bacon’s ranch, and Hill’s ranch are all backcountry low fence, and many more, all low fence backcountry. All the ranches in the lower Sangre de Cristo range are all private owned backcountry low fence ranches owned by billionaires and very wealthy people.
Thanks for the information. Let's see, "Turner's Ranch" in the Sangres would be Vermejo, right? And "Bacon's Ranch" would be Trinchera, correct? And of course, "Hill's ranch" is the Hill Ranch in southern Colorado. Which of those do you hunt?
Not sure why he wouldn't want to answer
1 - There's more than 1 Hill ranch. 2 - I hunt "and many more" 3 - It isn't any of your business: who I am; how many sections I own, head I run, lever guns I own; where exactly I live; or where exactly I hunt....because you're a mentally disturbed individual stalking me on this site. 4 - Go apply for that Walmart Greeter job, so you can obtain health benefits, and receive the medication and psychological help you so desparatly need.
Originally Posted by smokepole
Sport, I don't want to know "who you are" what you own, or any of your information, and I didn't ask for anything like that so stop your bitching and whining. Nice try at misdirection though.
Originally Posted by smokepole
Which of those do you hunt?
Originally Posted by smokepole
Not sure why he wouldn't want to answer
You are a deranged cyberstalking troll, and your two quotes above prove you continue to harrass me for personal information which is none of your business.
Originally Posted by smokepole
You've been bragging about your elk hunting prowess, and I'm calling bullsh**, just so everyone here can see that you're as FOS as a Christmas turkey. You said you hunt on "low fence back country ranches" (there's an oxymoron) and you named three, Trinchera, Vermejo, and Hill. All three offer only guided hunts.
You are a deranged cyberstalking troll who only states lies. You stated:
Originally Posted by smokepole
"Low fence backcountry" that's hilarious, keep 'em coming!! "Backcountry" is not fenced. At least where I hunt. It ain't private land either.
I simply listed three huge well known low fence, trophy grade ranches, in the backcountry of Colorado, to prove you have no clue what you are talking about.
Further, you are trolling and harassing me, because I hunt private land, and not public.
Originally Posted by smokepole
You don't hunt Trinchera because they're bowhunting only and you've been bragging about your rifle skills. Plus they have a long waiting list.
The above and next two statements of yours prove just how mentally deranged you are.
1 – You don’t know where I hunt. 2 – You don’t know whether I bow hunt. 3 – You don’t know if I am on their waiting list. 4 – Basing whether I bow hunt or not from me discussing rifle hunting here, shows how absolutely mentally deranged you are.
Originally Posted by smokepole
Hill Ranch advertises 95% success, and Vermejo advertises 90% success with 100% of hunters getting an opportunoty for a shot on a bull.
And here, with this quote, is where you steer the conversation back to high success, large acreage, private land hunting on trophy caliber ranches, since you can not afford to, so you can continue your cyberstalking and harassment of me here on this site, along with everyone else you have managed to pull together and become involved.
FACT: Your above quote shows what a TOTAL NON-ELK HUNTING FAKE YOU ARE, and how unknowledgeable you are to elk hunting. There are many low to medium acreage private ranches where the success is not even close to 50%, much less 30%. The big ranches that hold herds can drive to different parts of the ranch holding game to get a shot. Low to medium acreage private ranches don’t have that advantage. You’re clueless.
Originally Posted by smokepole
So congratulations "elkslayer," for killing elk on "low-fence back country" ranches with 90+% success rates.
This quote of yours, proves beyond any shadow of a doubt, you are cyberstalking, and harassing me, because I hunt private land…..and you don’t.
You’re a 60 year old mentally deranged man, who has managed to pull numerous members here together, to cyberstalk and harass me on several threads here in the span of only a few weeks, in your attempt to completely destroy my ability for enjoyment on this site as a contributor and purchaser of goods.
I have posted hard proof you are the single individual who started the trolling and attacked others on this one thread, and yet your cyberstalking and mentally deranged friends completely ignore the facts to help you in your cyberstalking and harassment.
You’re a sick man, and your member friends helping you are just as mentally deranged.
30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80 year old men, wasting your lives away trolling someone, based on lies from a deranged person’s posts on a screen. Pitiful. Absolutely pitiful.
And I have zero problem quoting you people to make you look the fools and criminals you are for the world to read, and see for eternity.
None of you are Christians for the actions you have taken here against me.
All of you are pure evil, Satanist loving sick souls, especially the ones who have anything pertaining to scripture or having “God” in your signature. You are fake.
You are fake Christians, and the absolute scum of this country.
