A ranking of “hunters” is by no means any indication of hunting ability, No education needed here,
Throwing large stacks at guided hunts does not equate to a ‘ranking’ implying that one is better than others,
They may have more money to throw at hunts, That does not equate to being a better or best hunter,
A ranking is nothing more than some egotistical pat on the back at the good ole boys club,
I may agree with ranking (scoring) individual animals, but not hunters.
In part I agree with you comments Kenneth.
If you read my posts above you will see that i do not consider guided hunts as truly "Hunting" to me they are more akin to being "Shooting Adventures", and there is nothing wrong with that as far as I am concerned.
None the less, there is a ranking system, and you should thank me for educating you, since like me, you were unaware they existed, based on your post.
KB
