Originally Posted by Valsdad
Originally Posted by Jeff_O
What’s fascinating about this one is that it will likely force SCOTUS to rule on whether what Trump attempted was or was not an insurrection as defined in the Constitution.

Your thoughts?
Insurrections look like the bottom half. Should be easy enough for the bright Justices to figure out

[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]

Not necessarily. A case can be made that an insurrection is simply any attempt to prevent or usurp the rightful possession or transfer of power (I just made that up, so if any of our Brilliant legal minds here want to pick it apart, please do, I’m here to learn).

I’m not really talking about J6, although we could. It was much, much more violent than your pic portrays and no, it was not antifa or the Feds doing it. But that’s a side issue. Even without J6 it seems fair to this lunk to say that Trump attempted to prevent and hence overthrow the exercise of our democratic process. I will argue that meets any reasonable definition of “insurrection”. Could be wrong there.

Your thoughts?

The CENTER will hold.

Reality, Patriotism,Trump: you can only pick two

FÜCK PUTIN!