I’m sure you’ll be in church tomorrow, rubbing shoulders with your neighbors, to assure them how “pure” you are.
guylayer91 bout ta log in under his other handle, kickstheshitouttaeverbody, which was also given to him due to his incredible skills fighting low fences, whilst correcting their grammar, but never his own, and tell us all how wrong everybody is but him.
Chicks dig guys with skills......computer hacking skills, nun chuck skills ..
None of you are Christians for the actions you have taken here against me.
All of you are pure evil, Satanist loving sick souls, especially the ones who have anything pertaining to scripture or having “God” in your signature. You are fake.
You are fake Christians, and the absolute scum of this country.
Forgive the fire, guylayer, for they know not what they do.
Fact is, if ya wanted to show everbody here, once and for all, you could not post here anymore.
Fire'd be in tears, regrettin the loss, and wonderin for the resta their lives, what incredible knowledge you'da bestowed on em, with giant longass posts that are impossible and boring to follow, over the years.
Maybe ya could, you know, go out into the desert for, let's just throw a number out there, 40 days and 40 nights?
You know, grabba crown o' cholla and really show everbody what they're missin.
Why, it'd be the ruination of the site. Nobody'd post anymore.
Except for all the where'd guylayer91 go? threads, where all the actual christian members would flagellate themselves until your second coming, so to speak.
Just a suggestion, and hope I splelled this to your satisfaction.
None of you are Christians for the actions you have taken here against me.
All of you are pure evil, Satanist loving sick souls, especially the ones who have anything pertaining to scripture or having “God” in your signature. You are fake.
You are fake Christians, and the absolute scum of this country.
Forgive the fire, guylayer, for they know not what they do.
Fact is, if ya wanted to show everbody here, once and for all, you could not post here anymore.
Fire'd be in tears, regrettin the loss, and wonderin for the resta their lives, what incredible knowledge you'da bestowed on em, with giant longass posts that are impossible and boring to follow, over the years.
Maybe ya could, you know, go out into the desert for, let's just throw a number out there, 40 days and 40 nights?
You know, grabba crown o' cholla and really show everbody what they're missin.
Why, it'd be the ruination of the site. Nobody'd post anymore.
Except for all the where'd guylayer91 go? threads, where all the actual christian members would flagellate themselves until your second coming, so to speak.
Just a suggestion, and hope I splelled this to your satisfaction.
Fubarski,
I'm not sure, .....................................but this "...91" guy just might know about Cermalube.
You wouldn't know, because you just showed you're Two Stoopud™ to recognize any facts, being you don’t know the difference between your and you’re, something you’re taught in elementary school.
Your brilliance is showing while you’re wasting your life away as a troll.
big f-cking deal fake Texan is that all you got.
Did God teach you how to cuss on the internet, so kids reading these threads can learn they don’t have to have any morals in life either?
Did God teach you how to be proficient at cyberstalking, so kids reading these threads can learn how to be as proficient at cyberstalking as you have become?
Did God teach you how to be proficient at cyberstalking, by being a follower of a deranged man on this site, who is posting lies about a Christian, so you can participate in destroying him too?
Here’s is what I got. I have the God given talent to turn these little black dots into letters, which then become words that I can use to prove beyond any shadow of a doubt you are just as mentally deranged as smokepole, for your participation here in attempting to completely destroy me, when I never attacked anyone here, any where.
I GOT Jesus Christ protecting me from Satanists like you.
I GOT the Holy Spirit in my heart. You have the devil.
I GOT decades of vast knowledge acquired through a successful business career.
I GOT love for my fellow friends. You have hate, even against people who have never done anything to you, ME.
I GOT so much more, but you’re not worth my time.
May God somehow find the will, to give you mercy, for your poor and decrepit soul.
You wouldn't know, because you just showed you're Two Stoopud™ to recognize any facts, being you don’t know the difference between your and you’re, something you’re taught in elementary school.
Your brilliance is showing while you’re wasting your life away as a troll.
big f-cking deal fake Texan is that all you got.
Am I the only one having visions of elfslayer turning around and seeing Roger behind him after making these statements out loud?
mike r
Would you by any chance have the balls to clarify your statement, and specify exactly what you want to happen?
[quote=ElkSlayer91] Smokepole, again, you’re a complete idiot, and the biggest B.S. artist I have ever seen on the internet. Turner’s ranch, Bacon’s ranch, and Hill’s ranch are all backcountry low fence, and many more, all low fence backcountry. All the ranches in the lower Sangre de Cristo range are all private owned backcountry low fence ranches owned by billionaires and very wealthy people.
Thanks for the information. Let's see, "Turner's Ranch" in the Sangres would be Vermejo, right? And "Bacon's Ranch" would be Trinchera, correct? And of course, "Hill's ranch" is the Hill Ranch in southern Colorado. Which of those do you hunt?
