Originally Posted by Mule Deer
Originally Posted by TrueGrit
Originally Posted by Mule Deer
Originally Posted by sbhooper
In my opinion, the old SST was garbage. I had them come apart on small white-tailed does, shot from a moderate-velocity .308. Never again would I use that bullet.

The old SST was garbage, but as Nosler did with the early, fragile Ballistic Tips, Hornady fixed the SSTS not long after the initial poor results.

Among several instances I've witnessed in the past several years Including bull elk taken with a 180 SST from a Hornady factory load) was a hunt I went on in South Texas in 2017 with some other gun-industry people. We all used Franchi Momentum bolt-action rifles in .308 Winchester and factory ammo with the 150-grain SST at a listed 2820 fps. We took 20 whitetails and pigs--and never recovered a bullet, so don't know how much weight the bullets retained.

The biggest buck weighed around 200 pounds on the ranch scale, and was taken at around 100 yards, almost facing the hunter. The bullet entered the chest inside the left shoulder and exited the right ham. The biggest pig also weighed right around 200, and was shot through both shoulders at around 60 yards--and the bullet broke both shoulders and exited.
With that said, what would you expect the SST to do at longer ranges and lower velocities? And why can't the bullet companies make a partition or interlock bullet with a high BC?

What do you consider a high BC?
A BC of .500 would be acceptable, I'd rather have a BC of .600+ but not sure if it's actually needed. We like to hunt and target shoot with the same rifles and bullets. A 300wm shooting Barnes 168gr TTSX runs out of bullet past 1000yds, and you can't hit steel at 1200yds. Likewise when shooting 205gr Burger bullets with a higher BC hitting steel at 1200yds. isn't a problem.


Life is good live it while you can.