Originally Posted by Jeff_O
Originally Posted by MAC
Has anybody tried to explain to the OP that nobody running for the WH has been charged with insurrection much less been found guilty of it. And you cannot have an unarmed insurrection. No such thing as an unarmed insurrection in accordance with the govt's definition of the offense.

I know the OP is braindead but even an idiot can grasp those points.

Sec 3 of Amendment 14 does not require that anyone be charged much less found guilty. It’s self-executing and literally required, similar to say an election administrator not putting someone on the POTUS ballot who’s under 30 years old. An unarmed insurrection is still an insurrection by common legal definition. I haven’t seen the “govt’s definition”, but I’d like to. Got a link?

But then you moron if you don't need to be charged or found guilty then you have committed no crime. In that case anyone could be found unable to run for office. As for election interference you could easily charge the FBI, suppressing political speech and important voter information, Crossfire Hurricane, Russia Hoax (attempted coup) pick one. I didn't see any of these things happen on J6 so why are you bringing it up?

insurrection
ĭn″sə-rĕk′shən
noun

The act or an instance of open revolt against civil authority or a constituted government.A rising up; uprising.The act of rising against civil authority or governmental restraint; specifically, the armed resistance of a number of persons to the power of the state; incipient or limited rebellion.

The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition.

Dog I rescued in January

[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]