Not sure why he wouldn't want to answer
1 - There's more than 1 Hill ranch. 2 - I hunt "and many more" 3 - It isn't any of your business: who I am; how many sections I own, head I run, lever guns I own; where exactly I live; or where exactly I hunt....because you're a mentally disturbed individual stalking me on this site. 4 - Go apply for that Walmart Greeter job, so you can obtain health benefits, and receive the medication and psychological help you so desparatly need.
Originally Posted by smokepole
Sport, I don't want to know "who you are" what you own, or any of your information, and I didn't ask for anything like that so stop your bitching and whining. Nice try at misdirection though.
Originally Posted by smokepole
Which of those do you hunt?
Originally Posted by smokepole
Not sure why he wouldn't want to answer
You are a deranged cyberstalking troll, and your two quotes above prove you continue to harrass me for personal information which is none of your business.
Originally Posted by smokepole
You've been bragging about your elk hunting prowess, and I'm calling bullsh**, just so everyone here can see that you're as FOS as a Christmas turkey. You said you hunt on "low fence back country ranches" (there's an oxymoron) and you named three, Trinchera, Vermejo, and Hill. All three offer only guided hunts.
You are a deranged cyberstalking troll who only states lies. You stated:
Originally Posted by smokepole
"Low fence backcountry" that's hilarious, keep 'em coming!! "Backcountry" is not fenced. At least where I hunt. It ain't private land either.
I simply listed three huge well known low fence, trophy grade ranches, in the backcountry of Colorado, to prove you have no clue what you are talking about.
Further, you are trolling and harassing me, because I hunt private land, and not public.
Originally Posted by smokepole
You don't hunt Trinchera because they're bowhunting only and you've been bragging about your rifle skills. Plus they have a long waiting list.
The above and next two statements of yours prove just how mentally deranged you are.
1 – You don’t know where I hunt. 2 – You don’t know whether I bow hunt. 3 – You don’t know if I am on their waiting list. 4 – Basing whether I bow hunt or not from me discussing rifle hunting here, shows how absolutely mentally deranged you are.
Originally Posted by smokepole
Hill Ranch advertises 95% success, and Vermejo advertises 90% success with 100% of hunters getting an opportunoty for a shot on a bull.
And here, with this quote, is where you steer the conversation back to high success, large acreage, private land hunting on trophy caliber ranches, since you can not afford to, so you can continue your cyberstalking and harassment of me here on this site, along with everyone else you have managed to pull together and become involved.
FACT: Your above quote shows what a TOTAL NON-ELK HUNTING FAKE YOU ARE, and how unknowledgeable you are to elk hunting. There are many low to medium acreage private ranches where the success is not even close to 50%, much less 30%. The big ranches that hold herds can drive to different parts of the ranch holding game to get a shot. Low to medium acreage private ranches don’t have that advantage. You’re clueless.
Originally Posted by smokepole
So congratulations "elkslayer," for killing elk on "low-fence back country" ranches with 90+% success rates.
This quote of yours, proves beyond any shadow of a doubt, you are cyberstalking, and harassing me, because I hunt private land…..and you don’t.
You’re a 60 year old mentally deranged man, who has managed to pull numerous members here together, to cyberstalk and harass me on several threads here in the span of only a few weeks, in your attempt to completely destroy my ability for enjoyment on this site as a contributor and purchaser of goods.
I have posted hard proof you are the single individual who started the trolling and attacked others on this one thread, and yet your cyberstalking and mentally deranged friends completely ignore the facts to help you in your cyberstalking and harassment.
You’re a sick man, and your member friends helping you are just as mentally deranged.
30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80 year old men, wasting your lives away trolling someone, based on lies from a deranged person’s posts on a screen. Pitiful. Absolutely pitiful.
And I have zero problem quoting you people to make you look the fools and criminals you are for the world to read, and see for eternity.
None of you are Christians for the actions you have taken here against me.
All of you are pure evil, Satanist loving sick souls, especially the ones who have anything pertaining to scripture or having “God” in your signature. You are fake.
You are fake Christians, and the absolute scum of this country.
I’m sure you’ll be in church tomorrow, rubbing shoulders with your neighbors, to assure them how “pure” you are.
You wouldn't know, because you just showed you'reTwo Stoopud™ to recognize any facts, being you don’t know the difference between your and you’re, something you’re taught in elementary school.
Your brilliance is showing while you’re wasting your life away as a troll.
That's rich coming from a dumb ass that doesn't know the difference between Two and Too.
