I don't like absolutes, I prefer probabilities. I may not "know" something, but at the same time be certain to 5 or 6 sigma's, and that's how language of "real" science.
I guess not liking something can provoke an idea that leads to to a hypothesis, then to a theory and finally a law, so perhaps there’s some relevance at a reach. As far as the language of real science, I’m at a disadvantage and my ignorance leads me to believe it’s not essential to communicate the simplest of truths. In fact, it seems to be an effective way of avoiding the inconvenient ones (in some cases).
