And I'd bet if its actually "as advertised" it would very possibly be well accepted.

Of course its funny too how I shot deer for years with the 243 Win, and then had a 6.8 spc necked down to 6mm, IE a slow 243 if you will and have killed a LOT of stuff with it since. Cant' really tell the difference over the years. And its gotta be probably 300 plus FPS slower than 243 Win.

I'd surmise if someone looked at the numbers they'd scream the new round could NEVER do anything good.

Of course at 325 yards so far, a doe took one in the chest, a large mature one, and it exited the hindquarter and kept going. So even though the charts should say it sucks vs 243, its been a right handy little round.

We can keep Larry Root and all his idiotic blabber and user names on here, but we can't get Ralph back..... Whiskey Tango Foxtrot, over....