You didn’t correct me for the spelling of stupid, so I will have to assume you thought it was spelled correctly.
My post went miles over your head while it accomplished what I wanted it to, and that is for someone with S.L.I.Q. Syndrome™ (Super Low Intelligent Quotient Syndrome), like you, to take the bait you did, so the intelligent people reading here can see the level of ignorance I’m dealing with, and also get a good laugh at your expense.
Spelling words incorrectly on purpose is a form of branding, and also known as: Sensational spelling; Satiric misspelling. Marketing agencies do this when creating business names or naming a product. They then trademark the name, like I have.
Thank you for being the test dummy in this crash test.
Thank you for cyberstalking and harassing me, and enriching our lives by showing the world what a dumb ass you are.
I'd just like to go on the record, here, as stating that my innocent and playful references to our lord and savior guylayer91, are in no way to be construed as any type of support for the shatheaded moron smokepole.
Fact is, if layer hadn't been peckin at such an obvious blowhard, the fire'd come down on his ass 20 pages ago.
I'd just like to go on the record, here, as stating that my innocent and playful references to our lord and savior guylayer91, are in no way to be construed as any type of support for the shatheaded moron smokepole.
Fact is, if layer hadn't been peckin at such an obvious blowhard, the fire'd come down on his ass 20 pages ago.
You're a cyberstalker, criminal, and satan worshiper.
I'd just like to go on the record, here, as stating that my innocent and playful references to our lord and savior guylayer91, are in no way to be construed as any type of support for the shatheaded moron smokepole.
Fact is, if layer hadn't been peckin at such an obvious blowhard, the fire'd come down on his ass 20 pages ago.
You're a cyberstalker, criminal, and satan worshiper.
If he is between 30 and 80 years of age that is now apparently the case.
Hey "elkslayer." You keep calling me a "cyberstalker."
Look, I'm not going to put "Mr." in front of it, if that's where you are going.
Originally Posted by smokepole
Go back and read your first few posts on this thread. They had nothing to do with the subject under discussion or the OP.
Are you ready for the proof to prove you're a pathological liar?
FIRST POSTING:
Originally Posted by ElkSlayer91
Originally Posted by Tracks
My 'puter shows 12 pages on this, would be 4 without quotes on quotes on quotes.
Your ‘puter is providing you with 12 pages, so far, of free arm-chair-quarterbacking entertainment, by people who have no clue how horses or people react during a bear confrontation.
I believe when I discussed ”horses or people react during a bear confrontation” in my first post on this thread, I was on OP’s topic you mentally deranged cyberstalker.
Originally Posted by smokepole
The were all about me. Personal attacks by you.
The above facts, submitted into evidence, prove you're a liar.
Originally Posted by smokepole
You're an expert at projection.
I'm an expert at debating deranged liberals like you.
Originally Posted by smokepole
Google it, just like you did those ranches you say you hunt on.
I never said I hunted on those ranches I listed.
Go read the facts proving you are a liar in my world book encyclopedia posting.
I'm to old and beat up for fist fights ... sometimes, but i always carry a 1911.... sometimes. I'd just sic Sue our rat terrier on him, shes mean as hell.
Thanks for the laughs tough guy.
Badass on the internet talking about fist fights, and the model gun he packs. LMAO
What a piss-ant cyberstalking useful idiot you are, and too stupid to know the difference between to/too, your/you're, and most likely their/there/they're too.
Unplug your computer, and go back to San Francisco where you will fit right in with that bushy stash.
Or better yet, get smokepole to fly down, and you two tulips can go skinny dipping together in the Laguna Madre.
These low IQ midgets picked the wrong drover to screw with, and I'm rounding them up, to head them into the corral, for the world to see them, for the Low I.Q. clowns they are.
These low IQ midgets picked the wrong drover to screw with, and I'm rounding them up, to head them into the corral, for the world to see them, for the Low I.Q. clowns they are.
Someone here reminds me of someone who used to post here:
Originally Posted by William_E_Tibbe
Originally Posted by redacted
Making our lives miserable,schit,when are you gonna start? All I've seen from you is empty threats.
Hey (redacted) :
Haven't you already figgered out that I ALREADY disturbed your complacency.
Just wait for the heavy duty stuff coming down the pike
Bill
Geno
PS I sure miss Greg. Crossfire would add a needed dimension to this thread.
PPS as others have mentioned, quite a shame this thread devolved into madness. Perhaps it's due for a trip to the basement?
"elkslayer;" My most humble apologies, I missed your first post and as you so skillfully showed (you really have a knack for this) it wasn't about me. I don't know how I missed it, I must not be very good at this.
