"He said he knew the officer thought someone could be harmed during the situation."
And the jury would be instructed to dis-regard this portion of his testimony.........Right,Counseler?
And the part about how he "thought" the dead guy didn't disarm properly....and..
Once his "testimony" is reduced to actual facts,it doesn't help the cops.
==============
No,not right. Further,his behavior and actions in the store,his threatening of a employee,his reaching for his gun after being ordered not to and the fact he was drunk and on Xanax and morphine leaves a attorney hoping he gets the case on a hourly fee,rather than a contingency.
Easy,justifiable shoot.A no-brainer,not even debatable, save for those idiots who invent schit in their heads...and those who are deathly allergic to facts which puts their perspective in it's proper place... the dung pile.
Last edited by RISJR; 06/03/12.
The pessimist complains about the wind; the optimist expects it to change; the realist adjusts the sails. William Arthur Ward
