Originally Posted by Jeff_O
I was thinkin’ about this subject last night.

This could actually play to Trump’s advantage, and I’m surprised jag and his ilk haven’t seized on this yet.

This one is headed to SCOTUS and it’ll happen quickly. Otherwise the whole primary is going to be horked by administrators taking Trump off the ballot in jurisdictions all across America.

SCOTUS is good at narrowing decisions as much as possible, but, it seems like their presumed ruling on this will by necessity be a ruling on whether what Trump did was or was not an insurrection. That, in turn, could bear directly on Jack Smith’s indictments around the election aftermath. In other words, if SCOTUS ruled even tangentially that Trump did not engage in “insurrection”, it would weaken Smith’s case… I think. The law doesn’t always work the way it seems like it should.

Lawyers? Even “Brilliant” ones like JoeBob? Your thoughts?

The REAL "insurrection" is PedoBiden sitting in the Oval Office after STEALING the 2020 election. Everybody knows that, even you.

"To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical." -- Thomas Jefferson

We are all Rhodesians now.