It was your second, thrid, and fourth posts that were the personal attacks on me. And many more after that.
Now if you'll excuse me I'm gonna go do some satan worshipping, and check in with all my criminal friends. We have to coordinate the vast left-wing conspiracy against you.
well I GOT Joy, Joy, Joy, Joy, down in my heart. Yeah. Down in my heart. Yeah, Down in my heeaarrttt.....
Dat's de only most non-satan worshipping, cyberstalking song I memember from my lost, long-ago yute, before my long, downhill slide into the darkside of the joys of '91 fookenwith.
I'm to old and beat up for fist fights ... sometimes, but i always carry a 1911.... sometimes. I'd just sic Sue our rat terrier on him, shes mean as hell.
Thanks for the laughs tough guy.
Badass on the internet talking about fist fights, and the model gun he packs. LMAO
What a piss-ant cyberstalking useful idiot you are, and too stupid to know the difference between to/too, your/you're, and most likely their/there/they're too.
Unplug your computer, and go back to San Francisco where you will fit right in with that bushy stash.
Or better yet, get smokepole to fly down, and you two tulips can go skinny dipping together in the Laguna Madre.
A couple of the guys here have come down to kill Nilgia, ducks and fish with me on the Laguna Madre, but you wouldn't know about things like that seeing you're so busy on Google.
These low IQ midgets picked the wrong drover to screw with, and I'm rounding them up, to head them into the corral, for the world to see them, for the Low I.Q. clowns they are.
Oh my God, this idiot should be a poster child for Retards R' Us.
Now if you'll excuse me I'm gonna go do some satan worshipping, and check in with all my criminal friends. We have to coordinate the vast left-wing conspiracy against you.
Don't forget your Special Ed classes.. Gotta work on that IQ thing, you know.
I'm to old and beat up for fist fights ... sometimes, but i always carry a 1911.... sometimes. I'd just sic Sue our rat terrier on him, shes mean as hell.
Nothing to smile about, it denotes a fellow that moves stock along a stock route. I would have thought it peculiar to Australia.
I'm not putting down drovers. Just the poster's use of the word. Generally speaking, in America a drover is the boss of the large cattle drives of the mid 1800's.
Nothing to smile about, it denotes a fellow that moves stock along a stock route. I would have thought it peculiar to Australia.
I'm not putting down drovers. Just the poster's use of the word. Generally speaking, in America a drover is the boss of the large cattle drives of the mid 1800's.
Still used here, and there are plenty of fellows locally that move stock around here.
Nothing to smile about, it denotes a fellow that moves stock along a stock route. I would have thought it peculiar to Australia.
I'm not putting down drovers. Just the poster's use of the word. Generally speaking, in America a drover is the boss of the large cattle drives of the mid 1800's.
Still used here, and there are plenty of fellows locally that move stock around here.
Yeah, Stuart. I was privileged to take a few meals with one of your cattle ranchers from the Snowy Mountains when we stayed at the same hotel in Ballarat. They were “ rope versus whip “ type of conversations with each of us learning more about them.
Yeah, Stuart. I was privileged to take a few meals with one of your cattle ranchers from the Snowy Mountains when we stayed at the same hotel in Ballarat. They were “ rope versus whip “ type of conversations with each of us learning more about them.
Word of warning...Australians absolutely CRINGE when you lot refer to our stations and farms as "ranches", I truly cannot express the antipathy that is viewed with.
So basically you would write that as "I met a couple of your cow cockies in Ballarat and spent some time bullshitting about cattle".
figure he's about 27 if the 91 is to designate the yr he was born, probably educated beyond his means, you can have all the education in the world and still be a dumb chit.
figure he's about 27 if the 91 is to designate the yr he was born, probably educated beyond his means, you can have all the education in the world and still be a dumb chit.
That's could be the truth Roger and he's reading a lot of old Texas history books. Of course lots of low fence ranches to be hunted out south/west of Fort Stockton. The Elk are very used to PU's and oil field workers and they will just stand 50' away and watch as they feed.
Yeah, Stuart. I was privileged to take a few meals with one of your cattle ranchers from the Snowy Mountains when we stayed at the same hotel in Ballarat. They were “ rope versus whip “ type of conversations with each of us learning more about them.
Word of warning...Australians absolutely CRINGE when you lot refer to our stations and farms as "ranches", I truly cannot express the antipathy that is viewed with.
So basically you would write that as "I met a couple of your cow cockies in Ballarat and spent some time bullshitting about cattle".
