Originally Posted by alpinecrick
Originally Posted by test1328


You're right about this, I agree. However, I'm sure the legislature could come up with a plan in no time at all to get some funds to CPW if they wanted to. Why not a license to operate a kayak or mountain bike in CO that would go to CPW? Or, a one time CPW fee of $100 for every mountain bike, kayak, etc. that is sold in CO? They do similar to fund tourism in CO by charging an extra fee (tax) on your hotel stay. With some creativity and the right legislation, I'm sure it could be done. However, I doubt we would ever see it.


The risk to that idea--and it's a very real risk--is that those non-hunters, including anti-hunters, will have a bigger say in how wildlife is managed. Think changing hunting seasons to accommodate other activities, and think about predator hunting.

The biggest and best argument we have as hunters is we pay our own way. No other activities--especially on public lands--can say that.


That ship has sailed! Once the DOW became the CPW, our game commission got some new members to represent these "recreational" users. Not to mention the "at large" commission members, non-consumptive wildlife users, etc. By the way, who appoints these commissioners? The Governor, who has been a Democrat for the last 8 years and we've got another one just starting his 4 years. You think the Democrats are appointing people to look after our hunting interests? You think they don't already account for non and anti-hunters in setting hunting areas, seasons, etc.? If you didn't already know this, you've been sleeping. Hunters don't only pay our own way, we pay everyone else's way as well. That was my point.