Originally Posted by gonehuntin
Originally Posted by Jeff_O
I was thinkin’ about this subject last night.

This could actually play to Trump’s advantage, and I’m surprised jag and his ilk haven’t seized on this yet.

This one is headed to SCOTUS and it’ll happen quickly. Otherwise the whole primary is going to be horked by administrators taking Trump off the ballot in jurisdictions all across America.

SCOTUS is good at narrowing decisions as much as possible, but, it seems like their presumed ruling on this will by necessity be a ruling on whether what Trump did was or was not an insurrection. That, in turn, could bear directly on Jack Smith’s indictments around the election aftermath. In other words, if SCOTUS ruled even tangentially that Trump did not engage in “insurrection”, it would weaken Smith’s case… I think. The law doesn’t always work the way it seems like it should.

Lawyers? Even “Brilliant” ones like JoeBob? Your thoughts?

The REAL "insurrection" is PedoBiden sitting in the Oval Office after STEALING the 2020 election. Everybody knows that, even you.

Excuse me?

The 2020 election was not stolen. It was free and fair. Trump TRIED, but his Clown Coup fizzled out when the popular uprising he hoped to provoke didn’t happen.

Everybody know this, even you.

The CENTER will hold.

Reality, Patriotism,Trump: you can only pick two

FÜCK PUTIN!