He may have corrected me on that....I don’t recall it being an issue. His STATION was close to, and may have joined, the one where the filming was done fo The Man From Snowy River. I think his STATION has been used in other films as he was very knowledgeable about movie making. I learned this:
There were no trick camera shots involved in the scene where the hero follows the horse herd down a steep mountainside.one of the cow cockies actually rode down it and it was as steep as it appeared on film. Most of the extras in the riding scenes came from the neighboring STATIONS and just did what they do in their line of work.
Some damn fine horsemen in your country.......riding goofy looking saddles.😀
Yeah, Stuart. I was privileged to take a few meals with one of your cattle ranchers from the Snowy Mountains when we stayed at the same hotel in Ballarat. They were “ rope versus whip “ type of conversations with each of us learning more about them.
Word of warning...Australians absolutely CRINGE when you lot refer to our stations and farms as "ranches", I truly cannot express the antipathy that is viewed with.
So basically you would write that as "I met a couple of your cow cockies in Ballarat and spent some time bullshitting about cattle".
He may have corrected me on that....I don’t recall it being an issue. His STATION was close to, and may have joined, the one where the filming was done fo The Man From Snowy River. I think his STATION has been used in other films as he was very knowledgeable about movie making. I learned this:
There were no trick camera shots involved in the scene where the hero follows the horse herd down a steep mountainside.one of the cow cockies actually rode down it and it was as steep as it appeared on film. Most of the extras in the riding scenes came from the neighboring STATIONS and just did what they do in their line of work.
Some damn fine horsemen in your country.......riding goofy looking saddles.😀
Stock saddles are like sitting in big comfy easy chairs in comparison to those horrible things you lot insist on balancing so precariously upon...God alone knows how many have been emasculated by those damned roping horns. Although I worked stock on horseback when I was a young tacker I like to think of horses as impending dog meat, and much prefer Toyota.
I intended to buy myself one but my young daughter had always wanted an English saddle and I found a quality one in Ballarat. I hauled it back home as excess baggage rather than shipping it. I couldnt handle two.
I’d like to see one of your cow cockies doctoring Wheat pasture yearlings with only his whip. Or gather strays down in the Brasada.
Imagine this, youve plunked down $8000 to shoot some elk that keeps eating the cattle s hay in some ranchers low fenced back yard and you find yourself with elkturd whos supposed to accompany ( guide?) you. Stuck with this guy for a week where it's hard to get away from him, and you paid for it.
figure he's about 27 if the 91 is to designate the yr he was born, probably educated beyond his means, you can have all the education in the world and still be a dumb chit.
Roger,
3 hours have passed according to the little goodie on the side of your post.
Someone has not returned to chastise you for your derogatory comments.
Perhaps he has left the basement in ? .............................................TX? ,
More likely CT, IL, or maybe even MA???
Geno
PS, or he may be taking notes and getting ready to call us squirrels and purveyors of soft porn?
Never got charged yesterday,but only bumped (7) Bears...unless you count them that have choked on a feesh,then it's 7-1/2 and he was actually the best of the bunch size wise.
Only (1) Sow and she had but a single Cub. She kept feeding into the brushy shadows and the wind was a touch wrong to slip right up on them,in the WFO. The Trombone didn't care and I could fill the frame with it,but tended to shoot looser for some better feel.
Saw some fair Specimens,but certainly nothing to get excited about.
Brush didn't seem any less dense and the schit(HARSH) light,really wasn't helping me out with colors.
Was totin' The Usual and prolly shoulda yerked the 17-40L offa' the 1DS FF body and drove it on a 1D APS-H crop sensor instead. The added frame rate and buffer depth,do not hurt production. Just a touch unhandy to schlep (3) DSLR's at once,especially since the 300 2.8L is always so very fhuqking temptin' and I try not to leave it in the crummy,for that unhandy reason.(grin) For Sneakin'/Peekin' and Creepin',The Trombone really has no equal and a 1D4 steers it nicely.
Slummed a NIB GoPro that'd been setting on my shelf for multiple years and I'll upgrade in accordance,so as to add that flexibility to the fray. Coupla pards are trying to talk me into getting a Drone or two,but they really ain't my jam...but woulda been killer in said conditions(easier to chase light conditions). Still fighting compression,but really ain't too worried about it,though I'd like to understand cause/effect more better.
Too warm to be skinning Bears and I don't keep feesh in these temps,without slushed ice in a tote. Especially since I can cast from the driveway,into the front yard and yard 'em from colder water to start with.
Light fell away today,with lowered ceiling and rains. Will try to get charged again tomorrow,as you gals set on your Couchbound Kchunts and Whine about your Hurt Feelings.
Never got charged yesterday,but only bumped (7) Bears...unless you count them that have choked on a feesh,then it's 7-1/2 and he was actually the best of the bunch size wise.
