Had they gone straight 6x and mil-quad they would have been onto something.
Oh how I wish that were true. Agreed on the the 6x with mil-quad and mil adjustments - if they had proper eye relief.
Originally Posted by Pappy348
3.3" is marginal for safety with anything with even moderate recoil. 2.55" is hazardous, especially prone or at the bench. Get twocked in the eyebrow a time or two and you'll understand.
Exactly! Reminds me of the scopes Remington includes on their package rifles. Totally unusable eye relief at higher magnifications. Those scopes immediately get round filed, or used as a Carlos Hathcock vs NVA sniper target (i.e. try to shoot through the scope without touching the housing).