Only (1) Sow and she had but a single Cub. She kept feeding into the brushy shadows and the wind was a touch wrong to slip right up on them,in the WFO. The Trombone didn't care and I could fill the frame with it,but tended to shoot looser for some better feel.
Saw some fair Specimens,but certainly nothing to get excited about.
Brush didn't seem any less dense and the schit(HARSH) light,really wasn't helping me out with colors.
Was totin' The Usual and prolly shoulda yerked the 17-40L offa' the 1DS FF body and drove it on a 1D APS-H crop sensor instead. The added frame rate and buffer depth,do not hurt production. Just a touch unhandy to schlep (3) DSLR's at once,especially since the 300 2.8L is always so very fhuqking temptin' and I try not to leave it in the crummy,for that unhandy reason.(grin) For Sneakin'/Peekin' and Creepin',The Trombone really has no equal and a 1D4 steers it nicely.
Slummed a NIB GoPro that'd been setting on my shelf for multiple years and I'll upgrade in accordance,so as to add that flexibility to the fray. Coupla pards are trying to talk me into getting a Drone or two,but they really ain't my jam...but woulda been killer in said conditions(easier to chase light conditions). Still fighting compression,but really ain't too worried about it,though I'd like to understand cause/effect more better.
Too warm to be skinning Bears and I don't keep feesh in these temps,without slushed ice in a tote. Especially since I can cast from the driveway,into the front yard and yard 'em from colder water to start with.
Light fell away today,with lowered ceiling and rains. Will try to get charged again tomorrow,as you gals set on your Couchbound Kchunts and Whine about your Hurt Feelings.
Never got charged yesterday,but only bumped (7) Bears...unless you count them that have choked on a feesh,then it's 7-1/2 and he was actually the best of the bunch size wise. ..............
You guys have some fat bears up there. Our poor mountain bears are pretty skinny in comparison.
Never got charged yesterday,but only bumped (7) Bears...unless you count them that have choked on a feesh,then it's 7-1/2 and he was actually the best of the bunch size wise.
Only (1) Sow and she had but a single Cub. She kept feeding into the brushy shadows and the wind was a touch wrong to slip right up on them,in the WFO. The Trombone didn't care and I could fill the frame with it,but tended to shoot looser for some better feel.
Saw some fair Specimens,but certainly nothing to get excited about.
Brush didn't seem any less dense and the schit(HARSH) light,really wasn't helping me out with colors.
Was totin' The Usual and prolly shoulda yerked the 17-40L offa' the 1DS FF body and drove it on a 1D APS-H crop sensor instead. The added frame rate and buffer depth,do not hurt production. Just a touch unhandy to schlep (3) DSLR's at once,especially since the 300 2.8L is always so very fhuqking temptin' and I try not to leave it in the crummy,for that unhandy reason.(grin) For Sneakin'/Peekin' and Creepin',The Trombone really has no equal and a 1D4 steers it nicely.
Slummed a NIB GoPro that'd been setting on my shelf for multiple years and I'll upgrade in accordance,so as to add that flexibility to the fray. Coupla pards are trying to talk me into getting a Drone or two,but they really ain't my jam...but woulda been killer in said conditions(easier to chase light conditions). Still fighting compression,but really ain't too worried about it,though I'd like to understand cause/effect more better.
Too warm to be skinning Bears and I don't keep feesh in these temps,without slushed ice in a tote. Especially since I can cast from the driveway,into the front yard and yard 'em from colder water to start with.
Light fell away today,with lowered ceiling and rains. Will try to get charged again tomorrow,as you gals set on your Couchbound Kchunts and Whine about your Hurt Feelings.
Never got charged yesterday,but only bumped (7) Bears...unless you count them that have choked on a feesh,then it's 7-1/2 and he was actually the best of the bunch size wise.
Only (1) Sow and she had but a single Cub. She kept feeding into the brushy shadows and the wind was a touch wrong to slip right up on them,in the WFO. The Trombone didn't care and I could fill the frame with it,but tended to shoot looser for some better feel.
Saw some fair Specimens,but certainly nothing to get excited about.
Brush didn't seem any less dense and the schit(HARSH) light,really wasn't helping me out with colors.
Was totin' The Usual and prolly shoulda yerked the 17-40L offa' the 1DS FF body and drove it on a 1D APS-H crop sensor instead. The added frame rate and buffer depth,do not hurt production. Just a touch unhandy to schlep (3) DSLR's at once,especially since the 300 2.8L is always so very fhuqking temptin' and I try not to leave it in the crummy,for that unhandy reason.(grin) For Sneakin'/Peekin' and Creepin',The Trombone really has no equal and a 1D4 steers it nicely.
Slummed a NIB GoPro that'd been setting on my shelf for multiple years and I'll upgrade in accordance,so as to add that flexibility to the fray. Coupla pards are trying to talk me into getting a Drone or two,but they really ain't my jam...but woulda been killer in said conditions(easier to chase light conditions). Still fighting compression,but really ain't too worried about it,though I'd like to understand cause/effect more better.
Too warm to be skinning Bears and I don't keep feesh in these temps,without slushed ice in a tote. Especially since I can cast from the driveway,into the front yard and yard 'em from colder water to start with.
Light fell away today,with lowered ceiling and rains. Will try to get charged again tomorrow,as you gals set on your Couchbound Kchunts and Whine about your Hurt Feelings.
figure he's about 27 if the 91 is to designate the yr he was born, probably educated beyond his means, you can have all the education in the world and still be a dumb chit.
Roger,
3 hours have passed according to the little goodie on the side of your post.
Someone has not returned to chastise you for your derogatory comments.
Perhaps he has left the basement in ? .............................................TX? ,
More likely CT, IL, or maybe even MA???
Geno
PS, or he may be taking notes and getting ready to call us squirrels and purveyors of soft porn?
ha my rat terrier just flew through the air and bit my buddy Carlos on the ass. don't need no door bell with her she lets us know as soon as someone pulls up.best watchdog ever.
Light fell away today,with lowered ceiling and rains. Will try to get charged again tomorrow,as you gals set on your Couchbound Kchunts and Whine about your Hurt Feelings. IHOP Bless your hearts.
Hey everyone! Joined: Feb 2007 Posts: 2,712. Blank Offline Campfire Guide Finally got my membership approved and I guess this is the appropriate place for my intro. Anyways here goes.
Name's Blank and i'm a junior in high school. I enjoy dirtbiking, shooting, hunting, fishing, and chemistry. Got a great girlfriend and beautiful almost 10 month old baby boy. I have neven been camping in my life unless of course you count sleeping at the river after a long days worth of fishing. I am not into big game hunting because I don't like cold weather. I only hunt small game and varmints.
Anyways, I hope to post more here and get to know people and make friends. See you all around the forums. laugh
Here ya go ....... I took out dudes name and replace it with the word "Blank".
Maybe some of the more "astute" on here can do the math and tie things together to solve the great who is it mystery
Last seen yesterday at 305 am Can log on ,but can't post but once a year.
Dude has been playing stump the dummy extremely well with some of ya.
Hey everyone! Joined: Feb 2007 Posts: 2,712. Blank Offline Campfire Guide Finally got my membership approved and I guess this is the appropriate place for my intro. Anyways here goes.
Name's Blank and i'm a junior in high school. I enjoy dirtbiking, shooting, hunting, fishing, and chemistry. Got a great girlfriend and beautiful almost 10 month old baby boy. I have neven been camping in my life unless of course you count sleeping at the river after a long days worth of fishing. I am not into big game hunting because I don't like cold weather. I only hunt small game and varmints.
Anyways, I hope to post more here and get to know people and make friends. See you all around the forums. laugh
Here ya go ....... I took out dudes name and replace it with the word "Blank".
Maybe some of the more "astute" on here can do the math and tie things together to solve the great who is it mystery
Last seen yesterday at 305 am Can log on ,but can't post but once a year.
Dude has been playing stump the dummy extremely well with some of ya.
Hey everyone! Joined: Feb 2007 Posts: 2,712. Blank Offline Campfire Guide Finally got my membership approved and I guess this is the appropriate place for my intro. Anyways here goes.
Name's Blank and i'm a junior in high school. I enjoy dirtbiking, shooting, hunting, fishing, and chemistry. Got a great girlfriend and beautiful almost 10 month old baby boy. I have neven been camping in my life unless of course you count sleeping at the river after a long days worth of fishing. I am not into big game hunting because I don't like cold weather. I only hunt small game and varmints.
Anyways, I hope to post more here and get to know people and make friends. See you all around the forums. laugh
Here ya go ....... I took out dudes name and replace it with the word "Blank".
Maybe some of the more "astute" on here can do the math and tie things together to solve the great who is it mystery
Last seen yesterday at 305 am Can log on ,but can't post but once a year.
Dude has been playing stump the dummy extremely well with some of ya.
Mam and Ma'am are mistakenly used for same purpose. But actually 'Mam' is a diminutive or small version of mother, whereas, "Ma'am" is a contracted version of Madam. ... Ma'am is another written form for Madam, which is used to politely or respectfully address a woman.
If I use Ma'am......he'll get pissed for addressing him as a woman according to above.